ニーナ

Nina Price Today & AI Analysis

ニーナ
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Sep 16, 2026

4775QEyTS7ECpvhbeEg1a5XUjpK6CtEJwRpw6vvwpump

$0.000231

+521.31%

FDV $224,946

LiveContract:4775QEyTS7ECpvhbeEg1a5XUjpK6CtEJwRpw6vvwpumpChain:SolanaHolders:932Market cap:$224,946

More tokens on Solana

Machi

Machi

Machi Big Brother

$0.00073414.1%
MC $632.4K
GIGA

GIGA

GIGACHAD

$0.0019117.1%
MC $18.35M
NEARKAT

NEARKAT

NearKat

$0.00349821.1%
MC $3.49M
DeepSeek

DeepSeek

DeepSeek

$0.051823100.0%
MC $1.8K
METAX

METAX

Meta xStock

$676.082.0%
MC $48.93M
PAID

PAID

Paid

$0.00914622390.7%
MC $8.90M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about ニーナ

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Sep 16, 11:16 PM
FDV

$224,946

Liquidity

$21,860

Holders

0

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Nina (ニーナ) is a PumpSwap-listed micro-cap meme token themed around a viral macaque story. It has experienced an extreme 24h price surge (+521%) on the back of a spike in volume, but the move has already begun to reverse sharply (-38% in the last hour, -4% in the last 5 minutes). Liquidity is very thin at just $21.86K against a $224.95K FDV, and no holder or sniper data is available, which severely limits due-diligence depth. This profile is consistent with a highly speculative, volatile pump-and-dump-style meme coin rather than a fundamentally-driven asset.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme 24h price appreciation (+521%) followed by an immediate sharp reversal (-38% in the last 1h)
Very thin liquidity pool (~$21.86K) relative to FDV (~$224.95K), implying high slippage and fragility
Near-even buy/sell volume split (51.1% buy vs 48.9% sell) despite the huge price move, suggesting two-sided speculative churn rather than clean accumulation
No holder distribution or sniper data available, removing key transparency signals typically used to assess rug/whale risk
Meme/narrative-driven token (macaque story) with no disclosed utility, verified contract status, or authority renouncement confirmation

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1-24 hours

Price has already rolled over hard from the intraday high of ~$0.000812 (candle 21) down to ~$0.000231 currently, a drawdown of over 70% from peak. The 1h change of -38.4% and a -4.1% slide in the last 5 minutes both point to continued near-term weakness as the initial pump exhausts. Volume is also fading (candle 24 volume of ~$9.6K vs peak candle volumes of $60K-$169K), a classic sign of a cooling speculative spike.

Target low0.00013
Target high0.00030
Support: 0.000221 (candle 23/24 low zone), 0.000132 (candle 23 intraday low, deeper support)
Resistance: 0.000258 (recent local high, candle 24), 0.000387-0.000410 (prior consolidation zone, candles 19-20)

Medium term

bearish
3-7 days

Absent new catalysts (viral social momentum, exchange listings, influencer pushes), tokens exhibiting this kind of parabolic-then-crash pattern on thin liquidity typically continue to bleed toward pre-pump levels (sub-$0.00005, where price sat only ~18 hours prior). Sustained recovery would require renewed volume and buyer conviction that is not currently evident in the fading candle volumes.

Catalysts
  • Continued viral spread of the Nina/macaque narrative on social media (Twitter/Reddit)
  • Potential re-entry of buyers at perceived 'discount' levels after the crash
  • Risk of liquidity withdrawal or further sell-off if large holders exit given thin $21.86K pool

Bullish factors

—

Bearish factors

—

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset lacks holder concentration, sniper/insider positioning, and authority-renouncement confirmation — all critical inputs for gauging whether this is organic momentum or an orchestrated pump. The extreme volatility already observed (521% up, then -38% in an hour) makes short-term price paths inherently unpredictable.

ニーナ call history

Full track record →
Sep 16bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Over the last 24 hourly candles, price grinded from ~$0.0000304 to a mid-session high around ~$0.0000891 (candle 15), then exploded parabolically through candles 16-21, peaking at $0.000812 in candle 21 (2026-09-16T20:00Z) on volume of $169K — the largest volume bar of the set. Immediately after, candle 22 and especially candle 23 show a violent reversal, with candle 23 printing a huge range (open $0.000521, high $0.000524, low $0.000133) and closing near the bottom at $0.000221, indicating a sharp dump. Candle 24 shows stabilization/mild bounce, closing at $0.000231.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 51%Sell 49%

