DNUT

donut fade Price Today & AI Analysis

DNUTSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 26, 2026

Price

$0.058068

-23.53% 24h

Contract

Live
D8BNpRy9FSNXjXRMxX2qV5KJcdg9rVsirHj2bfUyPGoq

Chain

Solana

Holders

324

Market cap

$7,852

More tokens on Solana

ZILLIONSZILLIONSZillions$0.042322-2.6%MC $23.2KSHITCOINSHITCOINSHITCOIN$0.000126+9.3%MC $126.3Kmonke monke monke $0.000192+6.1%MC $192.2KCLORDCLORDCLORD-1$0.059488+14.9%MC $9.2KPIGEONSPIGEONSPIGEON TRUTH$0.041114-14.8%MC $11.1KRAYRAYRaydium$2.1+5.4%MC $1.16B

donut fade: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-26 00:46 UTC

Holder addresses

324

Top 10 supply share

22.87%

Reported liquidity

$4,690.00
How concentrated is donut fade ownership?
As of 2026-09-26 00:46 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 22.87% of supply. It reports 324 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling donut fade?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 00:46 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $63.00 in buys and $639.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is donut fade liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -13.80%, from $5,445.33 (2026-09-25 01:00 UTC) to $4,693.74 (2026-09-25 23:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-26 00:46 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-25 01:00 UTC$5,445.33
2026-09-25 02:00 UTC$5,445.32
2026-09-25 03:00 UTC$5,341.33
2026-09-25 04:00 UTC$5,314.48
2026-09-25 05:00 UTC$5,315.16
2026-09-25 06:00 UTC$5,212.99
2026-09-25 09:00 UTC$5,213.34
2026-09-25 10:00 UTC$5,215.20
2026-09-25 11:00 UTC$5,190.35
2026-09-25 13:00 UTC$5,204.47
2026-09-25 14:00 UTC$5,205.19
2026-09-25 15:00 UTC$4,837.47
2026-09-25 16:00 UTC$4,891.26
2026-09-25 17:00 UTC$4,793.25
2026-09-25 18:00 UTC$4,786.81
2026-09-25 19:00 UTC$4,787.29
2026-09-25 20:00 UTC$4,787.06
2026-09-25 21:00 UTC$4,787.06
2026-09-25 22:00 UTC$4,723.58
2026-09-25 23:00 UTC$4,693.74

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about DNUT

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 26, 12:47 AM UTC

FDV

$7,852

Liquidity

$4,690.00

Holders

324

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

DNUT ("donut fade") is a micro-cap Solana meme token trading on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of only ~$7.85K and total liquidity of ~$4.69K. The token has fallen steadily over the past 24 hours (-23.5%), moving from ~$0.0000106 to ~$0.0000081 across the hourly candle series, with sell volume ($639) dwarfing buy volume ($63) — a 91% sell-pressure skew. Holder base is small (324 addresses) and top-10 wallets control ~22.9% of supply. Critical risk inputs (mint/freeze authority, sniper wallet data, holder history) are not available in the provided data, which itself is a red flag for a token this small.

Key points

  • Extremely small FDV (~$7.85K) and thin liquidity (~$4.69K) implies very high price impact per trade
  • 24h price down ~23.5% with a consistent downtrend across nearly all recent hourly candles
  • Sell volume outweighs buy volume by roughly 10:1 in the last 24h (91% sell pressure vs 9% buy pressure)
  • No mint/freeze authority data, no sniper data, and no holder history available — transparency gap increases uncertainty
  • Only 324 holder addresses with top-10 concentration near 23%, though this is a single snapshot with no trend context

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48h

bearish

Price has been in a near-uninterrupted downtrend for the last 24 hours, sliding from ~$0.0000106 to ~$0.0000081 (-23.5%). Multiple candles show zero or negligible volume, indicating a thinly-traded, illiquid market where a handful of sell orders can move price significantly. Sell pressure (91% of 24h volume) heavily outweighs buy pressure (9%), suggesting continued downside risk absent a fresh wave of buyers.

Target low

0.0000060

Target high

0.0000090

Support

0.00000807 (current/most recent close), 0.00000812 (candle 23 open)

Resistance

0.00000855 (candle 16-17 area), 0.00000961 (candle 13-14 area), 0.0000105 (24h high, candle 1-2)

Medium term · 7-14 days

bearish

Without a reversal in buy/sell flow and given the very low liquidity and FDV, the token is at high risk of continued decline or a liquidity-driven price collapse. A sustained move higher would require a meaningful uptick in unique buyers and buy volume, which is not evident in current data.

