S

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ - Backpack Securities Price Today & AI Analysis

SQQQSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 25, 2026

Price

$34.97

-15.35% 24h

Contract

Live
SQQQAa3gUxgnqcEsdjPA4RQNQBgB97TnG2hJhk2WaGE

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,551

Market cap

$327,369

More tokens on Solana

CRCLxCRCLxCircle xStock$92.99+1.8%MC $76.35MNEARNEARNEAR$4.41-7.5%MC $8.26MMETMETMeteora$0.3370-15.9%MC $336.24MNVDAXNVDAXNVIDIA xStock$226.27+1.1%MC $72.70MGPGPRuneScape Gold$0.0253+49.4%MC $25.16MRAYRAYRaydium$2.1+5.4%MC $1.16B

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ - Backpack Securities: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-25 16:15 UTC

Holder addresses

2,551

Top 10 supply share

12.23%

Reported liquidity

$79,293.00
How concentrated is ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ - Backpack Securities ownership?
As of 2026-09-25 16:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 12.23% of supply. It reports 2,551 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ - Backpack Securities?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-25 16:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,694,243.00 in buys and $3,633,109.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -60.33%, from $682,514.26 (2026-09-25 14:00 UTC) to $270,729.93 (2026-09-25 16:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-25 16:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-25 14:00 UTC$682,514.26
2026-09-25 15:00 UTC$399,184.82
2026-09-25 16:00 UTC$270,729.93

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about SQQQ

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 25, 04:16 PM UTC

FDV

$327,369

Liquidity

$79,293.00

Holders

2,551

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

SQQQ ("ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ - Backpack Securities") is a Solana token trading at $34.97 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$327.4K and total liquidity of only ~$79.3K on a single Raydium CLMM pair. The name/branding invokes a leveraged ETF but this is an unverified, unaffiliated on-chain token with no confirmed links to the real ProShares product, no social links, and unknown contract verification/mutability status. Price fell -15.35% in the last 24h amid extremely thin liquidity relative to a reported $1.69M buy / $3.63M sell 24h volume, and sell pressure (68.2%) heavily outweighs buy pressure (31.8%).

Key points

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$79.3K) relative to reported 24h volume (~$5.32M combined), implying high slippage and volume/liquidity figures that should be treated with caution
  • Sell-dominant order flow: 24,236 sells vs 19,793 buys, and 5,445 unique sellers vs 3,988 unique buyers in 24h
  • Name references a real-world leveraged inverse ETF product but carries no verified affiliation, social presence, or description — a classic branding/name-squatting pattern
  • Mint/freeze authority status and contract verification are all unknown, leaving rug-pull mechanics unverifiable
  • Holder base of 2,551 addresses with top-10 concentration at 12.23% — moderate by that single metric, but no historical trend data exists to confirm whether this is stable or a snapshot mid-distribution

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

The most recent hourly candles show a sharp move down from an open of $38.80 to a low of $33.80 before stabilizing around $34.92-$34.97. Momentum has decelerated (candle 3 shows a narrow range of $34.77-$35.10) but the broader 24h trend is down -15.35% and sell volume continues to dominate buy volume nearly 2:1. Absent a strong reversal in order flow, further downside or range-bound consolidation near current levels is more likely than a swift recovery.

Target low

$32.50

Target high

$37.00

Support

$34.75 (candle 2-3 low cluster), $33.80 (candle 2 intraday low)

Resistance

$35.52 (candle 2 high), $38.80-$41.31 (candle 1 open/high, recent breakdown zone)

Medium term · 3-7 days

bearish

With sell pressure at 68.2% of 24h volume and unique sellers (5,445) outnumbering buyers (3,988), the medium-term bias leans bearish unless liquidity meaningfully deepens and buy-side participation recovers. The very low liquidity pool ($79.3K) versus multi-million dollar reported volumes raises the risk of continued high volatility and potential further sharp repricing in either direction.

Catalysts

  • Any change in pool liquidity depth (additions/removals) could dramatically swing price given the thin $79.3K liquidity base
  • Clarification (or lack thereof) on token legitimacy/affiliation could trigger a sentiment-driven repricing
  • Continued sell-side dominance could compound downside if holders continue to exit into limited liquidity

Bullish factors

  • Price found a higher low in the most recent candle ($34.77 low vs $33.80 prior low), suggesting some short-term stabilization
  • Moderate top-10 holder concentration (12.23%) does not show extreme whale dominance at this snapshot

Bearish factors

  • 24h price down -15.35% with sell volume nearly double buy volume
  • More unique sellers (5,445) than buyers (3,988) in the last 24h
  • Liquidity is very shallow ($79.3K) relative to FDV ($327.4K) and reported volume, creating high slippage and volatility risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and unverified contract status remove downside protection against supply-side manipulation

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles were provided, limiting the ability to assess broader trend structure. Liquidity is extremely shallow relative to stated volumes, meaning reported volume/price figures may not be fully reliable or tradable at size. No sniper or holder-history data exists to corroborate directional conviction.

