LinkedInu Price Today & AI Analysis

LinkedInuSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 17, 2026

$0.000130

+17.88% 24h

Contract

Live

FvhorDts9M8uJekzs3pBcYUPUjWtCTrGLhdv3ADHyeRY

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,303

Market cap

$129,793

At a $1M market cap, $LINKEDINU would be $0.001000 (7.70x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is LinkedInu a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 1

Transfer fee

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token blocks a sell

Transfer fee

1%Every buy and sell · can be raised

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about LinkedInu

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

SOLANGELESSolAngeles$0.000482+4.1%MC $481.1K

BOXABLBOXABL$0.000187+12.0%MC $183.5K

SovicatSoviet Cat$0.0₅2327+0.6%MC $2.3K

PINKPINK COIN$0.000112+1.4%MC $108.3K SSCHHSchwab U.S. REIT ETF - Backpack Securities$23.05+0.3%MC $53.5K

PAWCATPAWCAT$0.000126+116.1%MC $124.8K

LinkedInu: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-17 19:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$47,244.00

How concentrated is LinkedInu ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling LinkedInu?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is LinkedInu liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-17 19:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $47,244.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-17 19:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 17, 07:16 PM UTC

FDV

$1,057,209

Liquidity

$47,244.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

LinkedInu (LinkedInu) is a newly-active Solana meme token trading on a Raydium CPMM pool with extremely thin liquidity (~$47.24K) against a fully diluted valuation of roughly $1.06M. The token has just experienced a dramatic +2515.8% 24-hour price surge, including a second parabolic spike in the final two hours of available data, but is showing signs of an immediate reversal (-30.5% in the last 5 minutes). Critical datasets — holder distribution, whale concentration, and sniper wallet activity — are all unavailable, and mint/freeze authority status is unknown, leaving major transparency gaps around ownership concentration and rug risk.

Key points

Extremely low liquidity ($47.24K) relative to both 24h volume (>$1.8M combined) and FDV (~$1.06M)
Two distinct parabolic spike-and-collapse cycles within a single 22-hour observation window
No holder, whale, or sniper data available for verification — significant transparency gap
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status
Slight net buyer dominance (51.6% buy vs 48.4% sell volume) despite the recent sharp pullback signal

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Given the immediate -30.5% 5-minute reversal following an extreme +1148% 1h and +2515.8% 24h move, short-term price action is highly uncertain and could swing sharply either direction. A pullback toward the $0.0008 support zone is plausible after such an extended spike, but a continuation toward new highs cannot be ruled out if buy pressure (currently 51.6% of volume) persists.

Target low

$0.0004

Target high

$0.0020

Support: $0.000806 (candle 21 open), $0.0000297-$0.0000127 (prior consolidation lows)
Resistance: $0.00170 (candle 22 high / current ATH in window), $0.000358 (prior major high, candle 4)

Medium term · 3-7 days

bearish

Tokens exhibiting this kind of parabolic double-spike pattern on extremely thin liquidity ($47.24K) typically struggle to sustain gains once initial speculative momentum and social attention fade. Absent verified holder decentralization, confirmed renounced authorities, or meaningful liquidity growth, the medium-term bias leans bearish toward mean reversion back toward pre-spike levels.

Catalysts

Liquidity additions or removals by the deployer/team
Confirmation (or lack thereof) of mint/freeze authority renouncement
Sustained vs. fading social/meme attention
Whether large early holders (unverifiable here) begin distributing

Bullish factors

Net positive buy volume (51.6%) and more buyers than sellers (3,675 vs 2,938) in the last 24h
Genuine volume expansion accompanying the latest breakout, not just a thin wick
New all-time high in the observed window ($0.00170) shows demand can still push price higher

Bearish factors

Immediate -30.5% reversal in the last 5 minutes right after the peak
Extremely shallow liquidity ($47.24K) unable to support sustained buying without high slippage
Prior full spike-and-collapse cycle already occurred once in this same 22-hour window (candle 4 to candle 6)
Unknown mint/freeze authority status and no holder/sniper transparency raise rug and dump risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because critical datasets — holder distribution, whale concentration, and sniper wallet activity — are entirely unavailable, leaving significant blind spots around who holds the supply and whether early buyers are preparing to dump. The extreme volatility already observed in just 22 hours of data also makes any directional prediction inherently unreliable for this token.

