Nina Price Today & AI Analysis

ニーナSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 16, 2026

$0.0₄1038

-8.04% 24h

Contract

Live

4775QEyTS7ECpvhbeEg1a5XUjpK6CtEJwRpw6vvwpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

652

Market cap

$10,086

At a $1M market cap, $ニーナ would be $0.001029 (99.1x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is ニーナ a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

2.8%2 snipers, 3 insiders still holding

Creator holds

0.0%

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about ニーナ

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

MULTImultiple.cash$0.0₅2093-15.2%MC $2.0K

HANTAHantavirus$0.0₄3391-12.2%MC $33.9K

NEEGYNeegy$0.0₄2607-6.4%MC $26.1K

KMKekius Maximus$0.0₄4583+1.8%MC $45.8K

EMBERCATEmber Cat$0.0₄1865-14.5%MC $18.6K

CATBOTCat Bot$0.0₄8268+34.8%MC $82.1K

Nina: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-16 23:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$21,860.00

How concentrated is Nina ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Nina?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Nina liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-16 23:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $21,860.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-16 23:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 16, 11:16 PM UTC

FDV

$224,946

Liquidity

$21,860.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Nina (ニーナ) is a PumpSwap-listed micro-cap meme token themed around a viral macaque story. It has experienced an extreme 24h price surge (+521%) on the back of a spike in volume, but the move has already begun to reverse sharply (-38% in the last hour, -4% in the last 5 minutes). Liquidity is very thin at just $21.86K against a $224.95K FDV, and no holder or sniper data is available, which severely limits due-diligence depth. This profile is consistent with a highly speculative, volatile pump-and-dump-style meme coin rather than a fundamentally-driven asset.

Key points

Extreme 24h price appreciation (+521%) followed by an immediate sharp reversal (-38% in the last 1h)
Very thin liquidity pool (~$21.86K) relative to FDV (~$224.95K), implying high slippage and fragility
Near-even buy/sell volume split (51.1% buy vs 48.9% sell) despite the huge price move, suggesting two-sided speculative churn rather than clean accumulation
No holder distribution or sniper data available, removing key transparency signals typically used to assess rug/whale risk
Meme/narrative-driven token (macaque story) with no disclosed utility, verified contract status, or authority renouncement confirmation

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Price has already rolled over hard from the intraday high of ~$0.000812 (candle 21) down to ~$0.000231 currently, a drawdown of over 70% from peak. The 1h change of -38.4% and a -4.1% slide in the last 5 minutes both point to continued near-term weakness as the initial pump exhausts. Volume is also fading (candle 24 volume of ~$9.6K vs peak candle volumes of $60K-$169K), a classic sign of a cooling speculative spike.

Target low

0.00013

Target high

0.00030

Support: 0.000221 (candle 23/24 low zone), 0.000132 (candle 23 intraday low, deeper support)
Resistance: 0.000258 (recent local high, candle 24), 0.000387-0.000410 (prior consolidation zone, candles 19-20)

Medium term · 3-7 days

bearish

Absent new catalysts (viral social momentum, exchange listings, influencer pushes), tokens exhibiting this kind of parabolic-then-crash pattern on thin liquidity typically continue to bleed toward pre-pump levels (sub-$0.00005, where price sat only ~18 hours prior). Sustained recovery would require renewed volume and buyer conviction that is not currently evident in the fading candle volumes.

Catalysts

Continued viral spread of the Nina/macaque narrative on social media (Twitter/Reddit)
Potential re-entry of buyers at perceived 'discount' levels after the crash
Risk of liquidity withdrawal or further sell-off if large holders exit given thin $21.86K pool

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset lacks holder concentration, sniper/insider positioning, and authority-renouncement confirmation — all critical inputs for gauging whether this is organic momentum or an orchestrated pump. The extreme volatility already observed (521% up, then -38% in an hour) makes short-term price paths inherently unpredictable.

ニーナ call history

Full track record →

Sep 16bearish@ $0.000231

24h-33.9%

7d-91.4%

30d-89.9%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 4775QE...pump
Total Supply: 971,847,768.16

Key Risks

Extreme volatility with a parabolic pump immediately followed by a severe crash (-70%+ from intraday peak)
Very shallow liquidity ($21.86K) creating high slippage and fragility to large sell orders
Complete absence of holder distribution and sniper data, preventing assessment of whale/insider concentration
Unknown mint/freeze authority and contract verification status, leaving rug-pull vectors unconfirmed

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the last 24 hourly candles, price grinded from ~$0.0000304 to a mid-session high around ~$0.0000891 (candle 15), then exploded parabolically through candles 16-21, peaking at $0.000812 in candle 21 (2026-09-16T20:00Z) on volume of $169K — the largest volume bar of the set. Immediately after, candle 22 and especially candle 23 show a violent reversal, with candle 23 printing a huge range (open $0.000521, high $0.000524, low $0.000133) and closing near the bottom at $0.000221, indicating a sharp dump. Candle 24 shows stabilization/mild bounce, closing at $0.000231.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (24h window) trend remains a steep uptrend given the token is up 521% from the start of the window, but the short-term (last 2-3 hours) trend has flipped sharply into a downtrend as the parabolic move collapsed from its $0.000812 peak.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

0.000221

Major support

0.000132

Immediate resistance

0.000258

Major resistance

0.000812

Immediate support sits near $0.000221 (current price/candle 23-24 close zone), with a deeper support at $0.000132 (the candle 23 flash-crash low). Immediate resistance is the recent local high near $0.000258 (candle 24 high), while major resistance is the blow-off top at $0.000812 (candle 21 high) — a level that would require renewed strong buying to retest.

