MDUDAS

Official Dudas Price Today & AI Analysis

MDUDAS
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 27, 2026

Af4F7EEccMWrkVAGAn4VYHpW1NP8VKnxCJHWRJrHpump

$0.000100

-7.39%

FDV $100,194

LiveContract:Af4F7EEccMWrkVAGAn4VYHpW1NP8VKnxCJHWRJrHpumpChain:SolanaHolders:765Market cap:$100,194

More tokens on Solana

Trump64

Trump64

Super Trump 64

$0.0529101.9%
MC $2.8K
TURTLE

TURTLE

TheMisterTurtle

$0.04205913.1%
MC $20.6K
elchef

elchef

elchef

$0.04598118.6%
MC $56.1K
EARNFI

EARNFI

EARNFI

$0.04393210.3%
MC $38.4K
Luigi

Luigi

Luigi Mangione

$0.0002261.4%
MC $226.2K
STONK

STONK

STONK

$0.228652.0%
MC $197.49M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about MDUDAS

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jul 27, 12:19 AM
FDV

$58,376

Liquidity

$24,956

Holders

681

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Official Dudas (MDUDAS) is a Solana-based collectible token launched on the pump.fun platform (mint ending in 'pump'). With a fully diluted valuation of ~$58.4K and total liquidity of ~$25K, this is an extremely micro-cap token. The token experienced a severe 75% price drop in the last 24 hours, though on-chain data shows a sudden spike in holder count (+129 on July 26) coinciding with that price action. Supply is highly concentrated, with the top 2 wallets alone holding over 61% of supply and the top 10 holding 75.6%. No social links, no verified contract, and an unrecognized update authority all add to the risk profile.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Extreme supply concentration: top 2 wallets hold 61.37% of total supply
Sudden +129 holder spike on July 26 coinciding with a 75% price crash
Very low liquidity (~$25K) creating high slippage risk for any meaningful position
No social links, no verified contract, and mutable=false with unrecognized update authority
Pump.fun origin token with 'collectible' branding but no verifiable utility

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
24–72 hours

After a 75% crash in 24h, the token is attempting to stabilize near $0.0000584. The most recent candle (hour 1) shows a bearish close from open $0.0000664 down to $0.0000584, with a significant lower wick to $0.0000489 suggesting some buy support but overall selling pressure dominates. Volume collapsed from $10,190 in the prior hour to $421 in the current hour, indicating fading interest.

Target low$0.0000489
Target high$0.0000657
Support: $0.0000489 (hourly candle low), $0.0000402 (prior candle open/low)
Resistance: $0.0000657 (prior candle high/close), $0.0000666 (current candle open)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

The token was largely stagnant for most of June and July 2026 (holders flat at ~577–589), with a sudden burst of activity on July 26. Without sustained community engagement, social presence, or utility, the medium-term outlook is bearish. The extreme concentration in the top 2 wallets poses a persistent overhang risk.

Catalysts
  • Any whale sell from top 2 wallets (61%+ supply) would be catastrophic
  • Absence of social links or community makes organic growth unlikely
  • Renewed pump.fun speculation cycle could temporarily boost price

Bullish factors

  • 53.9% buy pressure in 24h (60 buys vs 48 sells)
  • Lower wick on most recent candle suggests some demand at $0.0000489
  • Holder count spiked +129 in 24h, indicating new entrants

Bearish factors

  • 75% price crash in 24 hours
  • Top 2 wallets hold 61.37% — extreme dump risk
  • Total liquidity only ~$25K — any sell creates massive slippage
  • No social links, no verified contract, no stated utility
  • Volume collapsed 96% from prior hour ($10,190 → $421)
  • Token was stagnant for 30+ days before this event
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, price change fields all show 0% across 5m/1h/6h/24h (likely a data artifact), and the token has extremely thin liquidity. These factors severely limit technical analysis confidence.

