WNTV

Winternomics TV Price Today & AI Analysis

WNTV
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 3, 2026

2GXmB95pGD3pHV4mzNq7YsmyiEmVYWQLptbwYqgdpump

$0.004576

-23.50%

FDV $4,575,641

LiveContract:2GXmB95pGD3pHV4mzNq7YsmyiEmVYWQLptbwYqgdpumpChain:SolanaHolders:1,235Market cap:$4,575,641

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about WNTV

Report snapshotas of Jun 3, 05:17 AM
FDV

$1,555,028

Liquidity

$238,071

Holders

1,421

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Winternomics TV (WNTV) is a Solana-based meme/community token tied to the Winternomics.tv media brand, launched on PumpSwap with a total supply of ~999.99M tokens. The token is currently experiencing a severe price collapse, down ~85% in 24 hours from ~$0.0107 to ~$0.00156, with overwhelming sell pressure (84.8% sell volume). Despite the crash, holder count has surged +213 (+15%) in the last 24 hours, suggesting new buyers are entering at depressed prices. Total liquidity stands at $238K, and the FDV has collapsed from ~$8.73M implied peak to ~$1.55M at current prices.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Tied to an existing media brand (Winternomics.tv) with social presence across Telegram, Twitter, and website
Zero sniper activity in the first 1,000 blocks — no early predatory accumulation
Verified contract with immutable metadata (mutable: false)
Holder count growing +15% in 24h despite -85% price crash, indicating dip-buying interest
PumpSwap pair with $238K liquidity — moderate for a micro-cap

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

WNTV has collapsed ~85% in 24 hours from a high near $0.0102 to current ~$0.00156. The candle structure shows a catastrophic breakdown in candle [2] (04:00 UTC June 3) where price crashed from $0.00682 open to $0.00133 close on massive volume ($149K). The 5-minute bounce of +22% is a minor relief rally in a severe downtrend. Short-term direction remains bearish with risk of further downside toward the $0.00100–$0.00120 range.

Target low$0.00090
Target high$0.00200
Support: $0.00120 (candle [1] low), $0.00100 (psychological round number), $0.00085 (candle [2] absolute low)
Resistance: $0.00200 (near-term recovery level), $0.00682 (candle [2] open / pre-crash level), $0.00923–$0.01020 (prior consolidation zone)

Medium term

neutral
7–30 days

Recovery depends entirely on whether the Winternomics.tv community can re-engage buyers and whether the sell-side exhausts itself. The prior consolidation zone of $0.0090–$0.0102 represents a 5–6x recovery from current levels. Given the brand association and growing holder base, a partial recovery is possible but not guaranteed. Sustained volume above $50K/day would be needed to confirm a trend reversal.

Catalysts
  • Community re-engagement via Winternomics.tv media content
  • Sell-side exhaustion after the -85% flush
  • New holder accumulation at depressed prices (already showing +213 holders in 24h)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market recovery

Bullish factors

  • Zero sniper activity — no early predatory sellers overhang
  • Holder count growing +15% in 24h despite crash — dip buyers entering
  • Verified contract, immutable metadata — reduced rug risk from contract changes
  • Brand association with Winternomics.tv provides potential community catalyst
  • Sell pressure may be nearing exhaustion after -85% flush

Bearish factors

  • Catastrophic -85% 24h price decline with massive sell volume ($161.9K vs $29K buy)
  • 84.8% sell pressure ratio — sellers dominate overwhelmingly
  • Top 10 holders control 35.63%, top 100 control 88.81% — high concentration risk
  • FDV collapsed from implied ~$8.73M to ~$1.55M — significant value destruction
  • Thin liquidity ($238K) means large orders cause extreme slippage
  • Update authority not renounced — team retains some control
Confidence: low. The extreme 24-hour price collapse (-85%), thin liquidity ($238K), and overwhelming sell pressure (84.8%) make near-term price prediction highly uncertain. The 5-minute bounce is insufficient to confirm a reversal. Confidence is low due to the volatile and illiquid nature of this micro-cap token.

