FLESH

Fleshcoin Price Today & AI Analysis

FLESHSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 27, 2026

Price

$0.000208

+362.14% 24h

Contract

Live
FFPSq1ByV2XdPTj2UkSPRe14NoQydUkarBLeNfXd1gdj

Chain

Holders

684

Market cap

$198,499

More tokens on Solana

Fleshcoin: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-27 22:15 UTC

Holder addresses

684

Top 10 supply share

33.61%

Reported liquidity

$21,722.00
How concentrated is Fleshcoin ownership?
As of 2026-09-27 22:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 33.61% of supply. It reports 684 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Fleshcoin?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-27 22:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $281,321.00 in buys and $268,528.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Fleshcoin liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +656.87%, from $2,869.92 (2026-09-26 23:00 UTC) to $21,721.55 (2026-09-27 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-27 22:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-26 23:00 UTC$2,869.92
2026-09-27 00:00 UTC$2,838.69
2026-09-27 01:00 UTC$2,825.81
2026-09-27 03:00 UTC$2,785.25
2026-09-27 04:00 UTC$2,800.80
2026-09-27 05:00 UTC$2,772.67
2026-09-27 06:00 UTC$3,480.97
2026-09-27 07:00 UTC$3,410.88
2026-09-27 08:00 UTC$3,547.65
2026-09-27 09:00 UTC$3,538.42
2026-09-27 10:00 UTC$3,562.81
2026-09-27 11:00 UTC$3,467.06
2026-09-27 12:00 UTC$3,506.99
2026-09-27 13:00 UTC$3,418.65
2026-09-27 14:00 UTC$3,436.59
2026-09-27 15:00 UTC$3,244.72
2026-09-27 16:00 UTC$2,382.81
2026-09-27 17:00 UTC$2,833.80
2026-09-27 18:00 UTC$9,467.44
2026-09-27 19:00 UTC$10,938.88
2026-09-27 20:00 UTC$11,485.00
2026-09-27 21:00 UTC$27,773.40
2026-09-27 22:00 UTC$21,721.55

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about FLESH

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 27, 10:16 PM UTC

FDV

$198,499

Liquidity

$21,722.00

Holders

684

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Fleshcoin (FLESH) is a Solana memecoin trading on a single PumpSwap pair that has just undergone an explosive +362% 24h price pump (from ~$0.0000039 to ~$0.000208), accompanied by a volume surge into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Liquidity remains shallow at $21.72K against a $198.5K fully diluted valuation, and core safety data (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history) is unavailable, leaving significant blind spots despite the current 33.61% top-10 concentration across 684 holders.

Key points

  • Recent parabolic +362% 24h move driven by a spike in trading activity, unusual even for memecoins
  • Very thin liquidity pool ($21.72K) relative to its FDV, magnifying volatility and slippage
  • Missing authority/mint-freeze and sniper data, unlike tokens with fuller on-chain transparency
  • Memecoin branding with no disclosed utility beyond community/marketing content

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

After a parabolic run culminating in the last two hourly candles ($0.0000594→$0.000372 high→$0.000208 close), the 5m change is already -7.46%, and the last candle shows a large upper wick (high $0.000382 vs close $0.000208), suggesting rejection and profit-taking. Near-term pullback or consolidation is more likely than continuation without fresh volume.

Target low

$0.00012

Target high

$0.00028

Support

$0.000188 (candle 24 low), $0.0000567 (candle 23 low), $0.0000244 (candle 21 low)

Resistance

$0.000382 (candle 24 high), $0.000372 (candle 23 high), $0.0000813 (candle 21 high)

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the token's newness to this price regime and lack of sustained trend history beyond the last pump. Without renewed volume/buy pressure or clear catalysts, mean-reversion toward pre-pump levels (sub-$0.00001) is plausible, though continued speculative interest could sustain elevated prices.

Catalysts

  • Continued social media/community promotion (e.g., referenced '@fleshsimulator' account)
  • Potential listing on additional DEX pairs or aggregators improving liquidity
  • Broader memecoin market sentiment on Solana/PumpSwap ecosystem
  • Risk of liquidity withdrawal or large holder exits reversing gains

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($281.32K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($268.53K), and buyers (2,120) outnumber sellers (1,776)
  • Strong upward momentum and volume expansion could attract further speculative/momentum buying
  • Social media presence exists (twitter handle), which can sustain retail attention short-term

Bearish factors

  • Last two candles show large upper wicks and a sharp pullback from intra-candle highs, a classic blow-off-top signature
  • 5m price change already negative (-7.46%), hinting momentum is fading
  • Extremely shallow $21.72K liquidity means any meaningful sell pressure could cause outsized downside moves
  • No verifiable mint/freeze authority status adds tail risk of supply dilution or freezing

Confidence: low. Price prediction confidence is low due to extremely thin liquidity, a single trading pair, absence of authority/sniper verification, and the fact that the entire price history provided covers only 24 hours dominated by an anomalous pump — insufficient basis for reliable forecasting.

