TeslaFC

TeslaFC Price Today & AI Analysis

TeslaFCSolanaAnalysis as of May 24, 2026

Price

$0.053431

FDV $3,430

Contract

Live
DF82BTbe7bu3DCHXWaYMBvK1H93afcQSYCf3swwTpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

139

Market cap

$3,430

More tokens on Solana

ROBINJACKROBINJACKROBINJACK$0.052103+0.0%MC $2.0KUAIMUAIMUniversal Ai Movement$0.051888+0.0%MC $1.9Kspepespepeshadilay pepe$0.053022+0.0%MC $2.9KPeacePeaceピース$0.052941+0.0%MC $2.9KTWINTWINTWIN$0.052854+0.0%MC $2.7KRAYRAYRaydium$1.99+8.6%MC $1.10B

TeslaFC: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-24 10:17 UTC

Holder addresses

520

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is TeslaFC ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 520 addresses (2026-05-24 10:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling TeslaFC?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is TeslaFC liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-24 10:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about TeslaFC

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of May 24, 10:17 AM UTC

FDV

$68,367

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

520

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

TeslaFC (TeslaFC) is a newly launched Solana memecoin on PumpSwap with a total supply of 1 billion tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$68,367. The token has experienced an explosive 91.9% price surge in the past 24 hours, driven by a rapid influx of 507 new holders (from 13 to 520) in a single day. However, the token exhibits severe sell pressure (68.4% of 24h volume), zero reported on-chain liquidity, highly concentrated whale holdings, and no verified contract or social presence — all hallmarks of an extremely high-risk speculative asset.

Key points

  • Explosive 91.9% 24h price gain from a very low base (~$0.0000684)
  • Holder count surged from 13 to 520 in under 24 hours — nearly all growth is brand new
  • Sell pressure dominates at 68.4% of 24h volume ($139.28K sells vs $64.22K buys)
  • Top 10 holders control 34.68% of supply; top 100 control 84.85%
  • Zero reported total liquidity on-chain — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • 20 snipers active in first 1,000 blocks; majority are in profit and actively selling

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already pumped ~92% in 24h and is showing dominant sell pressure (68.4%). The 1h candle shows a massive spike to ~$0.0000357 followed by a sharp pullback, and the most recent candle (hour 1) shows a lower close. With zero liquidity depth, sniper profit-taking, and 2:1 sell-to-buy ratio, a sharp retracement is the most probable near-term outcome.

Target low

$0.000020

Target high

$0.000085

Support

$0.0000349 (recent candle low / open), $0.000020 (pre-pump baseline estimate)

Resistance

$0.0000357 (candle 2 high), $0.0000574 (candle 1 high — likely data anomaly/wick)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Without verified utility, social presence, or liquidity depth, sustaining price gains is unlikely. The token sat dormant at 13 holders for 30 days before today's pump, suggesting coordinated activity. Unless new catalysts emerge, the medium-term trajectory is a slow bleed or complete collapse.

Catalysts

  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally
  • Viral social media attention (currently no links)
  • Listing on a centralized exchange (highly unlikely at this stage)
  • Whale accumulation rather than distribution

Bullish factors

  • 91.9% 24h price surge shows strong short-term momentum
  • 507 new holders acquired in under 24 hours signals viral interest
  • 5m price change of +2.68% suggests very recent buying activity
  • Some snipers (e.g., sniper 16 at +228.9%, sniper 4 at +139.2%) have large realized gains, indicating early price appreciation

Bearish factors

  • 68.4% sell pressure dominates 24h volume ($139.28K sells vs $64.22K buys)
  • Zero reported on-chain liquidity — any significant sell order will crater price
  • Token was dormant at 13 holders for 30+ days before today — suggests coordinated pump
  • No verified contract, no social links, no description — zero fundamental backing
  • Top 100 holders control 84.85% of supply — extreme concentration
  • Majority of snipers are in profit and actively selling, increasing dump risk