LinkedInu call history

Full track record →

Sep 17neutral@ $0.00106

24h—

7d—

30d-90.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: FvhorD...yeRY
Total Supply: 999,998,045.43 LinkedInu

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($47.24K) relative to volume and FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot confirm rug-pull protections are in place
No holder or whale concentration data available — concentration risk is unverifiable and must be assumed elevated
No sniper data available — early buyer/bot dump risk cannot be quantified

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 22-hour candle series shows an extremely volatile microcap trajectory. Price started near $0.0000032, spiked violently to a local high near $0.000358 within the first 4 hours (candles 1-4), then collapsed back down to the $0.0000127-$0.0000473 range for several hours (candles 5-11), consolidated in a tight $0.000053-$0.0000846 band mid-sequence (candles 12-17), before another sharp expansion in the final two candles: candle 21 ranged from $0.0000571 to $0.00119 (a >20x intra-candle swing) and candle 22 pushed further to a high of $0.00170 before closing at $0.00115. This is a classic low-liquidity parabolic pump pattern with two distinct blow-off spikes separated by a consolidation phase.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term (last 2-3 hours) trend is sharply upward, driven by the candle 21-22 breakout that took price from ~$0.00006 to over $0.00114, a >1700% move. Medium-term (across the full 22-hour window) the trend is better described as sideways-to-choppy with two spike-and-fade cycles, since the token round-tripped from a $0.000358 high down to $0.0000127 lows before the second spike began.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000806 (candle 21 open) / $0.000792 (candle 21 low)

Major support

$0.0000127-$0.0000297 (candles 2, 5-6, 17-18 lows — the multi-hour consolidation floor)

Immediate resistance

$0.00170 (candle 22 high, most recent all-time high in this window)

Major resistance

$0.000358 (candle 4 high, the first blow-off top before the multi-hour retracement)

Price has just broken above the prior major resistance at $0.000358 (set in candle 4) with the candle 21-22 surge, making $0.00170 the new immediate resistance / local high. Given the -30.5% five-minute pullback, the $0.000806-$0.000792 zone (candle 21 open/low) is the first support to watch; a break below that would open the door back toward the $0.0000297-$0.0000127 consolidation zone that held for most of the mid-sequence.

Notable patterns

Double parabolic spike (two distinct blow-off moves separated by multi-hour consolidation)
Long-wick volatile candles with wide high-low ranges (e.g., candle 21: low $0.0000571 to high $0.00119)
Sharp mean-reversion/retracement after each spike (candle 4 high $0.000358 collapsing to candle 6 low $0.0000127)
Volume expansion coinciding with the latest breakout (candles 21-22)
Immediate post-spike reversal signal (-30.5% in last 5 minutes) suggesting possible exhaustion at the top

Liquidity

$47,244.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total pool liquidity of just $47.24K is extremely thin relative to a 24h traded volume north of $1.86M combined (buy+sell) and a fully diluted valuation of ~$1.06M. This mismatch — volume roughly 39x the liquidity pool — means the pool is being recycled many times over in a day, a classic signature of a freshly-launched, highly speculative micro-cap on a Raydium CPMM pair. Buy volume ($963.09K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($904.91K), giving a modest net inflow (51.6% vs 48.4% buy/sell pressure), and buyer count (3,675) outnumbers sellers (2,938), suggesting more net demand than supply over the day. However, with liquidity this shallow, even modest-sized trades can move price dramatically (as evidenced by the candle data), and slippage risk for any meaningfully-sized order is high in both directions.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,998,045.43 LinkedInu

FDV

$1,057,209

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +2515.8%, with intra-candle swings exceeding 20x (e.g., candle 21) and a -30.5% move in just the last 5 minutes. This is extreme, almost unprecedented volatility even by microcap standards.
Liquidityhigh
Only $47.24K total liquidity against >$1.8M combined daily volume and a >$1M FDV means the pool can be drained or heavily skewed by relatively small trades, and large holders exiting could crash price severely.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($47.24K) relative to volume and FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot confirm rug-pull protections are in place
No holder or whale concentration data available — concentration risk is unverifiable and must be assumed elevated
No sniper data available — early buyer/bot dump risk cannot be quantified
Extreme volatility (+2515.8% 24h, -30.5% in the last 5 minutes) indicates the token may already be reversing from a blow-off top
No social links or verified contract status — reduces confidence in legitimacy and community backing
Token name/description ('Log off LinkedIn forever') suggests a meme/joke token with no clear utility, typical of short-lived speculative pumps

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume ($963.09K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($904.91K), and buyers (3,675) outnumber sellers (2,938), suggesting net demand is currently positive
Volume is genuinely expanding alongside the price move (not a low-volume illiquid wick), indicating real trading interest rather than a single manipulated print
Trading is occurring on Raydium CPMM, a widely used and audited AMM infrastructure, reducing (but not eliminating) smart-contract risk at the DEX level

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand microcap/meme-token dynamics and can afford total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, retirement funds, or anyone seeking stable or predictable returns. Position sizing should be minimal given the very high risk score.