FLESH call history

Full track record →

Sep 27bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
FFPSq1...1gdj
Total Supply
953,117,815.945215 FLESH

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($21.72K) relative to FDV ($198.5K) creates high slippage and exit risk
  • Unverifiable mint/freeze authority status — token could theoretically be minted further or frozen, no evidence rules this out
  • No sniper or holder-history data available, removing visibility into early-buyer dumping behavior or accumulation/distribution trends
  • Massive short-term volatility (362% in 24h, single hourly candles moving >100%) indicates a pump event that could reverse sharply

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the last 24 hourly candles, FLESH was flat and low-volume (~$0.0000039-0.0000042, near-zero volume) for the first 7 hours before an explosive breakout at hour 8 (V:20,877) that sent price from $0.0000038 to a high of $0.0000185. This was followed by a choppy consolidation/uptrend through hours 9-17 (roughly $0.000008-$0.000025 range) before a second, larger breakout in hours 18-24, where price surged from $0.0000201 to an intra-candle high of $0.000382 (candle 24), before pulling back to close at $0.000208 — leaving a long upper wick indicative of rejection at highs.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both short- and medium-term trends are sharply upward over the 24h window, but the most recent candles show decelerating momentum and a pullback from intra-candle highs, suggesting the uptrend may be losing steam or entering a corrective phase.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000188 (candle 24 intraperiod low)

Major support

$0.0000244 (candle 21 low) / $0.0000079 (candle 9 low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000382 (candle 24 high, most recent rejection point)

Major resistance

$0.000372 (candle 23 high)

The token is trading well above all support levels established earlier in the 24h window, but the most recent candle's rejection from $0.000382 down to a $0.000208 close establishes immediate overhead resistance. A break and hold above $0.000382 would be needed to confirm continuation; a drop below $0.000188 would signal loss of short-term support.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off top / long upper-wick candle at hour 24 (open $0.000341, high $0.000382, close $0.000208) suggesting seller absorption at highs
  • Volume-confirmed breakout candles at hours 8, 18, 20, and 23 preceding sharp price accretion
  • Step-pattern of higher highs and higher lows across hours 8-23 consistent with a strong uptrend before the final reversal candle

Liquidity

Liquidity

$21,722.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $21.72K is very thin relative to both the 24h trading volume (~$550K combined buy+sell) and the $198.5K FDV, meaning the pool has been churning far more volume than its depth can comfortably support — a hallmark of high slippage and volatility risk. Buy volume ($281.32K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($268.53K), a mild net inflow, and unique buyers (2,120) outnumber unique sellers (1,776) over the 24h period, indicating net speculative demand during the pump. However, with liquidity this shallow on a single PumpSwap pair, both entering and exiting positions of any meaningful size carries substantial price-impact risk.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

953,117,815.945215 FLESH

FDV

$198.50K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price move of +362% with hourly candles showing swings from ~$0.0000038 to $0.00038, including single-hour ranges >100%. This is extreme, speculative volatility typical of a freshly-pumped micro-cap memecoin.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $21.72K against a $198.50K FDV, on a single PumpSwap pair. Shallow liquidity means even moderate-sized trades can move price significantly and large holders exiting could crater the pool.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top-10 holders control 33.61% of the 953.1M supply across only 684 known holder addresses. No historical or classification data is available to determine if these are insiders, LPs, or dispersed retail, but the concentration level itself is a material risk given shallow liquidity.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($21.72K) relative to FDV ($198.5K) creates high slippage and exit risk
  • Unverifiable mint/freeze authority status — token could theoretically be minted further or frozen, no evidence rules this out
  • No sniper or holder-history data available, removing visibility into early-buyer dumping behavior or accumulation/distribution trends
  • Massive short-term volatility (362% in 24h, single hourly candles moving >100%) indicates a pump event that could reverse sharply
  • Top-10 wallets hold 33.61% of supply with only 684 total holders — a thin, concentrated holder base
  • Description text references 'the deep state' and an external handle/link, typical of low-substance memecoin marketing with no verifiable utility

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy/sell volume is fairly balanced (51.2% buy vs 48.8% sell) suggesting two-sided trading rather than one-sided dumping so far
  • Buyer count (2,120) modestly exceeds seller count (1,776) in the last 24h, indicating net new demand during the pump
  • No evidence of an outright rug (e.g., liquidity pull) in the data provided, though this cannot be confirmed as a permanent guarantee

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital. Not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation or those unable to monitor positions actively given the extreme volatility and thin liquidity.