Catalysts

  • Renewed marketing/social attention (only a Twitter link is provided, no evidence of active promotion)
  • Potential liquidity additions that could stabilize price discovery
  • Continued sell pressure from existing holders could trigger further downside
  • Any large holder (top-10 controls ~22.9% of supply) exiting could cause a sharp drop given the shallow $4.69K liquidity pool

Bullish factors

  • Price decline may be attracting value-seeking micro-cap speculators at lower price points
  • No evidence (in the data provided) of an active rug-pull execution such as a single massive sell candle

Bearish factors

  • Consistent lower highs and lower lows across almost every hourly candle in the sample
  • 91% of 24h volume is sell-side (38 sells vs 20 buys; 31 sellers vs 14 buyers)
  • Extremely low liquidity ($4.69K) and FDV ($7.85K) make the token highly susceptible to sharp moves on small trades
  • Multiple zero-volume candles indicate sporadic, thin trading that increases slippage and manipulation risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset covers only 24 hourly candles, lacks holder history, sniper wallet data, and authority verification, and the token has extremely thin liquidity where price action can be dominated by very few trades (several candles show $0 volume).

DNUT call history

Full track record →

Sep 26bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
D8BNpR...PGoq
Total Supply
973,190,379.20 DNUT

Key Risks

  • Extremely low liquidity (~$4.69K) and FDV (~$7.85K) make the token highly susceptible to large price swings from small trades
  • 24h sell volume ($639) is roughly 10x buy volume ($63), with 31 unique sellers vs only 14 unique buyers, indicating net distribution pressure
  • Mint/freeze authority status is unverified/unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply manipulation or account freezing
  • No sniper or holder-history data available, removing key tools for detecting insider dumping or genuine organic growth

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 24 provided hourly candles, price fell almost monotonically from an open of ~0.0000105772 (candle 1) to a close of ~0.0000080679 (candle 24), a decline of roughly 23.7% peak-to-trough. Notable steps down occurred at candle 3 (drop to ~0.0000101), candle 6 (drop to ~0.0000097), candle 11 (drop to ~0.0000096), and a sharp move at candle 15 (drop from ~0.0000096 to ~0.0000085, the largest single-candle decline, on volume of ~262.8 — the highest volume candle in the sample). Several candles (2,5,7,8,9,12,14,19,20,21,24) show flat O=H=L=C or near-zero volume, indicating stretches of no real trading activity between sell-driven leg-downs.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Both the immediate (last few hours) and the full 24h window show a persistent downtrend with lower highs and lower lows; there is no candle in the sample that closes higher than its prior close by a meaningful margin, and no clear reversal pattern is visible.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

9%

Sell

91%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00000807 (current price / 24h low)

Major support

No clear historical major support below current price is visible in the provided 24-candle window; a break below $0.0000081 has no charted floor in this dataset

Immediate resistance

$0.00000855 (candle 16-17 consolidation zone)

Major resistance

$0.0000105 (24h high, candle 1)

The token is trading at the low end of its 24h range with no bounce yet established. The nearest resistance is the $0.00000855 zone where price paused for two candles before falling further; the major resistance at $0.0000105 represents the starting point of this 24h window and would require a ~30% rally to reclaim.

Notable patterns

  • Staircase downtrend with repeated flat/no-volume candles between sell-driven step-downs
  • Large single-candle sell-off at candle 15 (highest volume in the dataset) causing the steepest single-hour decline (~12%)
  • Volume drying up into the final candles (V approaching $0), consistent with a stalling, illiquid market rather than a confirmed reversal

Liquidity

Liquidity

$4,690.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $4.69K against an FDV of $7.85K places this firmly in shallow, high-slippage territory — any moderately-sized trade (even a few hundred dollars) can move the price substantially, as evidenced by the ~23.5% 24h decline driven by only $639 of sell volume. The 24h data shows a clear net outflow: 38 sell transactions from 31 unique sellers versus only 20 buy transactions from 14 unique buyers, and sell volume outweighs buy volume by roughly 10x ($639 vs $63). This imbalance, combined with thin liquidity, creates elevated risk of continued price deterioration or a sudden liquidity withdrawal.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

973,190,379.20 DNUT

FDV

$7,852

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of -23.5% with a near-continuous downtrend across the hourly candles and a single candle (candle 15) accounting for a ~12% drop; this is a highly volatile, illiquid micro-cap.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only ~$4.69K against an FDV of ~$7.85K means shallow order books and high slippage; sell volume of $639 was enough to move price down substantially in 24h.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Top-10 holders control ~22.87% of supply based on a single current snapshot; however, top-100 concentration, wallet classifications, and any historical trend are unavailable, so the full concentration picture cannot be assessed and is marked unknown rather than assumed low or moderate.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely low liquidity (~$4.69K) and FDV (~$7.85K) make the token highly susceptible to large price swings from small trades
  • 24h sell volume ($639) is roughly 10x buy volume ($63), with 31 unique sellers vs only 14 unique buyers, indicating net distribution pressure
  • Mint/freeze authority status is unverified/unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply manipulation or account freezing
  • No sniper or holder-history data available, removing key tools for detecting insider dumping or genuine organic growth
  • Top-10 wallets hold ~22.87% of supply, which combined with shallow liquidity could enable outsized price impact from a small number of holders

