How concentrated is PEEP ownership?

As of 2026-09-25 18:15 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 16.04% of supply, out of 1,362 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling PEEP?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-25 18:15 UTC, DEX buys were $2,404,591.00 and sells $2,356,009.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is PEEP liquidity falling?

Liquidity fell 19.10%, from $27,078.64 (2026-09-25 17:00 UTC) to $21,906.80 (2026-09-25 18:00 UTC).

PEEP Price Today & AI Analysis

PEEPSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 25, 2026

$0.0₅2784

Contract

Live

jU7hpVbGfLPFzfHB1iy74hPA379iubPqVQwLGBepump

Chain

Solana

Holders

547

Market cap

$2,734

At a $1M market cap, $PEEP would be $0.001018 (366x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is PEEP a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 7

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about PEEP

3 free answers a day

PEEP: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-09-25 18:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,362

Top 10 supply share

16.04%

Reported liquidity

$21,858.00

How concentrated is PEEP ownership?: As of 2026-09-25 18:15 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 16.04% of supply, out of 1,362 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling PEEP?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-25 18:15 UTC, DEX buys were $2,404,591.00 and sells $2,356,009.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is PEEP liquidity falling?: Liquidity fell 19.10%, from $27,078.64 (2026-09-25 17:00 UTC) to $21,906.80 (2026-09-25 18:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-25 18:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-25 17:00 UTC	$27,078.64
2026-09-25 18:00 UTC	$21,906.80

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-25 18:15 UTCSell · $274.622axknGen…1kpMWaWallet DZ8u9jwE…ujZZ6H
2026-09-25 18:15 UTCSell · $224.015TuinmAg…m67ZcWWallet JD5nwsJd…ogE5Nd
2026-09-25 18:15 UTCSell · $59.584uRfYKEN…3aFA6UWallet 9yBhLTYi…xRJgKX
2026-09-25 18:15 UTCSell · $281.86qJNnjhMM…Sru9cdWallet 8a7cPEsK…JiWoAh
2026-09-25 18:15 UTCSell · $229.855ctnJL1p…Gba62kWallet DNViACgw…35uuHS
2026-09-25 18:15 UTCBuy · $405.604T386nkM…vMGzt1Wallet EvvbV4he…zpkYPx
2026-09-25 18:15 UTCSell · $261.852P1sMwzt…EcKX2pWallet Gt5XNvXC…9Cd93j
2026-09-25 18:15 UTCSell · $1.305HhqkZ1N…CxpgYdWallet CJnD8S9u…ab6n58
2026-09-25 18:15 UTCSell · $1.315TqfRkbc…1YpYH9Wallet 2wFZAnpU…4naigy
2026-09-25 18:15 UTCSell · $1.30446rwzCk…zCyfp2Wallet CMBC3q3N…8gVWdJ

Report snapshot

as of Sep 25, 06:16 PM UTC

FDV

$153,501

Liquidity

$21,858.00

Holders

1,362

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

PEEP is a newly-observed pump.fun-style meme token on Solana (PumpSwap pair) that saw an extreme +207% 24h price spike followed by a sharp intraday reversal (-34.8% in the last hour, -37.2% in the last 5 minutes). It has a fully diluted valuation of ~$153.5K but only $21.86K in total liquidity, against $2.40M in 24h buy volume and $2.36M in sell volume. Critical data gaps exist: no mint/freeze authority verification, no sniper data, and no holder history beyond a single snapshot (1,362 holder addresses, top-10 holding 16.04% of supply). This profile is characteristic of a highly speculative, volatile early-stage meme token rather than an established asset with verifiable fundamentals.

Key points

Extreme volatility: 207% 24h gain now reversing sharply (-34.8% in 1h)
Very thin liquidity ($21.86K) relative to heavy trading volume (~$4.76M combined 24h), creating high slippage risk
Multiple unresolved data gaps: mint/freeze authority unknown, sniper activity unknown, no holder history — preventing full risk characterization
Near-balanced 24h buy/sell activity (50.5%/49.5%) rather than one-sided dumping, at least in the aggregate 24h window

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · next 1-6 hours

bearish

Short-term momentum is sharply negative, with price down 34.8% over the last hour and 37.2% over the last 5 minutes following an initial spike. Combined with declining volume and a candle that closed near its low, the near-term bias leans bearish toward the immediate support zone.

Target low

$0.000100

Target high

$0.000200

Support: $0.000137, $0.0000034 (extreme low outlier)
Resistance: $0.000256, $0.000533

Medium term · next 24-72 hours

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given only two candles of history and no fundamental catalysts identified. The 24h change remains positive (+207%) purely due to the initial spike, but sustaining this depends on renewed volume and buyer interest that is not currently evident in the fading volume trend.

