NEAR

NEAR Price Today & AI Analysis

NEAR
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 7, 2026

3ZLekZYq2qkZiSpnSvabjit34tUkjSwD1JFuW9as9wBG

$2.01

+5.76%

FDV $1,915,141

LiveContract:3ZLekZYq2qkZiSpnSvabjit34tUkjSwD1JFuW9as9wBGChain:SolanaHolders:1,768Market cap:$1,915,141

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about NEAR

Report snapshotas of Jun 7, 05:17 PM
FDV

$2,193,012

Liquidity

$1,338,897

Holders

1,041

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

NEAR is a Solana-based token (mint: 3ZLekZYq2qkZiSpnSvabjit34tUkjSwD1JFuW9as9wBG) with a total supply of ~1.06M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$2.19M. The token trades at ~$2.07 on Meteora DLMM with $1.34M in total liquidity. Despite a 10.5% 24h price gain, the holder base has been in persistent decline — down 29% over 7 days and 46% over 30 days — raising significant red flags about long-term community retention. The contract is unverified, mutable, and the update authority has not been renounced, adding meaningful rug/manipulation risk.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bullish
Strong 24h price momentum (+10.5%) with net buy pressure (53.2% buys)
Relatively deep liquidity for its market cap ($1.34M liquidity vs $2.19M FDV)
Persistent and accelerating holder decline (-46% over 30 days, -29% over 7 days)
Highly concentrated supply: top 10 hold 60.8%, top 100 hold 92.04%
Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority — elevated rug risk
No verified contract, no project description, minimal social presence

AI Price Analysis

bullish

Short term

bullish
24–48 hours

The token has posted 6 consecutive higher closes over the last 6 hours, breaking above $2.00 resistance and reaching $2.07. Short-term momentum is bullish with buy pressure at 53.2%. However, volume in the most recent candle (21.6K) is significantly lower than the prior three candles (91–105K), suggesting the rally may be losing steam. A pullback toward $1.95–$1.97 is plausible before any continuation.

Target low$1.88
Target high$2.15
Support: $2.00 (psychological + prior resistance-turned-support), $1.95 (candle [3] open), $1.88 (candle [5] low / recent swing low)
Resistance: $2.07 (current price / candle [1] high), $2.08 (candle [2] high zone), $2.10–$2.15 (extension target)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

The persistent and accelerating holder decline (-304 over 7 days, -474 over 30 days) combined with highly concentrated supply and a mutable, unrenounced contract creates a structurally bearish medium-term outlook. Any short-term price pump is at risk of being used as an exit by large holders. Without a reversal in holder trends or a fundamental catalyst, downward pressure is likely to resume.

Catalysts
  • Reversal in holder decline trend
  • Renouncement of mint/freeze/update authority
  • Listing on a major exchange or integration announcement
  • Broader Solana ecosystem rally lifting all tokens

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h price gain of +10.5%
  • Net buy pressure: 53.2% of 24h volume is buys ($515.5K vs $453.5K sells)
  • Liquidity-to-FDV ratio is relatively healthy ($1.34M / $2.19M)
  • Price has broken above $2.00 psychological resistance
  • 1,705 buys vs 1,517 sells in 24h — more buy transactions

Bearish factors

  • Holder count declining sharply: -29% in 7 days, -46% in 30 days
  • Top 10 wallets hold 60.8% of supply — extreme concentration risk
  • Contract is mutable with non-renounced update authority
  • No verified contract, no description, no clear project identity
  • Recent candle volume declining sharply (21.6K vs 105K prior hour) — momentum fading
  • No sniper data available to assess early buyer behavior
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) no project description or verified contract to assess fundamentals, (2) no sniper data available, (3) mutable contract with non-renounced authority introduces unpredictable risk, (4) holder decline is severe and accelerating, making price action unreliable as a signal.

