UNI

Uniswap Price Today & AI Analysis

UNISolanaAnalysis as of Sep 17, 2026

Price

$7.99

+23.32% 24h · FDV $271,812

Contract

Live
uniHfuPhEQSrtpzXpJZDCSq53yaejKKpNhFUiKoHKHV

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,788

Market cap

$271,812

More tokens on Solana

NEARNEARNEAR$2.67+14.3%MC $3.13MANSEMANSEMThe Black Bull$0.1316+4.0%MC $131.22MxBTCxBTCHylo Leveraged BTC$1.76+2.2%MC $970.7KTilcayoTilcayoLeopardus tilcayo$0.000220+431.1%MC $214.7KMothMothMempool Moth$0.046395+66.4%MC $61.5KPAIDPAIDPaid$0.009146+22390.7%MC $8.90M
Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about UNI

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 17, 09:17 PM UTC

FDV

$271,812

Liquidity

$65,221

Holders

0

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

This token trades under the ticker UNI with the name 'Uniswap' on a Meteora pool (pair 43wQydX3UuRKVief4bkPxNz31inxCwvBNY7s1C9rK1XD), but it is NOT the real Uniswap governance token (which lives on Ethereum, not Solana). This is almost certainly an unofficial/impersonation token riding on a recognizable brand name with no verified contract status, no social links, and no description provided. Price has surged 23.3% in 24h to $7.99, with total liquidity of only $65.2K against a fully diluted valuation of $271.8K — an extremely thin and risky liquidity profile for the volume being traded ($1.73M combined buy/sell volume in 24h, which is >26x the pool's stated liquidity, an internally inconsistent and suspicious ratio suggesting stale/partial liquidity reporting or extreme volatility from a very small float).

Key points

  • Name/symbol mimics the well-known Uniswap (UNI) brand while running on Solana via Meteora, a strong impersonation/spam red flag
  • 24h volume ($1.73M combined) vastly exceeds reported total liquidity ($65.2K), an unusual and risky imbalance
  • No holder, sniper, verified-contract, or social-link data available, leaving major blind spots
  • Price up 23.3% in 24h with a huge intra-day wick to $11.09 in the second-to-last candle, indicating extreme volatility

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48h

neutral

Price action shows extreme volatility with a violent wick to $11.09 that immediately retraced to the $7.5-7.7 zone, followed by a bounce to $7.99. Momentum is bullish on the surface (23.3% 24h gain, +3.99% 1h) but the sell pressure (52.1%) slightly exceeds buy pressure (47.9%) in raw volume, and the extreme wick suggests thin order-book liquidity that can move price abruptly in both directions.

Target low

6.80

Target high

9.50

Support

7.52 (candle 21/22 lows), 6.80 (cluster of lows candles 4-13), 6.38 (candle 1 low, 24h floor)

Resistance

8.62 (candle 24 high), 8.33 (candle 21 high), 11.09 (candle 23 spike high, likely an outlier/wick)

Medium term · 7-14 days

bearish

Given the razor-thin $65.2K liquidity pool relative to a $271.8K FDV and $1.73M in 24h trading volume, this token is highly susceptible to a rapid unwind if buying momentum stalls. Lack of holder distribution data, sniper data, and verified contract status makes it impossible to confirm healthy organic demand versus wash trading or coordinated pumping tied to the brand-name association.

Catalysts

  • Any large sell against the shallow $65.2K liquidity pool could crater price rapidly
  • Continued brand confusion with real Uniswap could attract retail buyers but also regulatory/exchange scrutiny for impersonation
  • Absence of verified contract/social presence increases likelihood of a rug or abandonment

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h price momentum (+23.3%)
  • Positive 1h and 5m momentum (+3.99%, +3.87%) suggesting continued short-term buying interest
  • High trading activity (10,594 buys vs 9,716 sells) shows active market participation

Bearish factors

  • Sell volume ($903.65K) slightly exceeds buy volume ($830.30K) in dollar terms despite more buy transactions, implying larger average sell sizes
  • Total liquidity of just $65.2K is extremely shallow relative to volume and FDV, high slippage/rug risk
  • No verifiable contract, authority, or social data — classic profile of a low-transparency token
  • Brand impersonation of Uniswap raises scam/manipulation concerns per the untrusted-data guidance

Confidence: low. Only 24 hourly candles and aggregate 24h analytics are available; no holder trends, sniper data, or verified authority data exist to corroborate the price action. The volume-to-liquidity mismatch and lack of fundamental verification make forward projections highly speculative.

