ANSEM

The Black Bull Price Today & AI Analysis

ANSEM
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Sep 15, 2026

9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump

$0.1245

-13.44%

FDV $124,162,010

LiveContract:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpumpChain:SolanaHolders:143,971Market cap:$124,162,010

More tokens on Solana

USELESS

USELESS

USELESS COIN

$0.19928.2%
MC $198.98M
HUHCAT

HUHCAT

HUHCAT

$0.0011042532.6%
MC $1.06M
bruh

bruh

bruh

$0.04698367.5%
MC $67.0K
GLDX

GLDX

Gold xStock

$392.771.2%
MC $45.67M
bikecate

bikecate

BIKE CATE

$0.05314899.5%
MC $3.1K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.196425.2%
MC $166.42M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about ANSEM

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Sep 15, 02:19 PM
FDV

$124,162,010

Liquidity

$1,022,184

Holders

0

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

The Black Bull (ANSEM) is a Solana meme token trading on PumpSwap at ~$0.1245, down -13.4% over the last 24 hours after a sharp intra-day flush from a $0.1553 high to a $0.1136 low on a large volume spike. It carries a $124.16M fully diluted valuation against only ~$1.02M in on-chain liquidity, and its metadata includes an unverified claim that 65% of supply sits in a single named wallet with all fees redirected to it. Critical due-diligence data — holder distribution, sniper activity, and contract authority (mint/freeze) status — is entirely unavailable, making this a high-uncertainty, high-risk profile.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Neutral
Extremely thin liquidity ($1.02M) relative to a rich $124.16M FDV
Unverified, creator-supplied claim of 65% supply concentration in one wallet embedded in token description
Recent violent flush candle (~2.22M volume) suggesting large-holder selling activity
Complete absence of holder and sniper due-diligence data, and unknown contract authority status
Near-balanced but slightly sell-heavy 24h flow (51% sell vs 49% buy volume, 3,172 sellers vs 2,965 buyers)

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term

neutral
24-48 hours

Price is consolidating after a sharp flush, trapped between immediate support near $0.1136-$0.1160 and resistance near $0.1259. Near-balanced buy/sell flow (49%/51%) suggests a lack of strong directional conviction in the very short term, with a slight bearish lean given more sellers than buyers.

Target low$0.1100
Target high$0.1350
Support: $0.1160, $0.1136
Resistance: $0.1259, $0.1385

Medium term

neutral
7-14 days

Absent new catalysts, expect continued high volatility within a wide range roughly bounded by the recent 24h high ($0.1553) and the flush low ($0.1136), with the unresolved questions around holder concentration and contract authorities acting as an overhang that could trigger further downside if negative information emerges, or a relief rally if the narrative regains traction.

Catalysts
  • Any confirmation or debunking of the '65% in one wallet' claim
  • Clarification of mint/freeze authority status
  • Renewed social/narrative attention (e.g., the referenced 'Ansem' figure engaging publicly)
  • Liquidity additions or removals on the PumpSwap pair

Bullish factors

  • Near-balanced 24h buy/sell volume (49% vs 51%) rather than one-sided dumping
  • Volume decay after the flush suggests seller exhaustion
  • Active trading with thousands of buys/sells daily shows continued market interest

Bearish factors

  • Unverified 65%-single-wallet concentration claim in token metadata, a major red flag if true
  • Thin liquidity ($1.02M) relative to $124.16M FDV amplifies downside moves
  • Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status leaves open supply/freeze risk
  • Recent violent flush candle with ~2.22M volume signals large-holder selling capability
  • Slightly more unique sellers (3,172) than buyers (2,965) in the last 24h
Confidence: low. Confidence is low because key due-diligence data (holder distribution, sniper activity, contract authority status) is entirely missing, the token has just undergone a high-volatility flush event with uncertain resolution, and the fundamental narrative behind the token relies on an unverified concentration claim that could materially change the risk picture in either direction.

ANSEM call history

Full track record →
Sep 15neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Over the last 24 hourly candles, price rallied from ~$0.1415 to a local high of $0.1553 (candle 5) by hour 5, then rolled over into a steady downtrend, breaking down sharply in candle 19 (2026-09-15 09:00) where price wicked from $0.1343 down to a low of $0.1136 on a huge volume spike of ~2.22M (roughly 4-10x normal hourly volume), before stabilizing and chopping sideways between ~$0.1160 and ~$0.1260 in the final hours, closing at $0.1246.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
neutral

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 49%Sell 51%

Short-term price action is a downtrend from the $0.1553 high to the $0.1136 low, with a recent basing/consolidation attempt in the $0.116-$0.126 range. Medium-term (24h) trend is also down, with price off roughly -13.4% from where it started the window, and structure showing lower highs since candle 5.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.1160 (candle 21 low) / $0.1136 (candle 19 flush low)
Major$0.1136 (24h low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.1259 (candle 23-24 high)
Major$0.1553 (24h high, candle 5) / $0.1509 (candle 4 high)

Price is currently trapped between the post-flush consolidation ceiling near $0.1259 and the flush low of $0.1136. A break above ~$0.1260 with volume would target the $0.1350-$0.1385 zone (pre-flush levels), while a break below $0.1136 opens further downside with no clear support until psychological levels below.

