DDOS

dropping dollars on strangers Price Today & AI Analysis

DDOSSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 26, 2026

Price

$0.001045

+1969.94% 24h

Contract

Live
HSnCtWsw5YmfAkJo9S3eetWtGHPMrc2pAxvCu24AnQEa

Chain

Solana

Holders

3,966

Market cap

$1,025,397

More tokens on Solana

CRCLxCRCLxCircle xStock$92.99+1.8%MC $76.35MSSQQQProShares UltraPro Short QQQ - Backpack Securities$34.97-15.4%MC $327.4KPEEPPEEPPEEP$0.000156+207.2%MC $153.5KNVDAXNVDAXNVIDIA xStock$226.27+1.1%MC $72.70MPAIDPAIDPaid$0.0186+95.3%MC $17.64MRAYRAYRaydium$2.1+5.4%MC $1.16B

dropping dollars on strangers: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-26 06:15 UTC

Holder addresses

3,966

Top 10 supply share

17.63%

Reported liquidity

$53,005.00
How concentrated is dropping dollars on strangers ownership?
As of 2026-09-26 06:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 17.63% of supply. It reports 3,966 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling dropping dollars on strangers?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 06:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $2,489,671.00 in buys and $2,424,687.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is dropping dollars on strangers liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +20.94%, from $55,616.03 (2026-09-26 04:00 UTC) to $67,262.89 (2026-09-26 06:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-26 06:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-26 04:00 UTC$55,616.03
2026-09-26 05:00 UTC$67,400.46
2026-09-26 06:00 UTC$67,262.89

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about DDOS

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 26, 06:16 AM UTC

FDV

$1,025,397

Liquidity

$53,005.00

Holders

3,966

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

DDOS ("dropping dollars on strangers") is a brand-new, extremely volatile PumpSwap-listed micro-cap token with a $1.03M FDV but only ~$53K of total liquidity. The token has moved parabolically in the last 24h (+~1970%) on very high but roughly balanced two-sided volume (50.7% buy / 49.3% sell of ~$4.9M combined). Holder count sits at 3,966 addresses with the top 10 holding 17.6% of supply, but no historical holder data, wallet classification, sniper data, or mint/freeze authority data is available, so several standard risk checks cannot be completed and are marked unknown rather than assumed safe.

Key points

  • Extreme 24h price move (~1970%) on a sub-$1.03M FDV token with only ~$53K liquidity
  • Very high, near-balanced 24h buy/sell volume (~$2.49M buys vs ~$2.42M sells) relative to tiny liquidity pool, implying high volatility and slippage risk
  • No sniper, holder-history, or mint/freeze authority data available — several risk dimensions are genuinely unknown, not verified-safe
  • Description references fees routed to a third-party (@RandomActsOrg via UsePaid) — an unverified, creator-supplied claim that cannot be confirmed on-chain from the data given

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Price has just completed an extreme parabolic move (open ~$0.0000046 to a high of ~$0.00192, closing near $0.00104-$0.00109 across the last three hourly candles) with a huge wick-to-wick range, indicating a blow-off top followed by consolidation. Near-term direction is highly uncertain given the shallow $53K liquidity pool, which can amplify moves in either direction on relatively modest order flow.

Target low

$0.00062 (recent candle low)

Target high

$0.00192 (recent candle high)

Support

$0.00089 (candle 3 low), $0.00062 (candle 2 low)

Resistance

$0.00110-0.00111 (candle 1/3 highs), $0.00192 (candle 2 high / local top)

Medium term · 3-14 days

bearish

Tokens exhibiting this kind of vertical, low-liquidity spike historically face elevated risk of mean reversion once initial speculative buying fades, especially with only $53K backing a >$1M FDV. Sustained upside would require continued strong organic demand and liquidity growth, which cannot be confirmed from the data provided.

Catalysts

  • Potential continued social/twitter-driven attention given the token's meme-style branding
  • Liquidity additions or lack thereof on PumpSwap
  • Any resolution of unknowns around mint/freeze authority and holder concentration that could shift sentiment

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($2.49M) slightly exceeds sell volume ($2.42M), a marginally positive net flow
  • Buyer count (9,073) exceeds seller count (6,987) in the last 24h, suggesting broader demand participation
  • Holder base of 3,966 addresses shows some distribution rather than a handful of wallets

Bearish factors

  • Extremely thin $53K liquidity relative to $1.03M FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Massive intra-hour wicks (e.g., candle 2 ranging from $0.00062 to $0.00192) show erratic, thin-market price action typical of pump-and-dump patterns
  • No verified mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out further supply-side risk
  • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dumping risk, an unresolved unknown

Confidence: low. Only three hourly candles and a single day of trading analytics are available; there is no multi-day trend, no verified authority data, and no sniper/holder-history data, making any forward projection speculative and low-confidence.

