RuneScape Gold Price Today & AI Analysis

GPSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 16, 2026

$0.001207

-6.39% 24h

Contract

Live

HTmQz7My6MehV7bjhJ6jde8nDND1yvsz68d24LP7YgUQ

Chain

Solana

Holders

19,407

Market cap

$1,194,754

At a $10M market cap, $GP would be $0.0101 (8.37x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is GP a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell · can be raised

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about GP

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

RobinhoodROBINHOOD$0.0₅1737-95.7%MC $1.7K

RockstarRockstar Games$0.000333+729.5%MC $328.3K

MINIMinirouter.sh$0.001958+9.8%MC $1.96M

ANTAnthropic$0.000103+0.6%MC $99.6K

SISuper Intelligence$0.000426-10.8%MC $413.9K

KIMKim Jong Un Coin$0.000239+476.4%MC $234.5K

RuneScape Gold: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-16 21:46 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$97,088.00

How concentrated is RuneScape Gold ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling RuneScape Gold?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is RuneScape Gold liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-16 21:46 UTC, reported liquidity was $97,088.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-16 21:46 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 16, 09:46 PM UTC

FDV

$4,135,465

Liquidity

$97,088.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

RuneScape Gold (GP) is a newly popular Solana memecoin (mint HTmQz7My6MehV7bjhJ6jde8nDND1yvsz68d24LP7YgUQ) trading on Raydium CPMM, currently priced at $0.004137 after a dramatic +130.9% 24h rally driven by $816.7K in combined buy/sell volume. Despite the strong price action, the token exhibits significant transparency gaps: total liquidity is only ~$97.09K against a $4.14M FDV, and holder distribution, whale concentration, sniper activity, and mint/freeze authority status are all unverifiable from available data. The combination of extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and missing due-diligence data points to a high-risk speculative asset.

Key points

Nostalgic 'RuneScape Gold' branding tied to a well-known gaming IP reference, which may drive retail social attention
Extremely thin liquidity ($97.09K) relative to trading volume ($816.7K in 24h) and FDV ($4.14M), an outsized mismatch even for memecoins
Complete absence of holder, whale, and sniper transparency data, unusual even relative to typical low-cap token analyses
Strong recent volume-backed price momentum (+130.9% 24h) with buy pressure (52.6%) modestly outweighing sell pressure (47.4%)

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Given the parabolic 131% 24h rally into thin liquidity, the token is technically overbought and showing early signs of exhaustion (upper wick rejection on the most recent candle, -1.55% in the last 5 minutes after a strong 1h gain). A short-term consolidation or pullback toward the $0.00366-$0.0030 support band is plausible before any further advance, though continued speculative momentum could also push price to retest/break the $0.00456 high.

Target low

$0.0028

Target high

$0.0050

Support: $0.00366, $0.0030, $0.00160
Resistance: $0.00417, $0.00439, $0.00456

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the lack of holder, whale, and sniper data, and the extremely shallow $97.09K liquidity pool. Sustainability of the rally depends heavily on continued buy-side demand outpacing profit-taking; without deeper liquidity or verified tokenomics/authority renouncement, sharp reversals remain a material risk.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or new listings could reduce slippage risk and attract larger buyers
Continued social/community traction (token has a Twitter presence) could sustain speculative interest
Any confirmation of mint/freeze authority renouncement could reduce perceived rug risk and support price
Conversely, large holder unlocks or profit-taking by early/sniper wallets (unverifiable currently) could trigger sharp downside

Bullish factors

24h buy volume ($429.78K) exceeds sell volume ($386.91K), a 52.6%/47.4% split favoring buyers
Higher-highs pattern across the session with volume-confirmed breakouts (notably candle 18's $141.2K volume)
+130.9% 24h price change and +10.1% in the last hour show strong recent momentum and market attention

Bearish factors

Extremely shallow liquidity ($97.09K) relative to $4.14M FDV creates high volatility and slippage risk, and can exaggerate reversals
Recent candle shows overbought exhaustion signals (upper wick rejection, -1.55% in last 5 minutes)
Unknown mint/freeze authority status and no verified contract status leave open rug-pull or supply-dilution risk
No holder or sniper data available to confirm distribution health or early-buyer dumping risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because several critical data sets are missing entirely (holder distribution, whale concentration, sniper activity, mint/freeze authority confirmation), and the available price action is based on only 24 hourly candles of a highly volatile, newly popular, thinly-liquid token. Predictions are based solely on technical patterns and 24h trading analytics, without fundamental or distribution confirmation.