UNI call history

Full track record →

Sep 17neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
uniHfu...HKHV
Total Supply
34,011.93 UNI

Key Risks

  • Brand impersonation of the well-known Uniswap (UNI) token, a common scam pattern designed to attract mistaken buyers
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($65.2K) relative to trading volume ($1.73M) and FDV ($271.8K), enabling severe slippage and price manipulation
  • Unverified contract status and unknown mint/freeze authorities leave open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
  • No holder distribution or sniper data available, eliminating key tools for assessing concentration and early-buyer dumping risk

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidenceLow risk

No sniper data was provided for this token, so no assessment of early-buyer/sniper concentration or profit-taking behavior can be made. This is a data gap, not evidence of clean distribution.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration
0.00%
PnL state
Unknown
Sell-through rate
Unknown
Profit-taking risk
low

unknown

Unknown — no sniper or early-transaction data available to gauge early buyer conviction or exit behavior.

Deep Analysis

Over the last 24 hourly candles the price climbed from an open of $6.48 to a close of $7.99, a broad uptrend punctuated by a violent spike to $11.09 in candle 23 (2026-09-17T20:00) on volume of $1.18M — by far the largest volume bar in the dataset — before retracing sharply to close near $7.74, then continuing to $7.99 in the final candle on $629K volume. This pattern resembles a blow-off spike/wick followed by partial retracement, a classic sign of a liquidity-thin pump.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both the short-term (last few hours) and medium-term (full 24h window) trends are up, with price roughly 23% higher than 24h ago, but the trend is punctuated by an extreme volatility spike that undermines trend reliability.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

48%

Sell

52%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$7.52 (lows of candles 21-22)

Major support

$6.38 (24h low, candle 1)

Immediate resistance

$8.62 (candle 24 high)

Major resistance

$11.09 (candle 23 spike high)

Price is currently trading near the top of its 24h range. The $11.09 wick in candle 23 is likely a thin-liquidity anomaly rather than a sustainable resistance test, while $7.52 and $6.38 represent more reliable support zones formed over multiple candles.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off wick/spike in candle 23 (low $7.56 to high $11.09) with immediate rejection — classic thin-liquidity pump-and-dump wick
  • Sequence of higher lows from candle 1 ($6.38) through candle 20 ($7.14), indicating grinding accumulation before the spike
  • Volume climax on candles 23-24 far exceeding all prior candles, suggesting exhaustion risk near-term

Liquidity

Liquidity

$65.22K

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $65.2K is very shallow, especially set against $271.8K FDV and a striking $1.73M in combined 24h volume — a volume-to-liquidity ratio exceeding 26x, which is highly atypical and suggests either significant price impact per trade, rapid liquidity churn, or reporting lag between the liquidity snapshot and volume data. Sell volume ($903.65K) marginally exceeds buy volume ($830.30K) despite buy transaction count (10,594) exceeding sell transaction count (9,716), implying average sell sizes are larger than average buy sizes — a mild bearish signal on net dollar flow even as trade count favors buyers. With more unique buyers (4,415) than sellers (4,039), retail interest appears broad, but the shallow pool means any concentrated selling could cause outsized price swings and high slippage for larger trades.

Flow (24h)

Buy volume

$830.30K

Sell volume

$903.65K

Net flow

Outflow

Unique buyers

4,415

Unique sellers

4,039

Supply & authorities

Total supply

34,011.93 UNI

FDV

$271,812

Mint authority

Active

Freeze authority

Active

Update authority, mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract status, and mutability are all listed as unknown in the provided metadata. Total supply is a modest 34,011.93 tokens (8 decimals), giving a fully diluted valuation of roughly $271.8K at the current price of $7.99. With no authority renouncement confirmed and no verified contract flag, rug risk from authorities cannot be ruled out and should be treated cautiously. The token's name ('Uniswap') and symbol ('UNI') closely mimic the well-known Ethereum-based Uniswap governance token, which is a significant impersonation red flag given this asset trades on Solana via Meteora and has no official social links or description — this pattern is commonly associated with brand-squatting scam tokens.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price swung from a low of $6.38 to a spike high of $11.09 (a >70% intra-day range) before settling at $7.99, a +23.3% net change — extreme volatility even for a small-cap crypto asset.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $65.2K against $1.73M in 24h volume and a $271.8K FDV represents a severe liquidity-to-volume mismatch, creating high slippage and exit risk for holders of any meaningful size.

  • Concentrationhigh

    No holder or whale distribution data is available, but given the extremely small liquidity pool and low total supply (~34,012 tokens), concentration risk must be assumed elevated as a precaution.

  • Sniper Dumpmedium

    No sniper data was available to quantify early-buyer concentration or realized PnL, so this risk cannot be measured directly; the unexplained volume/price spike in candle 23 is a soft indicator of potential coordinated buying/selling activity.

  • Authorityhigh

    Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract status, and update authority are all unknown/unverified, so the possibility of continued minting, freezing, or other authority-based manipulation cannot be excluded.