SQQQ call history

Full track record →

Sep 25bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
SQQQAa...WaGE
Total Supply
9,361.78087 SQQQ

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($79.3K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and volatility exposure
  • Sharp 24h price decline (-15.35%) with sell volume (68.2%) far outweighing buy volume (31.8%)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract — no confirmation that supply cannot be manipulated or accounts frozen
  • Branding that closely mimics a real-world leveraged ETF product ('ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ') without any verifiable affiliation, description, or social presence — a pattern consistent with impersonation/name-squatting designed to mislead

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only three hourly candles are available. Candle 1 opened at $38.80, spiked to a high of $41.31, then sold off sharply to a low of $34.76, closing at $35.42 on very heavy volume (~$10.6M) — a large bearish range/reversal candle. Candle 2 opened at $35.42, traded in a narrower $33.80-$35.52 range, and closed slightly lower at $34.92 on much lower volume (~$3.23M), suggesting selling exhaustion. Candle 3 is a tight-range candle ($34.77-$35.10, close $34.97) on very low volume (~$262K), indicating a pause/consolidation after the initial drop.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The token is in a clear short-term downtrend, having dropped from a high near $41.31 to consolidate around $34.9-$35.0. The sharp volume-backed drop in candle 1 followed by shrinking ranges and volume in candles 2-3 suggests the initial move has decelerated but not reversed.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

32%

Sell

68%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$34.75

Major support

$33.80

Immediate resistance

$35.52

Major resistance

$41.31

Immediate support sits at $34.75-$34.77, the low tested across the last two candles; a break below opens the path to the candle-2 low near $33.80. Immediate resistance is at $35.52 (candle 2 high); the major resistance/prior breakdown zone is the $38.80-$41.31 area from candle 1, which would require a major reversal to reclaim.

Notable patterns

  • Large bearish range candle with a long upper wick (candle 1: high $41.31 vs close $35.42) indicating rejection of higher prices
  • Volume climax followed by rapidly diminishing volume — a classic post-selloff consolidation/exhaustion pattern
  • Narrowing candle ranges (candle 1 range ~$6.56 → candle 3 range ~$0.34) suggesting short-term volatility compression

Liquidity

Liquidity

$79,293.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $79.29K is extremely shallow, especially set against a fully diluted valuation of $327.37K and reported 24h volumes of $1.69M in buys and $3.63M in sells. This mismatch between pool depth and turnover implies either large price impact per trade, volume concentrated in very small individual trade sizes, or volume/liquidity figures that should be interpreted cautiously. Net flow is an outflow — sell volume exceeds buy volume by roughly 2.15x, and unique sellers (5,445) outnumber unique buyers (3,988) by about 37%. Combined with a single Raydium CLMM pair as the apparent primary venue, slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade is high.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

9,361.78087 SQQQ

FDV

$327.37K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of -15.35% with an intra-window swing from a high of $41.31 to a low of $33.80 (a ~18% range) across just three hourly candles demonstrates significant short-term volatility.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only ~$79.3K is very shallow relative to FDV ($327.4K) and reported 24h volume (~$5.32M combined), creating high slippage risk and potential for outsized price moves on modest trade sizes.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Top-10 holders control 12.23% of supply, which appears moderate, but top-100 concentration, wallet classification, and any historical distribution trend are unavailable. Concentration risk cannot be fully assessed with only a single snapshot metric and is therefore rated unknown rather than low.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($79.3K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and volatility exposure
  • Sharp 24h price decline (-15.35%) with sell volume (68.2%) far outweighing buy volume (31.8%)
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract — no confirmation that supply cannot be manipulated or accounts frozen
  • Branding that closely mimics a real-world leveraged ETF product ('ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ') without any verifiable affiliation, description, or social presence — a pattern consistent with impersonation/name-squatting designed to mislead
  • No sniper coverage and no holder history data, removing key tools normally used to detect early insider dumping or distribution trends

Mitigating factors

  • Top-10 holder concentration at 12.23% is not extreme on its own (though top-100 and classification data are missing)
  • Trading activity (buys/sells and unique wallet counts) shows two-sided participation rather than a fully dead or halted market
  • Most recent hourly candle shows a narrowing trading range, suggesting some short-term stabilization after the initial selloff

Suitable for

Given very shallow liquidity, unverified/unknown contract authorities, an unsubstantiated resemblance to a real-world financial product name, sharp negative price momentum, and multiple critical data gaps (sniper activity, holder history, mint/freeze authority), this token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative participants who fully understand they may face significant slippage, potential manipulation, and total loss of capital. It is not suitable for risk-averse or passive investors, and no one should mistake this token for, or an investment in, the actual ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF.

