swarms

swarms Price Today & AI Analysis

swarmsSolanaAnalysis as of Apr 29, 2026

Price

$0.006133

-1.04% 24h

Contract

Live
74SBV4zDXxTRgv1pEMoECskKBkZHc2yGPnc7GYVepump

Chain

Solana

Holders

28,767

Market cap

$6,132,950

At a $50M market cap, $SWARMS would be $0.0500 (8.15x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is swarms a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 27

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about swarms

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Solana

BREAKBREAKGrail Break$0.000656+6.3%MC $623.5KMETAMETAMetaDAO$4.86+2.0%MC $110.23MRYBKARYBKARYBKA$0.056397+61.7%MC $6.4KCOCKROACHCOCKROACHcockroach$0.000311-26.4%MC $305.7KPHPPHPPHP-UP-2026$0.043788-46.7%MC $37.0KMPLXMPLXMetaplex$0.0670+36.4%MC $31.56M

swarms: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-04-29 21:49 UTC

Holder addresses

28,637

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$2,147,469.72
How concentrated is swarms ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 28,637 addresses (2026-04-29 21:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling swarms?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is swarms liquidity falling?
As of 2026-04-29 21:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $2,147,469.72. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-04-29 21:49 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Apr 29, 09:49 PM UTC

FDV

$24,650,020

Liquidity

$2,147,469.72

Holders

28,637

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High
Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Neutral

Swarms (swarms) is a Solana-based token (mint: 74SBV4zDXxTRgv1pEMoECskKBkZHc2yGPnc7GYVepump) with a total supply of ~999.97M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$24.65M. The project describes itself as powering an Enterprise Multi-Agent AI framework. Trading at $0.02465 with a 24h gain of ~8.5%, the token shows moderate liquidity ($2.15M) on Raydium but carries significant concentration risk — the top 2 holders alone control over 50% of supply. No snipers were detected in the first 1,000 blocks, which is a positive signal. Holder count has been in a slow, steady decline over the past 30 days.

Key points

  • No sniper activity detected in first 1,000 blocks — clean launch
  • Verified contract with mutable=false metadata, reducing rug risk from metadata manipulation
  • Established social presence (Reddit, Twitter, Website, GitHub, Moralis)
  • Moderate $2.15M liquidity on Raydium providing reasonable depth for its market cap
  • AI/agent narrative alignment with current market themes

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24–72 hours

neutral

Price has recovered strongly from the intraday low of ~$0.01808 to the current $0.02465, a ~36% intraday swing. The most recent candle closed at the session high ($0.02465), suggesting short-term bullish momentum. However, the 6h change is -3.82% and the 5m change is -1.10%, indicating the rally may be stalling near resistance. Expect consolidation between $0.0228 and $0.0258 in the near term.

Target low

$0.0215

Target high

$0.0260

Support

$0.0228 (candle 2 close / recent pivot), $0.0213 (candle 14 low area), $0.0199 (candle 15 low / intraday support)

Resistance

$0.0258 (candle 6 high), $0.0259 (candle 8 high), $0.0250 (candle 4 high / round number)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

neutral

The 30-day holder trend is declining (-330 over 7d, -68 over 30d), suggesting organic demand is not growing. Price recovery depends on broader AI/crypto narrative tailwinds and whether the project delivers on its roadmap. Without a catalyst, the token may drift sideways to slightly lower.

Catalysts

  • Broader AI token sector rally
  • Project milestone announcements or product launches
  • Exchange listing or partnership news
  • Recovery in overall Solana ecosystem sentiment

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h price recovery (+8.5–9.6%)
  • Buy pressure slightly dominant at 53.1% of 24h volume
  • No sniper activity — clean launch dynamics
  • AI narrative tailwind
  • Verified contract, mutable=false

Bearish factors

  • Top 2 holders control 50.51% of supply — extreme concentration risk
  • Top 10 holders control 70.91% — very concentrated distribution
  • Holder count declining over 7d (-330) and 30d (-68)
  • 6h price change negative (-3.82%) suggesting short-term momentum fading
  • Update authority not renounced (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM)

Confidence: low. Only 24 hours of OHLC data are available, limiting trend analysis. Holder data shows a declining trend which is bearish medium-term. High supply concentration in top 2 wallets (50.51%) creates significant price manipulation risk. No sniper data complicates smart money analysis.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
74SBV4...pump
Total Supply
999,971,749.82

