SNDK - Backpack Securities Price Today & AI Analysis

SNDKSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 16, 2026

$1,149.09

-10.16% 24h

Contract

Live

SNDKbwMUQvZhnLnxLduradgLHG5KrPuKwpnrkkGRhfH

Chain

Solana

Holders

7,410

Market cap

$1,505,644

At a $10M market cap, $SNDK would be $7,631.89 (6.64x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is SNDK a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 28

Issuer token

No scam signals. As a tokenized stock, its issuer can freeze, pause and move tokens.

Can you sell?

YesThe issuer can pause or freeze transfers, as stock tokens allow

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about SNDK

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

NVDAXNVIDIA xStock$204.68-2.0%MC $47.56M

MINECATNever Give Up$0.0₄4479-3.2%MC $44.0K

PEPEPepe$0.0₅4995-7.0%MC $1.40M

ElonElon Coin$0.0₄8207+69.3%MC $81.6K IICEIntercontinental Exchange - Backpack Securities$169.31+0.4%MC $44.8K

ZECZcash$1,272.5+0.1%MC $130.30M

SNDK - Backpack Securities: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-16 22:47 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$33,330.00

How concentrated is SNDK - Backpack Securities ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling SNDK - Backpack Securities?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is SNDK - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-16 22:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $33,330.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-16 22:47 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 16, 10:47 PM UTC

FDV

$1,781,918

Liquidity

$33,330.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Neutral

SNDK (Backpack Securities) is a low-supply, high-unit-price Solana token trading on a single Raydium CPMM pool with a current price near $1,534.34 and a fully diluted valuation of roughly $1.78M. The token exhibits an extremely thin total supply (~1,161 tokens) and very shallow liquidity (~$33.33K), which is a major structural risk despite active 24h trading volume of roughly $856K combined buy/sell. No holder or sniper data is available from upstream sources, which severely limits the depth of due diligence possible here.

Key points

Unusually small total supply (~1,161 tokens) with a very high nominal per-token price (~$1,534)
Thin liquidity pool (~$33.33K) relative to 24h trading volume (~$856K), implying high volume/liquidity churn and slippage risk
Balanced buy/sell pressure at ~50/50 over 24h despite volatile intraday swings
No holder distribution or sniper wallet data available, obscuring concentration and rug risk assessment
Single trading pair on Raydium CPMM — no cross-venue liquidity redundancy

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Price has oscillated in a relatively tight band between roughly $1,506 and $1,559 over the past 24 candles, with the most recent close at $1,534.33, essentially flat (+0.22%) versus 24h ago. Intraday volatility spiked around candles 11, 15, 17, 20, 21, and 23 with volume surges (e.g., 240K, 351K, 753K, 264K, 270K, 647K), suggesting episodic large trades rather than sustained directional momentum. Absent a liquidity or catalyst shift, price likely continues to range-trade near current levels.

Target low

$1,505

Target high

$1,560

Support: $1,518 (candle 3 low / early consolidation), $1,506.49 (candle 21 low, lowest print in dataset)
Resistance: $1,551.59 (candle 8 high), $1,558.99 (candle 15 high, dataset peak)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With no holder growth data, no sniper intelligence, and only thin liquidity ($33.33K) backing a $1.78M FDV, medium-term price direction is highly uncertain and could swing sharply on modest capital flows. The balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.0%/50.0%) shows no clear accumulation or distribution bias currently.

Catalysts

Any material liquidity addition or removal from the single Raydium CPMM pool
Large individual wallet buy/sell given the small supply base could move price disproportionately
Potential listing on additional pairs/DEXs to diversify liquidity
Social/community catalysts via the token's Twitter/Discord/website presence (unverified impact)

Confidence: low. Only 24 hourly candles and aggregate 24h analytics are available; there is no holder trend, sniper, or multi-day historical dataset to validate a directional thesis. The extremely low liquidity relative to FDV also means price data may not be robust to larger trade sizes, reducing predictive confidence.