Deep Analysis

Over the 24-hour OHLC window, price ranged from a low of ~$1.848 (candle [14]) to a high of ~$2.083 (candle [2]). The session began with sideways/consolidation action between $1.85–$1.90 (candles [18]–[24]), followed by a volatile period in candles [16]–[17] where price swung between $1.877 and $1.950. A dip to $1.840 in candle [14] formed the session low. From candle [13] onward, the token printed a clear series of higher lows and higher highs, culminating in candle [2] reaching $2.034–$2.058 and candle [1] closing at $2.067. The most recent candle [1] shows a bullish close near the high but on dramatically reduced volume (21.6K vs 105K in candle [2]), suggesting potential exhaustion.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 53%Sell 47%

Short-term (last 6–8 hours) is clearly in an uptrend with higher highs and higher lows. Medium-term (30-day holder data and price context) remains in a downtrend given persistent holder exodus and likely prior price weakness.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$2.00 (psychological level, prior resistance, candle [4] high zone)
Major$1.877 (candle [5]/[6] low cluster, multiple candle opens)
Resistance
Immediate$2.075 (candle [1] high / current price zone)
Major$2.10–$2.15 (no prior candle data above $2.083 in this window)

The $2.00 level is the most critical near-term support — it was resistance for several candles before being broken. The $1.877–$1.880 zone served as a floor multiple times (candles [5], [6], [13], [17], [20]) and represents major support. On the upside, there is limited candle-based resistance data above $2.083, making $2.10–$2.15 a projection zone.

Notable patterns

  • Higher highs and higher lows from candle [14] through candle [1] — confirmed short-term uptrend
  • Volume climax in candles [2]–[3] followed by sharp volume decline in candle [1] — potential exhaustion/distribution signal
  • Multiple candle wicks at $1.877–$1.880 zone confirming strong support
  • Candle [16] and [17] show large wicks (high of $1.950, low of $1.877) indicating indecision before breakout
  • Candle [1] closes near its high but on low volume — bullish candle structure but weakening conviction

Total holders1,041
24h Δ-3.4
7d Δ-29
30d Δ-46
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Inverse — price has risen +10.5% in 24h while holders dropped -3.4% in the same period. This divergence (price up, holders down) is a bearish signal suggesting the price pump may be driven by a small number of large buyers rather than broad community growth. Over 30 days, the holder decline has accelerated: the first half of the period saw modest declines (~0.2–1.8%/day), while the second half (May 26 onward) saw much larger drops (3.3–7.9%/day).

The holder trend is deeply concerning. From a peak of ~1,564 holders on May 26, the count has fallen to 1,041 — a loss of 523 holders (33.4%) in just 12 days. The decline is clearly accelerating: the 7-day loss of -304 holders (-29%) dwarfs the prior weeks' pace. The single anomalous spike on May 26 (+193 holders, +12%) appears to have been a temporary event (possibly an airdrop or promotion) that failed to retain participants. The distribution breakdown (whales=95, sharks=56, dolphins=207, fish=186, octopus=167) shows a relatively high whale count relative to total holders, reinforcing concentration concerns.

Top 10 hold60.80%
Top 100 hold92.04%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

FhdW3Y6Ea6hXKbkGkt5YSAVtDNd5qJ8USevMaPyEr45S

DEX liquidity pool (Meteora DLMM pair address — matches the trading pair address listed in price data)

22.90%

GpMZbSM2GgvTKHJirzeGfMFoaZ8UR2X7F4v8vHTvxFbL

Individual whale or project treasury — large undifferentiated holder

8.60%

7xpnCyorxk9kYWVYuDhwDeu91pdMAaTLkywUq6pUH4Ws

Individual whale — no contract flag, significant balance

8.42%

AuHsaRkwk9TVTZv7uF2VJfwwRPZRky7Ah2ktKnACPFW3

Individual whale or team wallet

6.14%

GJvewfRjqTUPtx6WsBSUnaFbdgXwgXnWfpDyLm65T4YA

Individual whale

4.16%

The top holder (22.9%) is the Meteora DLMM liquidity pool address (FhdW3Y6Ea6hXKbkGkt5YSAVtDNd5qJ8USevMaPyEr45S — identical to the pair address in price data), which is expected and healthy. However, excluding the LP, the next 4 holders collectively control ~27.3% of supply. The top 10 (excluding LP) hold ~37.9% of circulating supply among individual wallets. With top 100 at 92.04%, the token is extremely concentrated. Holder #8 (JnMPMVCZ1P39pVz9pfMYmCnbbpdcGMzXqiz6BGCfMfb) holds exactly 20,000 tokens and holder #15 (AdGD1RPbrxyqEsKYskYSir9DYYr5xaLwFp5GM8izfJbk) holds exactly 11,230 — round numbers that may indicate team/insider allocations. The declining holder trend combined with whale concentration suggests whales are holding while smaller participants exit.

