How concentrated is meme + coin = ownership?

As of 2026-09-27 21:17 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 21.94% of supply, out of 1,454 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling meme + coin =?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-27 21:17 UTC, DEX buys were $626,746.00 and sells $615,318.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is meme + coin = liquidity falling?

Liquidity fell 33.25%, from $26,636.02 (2026-09-27 20:00 UTC) to $17,780.30 (2026-09-27 21:00 UTC).

meme + coin = Price Today & AI Analysis

moinSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 27, 2026

$0.0₄4972

-2.64% 24h

Contract

Live

8DXqVUopcdviLvujTcpwEqkKzB43Arp6E1axzsEE5Btq

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,207

Market cap

$48,269

At a $1M market cap, $MOIN would be $0.001030 (20.7x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is moin a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 11

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about moin

3 free answers a day

meme + coin =: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-09-27 21:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,454

Top 10 supply share

21.94%

Reported liquidity

$17,422.00

How concentrated is meme + coin = ownership?: As of 2026-09-27 21:17 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 21.94% of supply, out of 1,454 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling meme + coin =?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-27 21:17 UTC, DEX buys were $626,746.00 and sells $615,318.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is meme + coin = liquidity falling?: Liquidity fell 33.25%, from $26,636.02 (2026-09-27 20:00 UTC) to $17,780.30 (2026-09-27 21:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-27 21:17 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-27 20:00 UTC	$26,636.02
2026-09-27 21:00 UTC	$17,780.30

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-27 21:17 UTCSell · $24.633dEzkZSr…qUsucBWallet Fu8mqF6n…zWfxAW
2026-09-27 21:17 UTCBuy · $1.292Fwnssib…4DGYWXWallet 9MYi14Zp…j9i6vG
2026-09-27 21:17 UTCBuy · $2.0367a17dum…mX5LSzWallet 2hxdYfsr…efxNNW
2026-09-27 21:17 UTCSell · $141.843dBxDdYx…d6V6G1Wallet 4cUTYHT1…AesAi5
2026-09-27 21:17 UTCBuy · $12.79xuPcgW4D…jsDVSnWallet 9n6QNgCW…yGobbu
2026-09-27 21:17 UTCBuy · $3.613oBwG2v2…aJTvRiWallet 5kH8rTAr…SxafoM
2026-09-27 21:17 UTCBuy · $2.414ENC2QAQ…fqFe1jWallet 5wdXuWdZ…6vh8Hr
2026-09-27 21:17 UTCSell · $12.894vAytJCs…HLT9DrWallet HFX2dqzy…93zhY9
2026-09-27 21:17 UTCBuy · $24.50to4beYvP…ytiKcuWallet 2UBq3NLk…u5G7tV
2026-09-27 21:17 UTCBuy · $12.04358hH2ey…Qd9mfPWallet 2Mr19Ufr…KEg5Ro

Report snapshot

as of Sep 27, 09:19 PM UTC

FDV

$120,294

Liquidity

$17,422.00

Holders

1,454

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

MOIN is a newly-visible, meme-narrative-driven Solana token trading on a PumpSwap pair with a fully diluted valuation of ~$120.3K and extremely shallow liquidity of $17.42K against over $1.24M in 24h trading volume. Price has moved +145.6% in 24h but shows a sharp intra-period fade from a high of $0.000432 to a close of $0.0001238, with 1,454 holder addresses and top-10 concentration at 21.94%. Critical risk inputs — mint/freeze authority status, sniper positioning, and holder history — are all unavailable, leaving major transparency gaps.

Key points

Extremely thin liquidity ($17.42K) relative to trading volume (>$1.24M/24h), implying high slippage and manipulation susceptibility
Explosive but unstable price action: >100x intra-candle wick range followed by a ~71% drawdown from the period high
No sniper, holder-history, or contract-authority data available — significant blind spots for risk assessment
Overtly hype/meme-driven token description with no stated utility or roadmap beyond narrative virality
Top-10 holder concentration of 21.94% is moderate but unverifiable in composition (insiders vs. organic holders)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48 hours

bearish

The most recent candle closed well below its high with a large rejection wick, and momentum indicators suggest the token is unwinding from an overbought spike. Absent fresh buying catalysts, further consolidation or continued fade toward the $0.00006-$0.0001 zone is more likely than a retest of the $0.0004+ highs in the immediate term.

Target low

$0.00006

Target high

$0.00030

Support: $0.00006, $0.00000391
Resistance: $0.000303, $0.000432

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

With only two hourly candles of data and no medium-term trend history, a durable directional call cannot be made with confidence. Medium-term price behavior will likely hinge on whether liquidity is deepened, whether authority/verification questions are resolved, and whether social/meme momentum is sustained or fades — none of which can be forecast from the data provided.