MDUDAS call history

Full track record →
Jul 27bearish
24h-36.8%
7d+102.6%
30d+102.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (July 26 23:00 UTC): O=$0.0000402, H=$0.0000657, L=$0.0000402, C=$0.0000657 — a strong bullish candle with no upper wick, closing at the high on volume of $10,190. Candle [1] (July 27 00:00 UTC): O=$0.0000664, H=$0.0000665, L=$0.0000489, C=$0.0000584 — a bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern opening near the prior close, reaching a marginal new high, then selling off sharply with a long lower wick. Volume collapsed to $421, suggesting the pump was short-lived and sellers took control.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 54%Sell 46%

The short-term trend is bearish following the sharp rejection from the $0.0000665 high. The medium-term context (30 days of holder stagnation) suggests a sideways-to-dormant token that experienced a brief speculative spike.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000489 (current candle low)
Major$0.0000402 (prior candle open/absolute low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0000657 (prior candle close / current candle open area)
Major$0.0000666 (current candle high — recent peak)

The $0.0000489 level acted as intra-hour support with a notable lower wick bounce. A break below $0.0000402 would represent a new multi-session low with no visible support below. Resistance sits at the $0.0000657–$0.0000666 zone where sellers overwhelmed buyers.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish shooting star / inverted hammer on candle [1] — open near high, long lower wick, close below open
  • Volume climax on candle [2] followed by near-complete volume collapse on candle [1] — classic pump exhaustion pattern
  • Gap-up open on candle [1] relative to candle [2] close ($0.0000657 → $0.0000664) suggesting overnight momentum that immediately faded

Total holders681
24h Δ+15
7d Δ+15
30d Δ+16
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The sudden +129 holder spike on July 26 (18% single-day jump) coincides directly with the 75% price crash, suggesting the spike may reflect wallet fragmentation, airdrop distribution, or a coordinated event rather than organic retail accumulation. Prior to July 26, holders were essentially flat or slightly declining for 30 days (571–589 range), indicating no organic growth.

Holder count was stagnant between ~571–589 from June 27 through July 25, with minor daily fluctuations of ±1–6. On July 26, holders surged by +129 (18%) to 705, then the current reading shows 681 — a slight pullback. The 7d and 30d growth figures of ~15–16% are entirely driven by this single-day event. The acquisition breakdown (645 via swap, 34 via transfer, 2 via airdrop) suggests most holders entered through trading. The sudden spike warrants caution as it may reflect wash activity or token distribution mechanics rather than genuine community growth.

Top 10 hold75.60%
Top 100 hold99.31%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

5Uuw6GMbUrA5p5XgGEVYeFk4jTWuSMt95Xuf5gL45xK7

Individual whale / possible deployer — holds 32.34% (323.3M tokens), largest single holder, likely an early accumulator or project insider given pump.fun launch mechanics

32.34%

5Q544fKrFoe6tsEbD7S8EmxGTJYAKtTVhAW5Q5pge4j1

Individual whale / possible deployer — holds 29.03% (290.2M tokens), second largest holder; combined with #1 controls 61.37% of supply. Address pattern does not match known CEX hot wallets.

29.03%

9psjoAuz7zLdmD3GypSw8ugoJv3Y3bvxacpTJCR9rK6A

Individual whale — holds 2.18% (21.8M tokens), significantly smaller than top 2

2.18%

HDxcQ2GWNj6mPNgaKppWeg5w1C5wXv3gr1E4mKidTCou

Individual whale — holds 2.04% (20.4M tokens)

2.04%

2HCaiPHxWFb4WjdqZKbjVa7Y8TDa1pjF4XadKNmSQcXz

Individual whale — holds 1.98% (19.8M tokens)

1.98%

Supply distribution is extremely unhealthy. The top 2 wallets alone control 61.37% of the ~999.6M token supply. The top 10 hold 75.6% and the top 100 hold 99.31%, leaving less than 0.69% of supply distributed beyond the top 100 holders. This level of concentration is a severe red flag — any coordinated sell from the top 2 wallets would be catastrophic for price given the thin $25K liquidity pool. The distribution pattern (51 whales, 16 sharks, 75 dolphins per the holder metrics) with 681 total holders confirms this is a highly concentrated, illiquid micro-cap.

