C

CoreWeave - Backpack Securities Price Today & AI Analysis

CRWVSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 23, 2026

Price

$91.77

-6.08% 24h · FDV $321,428

Contract

Live
CRWVJeR2yEZuDUKYfGuKCHvLz8ywn4LGvovHfy5WiFmi

Chain

Holders

1,640

Market cap

$321,428

More tokens on Solana

CoreWeave - Backpack Securities: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-23 16:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,640

Top 10 supply share

14.84%

Reported liquidity

$373,728.00
How concentrated is CoreWeave - Backpack Securities ownership?
As of 2026-09-23 16:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 14.84% of supply. It reports 1,640 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling CoreWeave - Backpack Securities?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 16:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $357,120.00 in buys and $2,084,875.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is CoreWeave - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +12.14%, from $240,521.98 (2026-09-23 15:00 UTC) to $269,726.35 (2026-09-23 16:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-23 16:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-23 15:00 UTC$240,521.98
2026-09-23 16:00 UTC$269,726.35

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about CRWV

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 23, 04:16 PM UTC

FDV

$321,428

Liquidity

$373,728.00

Holders

1,640

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bearish

CRWV (CoreWeave - Backpack Securities) is a small-cap Solana token trading around $91.77 with a fully diluted valuation of roughly $321.4K and total liquidity near $373.7K on a single Raydium CLMM pool. The token has an extremely small total supply of ~3,502.5 tokens (6 decimals), giving it a high per-token price. In the most recent 24h window, price fell 6.08%, and trading activity shows heavy sell-side pressure (85.4% of volume vs. 14.6% buy) despite a higher number of buy transactions than sellers might suggest, with 2,327 unique sellers vs 1,793 unique buyers. The token has 1,640 holder addresses and top-10 holders control 14.84% of supply per the latest snapshot, but no historical holder data, wallet classification, sniper data, or mint/freeze authority verification is available, leaving significant blind spots in the risk picture.

Key points

  • Very low total supply (~3,502 tokens) with high unit price (~$91.77), unusual tokenomics structure suggestive of a tokenized security/wrapper product rather than a typical meme/utility token
  • Thin liquidity (~$373.7K) relative to 24h trading volume (~$2.4M combined buy+sell), implying meaningful slippage risk for larger trades
  • Heavily skewed sell pressure (85.4% sell vs 14.6% buy) in the 24h window despite modest single-hour price recovery
  • No verifiable mint/freeze authority status, no sniper coverage, and no holder history - substantial data gaps that limit confidence in any risk-off or risk-on conclusion

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Short-term price action shows a sharp intra-candle spike to $112.56 followed by a pullback to the $90-91 range, with the most recent hourly candle closing higher near $91.66 after touching a low of $90.27. The 24h trend remains net negative (-6.08%), and heavy sell volume (85.4% of 24h activity) suggests continued downward pressure is plausible, though the most recent 1h change of -0.87% and 5m change of +0.11% indicate near-term stabilization.

Target low

$85.00

Target high

$95.00

Support

$89.55 (24h candle low), $90.27 (most recent hourly low)

Resistance

$91.78-$91.89 (recent candle open/high cluster), $112.56 (recent spike high, likely a liquidity/wick anomaly rather than sustained resistance)

Medium term · 3-7 days

neutral

With only two hourly candles of data provided and no broader historical OHLC context, medium-term directional confidence is low. The dominant sell pressure and thin liquidity pool create conditions where price could either stabilize if selling exhausts or continue drifting lower if sellers remain in control.

Catalysts

  • Resolution of the apparent volatility spike seen in the first candle (high of $112.56 vs open of $91.89) - if this was a liquidity event or wash trade, further volatility is likely
  • Any change in liquidity depth (currently ~$373.7K) which could exacerbate price swings in either direction
  • Lack of visible catalysts (no social links, no verified contract status) limits ability to identify positive medium-term drivers

Confidence: low. Only two hourly OHLC candles were provided, severely limiting technical analysis depth. Broader price history, mint/freeze authority status, sniper data, and holder trend history are all unavailable, so both short and medium-term projections rely on a very narrow data window and carry low confidence.