GP call history

Full track record →

Sep 16neutral@ $0.00414

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: HTmQz7...YgUQ
Total Supply: 999,628,352.19 GP

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($97.09K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot confirm rug-pull protections are in place
No holder distribution or whale data available to assess concentration risk
No sniper/early-buyer data available to assess dump risk from initial buyers

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the most recent 24 hourly candles, price rallied from an open of ~$0.00179 (candle 1) to a close of ~$0.00414 (candle 24), representing roughly a 131% increase, consistent with the reported 24h change. The move was not linear — there were two clear legs: an initial run-up peaking near $0.00344 (candle 11) followed by a pullback to ~$0.00160 low (candle 8/9 area), then a stronger second leg pushing to a session high of $0.00456 (candle 24 high) after breaking through $0.00417 (candle 17 high) and $0.00439 (candle 18 high). Volume spiked notably on the breakout candles (candle 17: $78.3K, candle 18: $141.2K — the largest volume bar in the set), confirming the up-move was volume-backed rather than a low-volume drift.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both short-term (last few hours) and medium-term (full 24h window) trends are up, with a series of higher highs (0.00344 → 0.00417 → 0.00439 → 0.00456) punctuated by sharp pullbacks, typical of a volatile parabolic memecoin rally rather than a smooth trend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

53%

Sell

47%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00366 (candle 23 low/close area)

Major support

$0.00160 (candle 8/9 swing low)

Immediate resistance

$0.00456 (candle 24 high, session high)

Major resistance

$0.00439 (candle 18 high, prior swing high before final leg up)

Support is layered at $0.00366 (recent consolidation from candle 20-23) with deeper major support at the $0.00160 swing low established in candles 8-9 during the first pullback. On the resistance side, the market just tagged an all-time-session high of $0.00456 in candle 24 after clearing the prior swing high of $0.00439 (candle 18); a decisive close above $0.00456 would open room for continuation, while failure to hold $0.00366 support would risk a deeper retracement back toward the $0.0028-$0.0030 zone (candles 15/19 lows).

Notable patterns

Higher highs pattern across candles 11, 17, 18, and 24 confirming an uptrend structure
Sharp wick rejections (long upper wicks) on candles 8, 16, and 19 indicating repeated profit-taking at local tops
Volume-confirmed breakout on candle 18 ($141.2K volume, the session's largest) coinciding with a strong bullish close near the high
Most recent candle (24) shows a large high-to-close pullback (H:0.00456 to C:0.00414), a small upper-wick rejection suggesting short-term overbought exhaustion

Liquidity

$97,088.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $97.09K is extremely thin relative to a $4.14M fully diluted valuation and relative to the $429.78K/$386.91K in 24h buy/sell volume — implying volume is roughly 4.4x-8.8x the pool depth in a single day. This mismatch signals high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade and suggests the price action (up 130.9% in 24h) is being driven by a thin order book that can be moved substantially by relatively small trades in either direction. Buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume (52.6% vs 47.4%), indicating a modest net inflow bias, and buy count (2,195) exceeds sell count (1,587), though unique buyers (895) and sellers (901) are roughly balanced, suggesting no single large wallet dominance is visible in the trade counts. Overall market health is fragile given the liquidity-to-volume ratio.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,628,352.19 GP

FDV

$4.14M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved +130.9% in 24h with intra-hour swings of 20-30% (e.g., candle 17 O:0.00254 H:0.00417; candle 8 H:0.00242 L:0.00160), and 5m price change is already -1.55% while 1h is +10.1%, indicating extreme short-term volatility typical of a nascent, thinly-traded memecoin.
Liquidityhigh
Only $97.09K total liquidity against $4.14M FDV and ~$816K combined 24h volume creates a severe liquidity-to-volume mismatch, meaning large trades could cause outsized price impact and slippage in either direction.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($97.09K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot confirm rug-pull protections are in place
No holder distribution or whale data available to assess concentration risk
No sniper/early-buyer data available to assess dump risk from initial buyers
Extreme 24h volatility (+130.9%) suggests speculative, possibly unsustainable price action
Token description references 'earn gold' yield mechanics that are unverified and could represent unsustainable tokenomics or marketing hype

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume ($429.78K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($386.91K), suggesting net buying interest rather than a coordinated dump
Roughly balanced unique buyer (895) and seller (901) counts suggest no single dominant seller dumping in trade counts
Token trades on Raydium CPMM, a widely used and audited AMM infrastructure, reducing smart-contract execution risk at the DEX layer

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse or long-term investors given the combination of shallow liquidity, unknown token authorities, missing holder/sniper transparency, and extreme volatility. Position sizing should be minimal and only capital one can afford to lose entirely.