SNDK call history

Full track record →

Sep 16neutral@ $1,534.34

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: SNDKbw...RhfH
Total Supply: 1,161.356106 SNDK

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($33.33K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and exit risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority status and contract verification — cannot rule out deployer control over supply
No holder distribution data available, preventing assessment of whale concentration
No sniper/early-buyer data available, preventing assessment of coordinated dump risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the last 24 hourly candles price rose from an open near $1,531.32 to a recent close of $1,534.33, moving within a broad range of $1,506.49 (low, candle 21) to $1,558.99 (high, candle 15). Several candles show large wicks with volume spikes (candles 11, 15, 17, 20, 21, 23) indicating bursts of aggressive trading followed by mean reversion, consistent with a choppy, range-bound market rather than a clean trend.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Sideways

Price action lacks a clear sequence of higher highs/higher lows or lower highs/lower lows; instead it oscillates within a ~$50-60 band (roughly 3.5% of price) repeatedly testing both the $1,520s support zone and $1,545-1,559 resistance zone without a decisive breakout.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$1,523.09 (candle 15 low)

Major support

$1,506.49 (candle 21 low, dataset minimum)

Immediate resistance

$1,540.23 (candle 24 high)

Major resistance

$1,558.99 (candle 15 high, dataset maximum)

The $1,506-1,523 zone has acted as a repeated floor across multiple candles, while the $1,545-1,559 zone has repeatedly capped upside attempts. A sustained close above $1,559 or below $1,506 would signal a potential range breakout in either direction.

Notable patterns

Repeated long-wick candles (e.g., candles 11, 15, 20, 21, 23) suggesting rejection at both range extremes
Volume climax spikes without proportional price follow-through, consistent with churn/wash-like trading in a thin market
No clean higher-high/higher-low or lower-high/lower-low trend structure — market is range-bound

Liquidity

$33,330.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $33.33K against a 24h combined trading volume of roughly $856K and a $1.78M FDV represents a very high volume-to-liquidity ratio (~25.7x), indicating the pool is thin relative to trading activity. This creates high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade and heightens vulnerability to sharp price swings from individual large orders. Buy and sell volumes are almost perfectly balanced (50.0% vs 50.0%), and buyer/seller counts are similarly balanced (713 buyers vs 703 sellers), suggesting no strong net directional flow over the past 24 hours despite the volatile candle structure. The token trades on a single Raydium CPMM pair with no evidence of diversified liquidity venues, adding concentration risk to the liquidity itself.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,161.356106 SNDK

FDV

$1,781,918

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilitymedium
24h price change is modest (+0.22%), but intraday candles show swings of roughly 3-4% within the range ($1,506-$1,559) accompanied by volume spikes up to 753K in a single hour, indicating episodic volatility risk even though net daily movement was muted.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $33.33K against ~$856K in 24h combined volume and a $1.78M FDV implies a highly disproportionate volume-to-liquidity ratio, creating significant slippage and exit risk, especially for larger trades.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($33.33K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and exit risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority status and contract verification — cannot rule out deployer control over supply
No holder distribution data available, preventing assessment of whale concentration
No sniper/early-buyer data available, preventing assessment of coordinated dump risk
Single liquidity venue (one Raydium CPMM pair) with no redundancy
Unusually small total supply (~1,161 tokens) combined with very high per-unit price is an atypical structure that warrants extra scrutiny

Mitigating factors

24h buy and sell volumes are closely balanced (50.0%/50.0%), showing no acute one-sided selling pressure at this snapshot
Buyer and seller counts are roughly balanced (713 vs 703), suggesting broad-based two-sided participation rather than a single dominant actor
Price has remained within a relatively contained range over the observed 24-hour window rather than showing a collapse

Suitable for

Given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority/contract status, and complete absence of holder and sniper data, this token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant participants who can tolerate potential total loss of capital and significant slippage on entry/exit. It is not appropriate for conservative or risk-averse investors, and position sizing should be minimal relative to portfolio size.