Notable patterns

  • Sharp bearish wick/flush candle (candle 19) with outsized volume — capitulation-style move
  • Lower highs pattern from candle 5 ($0.1553) through candle 13 ($0.1412) into the flush
  • Post-flush sideways consolidation/basing (candles 20-24) with shrinking volume
  • Small-bodied indecision candles near session close suggesting equilibrium after the shock

Liquidity$1.02M
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
medium

Volume (24h)

Buy$1.65M
Sell$1.72M
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers2,965
Unique sellers3,172

Total liquidity of ~$1.02M against a $124.16M FDV is thin (liquidity-to-FDV ratio well under 1%), meaning large trades can move price significantly — consistent with the sharp intra-day drawdown seen in the candles. 24h volume is substantial relative to liquidity ($1.65M buys + $1.72M sells vs $1.02M liquidity, a ~3.3x liquidity turnover), indicating high trading activity but also elevated volatility risk. Sell volume ($1.72M) slightly exceeds buy volume ($1.65M), giving a modest net outflow / sell-side tilt (51.0% sell pressure vs 49.0% buy pressure). Seller count (3,172) also modestly exceeds buyer count (2,965), reinforcing a mildly bearish short-term flow picture. Given shallow liquidity, slippage risk is medium for moderate-to-large orders.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply997,363,445.4 ANSEM
FDV$124.16M

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Metadata fields for update authority, mutability, verified-contract status, and mint/freeze authority are all explicitly marked 'unknown' in the provided data, so no determination can be made on whether mint or freeze authorities have been renounced. This is a meaningful gap: an unrenounced mint authority would allow arbitrary supply inflation, and an unrenounced freeze authority would allow the deployer to freeze holder accounts. Additionally, the token's description contains an unverifiable, promotional/narrative claim ('Ansem's wallet has been confirmed... 65% of the supply has been sent to his wallet, and all fees are redirected to him') that reads as creator-supplied marketing rather than verified on-chain fact — this kind of claim inside metadata is a manipulation red flag per our methodology and should raise caution rather than be taken as reassurance. Total supply is ~997.36M tokens and FDV sits at $124.16M at the current $0.1245 price.

Volatility
high

Token swung from a 24h high of $0.1553 to a low of $0.1136 (a ~27% intra-window range) with a violent flush candle on ~2.2M volume, and is down -13.4% over 24h — clear evidence of high volatility.

Liquidity
high

Only ~$1.02M total liquidity against a $124.16M FDV means the market is thin relative to its valuation; 24h volume of ~$3.37M combined (buys+sells) is over 3x total liquidity, raising slippage and manipulation risk for any sizeable trade.

Concentration
high

No verified on-chain holder/whale data is available, but the token's own description asserts 65% of supply sits in a single wallet ('Ansem's wallet') with fees redirected there — an unverified but concerning concentration claim that, if accurate, would represent extreme single-wallet risk. This claim is treated as a risk flag rather than a confirmed fact.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available to quantify early-buyer concentration or profit-taking behavior, but the observed high-volume flush candle (candle 19) is consistent with a large holder or cluster of holders dumping into the market, which is a plausible explanation for the sharp price decline.

Authority
medium

Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, and mutability status are all marked 'unknown' in the provided metadata — this is itself a risk signal since it cannot be confirmed that the contract has been secured against further supply issuance or account freezing.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($1.02M) relative to $124.16M FDV creates high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unverified creator claim that 65% of supply is held in a single wallet with fees redirected to it — a major concentration/rug-style red flag embedded in promotional metadata
  • Mint/freeze/update authority status entirely unknown — cannot confirm the contract is secured
  • No holder or sniper data available at all, severely limiting due diligence depth
  • Recent violent price flush (-13.4% 24h, intra-window range of ~27%) shows the token is subject to sudden, large moves
  • Sell pressure (51.0%) slightly exceeds buy pressure (49.0%) with more unique sellers (3,172) than buyers (2,965) in the last 24h

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy and sell volumes are roughly balanced ($1.65M vs $1.72M), not a one-sided collapse
  • Post-flush price action shows stabilization/consolidation rather than continued freefall
  • Volume has decayed back to baseline after the flush, suggesting the immediate selling shock has passed
  • Token has active liquidity and trading (thousands of buys/sells in 24h), indicating it is not abandoned
Suitable for: This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who understand meme/narrative-driven Solana tokens and can tolerate the possibility of severe, rapid drawdowns or total loss. It is not appropriate for conservative investors or anyone seeking capital preservation, given the shallow liquidity, unverified extreme concentration claims, unknown contract authority status, and absence of holder/sniper due-diligence data.