Liquidity$24,960
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$5,710
Sell$4,890
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers34
Unique sellers22

With only ~$25K in total liquidity on a single Raydium pool (CuQAoDaZMqKxr4uaRXpkEWcHxouiJi3iJH22jwkWpkCF), MDUDAS has extremely shallow market depth. The FDV-to-liquidity ratio of ~2.34x means the entire market cap is only backed by $25K of actual liquidity — any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe slippage. 24h volume of ~$10.6K represents ~42.5% of total liquidity, which is high turnover for such a small pool. The slight net inflow (53.9% buy pressure, 60 buys vs 48 sells, 34 buyers vs 22 sellers) is marginally positive but insufficient to signal genuine demand recovery after a 75% crash. The token trades on a single DEX with no diversified liquidity, amplifying exit risk.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,606,110.334074
FDV$58,376.04

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~999.6M tokens with an FDV of ~$58.4K at current prices. The update authority is TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM — this is neither a known burn address (111...111) nor a recognized renounced authority, so mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed as renounced. The token is marked as mutable=false, which is a positive signal indicating metadata cannot be changed. However, the unrecognized update authority and lack of verified contract mean authority risks remain medium. The token was launched via pump.fun (mint address ends in 'pump'), which typically involves a bonding curve mechanism. No vesting schedule, tokenomics documentation, or utility description beyond 'A Dudas collectible' is provided.

Volatility
high

75% price crash in 24 hours on a micro-cap token with only 2 hourly candles of data. Extreme price swings are expected given the thin liquidity and concentrated supply.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity of only ~$25K on a single Raydium pool. Any position larger than a few hundred dollars will face significant slippage. Exit liquidity is severely limited.

Concentration
high

Top 2 wallets hold 61.37% of supply; top 10 hold 75.6%; top 100 hold 99.31%. This is extreme concentration — the token is effectively controlled by 1-2 entities who could dump at any time.

SniperDump
low

No sniper data is available, so sniper-specific dump risk cannot be quantified. However, the extreme concentration in top 2 wallets represents a functionally equivalent risk to sniper concentration.

Authority
medium

Update authority is an unrecognized address (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM), not a known burn/renounced address. Mint and freeze authority status is unknown. Mutable=false is a positive signal but insufficient to fully mitigate authority risk.

Key risks

  • Top 2 wallets control 61.37% of supply — a single coordinated sell would devastate price
  • Only $25K liquidity — catastrophic slippage for any meaningful exit
  • No social links, no community, no verified utility beyond 'collectible' branding
  • Unverified contract with unknown authority status
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days before a single-day spike — suggests manufactured activity
  • 75% price crash already occurred — further downside risk remains
  • Pump.fun origin with no post-launch development signals

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false prevents metadata manipulation
  • Slight net buy pressure in 24h (53.9% buys)
  • No confirmed sniper concentration data to indicate imminent coordinated dump
  • Holder count increased, suggesting some new entrants (though quality is uncertain)
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, conservative portfolios, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap Solana token risks. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

MDUDAS is an extremely high-risk micro-cap collectible token on Solana with severe concentration risk, minimal liquidity, no social presence, and a 75% recent price crash. The investment case is almost entirely speculative, relying on a potential pump.fun revival cycle. The dominant risk is the top 2 wallets (61.37% supply) selling into any price recovery.

Bull case (low)

Viral social media attention drives speculative demand into the token, causing a short-term price spike. New holders continue accumulating, the top 2 whales hold their positions, and the token develops a community around its 'Dudas collectible' theme.

