TWIN Price Today & AI Analysis

TWINSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 13, 2026

$0.0₅2541

Contract

Live

DFkrD8xDANHCwgp6fKr5EPVYE2CyFyY6fTrrXfiHJSdd

Chain

Solana

Holders

158

Market cap

$2,425

At a $1M market cap, $TWIN would be $0.001048 (412x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is TWIN a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 26

Caution

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

96%1 insider still holding

Wallets linked to the creator hold a large share.
There is very little liquidity in the pool.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about TWIN

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

SpreadSpread$0.0₅2442+0.0%MC $2.4K

Peaceピース$0.0₅2796+0.0%MC $2.8K

sPL.001First Life on Mars$0.0₅3551+0.0%MC $3.3K

BumpyBumpy$0.0₅5069+0.0%MC $5.1K

jefjefrey$0.0₅3411+0.0%MC $3.1K

MPLXMetaplex$0.0665+33.4%MC $31.32M

TWIN: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-13 23:17 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$12,811.00

How concentrated is TWIN ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling TWIN?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is TWIN liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-13 23:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $12,811.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-13 23:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 13, 11:17 PM UTC

FDV

$80,423

Liquidity

$12,811.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

TWIN (DFkrD8xDANHCwgp6fKr5EPVYE2CyFyY6fTrrXfiHJSdd) is a micro-cap Solana token trading on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$80.4K and total liquidity of only $12.81K. Price is extremely volatile: +101% over 24h but -7.1% in the last hour and -14.4% in the last 5 minutes, indicating a sharp pump followed by an equally sharp reversal. Hourly candles show wicks of 2-4x the open/close range, consistent with a thin, low-liquidity pool being pushed and dumped. No holder or sniper data is available, and metadata fields (update authority, mutability, verification) are all unknown, which materially limits due-diligence confidence.

Key points

Extremely low liquidity ($12.81K) relative to volume ($381K+$373K in 24h), implying very high slippage and manipulation risk
24h price move of +101% coupled with a violent intra-hour reversal (-7.1% 1h, -14.4% 5m) signaling classic pump-and-dump candle structure
No verifiable authority, mint/freeze, or holder data — token metadata transparency is essentially absent
Balanced 24h buy/sell volume (50.5%/49.5%) despite the huge price swing, suggesting two-sided high-frequency trading rather than one-directional accumulation

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-6 hours

bearish

Momentum has reversed sharply from the 24h pump. The last two intervals show -7.1% (1h) and -14.4% (5m) declines after price spiked to a high of $0.00018 in the prior hour. With such thin liquidity ($12.81K), further downside continuation toward the $0.0000668-$0.0000755 candle-4 low is plausible before any stabilization.

Target low

$0.0000550

Target high

$0.0000950

Support: $0.0000668 (candle 4 low), $0.0000230 (candle 2/3 open zone)
Resistance: $0.0001320 (candle 4 high), $0.0001799 (candle 3 high, session peak)

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

With FDV of only $80.4K and liquidity of $12.81K, the token's medium-term trajectory is highly uncertain and dependent on whether new buyers continue to rotate in. Lack of holder and authority data makes any durable trend call speculative; base case is continued high volatility with no clear directional edge.

Catalysts

Potential further liquidity additions or removals on the PumpSwap pool
Any social/community traction given website-only social presence
Broader memecoin/PumpSwap market sentiment shifts

Bullish factors

24h change is still strongly positive (+101%)
Buy volume ($381.28K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($373.24K) over 24h, a marginally positive net flow
High trading activity (4,683 buys vs 3,929 sells) shows active retail interest

Bearish factors

Sharp reversal in the most recent hour (-7.1%) and last 5 minutes (-14.4%) right after the pump
Extremely shallow liquidity ($12.81K) relative to 24h volume (~$754K combined), enabling large price swings on small trades
No mint/freeze authority or verification data to rule out rug risk
No holder or sniper data available to assess distribution or insider dumping risk

Confidence: low. Only 4 hourly candles are available, liquidity is extremely thin ($12.81K), and there is no holder, sniper, or authority data to corroborate directional conviction. The extreme volatility already observed (100%+ swings within single hours) makes any price target inherently unreliable.

TWIN call history

Full track record →

Sep 13bearish@ $0.0000842

24h-96.5%

7d-96.8%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: DFkrD8...JSdd
Total Supply: 954,986,392.21 TWIN

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($12.81K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation susceptibility
Violent price reversal within the last hour (-7.1%) and 5 minutes (-14.4%) immediately following a 101% 24h pump — signature of a pump-and-dump
Complete absence of holder, whale, and sniper data, preventing verification of distribution and insider risk
Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status, leaving open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezes

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 4 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 opened at $0.00000468 and closed at $0.0000388, with a high wick to $0.0000698 — a large-range candle typical of a low-liquidity pump. Candle 2 opened at $0.0000388, spiked to $0.0000988, then collapsed to close at $0.0000230 — a long upper-wick rejection candle. Candle 3 exploded from $0.0000230 to a high of $0.00018 (session peak) before closing at $0.0000755, again showing a huge upper wick and rejection. Candle 4 opened at $0.0000755, ranged between $0.0000668 and $0.000132, and closed at $0.0000842 — a smaller-bodied consolidation candle after the prior blow-off.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Medium-term (24h) trend is strongly up (+101%), but the most recent price action (1h: -7.1%, 5m: -14.4%) shows the short-term trend has flipped down as the pump fades. The candle sequence shows a classic parabolic spike (candles 2-3) followed by fading momentum (candle 4).