Key risks

  • Brand impersonation of the well-known Uniswap (UNI) token, a common scam pattern designed to attract mistaken buyers
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($65.2K) relative to trading volume ($1.73M) and FDV ($271.8K), enabling severe slippage and price manipulation
  • Unverified contract status and unknown mint/freeze authorities leave open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
  • No holder distribution or sniper data available, eliminating key tools for assessing concentration and early-buyer dumping risk
  • Violent, unexplained price wick to $11.09 followed by rapid retracement suggests thin order book and potential manipulation

Mitigating factors

  • Trade counts show a healthy number of unique buyers (4,415) versus sellers (4,039) in 24h, indicating broad retail participation rather than a single dominant actor (based on available data)
  • Price has maintained a general uptrend structure with higher lows over the 24-candle window prior to the spike

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand they may lose their entire position; unsuitable for conservative or long-term investors given the impersonation red flag, shallow liquidity, and unverifiable authority/contract status.

This Solana-based 'Uniswap' (UNI) token presents an extremely high-risk, speculative trading opportunity driven by short-term momentum and volume spikes, but it carries major red flags including likely brand impersonation, razor-thin liquidity relative to volume, and a complete absence of holder/authority verification data. Any position should be treated as a short-duration speculative trade rather than an investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the brand association with 'Uniswap' continues to attract confused or speculative retail buyers, and volume/momentum persists, price could extend gains toward the $9.50-11.00 zone last tested during the candle 23 spike, especially if buyer count continues to exceed seller count.

  • Continued high buyer count (4,415 vs 4,039 sellers) sustaining upward pressure
  • Momentum traders chasing the +23.3% 24h move and recent breakout above prior resistance levels
  • Low total supply (~34K tokens) magnifying price impact of even moderate net buying

Base Case

Price likely continues to oscillate with high volatility between the $6.80-8.60 range in the near term as the market digests the recent spike, with elevated risk of a sharp correction if liquidity thins further or large holders exit, absent any fundamental catalysts (none identified in available data).

  • No new liquidity is added to meaningfully deepen the $65.2K pool
  • No verification of contract authorities or holder distribution becomes available
  • Trading remains driven primarily by momentum/speculation rather than fundamentals given the 'none' description and lack of social links

Bear Case

High probability

Given the shallow $65.2K liquidity pool, unverified contract/authority status, and clear brand-impersonation red flag, the token could see a rapid liquidity withdrawal or coordinated dump, sending price back toward or below the $6.38-7.00 support zone, or worse, resulting in a total loss if liquidity is pulled entirely.

  • Volume-to-liquidity ratio of >26x is unsustainable and signals fragility
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves door open for supply manipulation or account freezes
  • Sell dollar-volume already exceeds buy dollar-volume in the 24h window despite more buy transactions
  • No verifiable social presence, description, or contract verification typical of durable projects

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 17, 09:17 PM UTC

Data freshness

Most recent candle timestamp 2026-09-17T21:00:00.000Z; data appears current as of analysis time

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint address, supply, decimals, FDV)
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (24 most recent hours) from Meteora pair 43wQydX3UuRKVief4bkPxNz31inxCwvBNY7s1C9rK1XD
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Price change percentages (5m, 1h, 24h)

Limitations

  • No holder distribution or holder growth data was available (endpoints retired), so holderTrends and whaleMap sections are empty placeholders
  • No sniper/early-buyer data was available, so smartMoneySignals sniper metrics could not be computed and are marked unknown/zero
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verified-contract status, and mutability are all listed as unknown in the source metadata, preventing a confident rug-risk determination
  • Only 24 hourly candles were available, limiting medium/long-term technical pattern confidence
  • 6h price change was unavailable
  • The stated total liquidity ($65.2K) appears inconsistent with reported 24h volume ($1.73M combined), which may reflect data snapshot timing differences or an unusually high volume/liquidity ratio that should be independently verified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, potentially incomplete on-chain data that may include adversarial or unverified inputs (token metadata, names, and descriptions were supplied by the token creator and treated as untrusted evidence). The token's name and symbol closely resemble the established Ethereum-based Uniswap (UNI) token; no relationship between this asset and the official Uniswap protocol has been verified, and this should be treated as a significant risk signal. Always conduct independent due diligence and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Uniswap (UNI)?

Price action shows extreme volatility with a violent wick to $11.09 that immediately retraced to the $7.5-7.7 zone, followed by a bounce to $7.99. Momentum is bullish on the surface (23.3% 24h gain, +3.99% 1h) but the sell pressure (52.1%) slightly exceeds buy pressure (47.9%) in raw volume, and the extreme wick suggests thin order-book liquidity that can move price abruptly in both directions. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48h), with a target range of 6.80 to 9.50.

Is UNI a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand they may lose their entire position; unsuitable for conservative or long-term investors given the impersonation red flag, shallow liquidity, and unverifiable authority/contract status.

What does sniper activity look like for UNI?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding UNI?

Brand impersonation of the well-known Uniswap (UNI) token, a common scam pattern designed to attract mistaken buyers • Extremely shallow liquidity ($65.2K) relative to trading volume ($1.73M) and FDV ($271.8K), enabling severe slippage and price manipulation • Unverified contract status and unknown mint/freeze authorities leave open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes

← Back to all predictions

Track UNI