Blender Exchange Price Today & AI Analysis

BLENDSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 17, 2026

$0.0₅2514

-2.11% 24h

Contract

Live

hb7QGttC8sXSQVAymn7aRdtbN3kdDwbQyihtHiipump

Chain

Solana

Holders

258

Market cap

$2,468

At a $1M market cap, $BLEND would be $0.001019 (405x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is BLEND a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 1

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Creator holds

0.01%

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about BLEND

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

FOMOFomo Family$0.0₅1749-3.2%MC $1.7K

BLUFBluf$0.0₅4039-1.5%MC $3.9K

America250America250$0.0₄1018-0.5%MC $10.2K

minigangmini gang$0.0₅2495-1.5%MC $2.4K

EQMEquium$0.000131-6.2%MC $2.7K

KIMKim Jong Un Coin$0.000154+136.4%MC $151.3K

Blender Exchange: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-17 12:46 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$9,750.00

How concentrated is Blender Exchange ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Blender Exchange?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Blender Exchange liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-17 12:46 UTC, reported liquidity was $9,750.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-17 12:46 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 17, 12:46 PM UTC

FDV

$47,480

Liquidity

$9,750.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Blender Exchange (BLEND) is a micro-cap PumpSwap-listed token (FDV ~$47.5K, total liquidity ~$9.75K) that experienced an extreme parabolic spike and violent reversal within a single 24h window. Price rocketed from ~$0.0000242 to a high of $0.000403 (a ~16x move) in the 05:00 UTC candle on massive volume (~$632K), then collapsed roughly 88% from that peak to the current $0.0000483, still up 15.5% on a 24h basis due to the earlier low base. This pattern is highly consistent with a low-liquidity pump-and-dump or a bot/whale-driven wick, and the token now trades in a fragile, thinly-liquid environment.

Key points

Single-hour 16x price spike followed by an 88%+ drawdown from the peak within hours — classic pump/dump wick pattern
Extremely thin liquidity (~$9.75K) relative to the volume spike (~$632K in one hour), implying massive slippage and price impact during the spike
Near 50/50 buy/sell pressure over 24h (50.3% buy vs 49.7% sell) despite the wild price action, suggesting balanced but frantic two-sided trading rather than one-directional accumulation
No holder or sniper data available from upstream sources, materially limiting distribution and smart-money visibility
Micro-cap FDV (~$47.5K) placing this well into the highest risk / speculative category

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

The token is in a sharp post-spike downtrend, having fallen from a $0.000403 high to $0.0000483 (~88% drawdown) over roughly 7 hours. The most recent candles show lower highs and lower lows with the 5m change already negative (-1.18%) despite a positive 1h (+8.08%) and 24h (+15.5%) reading, indicating a choppy, decaying trend rather than a genuine reversal. Without fresh volume catalysts, continuation toward the pre-spike base (~$0.000015-0.000024) is plausible.

Target low

0.000030

Target high

0.000075

Support: 0.0000454 (intraperiod low, candle 24), 0.0000354 (session low, candle 24), 0.0000149-0.0000242 (pre-spike base, candles 1-16)
Resistance: 0.0000608 (candle 22 high), 0.0000949-0.000119 (candles 19-20 highs), 0.000403 (spike high, candle 17) - unlikely near-term retest

Medium term · 3-7 days

bearish

Absent new catalysts (listings, marketing, or fresh liquidity injections), tokens that experience this magnitude of spike-and-collapse on thin liquidity ($9.75K) typically continue bleeding toward or below pre-spike levels as short-term speculators and profit-takers exit. Sustained recovery would require significant new buy-side demand and liquidity growth, neither of which is evidenced in the current data.