DDOS call history

Full track record →

Sep 26neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
HSnCtW...nQEa
Total Supply
981,231,788.77 DDOS (6 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($53K) relative to FDV and volume, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Parabolic +1970% 24h move followed by a sharp intra-hour reversal (from $0.00192 high to $0.00062 low) — classic pump/exhaustion pattern risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of further supply issuance or account freezes
  • No sniper or holder-history data available to detect early-buyer dumping or whale accumulation/distribution patterns

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (2026-09-26 04:00-06:00 UTC). Candle 1 opened at $0.0000046 and closed at $0.00110 after ranging up to $0.00123 on volume of ~$2.30M — a massive vertical expansion. Candle 2 opened at $0.00110, spiked to a high of $0.00192, then collapsed to a low of $0.00062 before closing at $0.00102 on volume of ~$3.56M, forming a long-wick candle typical of a blow-off top and sharp reversal. Candle 3 opened at $0.00102 and traded in a tighter $0.00089-$0.00111 range, closing at $0.00104 on much lower volume (~$134K), suggesting volatility is cooling and price is consolidating just below the recent highs.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Uptrend

Short-term price action over the last hour is consolidating in a tight range ($0.00089-$0.00111) after the prior two hours' explosive rally and reversal. Medium-term (the full visible window), price is still up enormously from the initial candle's open, so the broader trend remains an uptrend, but it is coming off a very sharp spike-and-fade pattern.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00089 (candle 3 low)

Major support

$0.00062 (candle 2 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.00111 (candle 1/3 high area)

Major resistance

$0.00192 (candle 2 high, all-time high in observed data)

With only 3 candles of data, support/resistance levels are provisional. The $0.00062-$0.00192 range captured in candle 2 represents the full observed volatility band; price is currently consolidating in the upper-middle of that range near $0.00104.

Notable patterns

  • Vertical breakout candle (candle 1) followed by blow-off top and long upper/lower wick reversal candle (candle 2) — classic pump-and-dump / exhaustion signature
  • Sharp volume decay into candle 3 suggesting cooling momentum and potential range-bound consolidation
  • Tight-bodied consolidation candle (candle 3) after high volatility, which can precede either a continuation breakout or a deeper retracement

Liquidity

Liquidity

$53,005.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $53.01K is extremely shallow relative to both the $1.03M FDV and the enormous 24h trading volume (~$4.91M combined buy+sell). This mismatch between reported volume and pool depth is a major red flag for slippage and price manipulation risk — large trades relative to the pool size can cause outsized price swings, consistent with the wild intra-hour wicks seen in the OHLC data (e.g., a swing from $0.00062 to $0.00192 within one hour). Net flow is marginally positive (buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume, and buyers outnumber sellers 9,073 to 6,987), but the margin (50.7%/49.3%) is thin and not a strong directional signal.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

981,231,788.77 DDOS (6 decimals)

FDV

$1,025,397 (~$1.03M)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of ~+1970% with intra-hour swings from $0.00062 to $0.00192 (candle 2) demonstrate extreme volatility and a pump-and-dump-like price pattern.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Only $53.01K total liquidity against a $1.03M FDV and ~$4.9M in 24h combined volume creates high slippage risk and vulnerability to sharp price impact from relatively small trades.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Top-10 holders control 17.63% of supply per the current snapshot, but top-100 concentration, wallet classification, and any historical accumulation/distribution pattern are unavailable, so true concentration risk cannot be fully assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($53K) relative to FDV and volume, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Parabolic +1970% 24h move followed by a sharp intra-hour reversal (from $0.00192 high to $0.00062 low) — classic pump/exhaustion pattern risk
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of further supply issuance or account freezes
  • No sniper or holder-history data available to detect early-buyer dumping or whale accumulation/distribution patterns
  • Unverified creator claim about fee routing to a third party (@RandomActsOrg via UsePaid) cannot be independently confirmed from on-chain data provided

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($2.49M) modestly exceeds sell volume ($2.42M), and buyers (9,073) outnumber sellers (6,987), a mild positive demand signal
  • Holder base of 3,966 addresses shows at least some breadth rather than extreme wallet concentration in a handful of addresses
  • Top-10 concentration of 17.63% is not, on its face, alarmingly high compared to many newly launched tokens

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of near-total loss. It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors or those seeking capital preservation, given the combination of extreme volatility, very shallow liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history).

