P

Pons Price Today & AI Analysis

PONSSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 23, 2026

Price

$0.6741

+6.16% 24h · FDV $1,203,053

Contract

Live
poNSfquKq512ApeYjVghwViSun4x1MhCqHVH2Paq4jN

Chain

Solana

Holders

5,496

Market cap

$1,203,053

More tokens on Solana

QQQxQQQxNasdaq xStock$745.15+2.6%MC $62.86M$CRPAW$CRPAWCrumb Paw$0.001796+3557.7%MC $1.70M⠁⠏⠑⠁⠏⠑⠃⠇⠊⠝⠙ ⠁⠏⠑$0.000314+468.1%MC $307.1Kfonefoneapeonfone$0.004924-4.6%MC $4.88MTokensTokensTokens$0.000428+152.3%MC $386.6KANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.009311-88.3%MC $82.61M

Pons: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-23 08:45 UTC

Holder addresses

5,496

Top 10 supply share

47.28%

Reported liquidity

$30,387.00
How concentrated is Pons ownership?
As of 2026-09-23 08:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 47.28% of supply. It reports 5,496 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Pons?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 08:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $433,122.00 in buys and $498,769.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Pons liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -17.09%, from $135,692.66 (2026-09-22 09:00 UTC) to $112,502.33 (2026-09-23 08:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-23 08:45 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-22 09:00 UTC$135,692.66
2026-09-22 10:00 UTC$136,151.21
2026-09-22 11:00 UTC$133,333.22
2026-09-22 12:00 UTC$136,713.94
2026-09-22 13:00 UTC$140,989.41
2026-09-22 14:00 UTC$107,553.79
2026-09-22 15:00 UTC$105,611.08
2026-09-22 16:00 UTC$100,508.00
2026-09-22 17:00 UTC$95,887.42
2026-09-22 18:00 UTC$95,387.82
2026-09-22 19:00 UTC$171,949.60
2026-09-22 20:00 UTC$198,874.00
2026-09-22 21:00 UTC$216,389.14
2026-09-22 22:00 UTC$97,762.95
2026-09-22 23:00 UTC$91,948.40
2026-09-23 00:00 UTC$92,172.36
2026-09-23 01:00 UTC$107,837.28
2026-09-23 02:00 UTC$97,431.39
2026-09-23 03:00 UTC$102,123.23
2026-09-23 04:00 UTC$104,454.25
2026-09-23 05:00 UTC$102,302.58
2026-09-23 06:00 UTC$112,087.47
2026-09-23 07:00 UTC$112,823.73
2026-09-23 08:00 UTC$112,502.33

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about PONS

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 23, 08:46 AM UTC

FDV

$1,203,053

Liquidity

$30,387.00

Holders

5,496

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

PONS is a small-cap token trading on Solana via a single Meteora liquidity pool, with a current price of $0.674, FDV of $1.20M, and total liquidity of only $30.39K. Over the past 24 hours the token rallied as much as ~22% intraday before pulling back, with net sell volume ($498.77K) slightly outweighing buy volume ($433.12K). Top-10 holders control 47.28% of supply, and critical data points — including mint/freeze authority status, sniper wallet activity, and holder growth history — are unavailable, leaving significant blind spots in this analysis.

Key points

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($30.39K) relative to its $1.20M FDV and heavy daily trading volume, creating high slippage risk
  • High holder concentration (top 10 = 47.28% of supply) with no available breakdown of holder identity or intent
  • Multiple critical unknowns: mint authority, freeze authority, sniper activity, and holder history are all unavailable, undermining confidence in the overall risk picture
  • An anomalous single-hour volume spike ($1.82M vs a typical $5K-$45K range) that stands out as a potential data anomaly or large isolated transaction

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Price is consolidating between immediate support near $0.670 and resistance in the $0.716-$0.725 zone after pulling back from the 24h high of $0.7358. Net sell pressure (53.5%) over the past 24h and a pattern of lower highs since the peak suggest near-term momentum has softened, but the broader 24h trend remains positive (+6.16%).

Target low

$0.604

Target high

$0.7358

Support

$0.670, $0.604

Resistance

$0.716-$0.725, $0.7358

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

With no fundamental catalysts, verified authority status, or holder-history trend data available, medium-term direction is highly uncertain. The token's fate will likely be driven by whether the shallow liquidity pool ($30.39K) can sustain continued trading interest, and whether the current holder concentration (47.28% in top 10) results in distribution or continued holding.