Deep Analysis

The 22-hour OHLC series reveals a token that traded in a tight consolidation band of $0.0090–$0.0102 from June 2 06:00 through June 3 03:00 UTC, followed by a catastrophic two-candle collapse. Candle [3] (03:00 UTC) showed the first crack — price dropped from $0.00898 open to $0.00873 close on modest volume ($2,876). Candle [2] (04:00 UTC) was the capitulation candle: opened at $0.00682 (already gapped down), crashed to a low of $0.000850, and closed at $0.001326 on enormous volume ($149,719 — roughly 10x any prior candle). Candle [1] (05:00 UTC, most recent) shows a partial recovery from $0.001324 open to $0.001518 close, with a high of $0.001521 — a small bullish candle but well below pre-crash levels.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 15%Sell 85%

Both short and medium-term trends are firmly bearish following the -85% crash. The prior uptrend from the $0.0090–$0.0102 consolidation has been completely invalidated. Price is now in price discovery to the downside, with the only positive signal being the minor recovery candle in the most recent hour.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.00120 (candle [1] low of $0.001199)
Major$0.000850 (candle [2] absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.00200 (psychological level above current price)
Major$0.00682 (candle [2] open / gap-down level)

The most critical support is the candle [2] low at $0.000850 — a breach of this level would signal further capitulation. Immediate resistance is the $0.00200 psychological level, with major resistance at the pre-crash open of $0.00682. The prior consolidation zone of $0.0090–$0.0102 is now distant overhead resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Catastrophic gap-down and capitulation candle (candle [2]): opened at $0.00682, crashed to $0.000850 low, closed at $0.001326 — a bearish engulfing/crash candle on 10x average volume
  • Prior consolidation (candles [4]–[22]): 18 consecutive candles in tight $0.0090–$0.0102 range with very low volume — classic pre-breakdown compression
  • Partial recovery candle (candle [1]): small bullish candle closing at $0.001518 — potential dead-cat bounce or early stabilization
  • Volume climax: candle [2] volume ($149,719) dwarfs all other candles — potential selling exhaustion signal
  • Lower highs and lower lows established post-crash — confirmed short-term downtrend structure

Total holders1,421
24h Δ+15
7d Δ+15
30d Δ+24
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Inverse correlation observed: holder count is growing (+15% in 24h) while price has crashed -85%. This suggests new buyers are entering at depressed prices (dip-buying), while existing holders are selling. The historical series shows the base holder count grew from 1,074 on May 4 to 1,211 on June 2 — a steady +12.8% over 30 days — with notable spikes on May 5 (+29), May 13 (+20), May 24 (+56), and May 26 (+53). The most recent 24h surge of +213 holders is a dramatic acceleration, likely driven by the price crash attracting speculative dip-buyers.

Holder growth has been modest and choppy over the 30-day historical period (May 4–June 2), oscillating between small gains and losses daily, with a net gain of ~137 holders (+12.8%) over 30 days. However, the most recent 24-hour period shows an extraordinary +213 holder surge (+15%), which is larger than the entire prior 30-day net gain. This acceleration coincides precisely with the -85% price crash, strongly suggesting opportunistic dip-buying. Whether these new holders represent genuine long-term conviction or speculative bottom-fishing remains to be seen. The holder distribution shows 136 whales, 47 sharks, 183 dolphins, 112 fish, and 195 octopus-classified holders.

Top 10 hold35.63%
Top 100 hold88.81%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

8sYeh6aiKfc59yf2zh3PsMFjEHakJPF7TK8fdgduBGue

Individual whale — largest single holder at 6.00% (60.02M tokens); unclassified wallet, likely an early community buyer or team-adjacent holder

6.00%

DoKEEjQmd6CUK7RWKnCVDdZCa4776fYhLGDNPJrf8qVN

Individual whale — second largest at 5.90% (59.01M tokens); close in size to #1, possibly a coordinated accumulation wallet

5.90%

Cd6ccxwiDxxs49KFV4npntXSnMve78NQnv53XgE2oRBh

Individual whale — 4.68% (46.83M tokens); significant holder with no obvious DEX/exchange pattern

4.68%

H4wswccFKGnCUtsrRwQtYZKCjAZBnWjRUoc9J2Gv7SRL

Individual whale — 3.88% (38.82M tokens)

3.88%

AjBm4BBsZFoSndhwEb5KqjxaBzEBgh1CRCo3E8wF43cv

DEX Liquidity Pool — this address matches the PumpSwap pair address listed in the price data, holding 3.58% (35.81M tokens) as protocol liquidity

3.58%

The top 10 holders control 35.63% of supply and the top 100 control 88.81% — a highly concentrated distribution. The #5 holder (AjBm4BBsZFoSndhwEb5KqjxaBzEBgh1CRCo3E8wF43cv) is identifiable as the PumpSwap liquidity pool pair address, holding 3.58% as protocol liquidity. The remaining top holders appear to be individual whales or early community buyers. The top 4 non-LP wallets collectively hold ~20.46% of supply. Given the -85% crash and 84.8% sell pressure, the overall whale sentiment is classified as distributing. The high top-100 concentration (88.81%) means the vast majority of supply is held by a small group, creating ongoing dump risk if large holders continue to exit.