Notable patterns

Parabolic blow-off top across candles 16-21 with expanding ranges and volume
Long-wick reversal/dump candle at candle 23 (open $0.000521 → low $0.000133 → close $0.000221), signaling aggressive profit-taking
Volume climax at the peak (candle 21) followed by declining volume into candle 24, typical of exhausted momentum
Small-bodied stabilization candle at the end (candle 24) after the crash, suggesting temporary equilibrium at lower levels

Liquidity

$21,860.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $21.86K is extremely shallow relative to the $224.95K FDV and the $382.64K/$365.55K in 24h buy/sell volume that has flowed through the pool — implying volume-to-liquidity turnover of roughly 17-34x in a single day. This mismatch between thin liquidity and heavy trading volume explains the extreme price volatility observed (521% pump followed by a 70%+ intraday crash). Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (51.1% vs 48.9%), and buyer/seller counts (1,621 vs 1,307) show more unique buyers than sellers, but this did not prevent a violent reversal, underscoring how thin liquidity can amplify moves in both directions. Slippage risk is high for any meaningfully-sized trade given the shallow pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

971,847,768.16

FDV

$224,946

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price move of +521% followed by an intraday crash of over 70% from peak ($0.000812 to $0.000132 low) and a further -38.4% move in just the last hour demonstrates extreme volatility inconsistent with stable investment characteristics.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $21.86K against $748K+ in combined 24h trading volume and a $224.95K FDV means the pool can be easily moved by moderate-sized trades, and exiting large positions would incur significant slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme volatility with a parabolic pump immediately followed by a severe crash (-70%+ from intraday peak)
Very shallow liquidity ($21.86K) creating high slippage and fragility to large sell orders
Complete absence of holder distribution and sniper data, preventing assessment of whale/insider concentration
Unknown mint/freeze authority and contract verification status, leaving rug-pull vectors unconfirmed
Meme-narrative-only token with no disclosed utility or roadmap beyond a viral story description

Mitigating factors

24h buyer count (1,621) exceeds seller count (1,307), indicating some breadth of retail interest rather than a single dominant actor
Buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (51.1%/48.9%), suggesting the crash was driven by broad profit-taking rather than one-sided panic selling alone
Token trades on PumpSwap with an active, identifiable trading pair, providing at least a visible on-chain market

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; unsuitable for conservative investors or those seeking fundamentally-grounded exposure given the absence of holder/authority transparency and extreme observed volatility.

Nina is a high-risk, narrative-driven micro-cap meme token that just experienced a parabolic pump-and-dump cycle within a single 24-hour window. Absent verified holder distribution, authority renouncement, or sniper data, any investment thesis here rests almost entirely on speculative momentum and social narrative continuation rather than fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the Nina/macaque narrative continues to gain viral traction on social media (Twitter, Reddit r/ninathemonkey), renewed buyer interest could push price back toward or beyond the recent high of $0.000812, especially given the broad buyer base (1,621 unique buyers in 24h) already established.

Continued social media virality and community growth around the Nina story
Fresh buyer inflows attracted by the 'ground floor' narrative after the pullback
Potential listing/exposure on aggregators or influencer promotion driving renewed volume

Base Case

Price likely continues to consolidate at significantly lower levels than the blow-off peak, trading in a volatile range between roughly $0.00013 and $0.00030 in the near term as the market digests the pump, with high day-to-day volatility persisting given the shallow liquidity base.

No major new catalyst emerges in the immediate term to reignite strong buying
Liquidity remains thin, keeping volatility elevated in both directions
Trading activity gradually normalizes closer to pre-pump baseline volumes

Bear Case

High probability

The token continues to bleed lower as the speculative pump fully unwinds, with thin liquidity ($21.86K) making it easy for remaining holders to push price back toward pre-pump levels (sub-$0.00005), especially if unknown/unconfirmed authorities allow further dilution or if concentrated holders (unconfirmed but suspected given the violent candle 23 dump) continue to exit.

Fading volume already evident in the final candle (~$9.6K vs peak $169K)
Sharp -38.4% 1h decline signaling active momentum breakdown
Structural thin liquidity making the token prone to further sharp drawdowns
No confirmed rug-pull protections (unknown mint/freeze authority status)

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 16, 11:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-16 23:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint address, supply, decimals)
USD price and 24h % change data
Hourly OHLCV candle data (24 most recent hourly candles) from PumpSwap pair F7Ec4mc9RcRGYFEyHB1gFxJXeGsCo87dELpXNDKa4JZA
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)

Limitations

No holder distribution data was available (holder endpoints retired), so holderTrends and whaleMap sections are empty placeholders and should not be relied upon
No sniper wallet data was available, preventing assessment of early-buyer concentration or PnL positioning
Metadata fields for verified contract status, update authority, mutability, and master edition were all listed as unknown, preventing confirmation of rug-pull protections
5m and 1h price changes indicate the market is moving very quickly; any analysis has a short shelf-life and may already be stale by the time it is read
Description and social metadata originate from the token creator and were treated as unverified, non-authoritative narrative content per analysis protocol

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency and meme tokens, especially thin-liquidity micro-caps like this one, carry extremely high risk including total loss of capital. Conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Nina (ニーナ) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Nina (ニーナ)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Nina ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Nina?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Nina liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-16 23:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $21,860.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Nina (ニーナ)?

Is ニーナ a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; unsuitable for conservative investors or those seeking fundamentally-grounded exposure given the absence of holder/authority transparency and extreme observed volatility.

What are the key risks of holding ニーナ?

Extreme volatility with a parabolic pump immediately followed by a severe crash (-70%+ from intraday peak) • Very shallow liquidity ($21.86K) creating high slippage and fragility to large sell orders • Complete absence of holder distribution and sniper data, preventing assessment of whale/insider concentration