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

51%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000668 (candle 4 low)

Major support

$0.0000230 (candle 2/3 pivot)

Immediate resistance

$0.0001320 (candle 4 high)

Major resistance

$0.0001799 (session high, candle 3)

Price is currently consolidating around $0.0000842, well below the session high of $0.00018 set during candle 3. Immediate support sits at the candle 4 low of $0.0000668; a break below could open a retest of the $0.0000230 pivot from candles 2-3. Resistance is layered at the candle 4 high ($0.000132) and the session peak (~$0.00018).

Notable patterns

Long upper-wick rejection candles on candles 2 and 3 (blow-off top signature)
Parabolic spike followed by sharp retracement — classic pump-and-fade pattern
Volume climax on candle 3 (474K) followed by volume contraction on candle 4 (70K)
Short-term negative momentum (5m -14.4%, 1h -7.1%) diverging from positive 24h trend

Liquidity

$12,811.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $12.81K against 24h trading volume exceeding $754K combined (buys+sells) represents a liquidity-to-volume ratio of roughly 1:59 — extremely thin for the amount of activity occurring. This dynamic explains the extreme intraday volatility (100%+ swings within hours) and creates high slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.5%/49.5%), and buyer/seller counts (1,927 vs 1,659) are also broadly comparable, suggesting an active two-sided market rather than one-sided distribution, but the shallow pool means even moderate order flow can move price dramatically in either direction.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

954,986,392.21 TWIN

FDV

$80,423

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price swung +101%, followed by an intra-hour move to a high of $0.00018 and a subsequent -7.1% (1h) and -14.4% (5m) collapse — extreme volatility even by memecoin standards.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $12.81K against 24h volume over $754K combined, a highly imbalanced ratio that produces high slippage and makes the token vulnerable to sharp price manipulation with relatively small capital.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($12.81K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation susceptibility
Violent price reversal within the last hour (-7.1%) and 5 minutes (-14.4%) immediately following a 101% 24h pump — signature of a pump-and-dump
Complete absence of holder, whale, and sniper data, preventing verification of distribution and insider risk
Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status, leaving open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezes
Micro-cap FDV of $80.4K makes the token highly susceptible to being moved by a small number of large trades

Mitigating factors

24h buy and sell volumes are closely balanced (50.5%/49.5%), suggesting two-sided market activity rather than pure one-way dumping
Buyer and seller counts are broadly similar (1,927 vs 1,659), indicating some organic-looking retail participation
Token continues to trade actively on PumpSwap rather than having liquidity fully pulled

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders comfortable with total loss of capital. This is not appropriate for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or moderate-risk exposure. Position sizing should be minimal given the shallow liquidity and unresolved authority/holder data gaps.

TWIN is an extremely thinly-traded, low-liquidity PumpSwap micro-cap that just experienced a violent 101% 24h pump followed by a sharp intra-hour reversal. With no holder, whale, sniper, or authority data available, the token cannot be adequately vetted for insider concentration or rug risk. Any thesis here is necessarily short-term and speculative, driven purely by momentum and liquidity dynamics rather than fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If buy-side momentum resumes and new capital continues rotating into the shallow $12.81K pool, price could retest or exceed the session high near $0.00018, especially if retail attention (1,927 unique buyers in 24h) continues to grow.

Continued organic retail buying interest evidenced by high 24h buyer count
Balanced buy/sell volume suggests demand has not fully collapsed
Low FDV ($80.4K) means relatively small capital inflows could produce outsized percentage gains

Base Case

Price likely continues to oscillate with high volatility in the $0.00003-$0.00012 range over the near term as the shallow liquidity pool absorbs ongoing two-sided trading, without a clear sustained directional trend until either liquidity deepens or a clear catalyst emerges.

Liquidity remains near current thin levels ($12.81K) unless new LP is added
Trading activity remains volatile and driven by short-term speculators rather than long-term holders
No new holder/authority data becomes available to change the risk profile

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic spike to $0.00018 followed by immediate rejection and now a -14.4% five-minute decline suggests the pump has exhausted itself, with price potentially reverting toward the $0.0000230-$0.0000668 support zone or lower as sellers take profit.

Textbook blow-off top pattern with long upper wicks on candles 2 and 3
Extremely thin liquidity magnifies downside moves once selling pressure exceeds buying
No verified token authority renouncement, raising rug-pull or dilution risk
Complete lack of holder/whale transparency prevents ruling out concentrated insider selling

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 13, 11:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-13 23:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
PumpSwap pair price feed
Hourly OHLC candle data (4 most recent candles)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No holder data available (counts, growth, distribution) — holder-related sections are populated with placeholder zero/empty values per methodology rules
No whale/top-holder concentration data available
No sniper wallet data available, preventing insider dump risk quantification
Only 4 hourly candles provided, limiting technical pattern reliability
Metadata fields for update authority, mint authority, freeze authority, verification, and mutability are all unknown, preventing rug-risk confirmation
Token name/symbol/description are self-reported by the token creator and treated as untrusted, unverified claims

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or an endorsement of this token. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in micro-cap and low-liquidity tokens, carries a very high risk of substantial or total loss of capital. Conduct independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is TWIN a scam?

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own. Wallets linked to the creator hold a large share. There is very little liquidity in the pool. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell TWIN?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is TWIN ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling TWIN?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is TWIN liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-13 23:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $12,811.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for TWIN (TWIN)?

Is TWIN a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders comfortable with total loss of capital. This is not appropriate for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or moderate-risk exposure. Position sizing should be minimal given the shallow liquidity and unresolved authority/holder data gaps.

What are the key risks of holding TWIN?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($12.81K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation susceptibility • Violent price reversal within the last hour (-7.1%) and 5 minutes (-14.4%) immediately following a 101% 24h pump — signature of a pump-and-dump • Complete absence of holder, whale, and sniper data, preventing verification of distribution and insider risk