Liquidity$1,340,000
Depth
Moderate
Slippage risk
medium

Volume (24h)

Buy$515,520
Sell$453,530
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers154
Unique sellers146

Total liquidity of $1.34M against an FDV of $2.19M represents a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~61%, which is unusually high and suggests the pool is well-capitalized relative to market cap — a positive sign for slippage on moderate trades. The 24h net buy flow of ~$62K (buy volume $515.5K vs sell volume $453.5K) confirms mild buying pressure. With 154 unique buyers vs 146 unique sellers and 1,705 buy transactions vs 1,517 sell transactions, the market shows slightly more buy-side activity. However, the relatively small number of unique wallets (231 total) trading in 24h on a token with 1,041 holders suggests low overall participation. Slippage risk is medium — the pool is on Meteora DLMM which uses concentrated liquidity, meaning large trades could still face meaningful slippage outside the active price range.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,061,151.315965428
FDV$2,193,012.37

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token metadata does not explicitly state whether mint or freeze authority has been renounced. The update authority is FvULawNPGBbuwYus74ECaQoV1oH9Tk6XPN7VPN51NYds — this is NOT a burn address (not 11111...1111) and has not been renounced. The token is marked as 'Mutable: true', meaning metadata can be changed by the update authority at any time. The contract is unverified and has no description. These factors combine to create HIGH authority risk: the deployer retains the ability to modify token metadata, and potentially mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed as renounced. The FDV of $2.19M with only 1.06M tokens in supply at $2.07/token is a small-cap token with significant manipulation risk. No vesting schedules, tokenomics documentation, or team disclosures are available.

Volatility
high

The token swung from $1.840 to $2.083 within 24 hours — a 13.2% intraday range. As a micro-cap ($2.19M FDV) with thin unique wallet participation (231 wallets in 24h), price is highly susceptible to large moves from individual whale actions.

Liquidity
medium

Liquidity of $1.34M is relatively strong vs FDV (61% ratio), reducing immediate exit risk for small holders. However, concentrated liquidity on Meteora DLMM means large trades outside the active range face high slippage. If the LP provider withdraws, liquidity could collapse rapidly.

Concentration
high

Top 10 wallets hold 60.8% of supply; top 100 hold 92.04%. Excluding the LP pool (22.9%), individual whales control ~38% of supply. Any coordinated sell by top 3–5 holders could devastate the price.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available, so this cannot be precisely assessed. However, 225 airdrop recipients represent potential low-conviction sellers. The accelerating holder decline (-29% in 7 days) suggests ongoing distribution pressure from early/airdrop holders.

Authority
high

The token is mutable (Mutable: true) with a non-renounced update authority (FvULawNPGBbuwYus74ECaQoV1oH9Tk6XPN7VPN51NYds). Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. The deployer retains significant control over the token, creating rug pull and metadata manipulation risk.

Key risks

  • Persistent and accelerating holder decline (-46% over 30 days) signals community abandonment
  • Extreme supply concentration: top 10 hold 60.8%, creating dump risk
  • Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority — rug pull vector
  • Unverified contract with no project description or social proof
  • Price/holder divergence: price pumping while holders flee is a classic distribution signal
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and profit-taking risk unknown
  • Small market cap ($2.19M FDV) makes price easily manipulable

Mitigating factors

  • Relatively high liquidity-to-FDV ratio (~61%) reduces immediate exit liquidity risk
  • Net buy pressure in 24h ($515.5K buys vs $453.5K sells)
  • Meteora DLMM is a reputable DEX infrastructure
  • Token marked as 'Possible spam: false' by data provider
  • 1,705 buy transactions in 24h shows some active trading interest
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand micro-cap Solana token risks, can monitor positions actively, and are prepared to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for long-term investors, passive holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with on-chain risk signals.

NEAR (Solana) is a high-risk micro-cap token with short-term price momentum but deeply concerning structural fundamentals. The bull case rests entirely on continued buying pressure and liquidity depth; the bear case is supported by accelerating holder exodus, extreme concentration, and unrenounced mutable authority. This is a speculative trade at best, not an investment.

Bull case (low)

Short-term momentum continuation: If the current buy pressure sustains and the token breaks above $2.10, momentum traders could push price toward $2.15–$2.30. The high liquidity-to-FDV ratio provides a cushion against flash crashes.