RuneScape Gold (GP) is a nascent, highly speculative Solana memecoin trading on Raydium CPMM that has seen a +130.9% price surge in the last 24 hours on the back of $816K in combined buy/sell volume, but sits on only ~$97.09K of liquidity and lacks verified authority renouncement, holder distribution, and sniper data. The thesis is purely speculative-momentum driven; there is no verifiable fundamental backing beyond a Twitter presence and a marketing tagline referencing 'earning gold.' Extreme caution is warranted given the many unresolved transparency gaps.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued viral/social momentum (leveraging the recognizable RuneScape 'GP' branding) drives sustained buy pressure, additional liquidity gets added reducing slippage, and the token attracts a durable holder base, allowing price to break past the $0.00456 session high toward new highs.

Sustained or increasing buy volume relative to sell volume beyond the current 52.6%/47.4% split
New liquidity injections that reduce the current severe liquidity-to-FDV mismatch
Positive social virality tied to the nostalgic RuneScape gold branding attracting retail speculative interest
Confirmation that mint/freeze authorities are renounced, reducing rug-risk perception

Base Case

Price consolidates within the recent range ($0.0030-$0.0046) as the initial momentum surge cools, with continued high volatility and two-way volume as speculative traders trade the range; sustainability beyond the near term remains highly uncertain pending greater transparency on holders and authorities.

Trading volume remains elevated but roughly balanced between buyers and sellers as observed in the 24h data (52.6%/47.4%)
No major liquidity events (additions or removals) occur in the near term
No confirmed rug-pull or authority-related negative catalyst emerges
Broader memecoin market sentiment on Solana remains stable, neither strongly risk-on nor risk-off

Bear Case

Medium probability

The rally proves to be an unsustainable liquidity-thin pump; early buyers or undisclosed large holders (unverifiable due to missing data) take profits, sell pressure overwhelms the shallow $97.09K pool, and price retraces sharply back toward or below the $0.0016-$0.0030 support zone established earlier in the session.

Shallow liquidity ($97.09K) makes the token highly susceptible to sharp downside moves from moderate-sized sell orders
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open possibility of supply dilution or malicious contract behavior
Lack of any confirmed holder distribution data means concentration risk cannot be ruled out and could materialize as a dump
Overbought technical signals (upper wick rejection on the latest candle, decelerating 5m momentum) suggest the rally may already be losing steam

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 16, 09:46 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-16 21:46 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, description)
Price and 24h % change data
24-hour hourly OHLCV candle data (24 candles) from Raydium CPMM pair 6fNtUWWpf9VckoZXce7pFUyxA9wPRVPpe83txqdYFiCn
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder distribution or holder growth data was available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are placeholders with all analysis explicitly noting data unavailability
No sniper wallet data was available — smart money/sniper metrics are marked unknown/zero rather than estimated
Mint authority, freeze authority, mutability, and contract verification status are all listed as 'unknown' in metadata and could not be independently confirmed
Only 24 hours of hourly candle data was available, limiting longer-term technical trend confirmation
Total liquidity figure ($97.09K) is a snapshot and may fluctuate significantly given the token's high volatility

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the on-chain and market data provided at the time of analysis, which contains significant gaps (holder data, sniper data, authority confirmation). Cryptocurrency and memecoin investments carry substantial risk, including total loss of principal. Conduct your own independent research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is RuneScape Gold (GP) a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 3% fee and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell RuneScape Gold (GP)?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is RuneScape Gold ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling RuneScape Gold?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is RuneScape Gold liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-16 21:46 UTC, reported liquidity was $97,088.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for RuneScape Gold (GP)?

Is GP a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse or long-term investors given the combination of shallow liquidity, unknown token authorities, missing holder/sniper transparency, and extreme volatility. Position sizing should be minimal and only capital one can afford to lose entirely.

What are the key risks of holding GP?

Extremely thin liquidity ($97.09K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot confirm rug-pull protections are in place • No holder distribution or whale data available to assess concentration risk