ANSEM (The Black Bull) is a high-risk, narrative-driven Solana token trading on PumpSwap with thin liquidity, a recent sharp price flush, and significant data gaps (no holder data, no sniper data, unknown contract authorities). The token's own marketing claims extreme wallet concentration tied to a named individual, which — if true — represents a serious tail risk; if false or exaggerated, it's a promotional narrative that should not be taken at face value. Any position should be sized as high-risk speculation only.

Bull case (low)

If the post-flush consolidation ($0.1160-$0.1260) holds as a base and buy pressure re-asserts (buy volume already near-balanced at 49% of 24h flow), price could reclaim the $0.1350-$0.1385 pre-flush zone and retest the 24h high near $0.1553 on renewed narrative momentum tied to the 'Ansem' branding and social attention.

  • Narrative/social attention around the named-wallet story driving speculative buying
  • Volume already showing signs of buy/sell equilibrium (49%/51%) rather than one-sided dumping
  • Shrinking volume after the flush suggests seller exhaustion, creating room for a relief bounce

Base case

Price likely continues to chop within the recent post-flush range ($0.1136-$0.1260) in the near term as the market digests the volatility event, with direction determined by whether buy or sell flow gains the upper hand; absent new catalysts, expect continued high volatility without a decisive trend.

  • No major new on-chain disclosures (holder/authority data) become available in the near term
  • Liquidity remains around current thin levels (~$1M)
  • Overall crypto/meme-token risk appetite stays roughly constant

Bear case (medium)

Given thin liquidity ($1.02M) relative to a rich $124.16M FDV, unknown contract authority status, and an unverified but alarming 65%-single-wallet concentration claim, the token could see continued distribution/selling pressure, a break below the $0.1136 flush low, and a deeper collapse if the concentrated wallet (if real) begins offloading or if the narrative loses attention.

  • Unverified extreme concentration claim (65% in one wallet) creating dump risk if accurate
  • Shallow liquidity amplifying downside moves and slippage
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaving open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezes
  • Slightly seller-heavy 24h flow (51% sell volume, more unique sellers than buyers)

GeneratedSep 15, 02:19 PM
Data freshnessPrice and candle data current as of 2026-09-15 14:00 UTC (most recent hourly candle close). Trading analytics reflect trailing 24h window as of the same timestamp.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (mint, supply, description, social links)
  • USD price and 24h % change
  • Hourly OHLCV candles (24 most recent)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buys/sells counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Pair/liquidity data from PumpSwap pool

Limitations

  • No holder distribution data available (endpoint retired) — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are placeholders with all-zero/defaulted values
  • No sniper analysis data available — smartMoneySignals largely unknown/defaulted
  • Contract authority status (mint, freeze, update, mutability, verification) all marked unknown in source metadata
  • Token description contains unverified, creator-supplied claims (e.g., '65% of supply sent to Ansem's wallet') that could not be independently confirmed and are treated as marketing/potential manipulation signals, not fact
  • Only 24 hourly candles were available, limiting longer-term technical pattern analysis
  • 6h price % change was not provided

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data that may contain unverified or adversarial claims from the token creator. Cryptocurrency tokens, especially low-liquidity meme tokens, carry substantial risk of loss, including total loss of capital. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply997,363,445.4 ANSEM

Key Risks

•Extremely thin liquidity ($1.02M) relative to $124.16M FDV creates high slippage and manipulation potential
•Unverified creator claim that 65% of supply is held in a single wallet with fees redirected to it — a major concentration/rug-style red flag embedded in promotional metadata
•Mint/freeze/update authority status entirely unknown — cannot confirm the contract is secured
•No holder or sniper data available at all, severely limiting due diligence depth

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data was provided for this token (data source unavailable), so sniper concentration, PnL state, and sell-through behavior cannot be assessed. This is a genuine data gap rather than an indication that sniper activity is absent.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

unknown

Unknown — no early buyer/sniper data available to characterize sentiment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for The Black Bull (ANSEM)?

Price is consolidating after a sharp flush, trapped between immediate support near $0.1136-$0.1160 and resistance near $0.1259. Near-balanced buy/sell flow (49%/51%) suggests a lack of strong directional conviction in the very short term, with a slight bearish lean given more sellers than buyers. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.1100 to $0.1350.

Is ANSEM a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 82/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who understand meme/narrative-driven Solana tokens and can tolerate the possibility of severe, rapid drawdowns or total loss. It is not appropriate for conservative investors or anyone seeking capital preservation, given the shallow liquidity, unverified extreme concentration claims, unknown contract authority status, and absence of holder/sniper due-diligence data.

What does sniper activity look like for ANSEM?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding ANSEM?

Extremely thin liquidity ($1.02M) relative to $124.16M FDV creates high slippage and manipulation potential • Unverified creator claim that 65% of supply is held in a single wallet with fees redirected to it — a major concentration/rug-style red flag embedded in promotional metadata • Mint/freeze/update authority status entirely unknown — cannot confirm the contract is secured

← Back to all predictions

Track ANSEM