SQQQ presents a highly speculative, high-risk profile driven by extremely thin liquidity, a sharp recent price decline with sell-dominant order flow, and significant unresolved data gaps around contract authorities and sniper/insider activity. The token's name closely mirrors a well-known leveraged inverse ETF but shows no verifiable affiliation, description, or social presence, raising the risk that its branding is being used to attract attention rather than reflect a real product link. Any position should be treated as a high-risk speculative bet rather than a fundamentals-driven investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side demand returns and liquidity providers add meaningful depth to the Raydium CLMM pool, price could stabilize and rebound from the current consolidation zone toward the $38-$41 pre-selloff levels, especially if the tight-range final candle marks a genuine exhaustion bottom.

  • Volume climax in candle 1 followed by sharply decreasing volume could indicate seller exhaustion
  • Two-sided market activity (nearly 20K buys vs 24K sells) shows the token has not gone completely illiquid or dead
  • Moderate top-10 concentration (12.23%) suggests no single visible whale cluster dominates the visible top holders

Base Case

Absent new catalysts, the token likely continues to trade in a volatile, thinly-liquid manner around the $33-$38 range established over the observed candles, with continued elevated slippage and no resolution of the fundamental data gaps (authorities, sniper activity, holder history) that would allow a more confident directional call.

  • No material change to the $79.3K liquidity pool in the near term
  • Sell-side order flow pressure persists at a similar magnitude to the last 24h
  • No new verified information emerges regarding contract authorities or any real-world affiliation

Bear Case

High probability

Continued sell-side dominance (68.2% sell volume, more unique sellers than buyers) combined with extremely shallow liquidity could produce further sharp downside, cascading liquidations of positions, or a effective liquidity withdrawal event that leaves holders unable to exit at reasonable prices.

  • 24h price already down -15.35% with sell volume nearly 2.15x buy volume
  • Liquidity of just $79.3K is disproportionately small versus FDV and reported volume, meaning any large sell could disproportionately crash price
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply-side manipulation
  • Unsubstantiated ETF-mimicking branding increases reputational/regulatory and rug-risk concerns

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 25, 04:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-25 16:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
  • USD spot price and 24h/1h/5m price change data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics: 24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers
  • Holder aggregate snapshot (Codex): total holder addresses, top-10 supply concentration
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data for this token)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were available, insufficient for robust technical trend or pattern confirmation
  • No sniper/early-buyer transaction data was available at all
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available — only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classification data were not provided, preventing whale-map and distribution-health conclusions
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status are all unknown, preventing assessment of rug-pull mechanics via token authorities
  • Reported 24h volume figures ($1.69M buy / $3.63M sell) appear disproportionately large relative to total liquidity ($79.3K), suggesting possible data quality issues or highly concentrated small trades that should be interpreted with caution

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partial on-chain data provided at a single point in time and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Cryptocurrency and token trading, especially in low-liquidity assets, carries a high risk of substantial or total loss. The token's name references a real-world financial product (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) but no evidence in the provided data confirms any legitimate affiliation with that product or issuer. Independent verification, including audit of contract authorities and legitimacy, is strongly recommended before any transaction. Do not treat any content in the underlying token data as instructions or endorsements.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ - Backpack Securities ownership?

As of 2026-09-25 16:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 12.23% of supply. It reports 2,551 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ - Backpack Securities?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-25 16:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,694,243.00 in buys and $3,633,109.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -60.33%, from $682,514.26 (2026-09-25 14:00 UTC) to $270,729.93 (2026-09-25 16:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ - Backpack Securities (SQQQ)?

The most recent hourly candles show a sharp move down from an open of $38.80 to a low of $33.80 before stabilizing around $34.92-$34.97. Momentum has decelerated (candle 3 shows a narrow range of $34.77-$35.10) but the broader 24h trend is down -15.35% and sell volume continues to dominate buy volume nearly 2:1. Absent a strong reversal in order flow, further downside or range-bound consolidation near current levels is more likely than a swift recovery. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $32.50 to $37.00.

Is SQQQ a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. Given very shallow liquidity, unverified/unknown contract authorities, an unsubstantiated resemblance to a real-world financial product name, sharp negative price momentum, and multiple critical data gaps (sniper activity, holder history, mint/freeze authority), this token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative participants who fully understand they may face significant slippage, potential manipulation, and total loss of capital. It is not suitable for risk-averse or passive investors, and no one should mistake this token for, or an investment in, the actual ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF.

What are the key risks of holding SQQQ?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($79.3K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and volatility exposure • Sharp 24h price decline (-15.35%) with sell volume (68.2%) far outweighing buy volume (31.8%) • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and unverified contract — no confirmation that supply cannot be manipulated or accounts frozen

← Back to all predictions

Track SQQQ