Key Risks

  • Top 2 holders control 50.51% of supply — single largest risk factor
  • Holder count declining for 30 consecutive days (net -330 over 7d)
  • Price-holder divergence: price rising while holders decline suggests distribution
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

24 hourly candles reviewed (2026-04-28T22:00Z to 2026-04-29T21:00Z). Price trended from ~$0.0222 down to an intraday low of ~$0.01808 (candle 17, 05:00Z) before staging a strong recovery to the session high of $0.02465 (candle 1, 21:00Z). The recovery from low to high represents approximately a 36% intraday move. Volume was heaviest during the sell-off and early recovery phase (candles 8 and 14 showing 342K and 138K USD respectively), then tapered as price consolidated near highs. The most recent candle (21:00Z) closed at its high ($0.02465), a bullish signal, but on relatively low volume (15.8K USD), suggesting weakening momentum.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is upward from the intraday low, with a series of higher lows and higher highs from candle 17 onward. Medium-term trend is sideways, as the 24h open (~$0.0226) and current price ($0.02465) are not dramatically different, and the 30-day holder decline suggests no sustained accumulation trend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

53%

Sell

47%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0237 (candle 3 low / recent consolidation zone)

Major support

$0.0181 (candle 17 intraday low — 24h floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.0250 (candle 4 high / psychological round number)

Major resistance

$0.0258 (candle 6 high — session peak)

The $0.0181 level represents the 24h floor and is the key support to watch. Immediate resistance sits at $0.0250 (tested multiple times intraday). A break above $0.0258 would signal a new leg higher; a break below $0.0237 would suggest the rally is exhausted.

Notable patterns

  • Close-at-high on most recent candle (candle 1) — short-term bullish
  • V-shaped recovery from $0.01808 low (candle 17) to $0.02465 high — strong buying interest at lows
  • Declining volume on price recovery — potential exhaustion signal
  • High-volume sell candle at 08:00Z (342K USD) followed by recovery — capitulation-style bottom
  • Series of higher lows from candle 17 to candle 1 — short-term uptrend structure intact

Liquidity

Liquidity

$2,147,469.72

Depth

Moderate

Slippage risk

Medium

Total liquidity of $2.15M on the Raydium pair (HL4KFTfhZZMm7NGefszQxzJ3M6CaDWE7TesyuRuQYmMJ) is moderate relative to the $24.65M FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 8.7%, which is reasonable but not deep. 24h buy volume of $1.10M slightly exceeds sell volume of $972.7K, confirming a net inflow and supporting the +8.5% price gain. However, unique buyers (219) are fewer than unique sellers (228), suggesting a smaller number of buyers are driving larger average buy sizes while more individual sellers are exiting. Total 24h transactions: 12,403 (6,104 buys + 6,299 sells), indicating active trading. Slippage risk is medium — large orders (>$10K) would likely experience meaningful slippage given the liquidity depth relative to trade sizes. The 305 unique wallets active in 24h is a relatively thin participant base for a $24M FDV token.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,971,749.82

FDV

$24,650,020.40

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    The token experienced a ~36% intraday price swing (from $0.01808 low to $0.02465 high) within a single 24-hour period. This extreme volatility is consistent with a low-liquidity, high-concentration token susceptible to large price moves on relatively modest volume.

  • Liquiditymedium

    $2.15M total liquidity provides moderate depth, but the liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~8.7% means large holders exiting would face significant slippage. Medium-sized trades ($10K+) may move the market meaningfully.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Top 2 holders control 50.51% of supply — single largest risk factor
  • Holder count declining for 30 consecutive days (net -330 over 7d)
  • Price-holder divergence: price rising while holders decline suggests distribution
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status
  • Thin unique buyer base (219 buyers in 24h) for a $24M FDV token
  • Extreme intraday volatility (36% swing in 24h)

Mitigating factors

  • Zero sniper activity — clean, organic launch
  • Verified contract with mutable=false metadata
  • Moderate $2.15M liquidity providing some price stability
  • Active social presence (Reddit, Twitter, GitHub, Website)
  • Net buy inflow in 24h ($1.10M buys vs $972.7K sells)
  • AI/agent narrative provides thematic tailwind

Suitable for

Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, experienced crypto traders who understand the risks of highly concentrated Solana tokens. Not suitable for conservative investors or those unable to withstand potential 50%+ drawdowns. Position sizing should be small relative to portfolio. This is NOT financial advice.

