SNILL

Snill.ai Price Today & AI Analysis

SNILLSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 25, 2026

Price

$0.0145

-24.17% 24h

Contract

Live
4quUyZSeuNkBDwR3xqV83cqEB9EnAT348B9ExbhGwory

Chain

Holders

138

Market cap

$7,250

More tokens on Solana

Snill.ai: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-25 11:17 UTC

Holder addresses

486

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$74,355.26
How concentrated is Snill.ai ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 486 addresses (2026-06-25 11:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Snill.ai?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Snill.ai liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-25 11:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $74,355.26. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-25 11:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about SNILL

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Jun 25, 11:17 AM UTC

FDV

$170,585

Liquidity

$74,355.26

Holders

486

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

SNILL (Snill.ai) is a newly launched Solana token on Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 with a total supply of 500,000 tokens and a current price of ~$0.341. The token experienced a dramatic 194.7% price surge in the past 24 hours, accompanied by a sudden spike from 35 holders (stable for 30 days) to 486 holders within the last 24 hours. The token is flagged as possible spam, is unverified, and presents numerous red flags including zero top-holder data, a suspicious holder explosion, and very shallow liquidity of only $74.36K against a $163.87K FDV.

Key points

  • Extreme 194.7% 24h price pump from a very low base (~$0.116 implied open)
  • Holder count exploded from 35 (flat for 30 days) to 486 in under 24 hours — highly anomalous
  • Update authority is the system program (11111...1), indicating immutability/renounced authority
  • Flagged as possible spam by data provider; contract unverified
  • Top holder and supply concentration data entirely unavailable — major transparency gap
  • Very small total supply of 500,000 tokens with shallow $74.36K liquidity pool

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–72 hours

bearish

After a 194.7% pump in 24 hours, the token is at extreme risk of a sharp retracement. The most recent hourly candle (11:00 UTC) shows a high of $0.3918 and a close of $0.3412, well below the wick high, indicating selling pressure at the top. The prior candle (10:00 UTC) was a massive bull candle from $0.0793 to $0.2839. This two-candle pump pattern is classic for a coordinated pump-and-dump. With only $74.36K in liquidity, any significant sell pressure could collapse the price rapidly.

Target low

$0.07

Target high

$0.39

Support

$0.2832 (recent hourly low), $0.0793 (prior candle low / launch zone)

Resistance

$0.3918 (recent hourly high / wick top), $0.3038 (prior candle high)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Without verified utility, a real user base, or meaningful liquidity, sustaining the current price level is unlikely. The 30-day holder stagnation at 35 prior to the pump suggests no organic community growth. If the pump was coordinated, early holders will likely distribute into retail buyers, driving price back toward launch levels.

Catalysts

  • Any verified product launch or partnership announcement could provide support
  • Broader Solana market rally could lift all tokens temporarily
  • Absence of sell-off would signal genuine accumulation — but this is low probability given current data

Bullish factors

  • Update authority renounced (system program), reducing rug-pull via metadata manipulation
  • Mint authority appears renounced (immutable metadata), preventing new supply issuance
  • 51.7% buy pressure vs 48.3% sell pressure — marginally net buying in 24h
  • 1,802 buys vs 1,391 sells in 24h suggests more buy transactions

Bearish factors

  • 194.7% pump in 24h with only $74.36K liquidity — classic pump-and-dump profile
  • Holder count was flat at 35 for 30 days, then spiked to 486 in <24h — highly suspicious
  • Token flagged as possible spam; contract unverified
  • Top holder and concentration data completely unavailable — no transparency
  • Price % change shown as 0% for 1h, 6h, 24h in analytics despite 194.7% 24h change — data inconsistency raises concerns
  • Shallow liquidity means large slippage on any meaningful exit

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available, (2) top holder data is entirely missing, (3) sniper data is unavailable, (4) the token is flagged as possible spam, and (5) the anomalous holder spike makes on-chain signals unreliable.