Catalysts

Potential renewed speculative interest if social media/Twitter activity reignites (a Twitter/website link is present)
Further liquidity additions to PumpSwap pool could reduce slippage and stabilize price
Continued high sell pressure or profit-taking by early spike participants could accelerate downside
Lack of holder/sniper transparency prevents confirmation of whether large spike beneficiaries have exited

Bullish factors

24h price is still up 15.5% net despite the crash, showing some residual buy interest
Buy/sell volume is nearly balanced (50.3%/49.7%), not indicating one-sided capitulation
High unique buyer count (2,815) during the 24h window shows broad participation, not just a single whale

Bearish factors

88%+ collapse from intrasession high within a few hours signals a classic pump-and-dump wick
Extremely thin liquidity ($9.75K) relative to FDV ($47.48K) and volume spike ($632K in one hour) creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Sequential lower highs and lower lows since candle 17 peak show a clear downtrend structure
No holder distribution or sniper data available to validate that large early holders aren't poised to dump remaining balances

Confidence: low. The extremely small liquidity base ($9.75K) and single-candle 16x spike make price action highly erratic and unreliable for standard technical projection. No holder or sniper data is available to corroborate whether the move was organic or manipulated, further reducing confidence in any directional call.

BLEND call history

Full track record →

Sep 17bearish@ $0.0000483

24h+152.3%

7d-88.0%

30d-94.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: hb7QGt...pump
Total Supply: 983,197,610.157446 BLEND

Key Risks

Extreme single-hour 16x price spike followed by an 88%+ collapse from the peak — signature of pump-and-dump activity
Very shallow liquidity ($9.75K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Complete absence of holder and whale distribution data, preventing verification of concentration risk
No sniper/bot data available to assess whether early spike beneficiaries are positioned to dump remaining holdings

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

24 hourly candles show a slow grind between $0.0000110-$0.0000242 for the first 16 hours, followed by an explosive single-candle spike at 05:00 UTC (candle 17: O:0.0000242 H:0.000403 L:0.0000217 C:0.000129) on volume of ~632K — by far the largest volume bar in the dataset, roughly 400x the average prior hourly volume. Since that peak, price has printed consecutive lower highs and lower lows across candles 18-24, closing at $0.0000483, down ~88% from the spike high but still above the pre-spike base.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action (last 7 candles) is a clear downtrend of lower highs and lower lows following the spike. Medium-term (24h), the token is technically higher than its starting point 24h ago, but that is entirely attributable to the one-off spike candle rather than sustained directional trend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

0.0000454

Major support

0.0000149

Immediate resistance

0.0000608

Major resistance

0.000403

Immediate support sits at the candle 24 low ($0.0000454), with major support at the pre-spike consolidation zone around $0.0000149 (candle 1 low region). Immediate resistance is the candle 22 high ($0.0000608), while major resistance remains the spike high of $0.000403, which is unlikely to be retested without a fresh liquidity/volume catalyst.

Notable patterns

Vertical spike candle (candle 17) with a massive upper wick — classic blow-off top / pump signature
Series of lower highs and lower lows post-spike (candles 18-24) — bearish descending structure
Volume climax followed by steadily decaying volume — waning speculative interest
Large range candles (high-low spread >50% of price) around the spike, indicating thin liquidity and high slippage

Liquidity

$9,750.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $9.75K against a 24h trading volume near $856K (buy+sell combined) implies liquidity is being turned over roughly 88x per day — an extremely thin pool relative to trading activity, which explains the enormous intra-hour price swings (e.g., a 16x spike in a single hour). Buy volume ($430.34K) marginally exceeds sell volume ($425.62K), a slight net inflow, and buyer count (2,815) modestly exceeds seller count (2,428), suggesting broad-based speculative participation rather than a single actor. However, with liquidity this shallow, even moderate-sized trades can move price dramatically in either direction, and slippage risk for any meaningful position size is high.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

983,197,610.157446 BLEND

FDV

$47.48K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from $0.0000242 to $0.000403 (16x) and back down to $0.0000483 (88% retracement from peak) within a single 24h window — among the most extreme volatility profiles observable in hourly candle data.
Liquidityhigh
Only $9.75K of total liquidity supports a token with $856K in combined 24h volume and a $47.48K FDV; any moderate trade can cause outsized price impact and slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme single-hour 16x price spike followed by an 88%+ collapse from the peak — signature of pump-and-dump activity
Very shallow liquidity ($9.75K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Complete absence of holder and whale distribution data, preventing verification of concentration risk
No sniper/bot data available to assess whether early spike beneficiaries are positioned to dump remaining holdings
Unknown/unverified mint and freeze authority status, unknown contract verification, and unknown mutability of metadata
Micro-cap FDV ($47.48K) with limited track record and no confirmed audit or verification status

Mitigating factors

24h buy/sell volume and buyer/seller counts are relatively balanced (50.3%/49.7%, 2,815 buyers vs 2,428 sellers), suggesting distributed rather than single-actor participation
Token has active social presence (Twitter, website) indicating some community/marketing effort
Volume has been steadily decaying since the spike, reducing (but not eliminating) the chance of a second violent leg without new catalysts

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total capital loss; entirely unsuitable for conservative or long-term holding strategies given the shallow liquidity, unverified contract authorities, absence of holder transparency data, and clear pump-and-dump-like price signature.