Confidence: low. OHLC data contains only 3 hourly candles with apparent data anomalies (candle 1 L > O, suggesting a data inversion). Liquidity is reported as $0.00, making price discovery unreliable. The 6h and 24h price change fields show 0%, conflicting with the 91.9% 24h figure — indicating data inconsistency. Predictions are therefore low-confidence.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
DF82BT...pump
Total Supply
1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

Key Risks

  • Zero on-chain liquidity — catastrophic exit risk for any meaningful position
  • Token dormant for 30+ days at 13 holders — strong evidence of coordinated pump
  • 68.4% sell pressure with 2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — sustained distribution
  • No verified contract, no social links, no description — zero fundamental value

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (08:00–10:00 UTC on 2026-05-24). Candle 3 (08:00): O=$0.0000349, H=$0.0000357, L=$0.0000349, C=$0.0000356 — a small bullish candle with modest range. Candle 2 (09:00): O=$0.0000355, H=$0.0000355, L=$0.0000349, C=$0.0000349 — a bearish candle, closing at the low. Candle 1 (10:00): O=$0.0000349, H=$0.0000355, L=$0.0000530, C=$0.0000355 — NOTE: the Low ($0.0000530) is higher than the High ($0.0000355), which is a data anomaly likely indicating a wick or data inversion; this candle's data should be treated with caution. Volume spiked dramatically in candle 2 ($139,947) vs candle 3 ($4,576) and candle 1 ($17,284), suggesting the major price action occurred in the 09:00 candle.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The 3-candle window shows a brief rally followed by a bearish close in candle 2. The current price (~$0.0000684) is significantly above the candle range (~$0.0000349–$0.0000357), suggesting the major pump occurred outside the provided OHLC window. The medium-term trend is effectively sideways given the 30-day dormancy prior to today.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

32%

Sell

68%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000349 (candle 2 & 3 low / open)

Major support

$0.000020 (estimated pre-pump level, no historical OHLC available)

Immediate resistance

$0.0000357 (candle 2 & 3 high)

Major resistance

$0.0000574 (candle 1 anomalous low — possible wick high)

Support is thin given zero liquidity. The $0.0000349 level has been tested multiple times across the 3 candles and held, making it the key near-term support. Resistance at $0.0000357 has capped multiple candles. The current price of $0.0000684 is well above the OHLC range, suggesting the pump occurred in a window not captured by the provided candles.

Notable patterns

  • Bearish close in candle 2 (close at low of candle)
  • Volume spike followed by sharp volume decline — momentum exhaustion signal
  • Price currently trading well above the 3-candle OHLC range — gap risk to downside
  • 30-day dormancy followed by single-day explosion — classic coordinated pump pattern
  • Data anomaly in candle 1 (L > H) — treat with caution

Liquidity

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

FDV

$68,367

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    91.9% single-day price gain from a dormant base. Extreme volatility with no price history to anchor expectations. The token can lose 80%+ of value in hours given zero liquidity depth.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Zero on-chain liquidity — catastrophic exit risk for any meaningful position
  • Token dormant for 30+ days at 13 holders — strong evidence of coordinated pump
  • 68.4% sell pressure with 2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — sustained distribution
  • No verified contract, no social links, no description — zero fundamental value
  • Top 100 holders control 84.85% of supply — extreme dump risk
  • Sniper majority in profit and actively selling — informed money is exiting
  • Unverified mint/freeze authority — potential for supply manipulation
  • FDV of only $68K — easily manipulated by small capital flows

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable=false prevents metadata manipulation
  • PumpFun launch mechanism typically burns mint authority at graduation
  • 507 new holders in 24h shows genuine retail interest (though may be short-lived)
  • Some snipers still holding (DhFjzvG4, 3DqCicBh, 5a9zVAvjuU, Dwdnjf5D) suggesting not all early buyers have exited

Suitable for

Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits nearly every characteristic of a pump-and-dump scheme: 30-day dormancy followed by a single-day explosion, extreme sell pressure, zero liquidity, no fundamentals, and coordinated sniper activity. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana memecoin dynamics.