SNDK presents a speculative, high-uncertainty setup: an actively traded but extremely thin-liquidity token with a large gap between FDV ($1.78M) and actual liquidity ($33.33K), compounded by missing holder, sniper, and authority verification data. Trading activity is currently balanced between buyers and sellers with a range-bound price structure, but the lack of on-chain transparency in several key areas (authorities, holder concentration) means the risk profile skews cautious despite the absence of an immediate bearish catalyst.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If liquidity is added and holder distribution proves reasonably decentralized (unverifiable currently), continued balanced two-sided trading volume and social presence (Twitter/Discord/website) could support price stability or gradual appreciation, especially if the range-bound consolidation resolves upward through the $1,559 resistance.

Growing organic trading volume as seen in the recent 24h candles (up to 753K in a single hour)
Balanced buyer/seller participation (713 vs 703 unique wallets) suggesting healthy two-sided interest
Presence of social channels (Twitter, Discord, website) that could support community-driven demand

Base Case

Absent new catalysts, SNDK likely continues to range-trade between roughly $1,506 and $1,559 in the near term, with balanced buy/sell flow persisting and volatility driven more by pool thinness than fundamental shifts, while key transparency gaps (holders, authorities, snipers) remain unresolved.

No major liquidity add/remove event occurs in the near term
Buy/sell volume balance (currently ~50/50) persists without a strong directional shift
No new holder or authority data becomes available to materially change the risk picture

Bear Case

Medium probability

Given the extremely shallow $33.33K liquidity pool relative to $856K daily volume and unverified mint/freeze authority status, a large sell order or liquidity withdrawal could trigger a sharp price collapse with high slippage, and any hidden mint authority could dilute holders without warning.

High volume-to-liquidity ratio (~25.7x) increasing slippage and price-impact risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority status raises possibility of supply dilution or account freezes
No holder or sniper data available to rule out concentrated ownership or coordinated dumping
Single-venue liquidity (one Raydium CPMM pair) with no redundancy if liquidity is pulled

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 16, 10:47 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-16 22:47 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata
Hourly OHLCV candle data (24 most recent hourly candles, Raydium CPMM pair 6c77ogPMSVy3QYbDuFuSGCiQAytqwRGLN8qTfrWbTCxg)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % changes)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder distribution or holder growth data available — upstream holder endpoints retired
No sniper wallet data available — endpoint returned no results
Metadata fields for update authority, mutability, verification, and master edition status are all 'unknown', preventing confirmation of mint/freeze authority renouncement
Only 24 hourly candles available, limiting longer-term trend and pattern validation
Liquidity figure ($33.33K) is a single-point-in-time snapshot and may not reflect intraday fluctuations in pool depth

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from on-chain and market data provided at a single point in time and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Cryptocurrency trading involves substantial risk of loss, including total loss of principal. Data gaps (holder data, sniper data, authority verification) materially limit the completeness of this analysis, and users should conduct independent due diligence before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SNDK - Backpack Securities (SNDK) a scam?

No scam signals. As a tokenized stock, its issuer can freeze, pause and move tokens. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell SNDK - Backpack Securities (SNDK)?

Nothing in the token blocks a sell today, but as a tokenized stock its issuer can freeze, pause or move tokens. Checked Oct 28, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is SNDK - Backpack Securities ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling SNDK - Backpack Securities?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is SNDK - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-16 22:47 UTC, reported liquidity was $33,330.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for SNDK - Backpack Securities (SNDK)?

Is SNDK a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 72/100. Given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority/contract status, and complete absence of holder and sniper data, this token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant participants who can tolerate potential total loss of capital and significant slippage on entry/exit. It is not appropriate for conservative or risk-averse investors, and position sizing should be minimal relative to portfolio size.

What are the key risks of holding SNDK?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($33.33K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and exit risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status and contract verification — cannot rule out deployer control over supply • No holder distribution data available, preventing assessment of whale concentration