Uniswap Price Today & AI Analysis

UNISolanaAnalysis as of Sep 17, 2026

$7.23

+3.54% 24h

Contract

Live

uniHfuPhEQSrtpzXpJZDCSq53yaejKKpNhFUiKoHKHV

Chain

Solana

Holders

4,809

Market cap

$497,303

At a $1M market cap, $UNI would be $14.54 (2.01x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is UNI a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 1

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

The owner can still mint new supply.
The liquidity could not be measured.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about UNI

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

GTA 6 CoinGTA6$0.000164+316.0%MC $161.9K

BUBBLESigns of a bubble$0.0₄2521-26.2%MC $24.6K

GMEXGameStop xStock$24.31-0.1%MC $17.50M

PRIMEOptimus Prime$0.0₅8722+8.4%MC $8.5K

FRONTIERAI Frontier$0.8663-1.0%MC $184.2K

uniuni$0.009403-64.2%MC $9.40M

Uniswap: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-17 21:17 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$65,221.00

How concentrated is Uniswap ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Uniswap?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Uniswap liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-17 21:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $65,221.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-17 21:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 17, 09:17 PM UTC

FDV

$271,812

Liquidity

$65,221.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

This token trades under the ticker UNI with the name 'Uniswap' on a Meteora pool (pair 43wQydX3UuRKVief4bkPxNz31inxCwvBNY7s1C9rK1XD), but it is NOT the real Uniswap governance token (which lives on Ethereum, not Solana). This is almost certainly an unofficial/impersonation token riding on a recognizable brand name with no verified contract status, no social links, and no description provided. Price has surged 23.3% in 24h to $7.99, with total liquidity of only $65.2K against a fully diluted valuation of $271.8K — an extremely thin and risky liquidity profile for the volume being traded ($1.73M combined buy/sell volume in 24h, which is >26x the pool's stated liquidity, an internally inconsistent and suspicious ratio suggesting stale/partial liquidity reporting or extreme volatility from a very small float).

Key points

Name/symbol mimics the well-known Uniswap (UNI) brand while running on Solana via Meteora, a strong impersonation/spam red flag
24h volume ($1.73M combined) vastly exceeds reported total liquidity ($65.2K), an unusual and risky imbalance
No holder, sniper, verified-contract, or social-link data available, leaving major blind spots
Price up 23.3% in 24h with a huge intra-day wick to $11.09 in the second-to-last candle, indicating extreme volatility

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48h

neutral

Price action shows extreme volatility with a violent wick to $11.09 that immediately retraced to the $7.5-7.7 zone, followed by a bounce to $7.99. Momentum is bullish on the surface (23.3% 24h gain, +3.99% 1h) but the sell pressure (52.1%) slightly exceeds buy pressure (47.9%) in raw volume, and the extreme wick suggests thin order-book liquidity that can move price abruptly in both directions.

Target low

6.80

Target high

9.50

Support: 7.52 (candle 21/22 lows), 6.80 (cluster of lows candles 4-13), 6.38 (candle 1 low, 24h floor)
Resistance: 8.62 (candle 24 high), 8.33 (candle 21 high), 11.09 (candle 23 spike high, likely an outlier/wick)

Medium term · 7-14 days

bearish

Given the razor-thin $65.2K liquidity pool relative to a $271.8K FDV and $1.73M in 24h trading volume, this token is highly susceptible to a rapid unwind if buying momentum stalls. Lack of holder distribution data, sniper data, and verified contract status makes it impossible to confirm healthy organic demand versus wash trading or coordinated pumping tied to the brand-name association.

Catalysts

Any large sell against the shallow $65.2K liquidity pool could crater price rapidly
Continued brand confusion with real Uniswap could attract retail buyers but also regulatory/exchange scrutiny for impersonation
Absence of verified contract/social presence increases likelihood of a rug or abandonment

Bullish factors

Strong 24h price momentum (+23.3%)
Positive 1h and 5m momentum (+3.99%, +3.87%) suggesting continued short-term buying interest
High trading activity (10,594 buys vs 9,716 sells) shows active market participation

Bearish factors

Sell volume ($903.65K) slightly exceeds buy volume ($830.30K) in dollar terms despite more buy transactions, implying larger average sell sizes
Total liquidity of just $65.2K is extremely shallow relative to volume and FDV, high slippage/rug risk
No verifiable contract, authority, or social data — classic profile of a low-transparency token
Brand impersonation of Uniswap raises scam/manipulation concerns per the untrusted-data guidance

Confidence: low. Only 24 hourly candles and aggregate 24h analytics are available; no holder trends, sniper data, or verified authority data exist to corroborate the price action. The volume-to-liquidity mismatch and lack of fundamental verification make forward projections highly speculative.