TeslaFC is a high-risk, zero-fundamental memecoin that has experienced a coordinated single-day pump after 30 days of complete dormancy. The investment case is purely speculative momentum trading with an extremely short time horizon. The overwhelming weight of on-chain evidence (sell pressure, sniper exits, zero liquidity, extreme concentration) points to a distribution phase rather than the beginning of a sustainable rally.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral momentum continuation: If TeslaFC catches broader social media attention (e.g., Tesla/Elon Musk news cycle alignment) and new retail capital floods in faster than insiders can exit, the token could sustain or extend its pump. At a $68K FDV, even modest capital inflows could produce outsized percentage gains.

  • Viral social media catalyst (Tesla/Elon news)
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally
  • New retail FOMO wave overwhelming sell pressure
  • Whale accumulation rather than distribution

Base Case

Short-term volatility followed by gradual decline: The token experiences continued high volatility over the next 24-72 hours as remaining momentum traders cycle in and out, then slowly bleeds lower as sell pressure outpaces new buyers. Without a sustained narrative or liquidity injection, the token likely returns to pre-pump levels within 1-2 weeks.

  • No major new catalyst emerges
  • Sniper and whale distribution continues at current pace
  • Liquidity remains shallow, preventing large position entries/exits
  • Retail interest fades without social media amplification

Bear Case

High probability

Rapid collapse: Early holders and snipers complete their distribution, liquidity evaporates, and the token retraces 80-95% from current levels. The 30-day dormancy pattern suggests this was a planned pump-and-dump, and the dump phase may already be underway given the 68.4% sell pressure.

  • Sniper and whale distribution completing
  • Zero liquidity amplifying price impact of sells
  • No fundamental value or utility to attract long-term holders
  • Retail FOMO fading as price stagnates or drops
  • No social presence to sustain narrative

Analysis details

Generated

May 24, 10:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-24 10:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Solana blockchain)
  • PumpSwap DEX trading data
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series
  • OHLC price candles (hourly, USD)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Candle 1 (10:00 UTC) contains a data anomaly where Low > High, making it unreliable
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — may be a data feed issue rather than literal zero
  • Sniper sniped amounts and total sniped USD are unknown — concentration % is estimated
  • 6h and 24h price change fields show 0% despite 91.9% 24h gain — data inconsistency
  • Top holder percentage figures in raw data appear to use incorrect units (showing values like 14521282089175000%) — actual concentrations taken from the supply concentration summary field
  • Mint and freeze authority status are unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be fully assessed
  • No social links or project description available for qualitative assessment
  • Update authority listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm renouncement

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched memecoins, carry extreme risk of total loss. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is TeslaFC ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 520 addresses (2026-05-24 10:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling TeslaFC?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is TeslaFC liquidity falling?

Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for TeslaFC (TeslaFC)?

The token has already pumped ~92% in 24h and is showing dominant sell pressure (68.4%). The 1h candle shows a massive spike to ~$0.0000357 followed by a sharp pullback, and the most recent candle (hour 1) shows a lower close. With zero liquidity depth, sniper profit-taking, and 2:1 sell-to-buy ratio, a sharp retracement is the most probable near-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000020 to $0.000085.

Is TeslaFC a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. This token exhibits nearly every characteristic of a pump-and-dump scheme: 30-day dormancy followed by a single-day explosion, extreme sell pressure, zero liquidity, no fundamentals, and coordinated sniper activity. Not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana memecoin dynamics.

What are the key risks of holding TeslaFC?

Zero on-chain liquidity — catastrophic exit risk for any meaningful position • Token dormant for 30+ days at 13 holders — strong evidence of coordinated pump • 68.4% sell pressure with 2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — sustained distribution

← Back to all predictions

Track TeslaFC