  • Sustained net buy pressure (53.2% buy volume)
  • High liquidity-to-FDV ratio supporting price stability
  • Breakout above $2.00 psychological resistance confirmed
  • Potential broader Solana market rally lifting micro-caps

Base case

Short-term pump fades, price consolidates or retraces to $1.85–$1.95 range as momentum exhausts (evidenced by volume drop in latest candle). Holder decline continues at moderate pace. Token persists as a low-activity micro-cap with occasional volatility spikes.

  • Volume decline in latest candle signals near-term exhaustion
  • No major catalyst emerges to reverse holder trend
  • Whale holders continue to hold rather than dump aggressively
  • Liquidity pool remains intact

Bear case (high)

Structural collapse: The accelerating holder decline continues, large whale wallets (holders #2–#5 controlling ~27% combined) begin distributing, and the mutable contract authority makes a hostile action. Price could retrace to $1.50 or below.

  • Holder count down 46% in 30 days with acceleration in recent days
  • Top 10 wallets hold 60.8% — any coordinated exit is catastrophic
  • Mutable contract with non-renounced authority — rug risk
  • Price/holder divergence suggesting pump-and-dump dynamics
  • No verified project identity, description, or roadmap

GeneratedJun 7, 05:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and candle data current as of candle close 2026-06-07T17:00:00Z. Holder data reflects snapshot as of analysis time. Historical holder series covers 2026-05-08 through 2026-06-06.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Solana)
  • Meteora DLMM price and liquidity data
  • 24-hour OHLC candle data (hourly, USD)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder time series (30 days daily)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data

Limitations

  • No sniper/early buyer data available — smart money signals section is severely limited
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata — inferred as unknown
  • No project documentation, whitepaper, or team information available
  • Contract is unverified — on-chain code cannot be audited
  • Social links listed as 'moralis' (data provider artifact) — no actual social presence verified
  • Top holder classification is inferred from address patterns and context, not verified labels
  • 30-day historical holder data ends June 6; June 7 intraday holder changes (+3 in 1h, -35 in 24h) suggest continued decline
  • FDV figures show slight discrepancy between metadata ($2,193,012.37) and analytics ($2.18M) — immaterial rounding difference

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,061,151.315965428

Key Risks

Persistent and accelerating holder decline (-46% over 30 days) signals community abandonment
Extreme supply concentration: top 10 hold 60.8%, creating dump risk
Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority — rug pull vector
Unverified contract with no project description or social proof

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data was provided for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from early buyer behavior, sniper wallet PnL, or sell-through rates. Analysis in this section is limited to observable on-chain holder and volume data.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available

Unknown — no sniper wallet data available. The acquisition breakdown shows 630 holders acquired via swap, 225 via airdrop, and 186 via transfer, suggesting a mix of organic buyers and distributed recipients. The airdrop component (225 holders, ~21.6% of total) may represent low-conviction holders more likely to sell.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for NEAR (NEAR)?

The token has posted 6 consecutive higher closes over the last 6 hours, breaking above $2.00 resistance and reaching $2.07. Short-term momentum is bullish with buy pressure at 53.2%. However, volume in the most recent candle (21.6K) is significantly lower than the prior three candles (91–105K), suggesting the rally may be losing steam. A pullback toward $1.95–$1.97 is plausible before any continuation. Short-term outlook is bullish (24–48 hours), with a target range of $1.88 to $2.15.

Is NEAR a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 8.5/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand micro-cap Solana token risks, can monitor positions actively, and are prepared to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for long-term investors, passive holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with on-chain risk signals.

How are NEAR holders trending?

NEAR currently has 1,041 holders and is declining (24h: -3.4, 7d: -29, 30d: -46). The holder trend is deeply concerning. From a peak of ~1,564 holders on May 26, the count has fallen to 1,041 — a loss of 523 holders (33.4%) in just 12 days. The decline is clearly accelerating: the 7-day loss of -304 holders (-29%) dwarfs the prior weeks' pace. The single anomalous spike on May 26 (+193 holders, +12%) appears to have been a temporary event (possibly an airdrop or promotion) that failed to retain participants. The distribution breakdown (whales=95, sharks=56, dolphins=207, fish=186, octopus=167) shows a relatively high whale count relative to total holders, reinforcing concentration concerns.

What does sniper activity look like for NEAR?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding NEAR?

Persistent and accelerating holder decline (-46% over 30 days) signals community abandonment • Extreme supply concentration: top 10 hold 60.8%, creating dump risk • Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority — rug pull vector

Track NEAR