Catalysts

Potential renewed social/community-driven buying via Twitter/Telegram
Further liquidity changes (additions or removals) on the PumpSwap pair
Any resolution of unknown mint/freeze authority status that could materially change risk perception

Bullish factors

24h price still up 207% despite recent pullback
Near-balanced 24h buy/sell volume and buyer/seller counts suggest continued two-sided interest
Active social presence (Twitter, Telegram, website) links present

Bearish factors

Sharp negative short-term momentum (-34.8% 1h, -37.2% 5m)
Volume declining ~78% between the two available candles despite continued volatility
Extremely thin liquidity ($21.86K) relative to volume, amplifying downside risk
Multiple critical unknowns: mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset contains only two OHLC candles, no sniper data, no holder history, and unknown authority status. Predictions are based on a very limited window of extreme volatility that is not representative of a stable trend, and pump.fun-style tokens are known for unpredictable, sentiment-driven price action that can reverse the observed pattern quickly.

PEEP call history

Full track record →

Sep 25bearish@ $0.000156

24h-97.7%

7d-97.8%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: jU7hpV...pump
Total Supply: 982,062,306.26 PEEP

Key Risks

Extreme price volatility with 200%+ 24h gains already reversing sharply intraday (-34.8% 1h, -37.2% 5m)
Very shallow liquidity ($21.86K) relative to $4.76M in 24h volume creates high slippage and price fragility
Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown — cannot rule out supply inflation or account freezing risk
No sniper data available — early-buyer dumping risk cannot be assessed at all

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (17:00 UTC) opened at $0.0000034, spiked to a high of $0.000533, dropped to a low matching its open ($0.0000034), and closed at $0.000256 — an enormous range consistent with a violent pump-and-partial-dump within a single hour on volume of ~3.96M units. Candle 2 (18:00 UTC) opened at $0.000256 (prior close), pushed to a high of $0.000452, fell to a low of $0.000137, and closed at $0.000156 — again a huge intracandle range but this time closing near the low, on much lower volume (~875K units), signaling fading momentum and follow-through selling after the initial spike.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (24h) the token is up 207%, reflecting the massive initial spike from ~$0.0000034 to over $0.0005. However, short-term price action (1h: -34.8%, 5m: -37.2%) shows the token rolling over hard from its intraday high, with candle 2 closing near its low. This pattern — a sharp pump followed by an accelerating retracement — suggests the medium-term gain is being rapidly eroded by short-term selling pressure.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000137 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.0000034 (candle 1 open/low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000256 (candle 1 close / candle 2 open)

Major resistance

$0.000533 (candle 1 high, all-time high in this dataset)

With only two candles of data, key levels are approximate. The candle 2 low of $0.000137 is the nearest support; a break below could target the extreme low near $0.0000034 seen in candle 1, though that level appears to be an anomalous wick rather than a stable support. On the upside, $0.000256 (the prior candle close/open) acts as immediate resistance, with the candle 1 high of $0.000533 representing major resistance and the highest price observed in the available data.

Notable patterns

Extreme wick-to-wick volatility within single hourly candles (candle 1 range spans roughly 150x from low to high)
Pump-and-fade pattern: sharp spike in candle 1 followed by lower high and close-near-low in candle 2, suggesting distribution after the initial pump
Sharply declining volume (-78%) between candle 1 and candle 2 despite continued large price swings, indicating fading conviction

Liquidity

$21,858.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $21.86K is extremely shallow relative to the $2.40M in 24h buy volume and $2.36M in sell volume — a liquidity-to-volume ratio suggesting the pool is being churned dozens of times over within a single day. This mismatch is a major red flag: such thin liquidity against this much volume implies large slippage for any meaningfully sized trade and makes the observed price extremely fragile to even modest order flow. Buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (50.5%/49.5%), and buyer/seller counts are similarly close (2,632 buyers vs 2,272 sellers), indicating broad two-sided participation rather than one-sided dumping, but this balance is occurring on top of a very unstable, low-liquidity base. The FDV of $153.5K against only $21.86K liquidity also means the market is thin enough that a handful of large trades could swing price dramatically, as the candle data already shows.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