Catalysts

  • Potential liquidity additions or withdrawals from the Meteora pool
  • Resolution/disclosure of mint and freeze authority status
  • Any large holder movements given the 47.28% top-10 concentration
  • General Solana meme/small-cap market sentiment shifts

Bullish factors

  • Positive 24h price change of +6.16%
  • Balanced buyer/seller counts (2,208 vs 2,122) suggesting healthy two-sided market participation
  • Active trading with over 11,000 combined buy/sell transactions in 24h

Bearish factors

  • Net sell volume exceeding buy volume in the last 24h ($498.77K vs $433.12K)
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($30.39K) relative to volume and FDV, raising slippage and manipulation risk
  • High top-10 holder concentration (47.28%) creating dump risk
  • Lower highs forming since the intraday peak, suggesting fading short-term momentum
  • Unresolved unknowns around mint/freeze authority

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because several critical data points are missing or unknown: mint/freeze authority status, sniper wallet activity, holder history/growth trends, and wallet classifications. The anomalous volume spike in candle 17 also raises questions about data quality/reliability. Predictions are based solely on 24 hourly candles and current-snapshot trading analytics, which is a limited window for medium-term forecasting.

PONS call history

Full track record →

Sep 23neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
poNSfq...q4jN
Total Supply
1,784,727.58 PONS

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($30.39K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • High holder concentration with top 10 wallets holding 47.28% of supply
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out the ability to mint new supply or freeze accounts
  • Anomalous volume spike (candle 17, $1.82M) that is inconsistent with surrounding activity and warrants scrutiny

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the most recent 24 hourly candles (2026-09-22 09:00 to 2026-09-23 08:00 UTC), price rose from an open near $0.639 to a peak intraday high of $0.7358 (candle 18) before pulling back to close near $0.673. The move from candle 8 through candle 13 (~$0.623 to $0.725) marks the strongest upward leg, accompanied by a volume spike in candle 11 ($94.2K) and an anomalous volume surge in candle 17 ($1.82M, far above the typical $5K-$45K range seen elsewhere) that coincided with a local high before reversing. Following the peak at candle 18 ($0.735), price has trended down over candles 19-24, printing lower highs and settling around $0.670-$0.673, suggesting the rally has stalled and is consolidating just below the recent peak.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (24h) trend is up roughly 6.16%, driven by a strong rally between hours 9-18. However, short-term price action over the last ~6 candles shows lower highs and a pullback from the $0.7358 peak to ~$0.673, indicating short-term momentum has turned negative/consolidating after the spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

47%

Sell

54%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.670 (recent consolidation low, candles 23-24)

Major support

$0.604 (24h candle low, candle 6)

Immediate resistance

$0.716-$0.725 (candles 14-15 resistance zone)

Major resistance

$0.7358 (24h high, candle 18)

Price is currently trading between immediate support near $0.670 and resistance around $0.716-$0.725. A break above $0.725 would target the major resistance/24h high of $0.7358. A break below $0.670 support could see a retest of the $0.604-$0.625 zone established earlier in the session.

Notable patterns

  • Sharp uptrend/rally from candle 8 to candle 13 with expanding range candles
  • Anomalous volume spike at candle 17 (~$1.82M) far exceeding surrounding volume — possible large trade or data artifact
  • Lower highs forming from candle 18 ($0.7358) through candle 24 ($0.673), suggesting short-term bearish divergence after the peak
  • Small-bodied consolidation candles (16, 20, 21, 24) near recent highs/lows indicating indecision

Liquidity

Liquidity

$30,387.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $30.39K is extremely thin relative to a 24h trading volume exceeding $930K combined (buy+sell) and an FDV of $1.20M. This mismatch (liquidity turning over roughly 30x in a day) indicates high slippage risk for any meaningfully-sized trade and suggests the pool could be easily destabilized by a single large order. 24h sell volume ($498.77K) modestly exceeds buy volume ($433.12K), producing a net outflow bias (53.5% sell pressure vs 46.5% buy pressure), though buyer (2,208) and seller (2,122) counts are fairly balanced, suggesting broad-based retail activity rather than one-sided whale dumping. The single Meteora pair (FYa8NPEDajia6oEvpAVQSKMuZVzeoFAN7mMNDSNr5Urk) appears to be the primary liquidity venue; concentration in one shallow pool is itself a risk.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,784,727.58 PONS

FDV

$1.20M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price swung from a 24h low of $0.604 to a high of $0.7358 (a ~22% range) within 24 hours, and has already pulled back ~8.5% from that peak, demonstrating significant short-term volatility.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $30.39K against ~$930K of combined daily trading volume and a $1.20M FDV. This thin liquidity means large trades can cause significant slippage and the pool is vulnerable to rapid price dislocation.