Mitigating factors

  • No evidence in the provided data of an outright liquidity-pull or single catastrophic sell candle (largest single-hour decline was ~12%, not a 90%+ collapse)
  • Trading, while sell-dominated, is still occurring across both buy and sell sides (20 buys and 38 sells in 24h), suggesting the pool has not been fully abandoned

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; this token exhibits multiple hallmarks of an extremely high-risk micro-cap meme coin (sub-$8K FDV, sub-$5K liquidity, unverified authorities, consistent sell pressure, and a lack of transparency in holder/sniper data). Not appropriate for risk-averse or long-term investors.

DNUT is a sub-$8K FDV Solana meme token showing a sustained 24h downtrend (-23.5%), dominated by sell-side flow (91% of volume) against a backdrop of extremely thin liquidity (~$4.69K) and multiple unverifiable risk factors (authorities, sniper activity, holder history). The balance of available evidence points toward continued downside risk absent a clear catalyst, though the very small size of the token means sharp reversals in either direction are possible on minimal capital flow.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A renewed wave of speculative buying (e.g., social media attention via the token's Twitter presence) pushes buy volume above sell volume, and the shallow liquidity pool amplifies the upside move the same way it amplified the recent downside.

  • Viral social/meme momentum reigniting buyer interest
  • Low absolute price and micro FDV attracting speculative capital looking for high-multiple bets
  • Thin liquidity means even modest buy volume could produce an outsized price rally

Base Case

Price continues to drift sideways-to-down within the recent range ($0.0000081-$0.0000096) on low, sporadic volume, reflecting a stalled, low-interest market typical of many small meme tokens post-initial-hype.

  • No major new catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term
  • Liquidity remains roughly at current levels (~$4.69K) without a large add or removal
  • Trading activity remains thin and sporadic as observed in the candle data (multiple zero-volume hours)

Bear Case

High probability

Sell pressure continues or accelerates as existing/top-10 holders (~22.87% of supply) distribute into a shallow market, driving price meaningfully lower or toward liquidity exhaustion.

  • Current 24h data already shows sellers outnumbering buyers 31 to 14 and sell volume outpacing buy volume ~10x
  • Unverified mint/freeze authorities leave open risk of adverse on-chain actions
  • No sniper/holder-history visibility prevents confirmation that any recent buyers are genuinely long-term holders rather than short-term flippers

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 26, 12:47 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-26 00:46 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • Hourly OHLCV candle data (last 24 hours) from the PumpSwap pair
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change)
  • Holder aggregate snapshot (Codex) - current holder count and top-10 concentration only
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No sniper wallet data was available, so sniper concentration, PnL, and dump risk are marked unknown rather than estimated
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was provided, only a single current snapshot of 324 addresses and top-10 concentration
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status were not confirmable from the provided data and are marked unknown
  • Top-100 holder concentration was not provided
  • Only 24 hourly candles were available, limiting longer-term technical trend analysis
  • Several candles show zero or negligible volume, meaning some price points may not reflect genuine liquid trading

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based entirely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history). Token data, including name/symbol/description, originates from the token's creator and may be adversarial or misleading; all figures should be independently verified before making any investment decision. Cryptocurrency, and especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry a high risk of total loss of capital.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is donut fade ownership?

As of 2026-09-26 00:46 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 22.87% of supply. It reports 324 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling donut fade?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 00:46 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $63.00 in buys and $639.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is donut fade liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -13.80%, from $5,445.33 (2026-09-25 01:00 UTC) to $4,693.74 (2026-09-25 23:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for donut fade (DNUT)?

Price has been in a near-uninterrupted downtrend for the last 24 hours, sliding from ~$0.0000106 to ~$0.0000081 (-23.5%). Multiple candles show zero or negligible volume, indicating a thinly-traded, illiquid market where a handful of sell orders can move price significantly. Sell pressure (91% of 24h volume) heavily outweighs buy pressure (9%), suggesting continued downside risk absent a fresh wave of buyers. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48h), with a target range of 0.0000060 to 0.0000090.

Is DNUT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; this token exhibits multiple hallmarks of an extremely high-risk micro-cap meme coin (sub-$8K FDV, sub-$5K liquidity, unverified authorities, consistent sell pressure, and a lack of transparency in holder/sniper data). Not appropriate for risk-averse or long-term investors.

What are the key risks of holding DNUT?

Extremely low liquidity (~$4.69K) and FDV (~$7.85K) make the token highly susceptible to large price swings from small trades • 24h sell volume ($639) is roughly 10x buy volume ($63), with 31 unique sellers vs only 14 unique buyers, indicating net distribution pressure • Mint/freeze authority status is unverified/unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply manipulation or account freezing

← Back to all predictions

Track DNUT