Catalysts

Any resolution/disclosure of mint and freeze authority status
Meaningful increase in pooled liquidity beyond the current $17.42K
Sustained or renewed social media attention/virality
Emergence of sniper/whale-selling data that could reveal distribution risk

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset includes only two OHLC candles (insufficient for robust trend/pattern analysis), no sniper data, no holder history, and unknown contract authority status. The extreme volatility already observed also makes any point prediction inherently unreliable for a token this immature and thinly traded.

moin call history

Full track record →

Sep 27bearish@ $0.000124

24h+101.7%

7d-32.7%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 8DXqVU...5Btq
Total Supply: 971,510,126.585104 MOIN

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.42K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown — possibility of supply inflation or account freezing cannot be ruled out
No sniper/early-buyer data available, so bot-driven pump-and-dump dynamics cannot be assessed or ruled out
Extreme short-term volatility (+145.6% 24h, huge intra-hour candle ranges) indicative of a highly speculative, likely very newly launched token

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles were provided. Candle 1 (20:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000391, spiked to a high of $0.000432, then fell back to a low equal to its open ($0.00000391) before closing at $0.000303 — an enormous range suggesting a violent initial pump likely tied to a launch or liquidity event, with a long wick both up and down. Candle 2 (21:00 UTC) opened at $0.000303 (prior close), pushed to a marginally higher high of $0.000424, sold down to a low of $0.00006, and closed near $0.0001238 — again a huge range, closing well below the candle's midpoint, indicating strong intra-hour selling pressure after the highs. The pattern across both candles is one of huge upside wicks rejected followed by sharp pullbacks — a classic high-volatility, low-liquidity pump-and-fade pattern rather than a stable uptrend.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Within the two available candles, price made a lower high ($0.000432 to $0.000424) and closed candle 2 sharply below candle 1's close ($0.0001238 vs $0.000303), a short-term downtrend/fade after the initial spike. With only two candles of data, no reliable medium-term trend can be established; it is characterized here as sideways/undetermined pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00006 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.00000391 (candle 1 low/open)

Immediate resistance

$0.000303 (candle 1 close / candle 2 open)

Major resistance

$0.000432 (candle 1 high, the highest print observed)

With only two hourly candles, support/resistance levels are provisional. The candle 1 high of $0.000432 represents the strongest resistance observed so far since price was twice rejected near that zone ($0.000432 and $0.000424). The candle 2 low of $0.00006 is the nearest support; a break below it would open a retest of the extreme candle 1 low of $0.00000391, though that print looks more like a launch-artifact wick than a durable support level.

Notable patterns

Large upper-wick rejection candles (both candles printed highs far above their closes)
Lower high formed between candle 1 ($0.000432) and candle 2 ($0.000424)
Sharp bearish close-over-close fade (close dropped from $0.000303 to $0.0001238, roughly -59%)
Extreme range/volatility consistent with a fresh pump-and-dump or launch-pump pattern on a low-liquidity PumpSwap pair

Liquidity

$17,422.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $17.42K is extremely shallow relative to a 24h traded volume of over $1.24M combined (buy $626.75K + sell $615.32K), implying a volume/liquidity turnover ratio above 70x in a single day — a strong indicator of high slippage and thin order-book depth. Any meaningfully sized trade (even a few hundred dollars) could move price substantially, consistent with the extreme candle ranges observed (price swung from ~$0.0000039 to ~$0.00043 within a single hourly candle). Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.5% buy vs 49.5% sell) with a slight net inflow, and buyer count (4,412) modestly exceeds seller count (3,749), suggesting broad participation, but this does not offset the structural fragility created by such low pooled liquidity on a PumpSwap pair.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

971,510,126.585104 MOIN

FDV

$120.29K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +145.6%, with hourly candles showing swings from a low of $0.00000391 to a high of $0.000432 (a >100x intracandle range) followed by a pullback to $0.000124. This is extreme, casino-like volatility typical of a very early-stage or freshly-launched PumpSwap meme token.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $17.42K against >$1.24M of 24h trading volume, a very high turnover ratio implying thin depth and high slippage on even modest trade sizes.
Concentrationmedium
Top-10 holder addresses control 21.94% of supply. This is a real but not extreme concentration figure; however top-100 concentration and wallet classification (insiders vs. exchanges vs. organic holders) are unavailable, limiting full assessment.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.42K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown — possibility of supply inflation or account freezing cannot be ruled out
No sniper/early-buyer data available, so bot-driven pump-and-dump dynamics cannot be assessed or ruled out
Extreme short-term volatility (+145.6% 24h, huge intra-hour candle ranges) indicative of a highly speculative, likely very newly launched token
Top-10 holders control ~22% of supply with no visibility into who these holders are
Token metadata/description contains promotional, hype-driven language ('become an onchain billionaire') typical of speculative memecoins, not fundamentals-driven investment cases
Verified contract status and spam flag are unknown, adding uncertainty about contract legitimacy