SNILL call history

Full track record →

Jun 25bearish
24h-39.6%
7d-91.0%
30d-96.7%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
4quUyZ...wory
Total Supply
500,000 SNILL

Key Risks

  • Possible spam flag from data provider — token may be a scam or pump-and-dump
  • Holder count explosion from 35 to 486 in <24h is highly anomalous and suspicious
  • Complete absence of top holder data prevents assessment of insider dump risk
  • Shallow $74.36K liquidity creates extreme slippage and exit risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (10:00 UTC): O=$0.0974, H=$0.3038, L=$0.0793, C=$0.2839 — a massive bullish candle with a 213% range, closing near the high. Volume: 125,956 units. Candle [1] (11:00 UTC): O=$0.3063, H=$0.3918, L=$0.2832, C=$0.3412 — a bearish candle (close below open) with a long upper wick to $0.3918, indicating rejection at the high. Volume: 26,748 units (significantly lower). The upper wick on candle [1] is a classic 'shooting star' or bearish wick rejection pattern, suggesting sellers overwhelmed buyers at the $0.39 level. Volume dropped sharply from 125,956 to 26,748, confirming weakening momentum.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically up given the 194.7% 24h gain, but the shooting-star candle and volume decline suggest the uptrend is exhausted. Medium-term is effectively sideways/unknown given only 2 candles of data and 30 days of price stagnation prior to the pump.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.2832 (11:00 candle low)

Major support

$0.0793 (10:00 candle low — launch zone)

Immediate resistance

$0.3918 (11:00 candle high — wick rejection)

Major resistance

$0.3038 (10:00 candle high — prior resistance now potential support/resistance flip)

The $0.2832 level is the most recent hourly low and acts as immediate support. A break below this would likely target the $0.0793 launch zone. The $0.3918 wick high is strong resistance given the rejection seen there. The $0.3038 level (prior candle high) is a key pivot zone.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / bearish wick rejection on most recent candle (11:00 UTC)
  • Volume climax on candle [2] followed by sharp volume decline on candle [1] — exhaustion signal
  • Two-candle parabolic pump pattern consistent with coordinated price manipulation
  • Price opened candle [1] above candle [2] close — gap-up open, then failed to hold gains

Liquidity

Liquidity

$74,355.26

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $74.36K on a single Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool. The FDV of $163.87K is 2.2x the total liquidity, meaning the entire market cap could theoretically be drained with a fraction of the 24h volume ($202.47K total). This creates extreme slippage risk — any wallet attempting to sell a meaningful position would face severe price impact. The 24h volume of ~$202K is 2.7x the total liquidity, indicating very high turnover relative to pool depth, which is consistent with speculative trading rather than genuine utility-driven volume. Net flow is marginally positive (51.7% buy pressure), but the difference is small and could reverse quickly. The 697 unique buyers vs 465 unique sellers suggests broader retail participation on the buy side, but this may reflect FOMO buying into a pump.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

500,000 SNILL

FDV

$163,870 (per trading analytics) / $170,585 (per metadata)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    194.7% price increase in 24 hours from a near-zero base. Only 2 hourly candles available, both showing extreme price swings. The 10:00 candle had a range from $0.0793 to $0.3038 — a 283% intra-candle range. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and risk management nearly impossible.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $74.36K against $202K+ in 24h volume. Any meaningful sell order will cause severe slippage. The single Meteora AMM pool could have liquidity removed by the LP at any time, creating an instant liquidity rug.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Possible spam flag from data provider — token may be a scam or pump-and-dump
  • Holder count explosion from 35 to 486 in <24h is highly anomalous and suspicious
  • Complete absence of top holder data prevents assessment of insider dump risk
  • Shallow $74.36K liquidity creates extreme slippage and exit risk
  • 194.7% pump in 24h is unsustainable and historically precedes sharp corrections
  • Unverified contract with no audit trail
  • 30 days of zero holder growth prior to pump suggests no organic community
  • Single liquidity pool — LP removal would instantly destroy tradability
  • FDV ($163-170K) is very small, making the token easy to manipulate with modest capital

Mitigating factors

  • Update authority renounced to system program — metadata cannot be changed
  • Token is immutable (Mutable: false) — supply and metadata are fixed
  • Marginal net buy pressure (51.7% buys) suggests some genuine demand
  • 697 unique buyers in 24h shows broad retail participation
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist — some public presence