CRWV call history

Full track record →

Sep 23bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
CRWVJe...iFmi
Total Supply
3,502.536169 CRWV (6 decimals)

Key Risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($373.73K) relative to trading volume creates high slippage and price-impact risk for meaningful trade sizes
  • 24h sell volume ($2.08M) outweighs buy volume ($357.12K) by nearly 6:1, with more unique sellers (2,327) than buyers (1,793), indicating net distribution/outflow
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown - the possibility of further dilution or account freezing cannot be ruled out
  • No sniper, holder history, or wallet classification data is available, leaving major blind spots around insider/early-buyer behavior and concentration trends

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles were provided. Candle 1 (15:00 UTC) opened at $91.89, spiked to a high of $112.56, dropped to a low of $89.55, and closed at $90.81 - a large upper-wick candle with the close near the low, indicating a sharp rejection from the $112 level and significant intra-hour volatility with volume of ~$7.25M. Candle 2 (16:00 UTC) opened at $90.81, traded between $90.27-$91.78, and closed at $91.66, a modest bullish recovery candle but on dramatically lower volume (~$158.8K), suggesting the initial spike/volume was an outlier event (possibly a large trade, wash trade, or liquidity event) rather than sustained buying interest.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term price is consolidating in the $90-92 range after a volatile spike-and-reject move. The medium-term trend is negative given the -6.08% 24h change, though the very limited 2-candle sample size prevents high-confidence trend classification.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

15%

Sell

85%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$90.27 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$89.55 (candle 1 low)

Immediate resistance

$91.78-$91.89 (candle 2 high / candle 1 open)

Major resistance

$112.56 (candle 1 high - likely anomalous spike)

The $89.55-$91.89 zone has acted as the effective trading range in the observed window, with the $112.56 print appearing to be a wick/anomaly rather than a level with real resistance memory given it was immediately rejected on high volume. Sustained trade above $91.89 would be the first sign of near-term strength; a break below $89.55 would open downside continuation given the prevailing 24h downtrend.

Notable patterns

  • Upper-wick rejection candle (spike to $112.56 rejected back to $90.81 close) - classic signature of a liquidity grab, large sell-into-strength, or thin order book slippage
  • Sharp volume decay (~98%) between candle 1 and candle 2, indicating the spike was not sustained by broad participation
  • Tight-range consolidation candle following the spike, suggesting short-term equilibrium between buyers and sellers at current levels

Liquidity

Liquidity

$373,728.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $373.73K is thin relative to 24h trading volume (buy + sell combined ~$2.44M), meaning the pool is being turned over roughly 6.5x in a day - a hallmark of shallow-liquidity, high-slippage conditions especially for trade sizes above a few thousand dollars. Sell volume ($2.08M) dwarfs buy volume ($357.12K) by nearly 6:1, and unique sellers (2,327) outnumber unique buyers (1,793), pointing to a clear net outflow / distribution pattern over the last 24 hours. This imbalance is consistent with the observed -6.08% 24h price decline and raises concern about continued downward pressure if sell-side flow persists without offsetting demand.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

3,502.536169 CRWV (6 decimals)

FDV

$321,428

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of -6.08% combined with an intra-hour spike to $112.56 followed by a rejection back to ~$90-91 demonstrates significant short-term volatility. The tiny 2-candle sample and thin liquidity amplify the potential for sharp price swings.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $373.73K against 24h combined trading volume of ~$2.44M indicates the pool is thin relative to trading activity, creating high slippage risk for any meaningfully-sized trade and vulnerability to sharp price impact from large orders.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only a top-10 concentration figure (14.84%) is available, which on its own does not appear extreme; however, top-100 concentration, wallet classification (team/exchange/LP vs. retail), and holder history are all missing. Without this context, true concentration risk cannot be reliably assessed and is marked unknown rather than low.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($373.73K) relative to trading volume creates high slippage and price-impact risk for meaningful trade sizes
  • 24h sell volume ($2.08M) outweighs buy volume ($357.12K) by nearly 6:1, with more unique sellers (2,327) than buyers (1,793), indicating net distribution/outflow
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown - the possibility of further dilution or account freezing cannot be ruled out
  • No sniper, holder history, or wallet classification data is available, leaving major blind spots around insider/early-buyer behavior and concentration trends
  • Only 2 hourly candles of price history were provided, severely limiting the ability to validate trend direction and technical structure with confidence
  • Token name/branding referencing 'CoreWeave' and 'Backpack Securities' with no verified social links or description raises questions about legitimacy and whether this represents a genuine tokenized security exposure or an unaffiliated/unauthorized wrapper

Mitigating factors

  • Top-10 holder concentration is reported at a relatively moderate 14.84% of supply, which - taken at face value and without further context - does not by itself suggest extreme insider concentration
  • The most recent hourly candle shows a modest recovery (close $91.66 vs prior close $90.81) and short-term momentum (5m: +0.11%) has stabilized somewhat after the earlier volatile spike

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, sophisticated investors who fully understand thin-liquidity Solana microcap dynamics and can tolerate potential total loss of capital. The combination of unknown mint/freeze authority status, no sniper or holder-history coverage, shallow liquidity, and net sell-side dominance over the last 24h makes this unsuitable for risk-averse or passive investors. Given the token's apparent framing as a tokenized security product with no verifiable social presence or contract verification, additional legal/regulatory due diligence would be warranted before any allocation.