Medium-term (24h window) trend remains a steep uptrend given the token is up 521% from the start of the window, but the short-term (last 2-3 hours) trend has flipped sharply into a downtrend as the parabolic move collapsed from its $0.000812 peak.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate0.000221
Major0.000132
Resistance
Immediate0.000258
Major0.000812

Immediate support sits near $0.000221 (current price/candle 23-24 close zone), with a deeper support at $0.000132 (the candle 23 flash-crash low). Immediate resistance is the recent local high near $0.000258 (candle 24 high), while major resistance is the blow-off top at $0.000812 (candle 21 high) — a level that would require renewed strong buying to retest.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic blow-off top across candles 16-21 with expanding ranges and volume
  • Long-wick reversal/dump candle at candle 23 (open $0.000521 → low $0.000133 → close $0.000221), signaling aggressive profit-taking
  • Volume climax at the peak (candle 21) followed by declining volume into candle 24, typical of exhausted momentum
  • Small-bodied stabilization candle at the end (candle 24) after the crash, suggesting temporary equilibrium at lower levels

Liquidity$21.86K
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$382.64K
Sell$365.55K
Net flow
balanced

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers1,621
Unique sellers1,307

Total liquidity of just $21.86K is extremely shallow relative to the $224.95K FDV and the $382.64K/$365.55K in 24h buy/sell volume that has flowed through the pool — implying volume-to-liquidity turnover of roughly 17-34x in a single day. This mismatch between thin liquidity and heavy trading volume explains the extreme price volatility observed (521% pump followed by a 70%+ intraday crash). Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (51.1% vs 48.9%), and buyer/seller counts (1,621 vs 1,307) show more unique buyers than sellers, but this did not prevent a violent reversal, underscoring how thin liquidity can amplify moves in both directions. Slippage risk is high for any meaningfully-sized trade given the shallow pool.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply971,847,768.16
FDV$224,946

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Metadata fields for verified contract status, update authority, mutability, and master edition are all listed as 'unknown' in the provided data, so mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed as renounced or active. This is a meaningful gap: unrenounced mint/freeze authorities would allow the deployer to mint additional supply or freeze holder accounts at will. Total supply is ~971.85M tokens with a 6-decimal configuration, and FDV sits at ~$224.95K, which is a very small-cap valuation typical of a fresh pump.fun/PumpSwap-style launch. Given the token appears to originate from a pump.fun-style contract address suffix ('pump'), and no authority renouncement data is confirmed, rug risk from authorities should be treated as unverified/unknown rather than assumed low.

Volatility
high

24h price move of +521% followed by an intraday crash of over 70% from peak ($0.000812 to $0.000132 low) and a further -38.4% move in just the last hour demonstrates extreme volatility inconsistent with stable investment characteristics.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only $21.86K against $748K+ in combined 24h trading volume and a $224.95K FDV means the pool can be easily moved by moderate-sized trades, and exiting large positions would incur significant slippage.

Concentration
high

No holder or whale distribution data is available, which itself is a red flag; concentration risk must be assumed elevated by default for an unverified micro-cap meme token until proven otherwise.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data is available to confirm or deny early-sniper concentration, but the observed candle 23 pattern (a rapid dump from $0.000521 to $0.000132 within one hour) is consistent with concentrated early holders taking profit, even though this cannot be directly attributed to snipers without data.

Authority
medium

Mint authority, freeze authority, verified contract status, and update authority are all listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, preventing confirmation of rug-pull protections such as renounced minting/freezing rights.

Key risks

  • Extreme volatility with a parabolic pump immediately followed by a severe crash (-70%+ from intraday peak)
  • Very shallow liquidity ($21.86K) creating high slippage and fragility to large sell orders
  • Complete absence of holder distribution and sniper data, preventing assessment of whale/insider concentration
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and contract verification status, leaving rug-pull vectors unconfirmed
  • Meme-narrative-only token with no disclosed utility or roadmap beyond a viral story description

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buyer count (1,621) exceeds seller count (1,307), indicating some breadth of retail interest rather than a single dominant actor
  • Buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (51.1%/48.9%), suggesting the crash was driven by broad profit-taking rather than one-sided panic selling alone
  • Token trades on PumpSwap with an active, identifiable trading pair, providing at least a visible on-chain market
Suitable for: Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; unsuitable for conservative investors or those seeking fundamentally-grounded exposure given the absence of holder/authority transparency and extreme observed volatility.

Nina is a high-risk, narrative-driven micro-cap meme token that just experienced a parabolic pump-and-dump cycle within a single 24-hour window. Absent verified holder distribution, authority renouncement, or sniper data, any investment thesis here rests almost entirely on speculative momentum and social narrative continuation rather than fundamentals.