UNI call history

Full track record →

Sep 17neutral@ $7.99

24h—

7d—

30d-10.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: uniHfu...HKHV
Total Supply: 34,011.93 UNI

Key Risks

Brand impersonation of the well-known Uniswap (UNI) token, a common scam pattern designed to attract mistaken buyers
Extremely shallow liquidity ($65.2K) relative to trading volume ($1.73M) and FDV ($271.8K), enabling severe slippage and price manipulation
Unverified contract status and unknown mint/freeze authorities leave open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
No holder distribution or sniper data available, eliminating key tools for assessing concentration and early-buyer dumping risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the last 24 hourly candles the price climbed from an open of $6.48 to a close of $7.99, a broad uptrend punctuated by a violent spike to $11.09 in candle 23 (2026-09-17T20:00) on volume of $1.18M — by far the largest volume bar in the dataset — before retracing sharply to close near $7.74, then continuing to $7.99 in the final candle on $629K volume. This pattern resembles a blow-off spike/wick followed by partial retracement, a classic sign of a liquidity-thin pump.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both the short-term (last few hours) and medium-term (full 24h window) trends are up, with price roughly 23% higher than 24h ago, but the trend is punctuated by an extreme volatility spike that undermines trend reliability.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

48%

Sell

52%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$7.52 (lows of candles 21-22)

Major support

$6.38 (24h low, candle 1)

Immediate resistance

$8.62 (candle 24 high)

Major resistance

$11.09 (candle 23 spike high)

Price is currently trading near the top of its 24h range. The $11.09 wick in candle 23 is likely a thin-liquidity anomaly rather than a sustainable resistance test, while $7.52 and $6.38 represent more reliable support zones formed over multiple candles.

Notable patterns

Blow-off wick/spike in candle 23 (low $7.56 to high $11.09) with immediate rejection — classic thin-liquidity pump-and-dump wick
Sequence of higher lows from candle 1 ($6.38) through candle 20 ($7.14), indicating grinding accumulation before the spike
Volume climax on candles 23-24 far exceeding all prior candles, suggesting exhaustion risk near-term

Liquidity

$65,221.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $65.2K is very shallow, especially set against $271.8K FDV and a striking $1.73M in combined 24h volume — a volume-to-liquidity ratio exceeding 26x, which is highly atypical and suggests either significant price impact per trade, rapid liquidity churn, or reporting lag between the liquidity snapshot and volume data. Sell volume ($903.65K) marginally exceeds buy volume ($830.30K) despite buy transaction count (10,594) exceeding sell transaction count (9,716), implying average sell sizes are larger than average buy sizes — a mild bearish signal on net dollar flow even as trade count favors buyers. With more unique buyers (4,415) than sellers (4,039), retail interest appears broad, but the shallow pool means any concentrated selling could cause outsized price swings and high slippage for larger trades.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

34,011.93 UNI

FDV

$271,812

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price swung from a low of $6.38 to a spike high of $11.09 (a >70% intra-day range) before settling at $7.99, a +23.3% net change — extreme volatility even for a small-cap crypto asset.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $65.2K against $1.73M in 24h volume and a $271.8K FDV represents a severe liquidity-to-volume mismatch, creating high slippage and exit risk for holders of any meaningful size.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Brand impersonation of the well-known Uniswap (UNI) token, a common scam pattern designed to attract mistaken buyers
Extremely shallow liquidity ($65.2K) relative to trading volume ($1.73M) and FDV ($271.8K), enabling severe slippage and price manipulation
Unverified contract status and unknown mint/freeze authorities leave open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
No holder distribution or sniper data available, eliminating key tools for assessing concentration and early-buyer dumping risk
Violent, unexplained price wick to $11.09 followed by rapid retracement suggests thin order book and potential manipulation

Mitigating factors

Trade counts show a healthy number of unique buyers (4,415) versus sellers (4,039) in 24h, indicating broad retail participation rather than a single dominant actor (based on available data)
Price has maintained a general uptrend structure with higher lows over the 24-candle window prior to the spike

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand they may lose their entire position; unsuitable for conservative or long-term investors given the impersonation red flag, shallow liquidity, and unverifiable authority/contract status.