CRWV presents a high-risk, data-sparse speculative opportunity. Its extremely low supply and high per-token price, combined with a name suggestive of tokenized exposure to CoreWeave equity via 'Backpack Securities,' hints at a novel synthetic asset product, but the on-chain evidence available is insufficient to confirm legitimacy, authority controls, or sustainable demand. Current market behavior shows net sell pressure and thin liquidity, both bearish signals, while price has partially stabilized after a volatile spike.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If CRWV genuinely represents a legitimate, redeemable tokenized security tracking CoreWeave, and demand for on-chain equity exposure grows, the token could see renewed buy interest and liquidity depth improve as the product gains adoption. Short-term price stabilization in the $90-92 range could form a base for recovery if sell pressure exhausts.

  • Growing interest in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) and synthetic equity exposure on Solana could drive fresh demand
  • Recent hourly candle shows a modest bounce off the $89.55-90.27 support zone
  • Top-10 holder concentration (14.84%) is not extreme, suggesting no single obvious whale currently dominates supply, at least among the identifiable top holders

Base Case

Price continues to trade in a volatile but roughly range-bound manner (roughly $85-95) in the near term as thin liquidity produces exaggerated swings in both directions without a clear sustained trend, pending resolution of the currently unknown fundamental/authority risk factors.

  • No major new liquidity is added or removed from the Raydium CLMM pool in the near term
  • Current sell/buy imbalance moderates somewhat but does not reverse dramatically without new information
  • No confirmation emerges regarding mint/freeze authority status or the token's underlying legitimacy as a tokenized security product

Bear Case

Medium probability

Sell pressure persists or accelerates, liquidity remains thin and continues to be drained, and the lack of verifiable mint/freeze authority or legitimacy signals (no social links, unverified contract) leads to continued price decline or a liquidity-driven collapse.

  • 24h sell volume ($2.08M) nearly 6x buy volume ($357.12K), with more unique sellers than buyers
  • Thin liquidity ($373.73K) makes the token vulnerable to sharp downside moves on relatively small sell orders
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezes without warning
  • No verified contract, no social links, and no description - hallmarks of low transparency that often precede negative outcomes in microcap tokens

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 23, 04:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-23 16:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
  • Price feed (USD price, 24h % change)
  • OHLC hourly candle data (2 candles, Raydium CLMM pair)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change across timeframes)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical trend and pattern analysis
  • No sniper data was available at all, preventing any assessment of early-buyer concentration or dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was available - only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • No wallet classification data was available, preventing identification of notable/whale holders or distribution sentiment
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status were all unknown, preventing any rug-risk assessment from authority controls
  • Top-100 holder concentration was not provided, limiting full concentration risk assessment to only the top-10 figure
  • No social links, project description, or verification status were available to assess project legitimacy or team transparency

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data that may not reflect the full picture of this token's risk profile. Cryptocurrency and tokenized asset investments carry substantial risk of loss, including total loss of principal. Conduct your own independent due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is CoreWeave - Backpack Securities ownership?

As of 2026-09-23 16:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 14.84% of supply. It reports 1,640 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling CoreWeave - Backpack Securities?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-23 16:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $357,120.00 in buys and $2,084,875.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is CoreWeave - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +12.14%, from $240,521.98 (2026-09-23 15:00 UTC) to $269,726.35 (2026-09-23 16:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for CoreWeave - Backpack Securities (CRWV)?

Short-term price action shows a sharp intra-candle spike to $112.56 followed by a pullback to the $90-91 range, with the most recent hourly candle closing higher near $91.66 after touching a low of $90.27. The 24h trend remains net negative (-6.08%), and heavy sell volume (85.4% of 24h activity) suggests continued downward pressure is plausible, though the most recent 1h change of -0.87% and 5m change of +0.11% indicate near-term stabilization. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $85.00 to $95.00.

Is CRWV a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 78/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, sophisticated investors who fully understand thin-liquidity Solana microcap dynamics and can tolerate potential total loss of capital. The combination of unknown mint/freeze authority status, no sniper or holder-history coverage, shallow liquidity, and net sell-side dominance over the last 24h makes this unsuitable for risk-averse or passive investors. Given the token's apparent framing as a tokenized security product with no verifiable social presence or contract verification, additional legal/regulatory due diligence would be warranted before any allocation.

What are the key risks of holding CRWV?

Extremely thin liquidity ($373.73K) relative to trading volume creates high slippage and price-impact risk for meaningful trade sizes • 24h sell volume ($2.08M) outweighs buy volume ($357.12K) by nearly 6:1, with more unique sellers (2,327) than buyers (1,793), indicating net distribution/outflow • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown - the possibility of further dilution or account freezing cannot be ruled out

← Back to all predictions

Track CRWV