Bull case (low)

If the Nina/macaque narrative continues to gain viral traction on social media (Twitter, Reddit r/ninathemonkey), renewed buyer interest could push price back toward or beyond the recent high of $0.000812, especially given the broad buyer base (1,621 unique buyers in 24h) already established.

  • Continued social media virality and community growth around the Nina story
  • Fresh buyer inflows attracted by the 'ground floor' narrative after the pullback
  • Potential listing/exposure on aggregators or influencer promotion driving renewed volume

Base case

Price likely continues to consolidate at significantly lower levels than the blow-off peak, trading in a volatile range between roughly $0.00013 and $0.00030 in the near term as the market digests the pump, with high day-to-day volatility persisting given the shallow liquidity base.

  • No major new catalyst emerges in the immediate term to reignite strong buying
  • Liquidity remains thin, keeping volatility elevated in both directions
  • Trading activity gradually normalizes closer to pre-pump baseline volumes

Bear case (high)

The token continues to bleed lower as the speculative pump fully unwinds, with thin liquidity ($21.86K) making it easy for remaining holders to push price back toward pre-pump levels (sub-$0.00005), especially if unknown/unconfirmed authorities allow further dilution or if concentrated holders (unconfirmed but suspected given the violent candle 23 dump) continue to exit.

  • Fading volume already evident in the final candle (~$9.6K vs peak $169K)
  • Sharp -38.4% 1h decline signaling active momentum breakdown
  • Structural thin liquidity making the token prone to further sharp drawdowns
  • No confirmed rug-pull protections (unknown mint/freeze authority status)

GeneratedSep 16, 11:16 PM
Data freshnessPrice and candle data current as of 2026-09-16T23:00:00Z (most recent hourly candle close); trading analytics reflect trailing 24h window as of the same timestamp.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint address, supply, decimals)
  • USD price and 24h % change data
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (24 most recent hourly candles) from PumpSwap pair F7Ec4mc9RcRGYFEyHB1gFxJXeGsCo87dELpXNDKa4JZA
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)

Limitations

  • No holder distribution data was available (holder endpoints retired), so holderTrends and whaleMap sections are empty placeholders and should not be relied upon
  • No sniper wallet data was available, preventing assessment of early-buyer concentration or PnL positioning
  • Metadata fields for verified contract status, update authority, mutability, and master edition were all listed as unknown, preventing confirmation of rug-pull protections
  • 5m and 1h price changes indicate the market is moving very quickly; any analysis has a short shelf-life and may already be stale by the time it is read
  • Description and social metadata originate from the token creator and were treated as unverified, non-authoritative narrative content per analysis protocol

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency and meme tokens, especially thin-liquidity micro-caps like this one, carry extremely high risk including total loss of capital. Conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply971,847,768.16

Key Risks

•Extreme volatility with a parabolic pump immediately followed by a severe crash (-70%+ from intraday peak)
•Very shallow liquidity ($21.86K) creating high slippage and fragility to large sell orders
•Complete absence of holder distribution and sniper data, preventing assessment of whale/insider concentration
•Unknown mint/freeze authority and contract verification status, leaving rug-pull vectors unconfirmed

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper wallet data was provided for this token, so no assessment of early-sniper concentration, PnL positioning, or sell-through behavior can be made. This is a data gap, not a signal of safety.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

unknown - no sniper data available

Cannot be determined from available data; the near-even 24h buy/sell volume split (51.1%/48.9%) and high buyer/seller counts (1,621 buyers vs 1,307 sellers) suggest broad retail participation rather than a small early-buyer cohort, but this is inferred from aggregate trading data, not sniper-specific data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Nina (ニーナ)?

Price has already rolled over hard from the intraday high of ~$0.000812 (candle 21) down to ~$0.000231 currently, a drawdown of over 70% from peak. The 1h change of -38.4% and a -4.1% slide in the last 5 minutes both point to continued near-term weakness as the initial pump exhausts. Volume is also fading (candle 24 volume of ~$9.6K vs peak candle volumes of $60K-$169K), a classic sign of a cooling speculative spike. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of 0.00013 to 0.00030.

Is ニーナ a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; unsuitable for conservative investors or those seeking fundamentally-grounded exposure given the absence of holder/authority transparency and extreme observed volatility.

What does sniper activity look like for ニーナ?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding ニーナ?

Extreme volatility with a parabolic pump immediately followed by a severe crash (-70%+ from intraday peak) • Very shallow liquidity ($21.86K) creating high slippage and fragility to large sell orders • Complete absence of holder distribution and sniper data, preventing assessment of whale/insider concentration

← Back to all predictions

Track ニーナ