  • Viral pump.fun speculation cycle
  • Top 2 whales choosing to hold rather than sell
  • Organic community formation around collectible theme
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally

Base case

The token continues to trade at extremely low volumes with occasional speculative spikes and declines. Price drifts lower over time as initial speculators exit and no new catalysts emerge. The token remains dormant like its 30-day pre-spike history.

  • Top 2 whales do not immediately dump but gradually reduce positions
  • No new marketing or community development occurs
  • Liquidity remains thin and trading activity stays minimal
  • No broader pump.fun revival specifically targeting this token

Bear case (high)

Top 2 wallets (61.37% supply) sell into the thin $25K liquidity pool, causing a near-total price collapse. The token returns to near-zero with no recovery catalyst.

  • Whale dump from top 2 concentrated wallets
  • No liquidity to absorb selling pressure
  • No community, social presence, or utility to sustain demand
  • Continued post-pump price decay following the 75% crash

GeneratedJul 27, 12:19 AM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately July 27, 2026 00:00 UTC. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were provided, limiting technical analysis depth.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Solana)
  • Raydium DEX trading analytics
  • OHLC price data (hourly)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Historical holder time series (30 days)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Price change fields (5m, 1h, 6h, 24h) all show 0% which appears to be a data artifact, not actual price stasis
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and smart money signals cannot be fully assessed
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status cannot be definitively confirmed from available metadata
  • Holder wallet classifications (CEX, treasury, team, etc.) cannot be verified without additional on-chain investigation
  • No social links or project documentation available to assess team credibility or roadmap
  • Single liquidity pool on Raydium — no cross-DEX data available

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Investing in micro-cap Solana tokens carries extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,606,110.334074

Key Risks

•Top 2 wallets control 61.37% of supply — a single coordinated sell would devastate price
•Only $25K liquidity — catastrophic slippage for any meaningful exit
•No social links, no community, no verified utility beyond 'collectible' branding
•Unverified contract with unknown authority status

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for MDUDAS. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. The token's pump.fun origin and extreme concentration in the top 2 wallets (61.37%) suggest early insiders or the deployer may hold dominant positions, but this cannot be confirmed from available data.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no records for this token.

Unknown — no sniper records available. The top 2 wallets (32.34% and 29.03%) are likely early acquirers given the token's pump.fun launch mechanics, but their cost basis and PnL state are not determinable from the provided data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Official Dudas (MDUDAS)?

After a 75% crash in 24h, the token is attempting to stabilize near $0.0000584. The most recent candle (hour 1) shows a bearish close from open $0.0000664 down to $0.0000584, with a significant lower wick to $0.0000489 suggesting some buy support but overall selling pressure dominates. Volume collapsed from $10,190 in the prior hour to $421 in the current hour, indicating fading interest. Short-term outlook is bearish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.0000489 to $0.0000657.

Is MDUDAS a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, conservative portfolios, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap Solana token risks. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

How are MDUDAS holders trending?

Official Dudas currently has 681 holders and is growing (24h: 15, 7d: 15, 30d: 16). Holder count was stagnant between ~571–589 from June 27 through July 25, with minor daily fluctuations of ±1–6. On July 26, holders surged by +129 (18%) to 705, then the current reading shows 681 — a slight pullback. The 7d and 30d growth figures of ~15–16% are entirely driven by this single-day event. The acquisition breakdown (645 via swap, 34 via transfer, 2 via airdrop) suggests most holders entered through trading. The sudden spike warrants caution as it may reflect wash activity or token distribution mechanics rather than genuine community growth.

What does sniper activity look like for MDUDAS?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding MDUDAS?

Top 2 wallets control 61.37% of supply — a single coordinated sell would devastate price • Only $25K liquidity — catastrophic slippage for any meaningful exit • No social links, no community, no verified utility beyond 'collectible' branding

← Back to all predictions

Track MDUDAS