Liquidity$238,070
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$28,980
Sell$161,910
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers128
Unique sellers295

Market health is severely stressed. Total liquidity of $238K is shallow for a token with 1,421 holders and a recent FDV of $8.73M — this means even moderate-sized orders cause significant price impact. The 24h trading data reveals extreme imbalance: $161.9K in sell volume vs only $29K in buy volume (84.8% sell pressure), with 295 unique sellers vs 128 unique buyers. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow). The 576 sell transactions vs 223 buy transactions confirm sellers are far more active. The liquidity pool holds 3.58% of supply (35.81M tokens), which at current prices represents approximately $55.7K in token-side liquidity — consistent with the shallow depth assessment. High slippage risk means large sell orders will continue to push price down significantly. The trading analytics show FDV at $8.73M which appears to be a stale/peak figure; at current price of $0.001555, FDV is approximately $1.555M.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,991,377.13 WNTV
FDV$1,555,028.22 (at current price $0.001555)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is effectively 1 billion WNTV tokens (999,991,377.13). The metadata shows the contract is verified and immutable (mutable: false), which is a positive signal — metadata cannot be changed post-deployment. However, the update authority (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) is neither a burn address nor explicitly renounced, meaning the deployer retains some authority. Mint and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data — classified as 'unknown'. The immutability of the contract (mutable: false) partially mitigates authority risk. The token was launched via PumpFun (mint address ends in 'pump'), which typically uses a bonding curve mechanism before graduating to a DEX. The FDV at current prices is ~$1.555M, down from the implied peak FDV of ~$8.73M — representing ~82% value destruction from peak.

Volatility
high

-85% price decline in 24 hours; 5-minute swings of +22% demonstrate extreme volatility. Token is in active price discovery to the downside with no established floor.

Liquidity
high

Only $238K total liquidity on PumpSwap. High slippage risk on any meaningful position size. A $10K sell order could move price by 4%+ given current depth.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 35.63% of supply; top 100 control 88.81%. The top 4 non-LP wallets hold ~20.46% collectively. Any large holder exit creates significant downward pressure.

SniperDump
low

Zero snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks — no predatory early accumulation overhang. This is one of the few positive risk signals for WNTV.

Authority
medium

Update authority (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM) is not renounced. Mint/freeze authority status unknown. However, contract is immutable (mutable: false), partially mitigating this risk.

Key risks

  • Catastrophic -85% price decline with no confirmed bottom
  • Overwhelming sell pressure (84.8%) with 295 unique sellers vs 128 buyers
  • High supply concentration — top 100 hold 88.81%
  • Shallow liquidity ($238K) amplifies price impact of sells
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status
  • Update authority not renounced
  • Token launched on PumpFun — high-risk launch mechanism associated with speculative tokens
  • No fundamental utility described beyond media brand association

Mitigating factors

  • Zero sniper activity — no predatory early accumulation
  • Verified contract with immutable metadata (mutable: false)
  • Existing media brand (Winternomics.tv) with multi-platform social presence
  • Holder count growing +15% in 24h — dip-buying interest exists
  • Sell-side may be approaching exhaustion after -85% flush
  • Acquisition method predominantly swaps (1,199 of 1,421) — organic market participation
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable returns, or anyone investing more than a very small speculative allocation. This token exhibits characteristics of a high-risk micro-cap meme coin in active distress.

WNTV is a high-risk, high-speculation community token tied to the Winternomics.tv media brand. The token has just experienced a severe -85% crash, creating a potential speculative entry point for risk-tolerant traders betting on a dead-cat bounce or community-driven recovery. However, the overwhelming sell pressure, concentrated holdings, shallow liquidity, and lack of clear utility make this a very high-risk proposition. The zero-sniper launch and growing holder count are the primary bullish differentiators.

Bull case (low)

Community-driven recovery: The Winternomics.tv brand leverages its media platform to re-engage its audience, driving new buyers into the token. The -85% crash attracts speculative dip-buyers (already evidenced by +213 new holders in 24h), sell-side exhausts itself, and price recovers to the prior consolidation zone of $0.0090–$0.0102 — a 5–6x return from current levels.

  • Winternomics.tv media content driving community re-engagement
  • Sell-side exhaustion after -85% flush
  • Continued holder accumulation at depressed prices
  • Broader Solana meme coin market tailwind

Base case

Stabilization at depressed levels: Price finds a floor in the $0.00100–$0.00200 range as sell-side exhausts and dip-buyers absorb remaining supply. Token trades sideways at a fraction of its peak value, with occasional volatility spikes tied to Winternomics.tv content releases. No sustained recovery to prior highs without significant new catalysts.

