Apple

Apple—DEX Price Today & AI Analysis

AppleSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 22, 2026

Price

$0.041526

+63.00% 24h · FDV $1,526,443

Contract

Live
J4nXtziuZXF4eRiKk3PB7MWrT6AmB64BYTyEnh7Wa3zh

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,239

Market cap

$1,526,443

More tokens on Solana

MRBEASTMRBEASTMrBeast$0.0119685+0.0%MC $1GMEXGMEXGameStop xStock$23.43+3.3%MC $16.87MSPYXSPYXSP500 xStock$778.81+1.3%MC $74.17MKMNOKMNOKamino$0.0329-9.0%MC $328.78MPAIDPAIDPaid$0.0121-15.5%MC $11.57MANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.009311-88.3%MC $82.61M

Apple—DEX: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-22 16:16 UTC

Holder addresses

2,239

Top 10 supply share

2.43%

Reported liquidity

$190,315.00
How concentrated is Apple—DEX ownership?
As of 2026-09-22 16:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 2.43% of supply. It reports 2,239 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Apple—DEX?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 16:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $3,707,183.00 in buys and $3,623,482.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Apple—DEX liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +26.64%, from $150,282.22 (2026-09-22 14:00 UTC) to $190,314.71 (2026-09-22 16:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-22 16:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-22 14:00 UTC$150,282.22
2026-09-22 15:00 UTC$185,271.43
2026-09-22 16:00 UTC$190,314.71

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about Apple

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 22, 04:17 PM UTC

FDV

$1,526,443

Liquidity

$190,315.00

Holders

2,239

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Apple—DEX (Apple) is a microcap Solana token trading on a single PumpSwap pair with a fully diluted valuation of roughly $1.53M and total liquidity of just $190.31K. The token has experienced extreme volatility (+63% in 24h, +28% in the last hour) accompanied by an anomalous OHLC candle showing a price spike from ~1e-10 to 0.000184 before settling near 0.0000104, raising questions about data integrity or wash-trading in early trading. Key risk inputs — mint/freeze authority status, sniper wallet activity, and holder history — are all unavailable, leaving significant blind spots.

Key points

  • Uses a well-known global brand name ('Apple') in its token name/symbol, which is a common red flag pattern rather than a genuine differentiator
  • Very low current top-10 holder concentration (2.43%) reported at this single snapshot, though this cannot be corroborated with trend data
  • Extremely lopsided buyer/seller wallet counts (2,311 buyers vs 90 sellers in 24h) despite near 50/50 volume split, suggesting large-size sell activity from very few wallets

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Price has shown parabolic movement over the last 3 hours (from ~$0.0000104 to $0.0000153, a ~46% increase within that window), with momentum still positive on the 5m (+1.36%) and 1h (+28.06%) timeframes. However, the extremely low liquidity base ($190.31K) makes short-term price action highly unpredictable and susceptible to sharp reversals in either direction.

Target low

$0.0000090

Target high

$0.0000210

Support

$0.0000104 (prior hourly open/low zone), $0.0000146 (recent hourly low)

Resistance

$0.0000154 (most recent hourly high), $0.000184 (anomalous spike high — unlikely near-term but shows historical volatility ceiling)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the absence of holder trend history, unknown authority permissions, and no sniper/insider tracking data. Sustained price appreciation would require continued strong buyer participation (currently 2,311 unique 24h buyers) without a shift toward net selling.

Catalysts

  • Any resolution of mint/freeze authority status (positive if renounced, strongly negative if not)
  • Continued growth or decline in unique buyer counts and liquidity depth
  • Potential migration to a deeper liquidity venue or additional exchange listings
  • General Solana memecoin/microcap market sentiment given the PumpSwap listing venue

Bullish factors

  • Strong recent price momentum (+63% 24h, +28% 1h)
  • High number of unique buyers (2,311) in 24h relative to sellers (90)
  • Slightly positive net buy pressure (50.6% buy vs 49.4% sell volume)

Bearish factors

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($190.31K) relative to FDV ($1.53M), amplifying downside risk on any large sell
  • Sell volume nearly matches buy volume despite being concentrated in far fewer wallets (90 sellers moving $3.62M), indicating potential large holder distribution
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezes
  • Anomalous candle behavior suggests possible manipulation or unreliable pricing during the observed period

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 3 hourly candles provided, insufficient for robust trend analysis; (2) an anomalous candle suggesting possible data/liquidity irregularities; (3) missing authority, sniper, and holder-history data that are critical for gauging manipulation risk; (4) thin liquidity that can produce erratic price action not reflective of genuine demand/supply dynamics.

Apple call history

Full track record →

Sep 22neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
J4nXtz...a3zh
Total Supply
99,999,970,938.09 tokens (6 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($190.31K) relative to $1.53M FDV, making the token highly susceptible to slippage and price manipulation
  • Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status — the possibility of further token minting or freezing cannot be ruled out
  • Massive short-term volatility (63% in 24h, 28% in 1h, and an anomalous candle with a high 10x+ above open/close) suggestive of thin order books or wash-like trading
  • Sell-side wallets are drastically outnumbered by buy-side wallets (90 sellers vs 2,311 buyers in 24h) yet volumes are nearly balanced ($3.71M buy vs $3.62M sell), implying a small number of sellers are moving very large size — possible whale or insider distribution

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (14:00 UTC) shows an extreme range: open and low near 1.07e-10, spiking to a high of 0.000184 before closing at 0.0000104 — a pattern consistent with either a data artifact or an extreme low-liquidity wick/wash trade, accompanied by volume of ~$1.16M. Candle 2 (15:00 UTC) shows a strong bullish move, opening at 0.0000104 and closing at 0.0000146 (a ~40% gain) on the highest volume of the set (~$5.09M), with a tight low near the open. Candle 3 (16:00 UTC) continues upward, opening at 0.0000146 and closing at 0.0000153, with a smaller range and reduced volume (~$1.09M), suggesting some cooling of momentum after the initial surge.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

All three available candles show closes trending higher (0.0000104 → 0.0000146 → 0.0000153), forming a short-term uptrend. However, with only 3 hours of data, this cannot be extrapolated confidently into a medium-term trend; it is labeled uptrend here strictly based on the limited data provided, not confirmed over a longer horizon.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000146 (low of most recent candle)

Major support

$0.0000104 (open of prior candle / prior consolidation zone)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000154 (high of most recent candle)

Major resistance

$0.000184 (anomalous spike high from candle 1 — extreme outlier, low reliability as a real resistance level)

With only 3 candles, support/resistance levels are provisional. The $0.0000104–0.0000146 range represents the most recently traded consolidation zone and is the most reliable near-term support band. The extreme high of $0.000184 in candle 1 is likely a liquidity-driven wick or data anomaly rather than a durable resistance level, and should be treated with caution.

Notable patterns

  • Extreme wick/anomalous spike in candle 1 (high of 0.000184 vs close of 0.0000104), indicative of a possible flash spike or thin-liquidity price dislocation
  • Sequential higher closes across all 3 candles forming a short-term bullish staircase pattern
  • Declining volume on the most recent up-close candle, a potential bearish divergence signal despite continued price appreciation

Liquidity

Liquidity

$190,315.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $190.31K is shallow relative to the $1.53M fully diluted valuation (~12.5% FDV/liquidity ratio) and extremely small relative to the $7.33M combined 24h buy+sell volume, implying volume is churning rapidly through a thin pool and any sizeable trade could cause substantial slippage. Despite near-balanced volume (50.6% buy / 49.4% sell), the wallet count asymmetry is stark: 2,311 unique buyers versus only 90 unique sellers, meaning average sell size ($3.62M / 90 ≈ $40.2K) vastly exceeds average buy size ($3.71M / 2,311 ≈ $1.6K). This pattern is consistent with a small number of larger holders or bots distributing into a large base of small retail buyers.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

99,999,970,938.09 tokens (6 decimals)

FDV

$1,526,443

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Price moved 63% in 24h and 28% in the last 1h alone, with a candle showing open near 1.07e-10 and high spiking to 0.000184 before closing at 0.0000104 in the first observed hourly candle — evidence of extreme, possibly manipulated volatility. Current price $0.0000152644 is over 60% off recent lows within a 3-hour window.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $190.31K against a fully diluted valuation of $1.53M (~12.5% of FDV), meaning even modest sell orders could move price significantly. This is a single-pair PumpSwap listing, adding concentration risk to one venue.

  • Concentrationlow

    Reported top-10 holder concentration is 2.43% of supply across 2,239 holder addresses, which on its face looks well distributed. However, this is a single current snapshot with no historical trend, no wallet classification (bots, exchanges, insiders, LPs are not distinguished), and an address count is not equivalent to a count of unique people/entities.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($190.31K) relative to $1.53M FDV, making the token highly susceptible to slippage and price manipulation
  • Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status — the possibility of further token minting or freezing cannot be ruled out
  • Massive short-term volatility (63% in 24h, 28% in 1h, and an anomalous candle with a high 10x+ above open/close) suggestive of thin order books or wash-like trading
  • Sell-side wallets are drastically outnumbered by buy-side wallets (90 sellers vs 2,311 buyers in 24h) yet volumes are nearly balanced ($3.71M buy vs $3.62M sell), implying a small number of sellers are moving very large size — possible whale or insider distribution
  • No sniper coverage and no holder history available, leaving blind spots on early-buyer behavior and accumulation/distribution trends
  • Token name 'Apple—DEX' and symbol 'Apple' invoke a globally recognized trademark, a common pattern in scam/imitation tokens designed to mislead retail buyers

Mitigating factors

  • Reported top-10 holder concentration is low (2.43%) at this snapshot, per available Codex holder data
  • 24h buy pressure (50.6%) slightly exceeds sell pressure (49.4%), indicating no severe immediate net distribution in aggregate volume terms
  • Large number of unique 24h buyers (2,311) suggests active retail interest rather than a completely dead pair

Suitable for

Suitable only for high-risk-tolerance speculative traders who can accept total loss of capital; unsuitable for risk-averse or long-term holders given unknown authority status, thin liquidity, and extreme volatility.

Apple—DEX is a highly speculative, low-liquidity Solana microcap that has seen a sharp short-term price surge on strong retail buyer participation, but it carries significant unresolved risks including unknown mint/freeze authority status, an unverified contract, thin liquidity, and a brand name that closely mimics a major global trademark — a classic pattern seen in low-quality or scam-adjacent tokens. Any position should be sized as high-risk speculative capital only, with full awareness that the missing authority and sniper data could mask serious downside risk.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued retail momentum and buyer inflows push price and liquidity higher, with the token benefiting from viral/meme attention around its brand-mimicking name, potentially attracting new listings or deeper liquidity pools.

  • Sustained high unique buyer counts (2,311 in 24h) outpacing sellers (90)
  • Continued positive short-term momentum (28% 1h, 63% 24h gains)
  • Possible viral attention driven by the 'Apple' branding, for better or worse

Base Case

Price remains highly volatile and range-bound between recent support ($0.0000104) and resistance ($0.0000154-0.0000210) levels, with continued high volatility driven by the thin liquidity pool, absent any major new catalyst or authority-related revelation.

  • No new liquidity is added and the pool remains near $190K
  • Authority status remains unresolved, keeping informed investors cautious
  • Buyer/seller wallet imbalance persists without a full holder base reversal

Bear Case

High probability

A small number of large holders (implied by only 90 sellers moving $3.62M, ~$40K average sell size) continue to distribute into retail demand, liquidity remains too shallow to support the FDV, and any confirmation of active mint/freeze authority or lack of contract verification triggers a sharp sell-off or rug-pull-style event.

  • Extremely thin $190.31K liquidity relative to $1.53M FDV
  • Large average sell sizes vs. small average buy sizes suggesting whale distribution into retail
  • Unknown/unverified mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status
  • Trademark-mimicking branding, a common scam/rug pattern
  • Anomalous price candle suggesting possible market manipulation or unreliable pricing

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 22, 04:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-22 16:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, FDV, social links)
  • PumpSwap pair price and OHLC hourly candle data (3 most recent candles)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change)
  • Codex holder aggregates snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were provided, insufficient for robust technical trend analysis
  • No mint or freeze authority verification data available — authority-related risk cannot be assessed and is marked unknown, not low
  • No sniper wallet data available — sniper concentration, PnL, and sell-through metrics are unknown, not zero-risk
  • Holder data is a single current snapshot with no historical trend; growth rates and accumulation/distribution patterns cannot be determined and holder-related numeric fields are set to non-meaningful placeholders (0) per required schema
  • No wallet classification or labeling data exists to identify whales, exchanges, or insiders
  • Contract verification and metadata mutability status are unknown, limiting assessment of rug/honeypot risk
  • One OHLC candle shows an extreme, likely anomalous price wick that may distort technical readings

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets, and especially microcap/low-liquidity tokens on Solana, carry a high risk of substantial or total loss of capital. Data gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history) mean this analysis cannot fully assess rug-pull or manipulation risk. Always conduct independent due diligence before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Apple—DEX ownership?

As of 2026-09-22 16:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 2.43% of supply. It reports 2,239 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Apple—DEX?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 16:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $3,707,183.00 in buys and $3,623,482.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Apple—DEX liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +26.64%, from $150,282.22 (2026-09-22 14:00 UTC) to $190,314.71 (2026-09-22 16:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Apple—DEX (Apple)?

Price has shown parabolic movement over the last 3 hours (from ~$0.0000104 to $0.0000153, a ~46% increase within that window), with momentum still positive on the 5m (+1.36%) and 1h (+28.06%) timeframes. However, the extremely low liquidity base ($190.31K) makes short-term price action highly unpredictable and susceptible to sharp reversals in either direction. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.0000090 to $0.0000210.

Is Apple a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerance speculative traders who can accept total loss of capital; unsuitable for risk-averse or long-term holders given unknown authority status, thin liquidity, and extreme volatility.

What are the key risks of holding Apple?

Extremely thin liquidity ($190.31K) relative to $1.53M FDV, making the token highly susceptible to slippage and price manipulation • Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status — the possibility of further token minting or freezing cannot be ruled out • Massive short-term volatility (63% in 24h, 28% in 1h, and an anomalous candle with a high 10x+ above open/close) suggestive of thin order books or wash-like trading

← Back to all predictions

Track Apple