DDOS is a highly speculative, newly-active meme-style token that has just undergone an extreme, likely unsustainable price spike on very thin liquidity. Any thesis here is dominated by short-term trading dynamics and unresolved data gaps rather than fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buyer demand continues (buyers already outnumber sellers 9,073 to 6,987 with slightly positive net volume flow) and social attention around the meme branding sustains, price could hold current levels or attempt another leg toward the recent $0.00192 high, especially if liquidity is added to the PumpSwap pool.

  • Continued organic buyer interest reflected in the 24h buyer/seller imbalance
  • Potential viral/social momentum given the token's provocative meme name and Twitter presence
  • Any liquidity injections that reduce slippage and attract larger buyers

Base Case

Most likely, the token continues to trade in a wide, volatile range with volume decaying from its initial spike (already down from $3.56M to $134K between candles 2 and 3) as speculative interest cools, with price consolidating somewhere between the recent $0.00062-$0.00192 band absent new catalysts.

  • No major new liquidity or authority-related disclosures emerge in the near term
  • Trading volume continues to normalize downward from the initial spike
  • Holder base remains roughly stable near the current 3,966-address snapshot without verifiable growth or decline data

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extreme volatility already observed (a full round-trip from $0.00062 to $0.00192 within a single hour) and the razor-thin $53K liquidity pool, the token could easily retrace most of its 24h gains as early buyers and any concentrated holders take profit, especially with unknown mint/freeze authority risk still unresolved.

  • Classic pump-and-dump candle signature (vertical breakout, blow-off top, sharp reversal)
  • Extremely shallow liquidity relative to volume and FDV, amplifying downside moves
  • No confirmation mint authority is renounced, leaving open dilution risk
  • No sniper/holder history data to rule out coordinated early-buyer dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 26, 06:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-26 06:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
  • PumpSwap pair pricing and 24h price change data
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, buy/sell pressure)
  • Codex holder aggregate snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust multi-day trend or pattern analysis
  • No sniper data was provided at all, preventing assessment of early-buyer concentration or dumping risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) is available; only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration exists
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract, and mutability status are all unknown, preventing a rug-risk determination from authority settings
  • Top-100 holder concentration and individual wallet classifications are unavailable
  • Token description and social claims (e.g., fee routing to a third party) are creator-supplied and unverified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, and no recommendation to buy, sell, or hold this or any token is intended. Cryptocurrency assets, especially newly launched, low-liquidity meme tokens, carry a high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is dropping dollars on strangers ownership?

As of 2026-09-26 06:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 17.63% of supply. It reports 3,966 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling dropping dollars on strangers?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 06:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $2,489,671.00 in buys and $2,424,687.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is dropping dollars on strangers liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +20.94%, from $55,616.03 (2026-09-26 04:00 UTC) to $67,262.89 (2026-09-26 06:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for dropping dollars on strangers (DDOS)?

Price has just completed an extreme parabolic move (open ~$0.0000046 to a high of ~$0.00192, closing near $0.00104-$0.00109 across the last three hourly candles) with a huge wick-to-wick range, indicating a blow-off top followed by consolidation. Near-term direction is highly uncertain given the shallow $53K liquidity pool, which can amplify moves in either direction on relatively modest order flow. Short-term outlook is neutral (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.00062 (recent candle low) to $0.00192 (recent candle high).

Is DDOS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of near-total loss. It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors or those seeking capital preservation, given the combination of extreme volatility, very shallow liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history).

What are the key risks of holding DDOS?

Extremely thin liquidity ($53K) relative to FDV and volume, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Parabolic +1970% 24h move followed by a sharp intra-hour reversal (from $0.00192 high to $0.00062 low) — classic pump/exhaustion pattern risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of further supply issuance or account freezes

← Back to all predictions

Track DDOS