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand pump-and-dump dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of rapid exit execution. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of possible spam flag, anomalous holder spike, shallow liquidity, and missing transparency data makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

SNILL presents an extremely high-risk speculative profile consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme. The 30-day holder stagnation at 35 wallets followed by a sudden 194.7% price pump and 1,289% holder spike in under 24 hours, combined with shallow liquidity, missing top-holder data, and a possible spam flag, creates a deeply unfavorable risk/reward profile for new entrants. The one genuine positive is the renounced update authority, which prevents metadata manipulation. However, this does not protect against liquidity removal or insider dumping.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

SNILL is a legitimate AI-tooling project that went viral, attracting genuine retail interest. The product described (natural language → internal systems) gains traction, the team builds out the platform, and the token develops real utility. Liquidity deepens as the project matures.

  • Verified product launch with working demo
  • Organic community growth sustaining beyond the initial pump
  • Liquidity pool deepening significantly above $500K
  • Partnerships or integrations with established Solana protocols
  • Token holder count continuing to grow organically over weeks

Base Case

The token experiences a partial retracement of 40-70% from current levels as early buyers take profits. Price stabilizes in the $0.10-0.20 range with thin liquidity and a small but persistent holder base. The project neither grows significantly nor collapses entirely, remaining a low-liquidity speculative token.

  • Some genuine retail interest persists beyond the initial pump
  • Liquidity pool is not removed
  • Original holders distribute gradually rather than all at once
  • No major catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term

Bear Case

High probability

The pump was coordinated by the original 35 holders who accumulated at near-zero cost over 30 days. They are now distributing into retail FOMO buyers. Once selling pressure overwhelms the shallow $74.36K liquidity pool, price collapses 80-95% back toward the $0.07-0.10 range. Liquidity may be removed entirely.

  • Original 35 holders dumping into the pump
  • Liquidity pool removal by LP provider
  • No real product or utility to sustain demand
  • Retail FOMO exhaustion after the initial pump
  • Possible spam classification deterring legitimate exchange listings

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 25, 11:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-25 11:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Solana on-chain metadata (mint, authority, supply)
  • Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool data
  • OHLC price candles (hourly, USD)
  • Trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top holder data (unavailable — returned empty)
  • Sniper analysis data (unavailable — returned empty)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top 20 holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess concentration or insider risk
  • Sniper analysis data unavailable — cannot assess early buyer PnL or dump risk
  • Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data errors, not genuine readings
  • Holder distribution categories (whales, sharks, etc.) all show 0 — likely a data pipeline issue for a newly active token
  • Price % change fields show 0% for 1h/6h/24h despite a 194.7% 24h move — data inconsistency of unknown cause
  • FDV discrepancy between metadata ($170,585) and analytics ($163,870) suggests data was pulled at slightly different times
  • Token is flagged as possible spam — underlying data quality may be compromised
  • No audit, no verified contract — smart contract risk cannot be assessed

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched tokens with limited data, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in SNILL. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Snill.ai ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 486 addresses (2026-06-25 11:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Snill.ai?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Snill.ai liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-25 11:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $74,355.26. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Snill.ai (SNILL)?

After a 194.7% pump in 24 hours, the token is at extreme risk of a sharp retracement. The most recent hourly candle (11:00 UTC) shows a high of $0.3918 and a close of $0.3412, well below the wick high, indicating selling pressure at the top. The prior candle (10:00 UTC) was a massive bull candle from $0.0793 to $0.2839. This two-candle pump pattern is classic for a coordinated pump-and-dump. With only $74.36K in liquidity, any significant sell pressure could collapse the price rapidly. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–72 hours), with a target range of $0.07 to $0.39.

Is SNILL a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand pump-and-dump dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of rapid exit execution. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. The combination of possible spam flag, anomalous holder spike, shallow liquidity, and missing transparency data makes this one of the highest-risk token profiles possible.

What are the key risks of holding SNILL?

Possible spam flag from data provider — token may be a scam or pump-and-dump • Holder count explosion from 35 to 486 in <24h is highly anomalous and suspicious • Complete absence of top holder data prevents assessment of insider dump risk

← Back to all predictions

Track SNILL