  • Sell pressure moderates as weak hands exit
  • New holders from the +213 24h surge provide buying support
  • Winternomics.tv maintains social media activity
  • Liquidity pool remains intact at current levels

Bear case (high)

Continued collapse: Large holders continue distributing into any relief rallies, liquidity dries up further, and price breaks below the $0.000850 capitulation low. Token becomes illiquid and effectively worthless as community interest fades.

  • Persistent 84.8% sell pressure with no sign of reversal
  • Top 100 holders controlling 88.81% — massive overhang of potential sellers
  • Shallow $238K liquidity cannot absorb continued selling
  • No clear utility or tokenomics mechanism to support price
  • Meme/community tokens frequently fail to recover after -80%+ crashes

GeneratedJun 3, 05:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of approximately 2026-06-03T05:00–05:30 UTC. Holder data reflects snapshot at time of analysis. OHLC data covers June 2 06:00 UTC through June 3 05:00 UTC (22 hourly candles).
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Solana)
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (AjBm4BBsZFoSndhwEb5KqjxaBzEBgh1CRCo3E8wF43cv)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (22 candles, June 2–3 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Top 20 holder snapshot
  • 30-day daily historical holder series
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Supply concentration metrics (top 10, top 100)

Limitations

  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — classified as unknown
  • Sniper analysis returned zero results — cannot assess early buyer PnL or sell-through rates
  • Top holder wallet classifications are inferred (no on-chain labels available) — only the LP address is definitively identified
  • Update authority identity unknown — cannot determine if team or third party
  • No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations
  • 30-day holder history ends June 2; the +213 holder surge is a 24h figure not yet reflected in daily series
  • FDV discrepancy: trading analytics show $8.73M FDV (likely stale/peak) vs $1.555M at current price

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,991,377.13 WNTV

Key Risks

Catastrophic -85% price decline with no confirmed bottom
Overwhelming sell pressure (84.8%) with 295 unique sellers vs 128 buyers
High supply concentration — top 100 hold 88.81%
Shallow liquidity ($238K) amplifies price impact of sells

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

Zero snipers were detected in the first 1,000 blocks of WNTV's launch. This is a notably positive signal — it means there was no predatory early accumulation by bots or insiders who would typically dump on retail buyers. However, the absence of sniper data means we cannot assess early buyer PnL state or sell-through rates from this cohort. The massive sell pressure observed in the 24h window ($161.9K sell vs $28.98K buy) appears to originate from non-sniper holders, possibly early community buyers or team-adjacent wallets exiting positions.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks

Unknown — no sniper data available. However, the -85% crash with 84.8% sell pressure suggests early holders (non-snipers) are aggressively exiting. The 576 sell transactions vs 223 buy transactions in 24h confirms heavy distribution.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Winternomics TV (WNTV)?

WNTV has collapsed ~85% in 24 hours from a high near $0.0102 to current ~$0.00156. The candle structure shows a catastrophic breakdown in candle [2] (04:00 UTC June 3) where price crashed from $0.00682 open to $0.00133 close on massive volume ($149K). The 5-minute bounce of +22% is a minor relief rally in a severe downtrend. Short-term direction remains bearish with risk of further downside toward the $0.00100–$0.00120 range. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.00090 to $0.00200.

Is WNTV a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 8.5/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable returns, or anyone investing more than a very small speculative allocation. This token exhibits characteristics of a high-risk micro-cap meme coin in active distress.

How are WNTV holders trending?

Winternomics TV currently has 1,421 holders and is growing (24h: 15, 7d: 15, 30d: 24). Holder growth has been modest and choppy over the 30-day historical period (May 4–June 2), oscillating between small gains and losses daily, with a net gain of ~137 holders (+12.8%) over 30 days. However, the most recent 24-hour period shows an extraordinary +213 holder surge (+15%), which is larger than the entire prior 30-day net gain. This acceleration coincides precisely with the -85% price crash, strongly suggesting opportunistic dip-buying. Whether these new holders represent genuine long-term conviction or speculative bottom-fishing remains to be seen. The holder distribution shows 136 whales, 47 sharks, 183 dolphins, 112 fish, and 195 octopus-classified holders.

What does sniper activity look like for WNTV?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding WNTV?

Catastrophic -85% price decline with no confirmed bottom • Overwhelming sell pressure (84.8%) with 295 unique sellers vs 128 buyers • High supply concentration — top 100 hold 88.81%

Track WNTV