  • Concentrationhigh

    Top 10 holders control 47.28% of total supply. No top-100 or wallet classification data is available to assess whether these are exchange/LP wallets versus individual whales, but the raw concentration figure itself represents meaningful centralization risk.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($30.39K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • High holder concentration with top 10 wallets holding 47.28% of supply
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out the ability to mint new supply or freeze accounts
  • Anomalous volume spike (candle 17, $1.82M) that is inconsistent with surrounding activity and warrants scrutiny
  • Net sell pressure (53.5% vs 46.5% buy) over the past 24h despite the overall price gain
  • No sniper, holder-history, or wallet classification data available, limiting the ability to detect coordinated dumping or insider activity

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buyer (2,208) and seller (2,122) counts are roughly balanced, suggesting broad participation rather than a single dominant seller
  • Token has posted a positive 24h price change (+6.16%) despite net outflow in volume terms
  • Trading activity (buys/sells counts in the thousands) indicates an actively traded market rather than a dead/illiquid token

Suitable for

This token profile is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can accept the possibility of total loss. The combination of shallow liquidity, high holder concentration, unknown authority status, and lack of sniper/holder history data means conservative or risk-averse investors should avoid this token. Any position sizing should assume high slippage on entry and exit.

PONS is a small-cap, thinly-liquid Solana token that has seen a strong intraday rally (+6.16% over 24h, peaking near +15% from the session low) but is now consolidating below its peak with net sell pressure. The combination of shallow liquidity ($30.39K), high top-10 concentration (47.28%), and multiple unresolved data gaps (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history) make this a high-risk, speculative-only setup. Any thesis here should be treated as short-term/tactical rather than a long-term conviction position given the lack of fundamental transparency.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Medium probability

If buy pressure re-accelerates and price reclaims the $0.716-$0.725 resistance zone with rising volume, PONS could retest and break above the 24h high of $0.7358, potentially extending the rally on momentum-driven retail interest.

  • Sustained or renewed buy-side volume above the current 46.5% buy pressure ratio
  • Break and hold above $0.716-$0.725 resistance
  • Continued broad-based buyer participation (currently 2,208 unique buyers in 24h)

Base Case

PONS likely continues to consolidate in a range roughly between $0.670 support and $0.725 resistance in the near term, with volatility remaining elevated due to thin liquidity. Absent new catalysts or resolution of key data unknowns, the token trades on momentum and speculative retail flow rather than fundamentals.

  • No major liquidity injection or withdrawal occurs in the near term
  • No resolution of authority/mint-freeze unknowns is publicly disclosed
  • Trading volume and participation remain similar to the most recent 24h pattern

Bear Case

Medium probability

Given the net sell pressure (53.5% sell vs 46.5% buy) over the past 24h and the formation of lower highs since the $0.7358 peak, PONS could break below the $0.670 immediate support and retest the $0.604-$0.625 zone, especially if the shallow liquidity pool is stressed by a large sell order.

  • Persistent net outflow (sell volume $498.77K > buy volume $433.12K)
  • High concentration among top 10 holders (47.28%) creating dump risk
  • Extremely thin liquidity ($30.39K) amplifying downside moves
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezing

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 23, 08:46 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-23 08:45 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata snapshot
  • 24-hour hourly OHLC candle data (Meteora pair)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % changes)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count and top-10 concentration only)

Limitations

  • No sniper wallet data was available — smart money/sniper signals could not be computed and were set to unknown/0 per methodology
  • No historical holder count data exists — 24h/7d/30d holder growth figures are placeholders (0) and do not represent actual measured growth or decline
  • No wallet classification data exists — whale/notable holder identification and distribution sentiment could not be substantiated beyond the raw top-10 concentration percentage
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status were not provided or confirmed — all authority-related fields are marked unknown rather than assumed safe
  • Only 24 hourly candles were available, limiting technical analysis to a single-day window and preventing assessment of longer-term chart structure
  • A volume anomaly in one candle ($1.82M vs typical range) could not be independently verified or explained and may indicate a data quality issue

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited on-chain and market data provided at a single point in time and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or an endorsement of this token. Cryptocurrency markets, especially low-liquidity tokens, carry substantial risk of loss, including total loss of capital. Several critical data points (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history) were unavailable and are explicitly marked as unknown rather than assumed favorable. Always conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Pons ownership?

As of 2026-09-23 08:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 47.28% of supply. It reports 5,496 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Pons?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 08:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $433,122.00 in buys and $498,769.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Pons liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -17.09%, from $135,692.66 (2026-09-22 09:00 UTC) to $112,502.33 (2026-09-23 08:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Pons (PONS)?

Price is consolidating between immediate support near $0.670 and resistance in the $0.716-$0.725 zone after pulling back from the 24h high of $0.7358. Net sell pressure (53.5%) over the past 24h and a pattern of lower highs since the peak suggest near-term momentum has softened, but the broader 24h trend remains positive (+6.16%). Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.604 to $0.7358.

Is PONS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 82/100. This token profile is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can accept the possibility of total loss. The combination of shallow liquidity, high holder concentration, unknown authority status, and lack of sniper/holder history data means conservative or risk-averse investors should avoid this token. Any position sizing should assume high slippage on entry and exit.

What are the key risks of holding PONS?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($30.39K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • High holder concentration with top 10 wallets holding 47.28% of supply • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out the ability to mint new supply or freeze accounts

← Back to all predictions

Track PONS