LinkedInu is a brand-new, extremely volatile Solana meme token that has just completed a violent parabolic move (+2515.8% in 24h) on very thin liquidity ($47.24K). The combination of genuine volume expansion and slightly positive buy/sell skew suggests short-term momentum traders are currently in control, but the lack of holder data, sniper data, and confirmed authority status makes this a high-uncertainty, high-risk speculative play rather than an investable asset in any traditional sense.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy pressure continues to outweigh sell pressure and new buyers keep entering (3,675 buyers vs 2,938 sellers in the last 24h), the token could extend its breakout above the new high of $0.00170, potentially attracting further momentum-driven speculative inflows and social media attention typical of meme-token cycles.

Continued net positive buy volume and buyer count
Viral/meme attention given the novel 'log off LinkedIn' narrative
Any liquidity additions that reduce slippage and attract larger buyers

Base Case

Price likely continues to whipsaw violently in both directions as it has throughout the observed 22-hour window, with no stable trend establishing until liquidity deepens or volume/interest fades. Expect continued high volatility with the token trading opportunistically between the immediate support (~$0.0008) and resistance (~$0.0017) zones in the near term.

Liquidity remains thin (~$47K) without major new inflows
No confirmed rug event (mint/freeze authority remains unclear but no evidence of malicious action yet)
Trading activity, both buy and sell, remains elevated near recent levels

Bear Case

High probability

The -30.5% five-minute pullback right after the candle 22 peak suggests the parabolic move may already be exhausted. Given the extremely shallow liquidity, any coordinated or panic selling — especially from early/sniper wallets that cannot be verified here — could rapidly collapse price back toward the $0.0000127-$0.0000297 consolidation zone seen earlier, similar to the collapse that followed the first spike (candle 4 high of $0.000358 down to candle 6 low of $0.0000127).

Post-spike momentum reversal already visible in the 5m price change
Extremely thin liquidity amplifying any sell-side pressure
Unknown mint/freeze authority and lack of holder/sniper transparency increasing rug/dump uncertainty
History of the token already round-tripping through a full spike-and-collapse cycle once in this 22h window

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 17, 07:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-17 19:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata
Hourly OHLC candle data (22 most recent hours, Raydium CPMM pair)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Price change percentages (5m, 1h, 24h)

Limitations

No holder data available — holder counts, growth trends, and distribution are entirely unverified
No whale/top-holder concentration data available
No sniper wallet data available — early buyer concentration and PnL cannot be assessed
Mint authority, freeze authority, update authority, verified-contract status, and mutability all reported as 'unknown' in metadata
Only 22 hours of hourly candle history provided, limiting longer-term trend and pattern validation
6h price change percentage was not provided
24h dollar price change and native price were not provided

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data and is provided for informational purposes only. It does NOT constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell any asset. Token metadata, names, and descriptions originate from potentially adversarial or unverified sources and were treated strictly as untrusted evidence. Cryptocurrency markets, and especially low-liquidity microcap tokens, carry an extremely high risk of total capital loss. Always conduct independent due diligence and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LinkedInu a scam?

No scam signals, but every transfer pays a 1% fee and the owner can still raise it. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell LinkedInu?

Yes. Every buy and sell pays a 1% transfer fee, and the owner can still raise it. Checked Nov 1, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is LinkedInu ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling LinkedInu?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is LinkedInu liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-17 19:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $47,244.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for LinkedInu (LinkedInu)?

Is LinkedInu a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand microcap/meme-token dynamics and can afford total loss of capital. Not appropriate for risk-averse investors, retirement funds, or anyone seeking stable or predictable returns. Position sizing should be minimal given the very high risk score.

What are the key risks of holding LinkedInu?

Extremely thin liquidity ($47.24K) relative to volume and FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot confirm rug-pull protections are in place • No holder or whale concentration data available — concentration risk is unverifiable and must be assumed elevated