BLEND is an extremely high-risk, low-liquidity micro-cap token that just experienced a violent 16x spike and subsequent 88% retracement within hours, on a pool with only $9.75K of liquidity against a $47.48K FDV. The near-balanced 24h buy/sell volume and broad buyer/seller participation counts suggest the move was not purely a single-wallet event, but the complete absence of holder and sniper data leaves major blind spots around concentration and dump risk. This is a speculative trade, not an investment, and should be sized accordingly.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If renewed social/marketing momentum (leveraging the existing Twitter/website presence) attracts fresh buy-side demand and additional liquidity is added to the PumpSwap pool, price could stabilize above the pre-spike base and attempt a retest of recent resistance levels ($0.0000608-$0.0000949).

Fresh marketing push or influencer attention reigniting speculative volume
Liquidity providers adding meaningful depth to reduce slippage and stabilize price discovery
Broad buyer participation (2,815 unique buyers in 24h) indicating some organic community interest beyond a single actor

Base Case

Price continues to consolidate in a wide, choppy range between roughly $0.0000350 and $0.0000750 as the market digests the spike, with volume continuing to taper and volatility gradually decreasing absent a new catalyst.

No major new liquidity injections or marketing catalysts occur in the near term
Buy/sell flows remain roughly balanced as observed in the 24h aggregate data
No confirmed large-holder dumping occurs, though this cannot be verified given the lack of holder data

Bear Case

High probability

Continued profit-taking and fading interest (volume has decayed every hour since the spike) drags price back toward or below the pre-spike base of $0.0000149-$0.0000242, especially if any large early holders or snipers begin liquidating positions that cannot be verified as absent.

Steadily decaying volume since the spike top, signaling fading speculative interest
Shallow liquidity ($9.75K) offering little price support against sustained selling
Unknown holder/sniper concentration creates asymmetric downside risk if large holders exit
Clear descending structure of lower highs/lower lows in the most recent candles

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 17, 12:46 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-17 12:46 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Token metadata (mint, supply, FDV, description, social links)
USD price and 24h/1h/5m percentage change data
24 hourly OHLCV candles from PumpSwap pair 8PLwf3wSu6uyxbZYxAA378MTGxSanMdCSjyLMFF4do6d
Trading analytics: 24h buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers, liquidity, FDV

Limitations

No holder distribution data available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are populated with placeholder zero/empty values per methodology rules
No sniper wallet data available — smart money signals section could not assess early-buyer concentration or PnL state
Mint/freeze authority and contract verification status are unknown, limiting tokenomics risk assessment precision
Extremely thin liquidity ($9.75K) makes historical price action highly susceptible to manipulation and not necessarily representative of sustainable market dynamics
Analysis is based on a single 24-hour window of hourly candles, limiting longer-term trend context

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, potentially incomplete on-chain and market data, some of which (token name, description, social links) originates from the token creator and may be inaccurate, misleading, or adversarial. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in low-liquidity micro-cap tokens such as this one, carry a very high risk of total capital loss. Always conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Blender Exchange (BLEND) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Blender Exchange (BLEND)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Blender Exchange ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Blender Exchange?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Blender Exchange liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-17 12:46 UTC, reported liquidity was $9,750.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Blender Exchange (BLEND)?

Is BLEND a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total capital loss; entirely unsuitable for conservative or long-term holding strategies given the shallow liquidity, unverified contract authorities, absence of holder transparency data, and clear pump-and-dump-like price signature.

What are the key risks of holding BLEND?

Extreme single-hour 16x price spike followed by an 88%+ collapse from the peak — signature of pump-and-dump activity • Very shallow liquidity ($9.75K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Complete absence of holder and whale distribution data, preventing verification of concentration risk