982,062,306.26 PEEP

FDV

$153,501

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token moved from an open of $0.0000034 to an intra-candle high of $0.000533 and back down to $0.000156 within two hourly candles — a swing of over 15,600% intracandle range and a 207% 24h gain that has already partially reversed with -34.8% in the last 1h and -37.2% in the last 5m. This is extreme, essentially uncontrolled volatility.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $21.86K versus ~$4.76M combined 24h volume, meaning the pool is thin relative to trading activity, creating high slippage potential and fragile price stability.
Concentrationunknown
Only top-10 concentration (16.04%) is available; top-100 concentration, wallet classification, and holder history are unavailable, so true concentration risk (including whether top wallets are insiders or the deployer) cannot be properly assessed.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme price volatility with 200%+ 24h gains already reversing sharply intraday (-34.8% 1h, -37.2% 5m)
Very shallow liquidity ($21.86K) relative to $4.76M in 24h volume creates high slippage and price fragility
Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown — cannot rule out supply inflation or account freezing risk
No sniper data available — early-buyer dumping risk cannot be assessed at all
No holder history — impossible to confirm organic growth vs. wash trading or bot-driven volume
Description field is informal/meme-style with no substantive utility disclosed, typical of speculative pump.fun-style tokens

Mitigating factors

Top-10 holder concentration of 16.04% is not extreme on its face, though it cannot be fully contextualized without top-100 or wallet classification data
24h buy/sell volume is roughly balanced (50.5%/49.5%) and buyer/seller counts are similarly close, suggesting two-sided market participation rather than one-sided dumping so far
Token has active trading pair on PumpSwap with social links (Twitter, Telegram, website) present, indicating some level of community presence

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly speculative traders with very high risk tolerance who can accept the possibility of near-total loss of capital. It is not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or moderate-risk exposure given the extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and multiple unknown risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, holder history).

PEEP is a pump.fun-style meme token that experienced an explosive 207% 24h price spike followed by a sharp intraday reversal (-34.8% 1h, -37.2% 5m), against a backdrop of very thin liquidity ($21.86K) and multiple critical data gaps (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history). The near-balanced 24h buy/sell volume ($2.40M vs $2.36M) suggests active two-sided trading rather than one-sided capitulation, but the fading volume and lower-high, lower-close pattern in the latest candle point to weakening momentum. This is a high-risk, short-duration speculative setup, not a fundamentals-driven investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy pressure re-accelerates and volume returns toward the levels seen in the initial pump candle, price could retest the $0.000256–$0.000533 range, especially if social momentum (Twitter/Telegram) drives renewed retail interest typical of meme coin cycles.

Renewed viral/social momentum reigniting buy volume
Balanced 24h buyer/seller counts (2,632 vs 2,272) showing base of active participants still present
Relatively low top-10 concentration (16.04%) reducing (though not eliminating) single-wallet dump risk

Base Case

Price continues to be highly volatile and range within the levels observed (~$0.000137 to ~$0.000256) as buyers and sellers remain roughly balanced, without a clear directional resolution in the very near term, pending more data.

24h buy/sell balance (50.5%/49.5%) persists in the near term
No major liquidity injection or removal occurs
No confirmation yet on authority/sniper risks materializing into an active rug or coordinated dump

Bear Case

High probability

Momentum continues to fade as seen in the declining volume (-78% between candles) and the accelerating short-term price decline (-34.8% 1h, -37.2% 5m), pulling price back toward or below the immediate support of $0.000137, with thin liquidity amplifying the downside move.

Sharp deceleration in volume alongside continued large price swings
Short-term price momentum is strongly negative (-34.8% 1h, -37.2% 5m) despite positive 24h number
Extremely thin liquidity ($21.86K) versus volume, making price highly susceptible to further sharp drops on modest sell orders
Unknown mint/freeze authority and unknown sniper activity leave open tail risks of rug-pull-style dumps

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 25, 06:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-25 18:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Token metadata (mint, supply, description, social links)
USD price and 24h % change data
OHLC hourly candlestick data (2 most recent candles)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change across timeframes)
Sniper analysis (returned no data)
Holder aggregates from Unhosted (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration only)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical trend analysis
No sniper data was provided, preventing any assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available — only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
Mint authority, freeze authority, verified contract status, and mutability were all unknown, preventing a full tokenomics/rug-risk assessment
Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classification data were not available, limiting whale/concentration analysis to only the top-10 figure
24h $ change, native price, and 6h % change were not provided

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (sniper data, holder history, authority status). Cryptocurrency, and especially early-stage meme tokens, carry very high risk including potential total loss of capital. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is PEEP a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 7, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell PEEP?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 7, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for PEEP (PEEP)?

Is PEEP a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. This token is suitable only for highly speculative traders with very high risk tolerance who can accept the possibility of near-total loss of capital. It is not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or moderate-risk exposure given the extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and multiple unknown risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, holder history).

What are the key risks of holding PEEP?

Extreme price volatility with 200%+ 24h gains already reversing sharply intraday (-34.8% 1h, -37.2% 5m) • Very shallow liquidity ($21.86K) relative to $4.76M in 24h volume creates high slippage and price fragility • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown — cannot rule out supply inflation or account freezing risk