Fleshcoin is a high-volatility Solana memecoin that just experienced a dramatic short-term price pump on thin liquidity, with balanced but elevated buy/sell activity and several critical data gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history) that prevent a full risk picture. Any position should be treated as a highly speculative, short-duration trade rather than an investment, sized appropriately for potential total loss.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued speculative/social-media-driven momentum sustains or extends the current pump, potentially aided by additional exchange/DEX visibility and community activity around the '@fleshsimulator' branding.

  • Net positive buy volume and buyer count over the last 24h suggest genuine speculative demand rather than pure bot activity
  • Social media presence (Twitter handle) could amplify retail attention
  • Memecoin markets can sustain multi-day momentum runs when narrative and volume align

Base Case

Price consolidates at an elevated but lower level than the recent spike high, with continued high volatility and two-sided volume as the market digests the pump, absent new catalysts.

  • No major new liquidity injections or listings occur in the near term
  • Buy/sell volumes remain roughly balanced as observed (51.2%/48.8%) rather than skewing sharply to one side
  • No adverse authority-related event (e.g., minting, freezing) materializes, though this cannot be confirmed from available data

Bear Case

High probability

The pump reverses sharply as the blow-off-top pattern (long upper wick, decelerating momentum, negative 5m move) plays out, with shallow liquidity amplifying the downside and early buyers/insiders taking profit.

  • Last candle shows a sharp rejection from $0.000382 intraday high down to $0.000208 close
  • 5m price change already -7.46%, indicating momentum reversal has begun
  • Only $21.72K liquidity cannot absorb meaningful sell pressure without steep price impact
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and absent sniper data leave open the possibility of undisclosed insider control or supply risk

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 27, 10:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-27 22:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • PumpSwap pair price and OHLC candle data (24 hourly candles)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % changes)
  • Codex holder aggregate snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No sniper/early-buyer wallet data was available, preventing assessment of sniper concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No historical holder-count data (24h/7d/30d) was available, preventing holder growth or accumulation/distribution trend analysis
  • No wallet classification data was available, preventing identification of notable/whale holders beyond raw top-10 concentration percentage
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status were all reported as unknown, preventing rug-risk assessment from authority permissions
  • Analysis is based on only 24 hours of candle history, an unusually short and volatility-dominated window, limiting the reliability of medium-term trend conclusions
  • Token metadata (name, description, social links) is creator-supplied and untrusted; it was treated as descriptive data only and not used to inform risk scoring positively

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Solana memecoins, especially those with thin liquidity and incomplete on-chain verification data, carry a high risk of substantial or total loss. Always conduct independent due diligence and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Fleshcoin ownership?

As of 2026-09-27 22:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 33.61% of supply. It reports 684 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Fleshcoin?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-27 22:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $281,321.00 in buys and $268,528.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Fleshcoin liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +656.87%, from $2,869.92 (2026-09-26 23:00 UTC) to $21,721.55 (2026-09-27 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Fleshcoin (FLESH)?

After a parabolic run culminating in the last two hourly candles ($0.0000594→$0.000372 high→$0.000208 close), the 5m change is already -7.46%, and the last candle shows a large upper wick (high $0.000382 vs close $0.000208), suggesting rejection and profit-taking. Near-term pullback or consolidation is more likely than continuation without fresh volume. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.00012 to $0.00028.

Is FLESH a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital. Not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation or those unable to monitor positions actively given the extreme volatility and thin liquidity.

What are the key risks of holding FLESH?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($21.72K) relative to FDV ($198.5K) creates high slippage and exit risk • Unverifiable mint/freeze authority status — token could theoretically be minted further or frozen, no evidence rules this out • No sniper or holder-history data available, removing visibility into early-buyer dumping behavior or accumulation/distribution trends

← Back to all predictions

Track FLESH