This Solana-based 'Uniswap' (UNI) token presents an extremely high-risk, speculative trading opportunity driven by short-term momentum and volume spikes, but it carries major red flags including likely brand impersonation, razor-thin liquidity relative to volume, and a complete absence of holder/authority verification data. Any position should be treated as a short-duration speculative trade rather than an investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the brand association with 'Uniswap' continues to attract confused or speculative retail buyers, and volume/momentum persists, price could extend gains toward the $9.50-11.00 zone last tested during the candle 23 spike, especially if buyer count continues to exceed seller count.

Continued high buyer count (4,415 vs 4,039 sellers) sustaining upward pressure
Momentum traders chasing the +23.3% 24h move and recent breakout above prior resistance levels
Low total supply (~34K tokens) magnifying price impact of even moderate net buying

Base Case

Price likely continues to oscillate with high volatility between the $6.80-8.60 range in the near term as the market digests the recent spike, with elevated risk of a sharp correction if liquidity thins further or large holders exit, absent any fundamental catalysts (none identified in available data).

No new liquidity is added to meaningfully deepen the $65.2K pool
No verification of contract authorities or holder distribution becomes available
Trading remains driven primarily by momentum/speculation rather than fundamentals given the 'none' description and lack of social links

Bear Case

High probability

Given the shallow $65.2K liquidity pool, unverified contract/authority status, and clear brand-impersonation red flag, the token could see a rapid liquidity withdrawal or coordinated dump, sending price back toward or below the $6.38-7.00 support zone, or worse, resulting in a total loss if liquidity is pulled entirely.

Volume-to-liquidity ratio of >26x is unsustainable and signals fragility
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves door open for supply manipulation or account freezes
Sell dollar-volume already exceeds buy dollar-volume in the 24h window despite more buy transactions
No verifiable social presence, description, or contract verification typical of durable projects

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 17, 09:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-17 21:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint address, supply, decimals, FDV)
Hourly OHLCV candle data (24 most recent hours) from Meteora pair 43wQydX3UuRKVief4bkPxNz31inxCwvBNY7s1C9rK1XD
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
Price change percentages (5m, 1h, 24h)

Limitations

No holder distribution or holder growth data was available (endpoints retired), so holderTrends and whaleMap sections are empty placeholders
No sniper/early-buyer data was available, so smartMoneySignals sniper metrics could not be computed and are marked unknown/zero
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verified-contract status, and mutability are all listed as unknown in the source metadata, preventing a confident rug-risk determination
Only 24 hourly candles were available, limiting medium/long-term technical pattern confidence
6h price change was unavailable
The stated total liquidity ($65.2K) appears inconsistent with reported 24h volume ($1.73M combined), which may reflect data snapshot timing differences or an unusually high volume/liquidity ratio that should be independently verified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, potentially incomplete on-chain data that may include adversarial or unverified inputs (token metadata, names, and descriptions were supplied by the token creator and treated as untrusted evidence). The token's name and symbol closely resemble the established Ethereum-based Uniswap (UNI) token; no relationship between this asset and the official Uniswap protocol has been verified, and this should be treated as a significant risk signal. Always conduct independent due diligence and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Uniswap (UNI) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below. The owner can still mint new supply. The liquidity could not be measured. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Uniswap (UNI)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Uniswap ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Uniswap?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Uniswap liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-17 21:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $65,221.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Uniswap (UNI)?

Is UNI a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand they may lose their entire position; unsuitable for conservative or long-term investors given the impersonation red flag, shallow liquidity, and unverifiable authority/contract status.

What are the key risks of holding UNI?

Brand impersonation of the well-known Uniswap (UNI) token, a common scam pattern designed to attract mistaken buyers • Extremely shallow liquidity ($65.2K) relative to trading volume ($1.73M) and FDV ($271.8K), enabling severe slippage and price manipulation • Unverified contract status and unknown mint/freeze authorities leave open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes