EBT Price Today & AI Analysis

EBTSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 13, 2026

$0.0₄1162

-0.34% 24h

Contract

Live

J53EGLkGxyC3mh45RVWxYtETEj2T9G3YnUPX5nn6AXGc

Chain

Solana

Holders

290

Market cap

$11,620

At a $1M market cap, $EBT would be $0.001000 (86.1x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is EBT a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 27

Watch insiders

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 10% of the supply.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

3%Every buy and sell · can be raised

Launch wallets hold

10%2 insiders still holding

Every transfer, buys and sells alike, pays a 3% fee, and the owner can still raise it.
The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about EBT

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

RegulardudeJust a regular dude$0.0₅4625-1.3%MC $4.5K

FOMOBULLThe Fomo Bull$0.0₅4822-1.9%MC $4.6K

TROLLOWEENTROLLOWEEN$0.0₅2915-0.5%MC $2.8K

picksPicks$0.0₅2313-3.3%MC $2.3K

SLEUTHYSleuthy$0.0₅5065-1.2%MC $4.5K

FrongusFrongus$0.000256+520.1%MC $247.2K

EBT: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-13 19:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$27,728.00

How concentrated is EBT ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling EBT?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is EBT liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-13 19:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $27,728.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-13 19:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 13, 07:16 PM UTC

FDV

$402,216

Liquidity

$27,728.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

EBT (Electronic Benefit Token) is a micro-cap Solana token trading on a single Raydium CPMM pool with only $27.73K in liquidity against a $402.22K fully diluted valuation. The token experienced an extreme parabolic move over the last 17 hourly candles, rising from roughly $0.0000030 to a peak of $0.00077 before pulling back to $0.000402, a 24h change of +829.6%. Holder and sniper data are unavailable, leaving major transparency gaps around distribution and authority status.

Key points

Description promises a USDC yield mechanic ('Hold $EBT -> Earn $USDC') that is unverified and should be treated as a marketing claim, not fact
Extremely thin $27.73K liquidity pool relative to its $402.22K FDV
Parabolic +829.6% 24h price action with a sharp -17.2% reversal in the most recent 5 minutes, a classic pump-and-dump volatility signature
No holder, whale, sniper, or authority-renouncement data available, unusual for evaluating a token already showing this much volume and volatility

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

After a nearly 260x intraday spike from candle lows to the peak near $0.00077, price has already retraced roughly 48% off the high to $0.000402, with the most recent 5-minute move down -17.2%. This pattern is consistent with a blow-off top followed by profit-taking and possible continued mean reversion toward prior consolidation levels near $0.0000045-$0.000026 unless fresh buy volume sustains the move.

Target low

0.00015

Target high

0.00055

Support: 0.0001779 (candle 15 open), 0.0000945 (candle 14 intracandle low), 0.0000045 (pre-breakout consolidation zone, candles 4-11)
Resistance: 0.000710 (candle 17 high), 0.000779 (candle 16 high, all-time high in dataset), 0.000649 (candle 16 close)

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the token's extremely low liquidity base and the lack of holder/authority transparency. Sustained upside would require continued strong buy pressure (currently 51.6% buy vs 48.4% sell) and liquidity growth; absent that, reversion toward pre-pump levels or further liquidity drain is plausible.

Catalysts

Whether liquidity grows beyond the current $27.73K, reducing slippage and manipulation risk
Confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority renouncement and contract verification
Continued social/Twitter-driven attention sustaining buyer inflow
Potential large holder distribution once/if data becomes available, which could reveal concentration risk

Bullish factors

24h buy volume ($440.34K) exceeds sell volume ($412.55K), and buyers (2,468) outnumber sellers (1,908)
Strong recent momentum and social visibility (Twitter presence) could continue attracting speculative flow
High volume relative to liquidity indicates active trading interest rather than a dead/abandoned pool

Bearish factors

Price is already retracing sharply from its intraday high, down ~48% from the $0.000779 peak
Extremely low liquidity ($27.73K) makes the token vulnerable to sharp drawdowns on relatively small sell orders
No holder or sniper data to confirm whether early buyers/insiders are distributing into the rally
Unknown authority/verification status raises rug-pull and mint-risk concerns

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset lacks holder distribution, sniper activity, and confirmed authority status — all critical inputs for gauging sustainability of the move. The extreme, thinly-traded price action also makes short-term forecasting inherently unreliable.

EBT call history

Full track record →

Sep 13bearish@ $0.000402

24h-45.1%

7d-61.5%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: J53EGL...AXGc
Total Supply: 999,999,030.71 EBT

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($27.73K) relative to $402.22K FDV, creating high slippage and easy price manipulation
Parabolic 829.6% 24h price move followed by an immediate 17.2% pullback in the last 5 minutes, suggesting a pump-and-dump pattern in progress
No verifiable holder/whale distribution data, meaning concentration risk is completely opaque
No confirmation that mint/freeze authorities are renounced — contract verification and spam status are unknown

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 17 hourly candles, price was essentially flat and illiquid from candle 1 through candle 11 (roughly $0.0000030-$0.0000074, mostly near $0.0000045 with several zero-volume candles), then candle 12 ignited a breakout (open $0.0000044, close $0.0000261, volume 17,233). Candle 13 produced a massive expansion candle (open $0.0000261, high $0.000295, low $0.000014, close $0.000164, volume 416,396 - the largest of the dataset), effectively a 10x+ wick move. Candles 14-15 pulled back toward $0.0000362-$0.0000946 lows before candle 16 pushed to a new high of $0.000780 on volume 240,613, and candle 17 topped at $0.000710 before closing at $0.000402, down roughly 38% from its own open.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (17h window) trend is a sharp uptrend off a near-zero base, but the most recent 2-3 candles show a clear short-term downtrend/reversal as price rejected the $0.000710-$0.000780 zone and closed well off intracandle highs.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

0.0001779

Major support

0.0000045

Immediate resistance

0.000710

Major resistance

0.000780

Immediate support sits near $0.0001779 (candle 15 open) with major support far below at the pre-breakout base near $0.0000045. Immediate resistance is the candle 17 high of $0.000710, with the dataset's absolute high of $0.000780 (candle 16) as major resistance. A break below $0.0001779 would suggest the breakout is fully unwinding; reclaiming $0.000710+ would suggest renewed bullish momentum.

Notable patterns

Long-wick exhaustion candles at the top (candles 16 and 17 both show highs far above their closes)
Volume-confirmed breakout candle (candle 13) after a prolonged flat/illiquid base
Repeated failure to hold new highs — sequential lower closes relative to highs in candles 15-17, suggesting distribution
Multiple zero-volume candles (5,6,8,9) prior to breakout indicating a dormant/illiquid market before the pump

Liquidity

$27,728.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $27.73K is very shallow relative to both the $402.22K FDV and the $440K+ in 24h buy volume, meaning the pool volume has turned over more than 15x the liquidity in a single day — a hallmark of a thinly-liquid, high-slippage micro-cap. Buy volume ($440.34K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($412.55K), a net inflow of roughly $27.8K, and buyers (2,468) outnumber sellers (1,908) in the last 24h, but the margin is thin (51.6% vs 48.4%) relative to the size of the price move, suggesting the price spike was driven more by thin liquidity/low float mechanics than overwhelming demand dominance. Any single large sell order could disproportionately impact price given the shallow pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,030.71 EBT

FDV

$402,216

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved from ~$0.0000030 to a high of $0.00077 and back to $0.00040 within 17 hourly candles, including an 829.6% 24h gain followed by a -17.2% move in the last 5 minutes. This is extreme, parabolic volatility typical of a fresh micro-cap pump.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $27.73K against a $402.22K FDV, meaning even moderate-sized trades can move price significantly. The pool sits on a single Raydium CPMM pair with no evidence of multi-venue depth.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($27.73K) relative to $402.22K FDV, creating high slippage and easy price manipulation
Parabolic 829.6% 24h price move followed by an immediate 17.2% pullback in the last 5 minutes, suggesting a pump-and-dump pattern in progress
No verifiable holder/whale distribution data, meaning concentration risk is completely opaque
No confirmation that mint/freeze authorities are renounced — contract verification and spam status are unknown
No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dumping behavior
Description text ('Hold $EBT -> Earn $USDC') resembles a marketing/reward-promise claim from the token creator that cannot be independently verified and should be treated skeptically

Mitigating factors

24h buy pressure (51.6%) is marginally higher than sell pressure (48.4%), with more buyers (2,468) than sellers (1,908) in the last 24h, indicating some active organic-looking demand
Trading volume is substantial relative to liquidity ($440K+ buy volume vs $27.7K liquidity), showing real turnover rather than a completely dead pool
Token has a social presence (Twitter link) suggesting at least minimal public visibility

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand micro-cap Solana pump dynamics and can accept total loss of capital. Not suitable for passive or risk-averse investors given the unresolved authority status, absent holder transparency, and extreme volatility.

EBT is a high-risk, high-volatility Solana micro-cap that just underwent an extreme parabolic move (+829.6% 24h) on very thin liquidity ($27.73K). The setup has classic pump characteristics — a dormant/illiquid base, a sudden volume-backed breakout, a blow-off top with long rejection wicks, and an ongoing pullback. With no holder, whale, sniper, or authority data available, this is a speculative, data-poor situation suitable only for traders explicitly seeking high-risk momentum plays who can tolerate total loss.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy demand continues to outpace sell pressure (currently 51.6%/48.4%) and new liquidity/attention flows in (e.g., via the Twitter presence or the advertised USDC-reward mechanic gaining traction), price could stabilize above the $0.0001779-$0.000402 range and attempt another push toward the $0.000710-$0.000780 resistance zone.

Sustained or increasing 24h buy volume relative to sell volume
Liquidity pool growth reducing slippage and enabling larger safe entries/exits
Verified confirmation that mint/freeze authorities are renounced, reducing rug-risk perception
Continued social media momentum driving new buyer inflow

Base Case

Price continues to be highly volatile and range-bound between the recent breakout support (~$0.0001779) and resistance (~$0.000710) as the market digests the pump, with buy/sell volumes remaining roughly balanced (51.6%/48.4%) and no immediate resolution toward either a durable uptrend or a full collapse.

Liquidity stays roughly at current shallow levels (~$27.73K) without major inflows or outflows
No new confirmed information emerges on holder concentration or authority status in the near term
Trading volume remains elevated relative to the small liquidity base, sustaining high volatility

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic move reverses fully as early buyers and any undisclosed insiders/snipers distribute into retail demand, liquidity remains too shallow to absorb sell pressure, and price mean-reverts toward the pre-breakout base near $0.0000045-$0.0000261, or lower if liquidity is pulled.

Already-visible rejection wicks and lower closes in the last two candles (16 and 17)
Extremely shallow $27.73K liquidity vulnerable to cascading sells
Unknown/unverified mint and freeze authority status raising rug-pull risk
No holder/sniper transparency to confirm broad, healthy distribution versus concentrated insider holdings
5-minute price already down -17.2%, indicating active unwind in progress

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 13, 07:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-13 19:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain price feed (USD)
Hourly OHLCV candle data (17 most recent candles)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % changes)
Token metadata (supply, decimals, FDV, description)
Sniper analysis (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder distribution data available — holderTrends and whaleMap sections are empty/placeholder per data availability
No sniper wallet data available — smartMoneySignals largely unverifiable
Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and spam-flag status are all reported as 'unknown' in metadata
Only 17 hourly candles were provided, limiting longer-term technical context
Native price and 24h dollar change were reported as 'unknown', limiting cross-validation of price figures

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from a limited, possibly incomplete on-chain data snapshot and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. Token metadata, descriptions, and social claims originate from the token's creator and may be inaccurate, misleading, or adversarial. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in low-liquidity micro-cap tokens, carry a very high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is EBT a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 10% of the supply. Every transfer, buys and sells alike, pays a 3% fee, and the owner can still raise it. The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell EBT?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 3% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is EBT ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling EBT?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is EBT liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-13 19:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $27,728.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for EBT (EBT)?

Is EBT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand micro-cap Solana pump dynamics and can accept total loss of capital. Not suitable for passive or risk-averse investors given the unresolved authority status, absent holder transparency, and extreme volatility.

What are the key risks of holding EBT?

Extremely thin liquidity ($27.73K) relative to $402.22K FDV, creating high slippage and easy price manipulation • Parabolic 829.6% 24h price move followed by an immediate 17.2% pullback in the last 5 minutes, suggesting a pump-and-dump pattern in progress • No verifiable holder/whale distribution data, meaning concentration risk is completely opaque