Swarms presents a speculative opportunity in the AI agent narrative space on Solana, with a clean launch (no snipers), verified contract, and moderate liquidity. However, the extreme supply concentration (top 2 holders = 50.51%) and persistent holder decline over 30 days are significant structural concerns that cap the upside risk-reward profile. The token is best characterized as a high-risk, narrative-driven speculative play.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

AI agent narrative accelerates broadly; project delivers product milestones; top holders maintain positions; new exchange listings drive fresh demand. Price could re-test $0.035–$0.050 range (40–100% upside from current levels).

  • Broader AI/crypto sector rally driving narrative tokens higher
  • Project delivers working Enterprise Multi-Agent Framework with real users
  • Top 2 holders (50.51% of supply) remain long-term holders and do not sell
  • New CEX or DEX listings expanding liquidity and buyer access
  • Holder count reversal — new accumulation phase begins

Base Case

Token consolidates in the $0.018–$0.028 range over the next 30 days, with slow holder attrition continuing and price driven primarily by broader market sentiment rather than project-specific catalysts.

  • Top holders maintain current positions without significant selling
  • Liquidity remains stable at ~$2M on Raydium
  • No major project announcements or exchange listings in the near term
  • Broader crypto market remains range-bound
  • Holder decline continues at current pace (-10 to -30/day)

Bear Case

Medium probability

One or both top holders begin distributing their combined 50.51% stake; holder decline accelerates; AI narrative fades. Price could fall to $0.010–$0.015 (40–60% downside from current levels).

  • Top 2 holders liquidating even a fraction of their 50.51% combined stake
  • Continued holder attrition accelerating beyond current -330/7d pace
  • Broader crypto market downturn reducing risk appetite
  • Project fails to deliver on AI framework promises
  • Competing AI tokens capturing market share and narrative attention

Analysis details

Generated

Apr 29, 09:49 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-04-29 21:49 UTC

Model confidence

Medium

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, update authority, mutable flag)
  • Real-time price feed (USD and WSOL pair)
  • 24-hour OHLC hourly candles (24 candles)
  • Trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data
  • Top 20 holder addresses and balances
  • 30-day daily historical holder count series
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Raydium DEX pair data

Limitations

  • Only 24 hours of OHLC data available — insufficient for robust technical analysis or trend identification
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — classified as unknown
  • Top holder wallet classifications are inferred, not confirmed via on-chain labeling
  • No sniper data available (0 snipers) — smart money signals section has limited analytical depth
  • Holder acquisition breakdown (swap/transfer/airdrop) does not include timestamps, limiting trend analysis
  • FDV assumes full circulating supply; actual circulating supply may differ if team/treasury tokens are locked
  • No order book data available — liquidity depth analysis is approximate

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk of loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. The analyst has no position in this token.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swarms a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell swarms?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is swarms ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 28,637 addresses (2026-04-29 21:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling swarms?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is swarms liquidity falling?

As of 2026-04-29 21:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $2,147,469.72. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for swarms (swarms)?

Price has recovered strongly from the intraday low of ~$0.01808 to the current $0.02465, a ~36% intraday swing. The most recent candle closed at the session high ($0.02465), suggesting short-term bullish momentum. However, the 6h change is -3.82% and the 5m change is -1.10%, indicating the rally may be stalling near resistance. Expect consolidation between $0.0228 and $0.0258 in the near term. Short-term outlook is neutral (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.0215 to $0.0260.

Is swarms a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 7.8/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, experienced crypto traders who understand the risks of highly concentrated Solana tokens. Not suitable for conservative investors or those unable to withstand potential 50%+ drawdowns. Position sizing should be small relative to portfolio. This is NOT financial advice.

What are the key risks of holding swarms?

Top 2 holders control 50.51% of supply — single largest risk factor • Holder count declining for 30 consecutive days (net -330 over 7d) • Price-holder divergence: price rising while holders decline suggests distribution

New reports on Solana

All new tokens →

LAUNCHLAUNCHLAUNCHNeutralUSDPUSDPUSDPNeutralINTCXINTCXIntel xStockNeutralSLEGOSLEGOSLEEGOBearishPODCATPODCATPODCATBearishMOGZMOGZMogz.funNeutralJOBJOBDogWifJobNeutralFLOATERFLOATERFLOATERNeutral

← Back to all predictions

Questions about swarms?