Mitigating factors

24h buy/sell volume is roughly balanced (50.5%/49.5%) with a slight net inflow, suggesting no obvious one-sided dumping in the observed window
Buyer count (4,412) exceeds seller count (3,749) in the 24h window, indicating relatively broad participation rather than a single whale dominating flow
Top-10 concentration of ~22% is not in the extreme (>50%) range seen in many rug-prone tokens, though this alone is not sufficient to call the token safe

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of near-total loss of capital; unsuitable for conservative investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to independently verify contract authorities before entry.

MOIN is an overtly self-described, hype-driven memecoin ('meme + coin = moin... hold something as stupid as moin, and become a onchain billionaire') trading on a shallow-liquidity PumpSwap pair. The available data shows explosive but highly unstable price action, thin liquidity, unknown contract authority status, and no sniper or holder-history visibility. Any thesis here rests on speculative meme momentum and community attention rather than fundamentals, which are entirely absent from the data provided.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If retail/meme attention continues to build (as suggested by the current +145.6% 24h move and thousands of daily buyers), the token could see further speculative upside driven by social virality typical of PumpSwap-launched memecoins, especially if liquidity is added and top-10 concentration (currently 21.94%) does not increase further.

Continued social/community momentum (Twitter link present)
Broad buyer participation (4,412 buyers vs 3,749 sellers in 24h)
Slight net inflow in 24h volume
Low absolute price and FDV ($120.29K) leave room for speculative multiples if narrative catches on

Base Case

Most likely outcome given available data is continued high-volatility, range-bound-to-declining price action typical of early-stage PumpSwap memecoins, with periodic sharp spikes on speculative interest followed by fades, absent any durable catalyst or resolved transparency on contract authorities.

No new liquidity is meaningfully added beyond the current $17.42K
Contract authority status remains unresolved/unverified
Retail attention driven purely by meme/social narrative rather than utility
Trading continues to be dominated by short-term scalpers given near-50/50 buy/sell split

Bear Case

High probability

Given the extreme volatility already observed (a >100x intra-candle range followed by a ~71% drawdown from the high), shallow liquidity ($17.42K vs $1.24M 24h volume), and complete lack of visibility into mint/freeze authority and sniper positioning, the token is highly susceptible to a rapid, disorderly collapse in price with minimal capital required to move it in either direction.

Extremely thin liquidity relative to volume, enabling large slippage and price manipulation
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the risk of supply dilution or account restrictions
No sniper/holder history data to rule out coordinated early-buyer dumping
Already-observed sharp fade from intra-period highs signals fragile demand
Hype-driven, fundamentals-free narrative typical of tokens with high abandonment/rug rates

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 27, 09:19 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-27 21:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, description)
Price feed (USD price, % change intervals)
OHLC hourly candle data (2 most recent candles)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, liquidity, FDV)
Unhosted holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were provided, insufficient for robust technical/trend analysis
No sniper data available — sniper concentration, PnL, and sell-through metrics could not be assessed
No holder history — growth trends, accumulation/distribution, and wallet classification could not be determined; only a current holder count (1454) and top-10 share (21.94%) exist
Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract status, and mutability flags are all unknown
Top-100 holder concentration not provided, only top-10
24h dollar price change and native price change were marked unknown in source data
6h price % change was marked unknown

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partial on-chain data and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity memecoins, carries a high risk of substantial or total loss of capital. Several key risk inputs (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history) were unavailable and are explicitly flagged as unknown rather than assumed safe. Independent due diligence and verification via on-chain explorers is strongly recommended before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is meme + coin = (moin) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 11, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell meme + coin = (moin)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 11, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for meme + coin = (moin)?

Is moin a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of near-total loss of capital; unsuitable for conservative investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to independently verify contract authorities before entry.

What are the key risks of holding moin?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($17.42K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown — possibility of supply inflation or account freezing cannot be ruled out • No sniper/early-buyer data available, so bot-driven pump-and-dump dynamics cannot be assessed or ruled out