Zeus

Ansems Dog Price Prediction 2026

Zeus
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 28, 2026

8mTu8AW8co1QzHHRnvVZnknUaRsEmxdhjCTCJFeZpump

$0.042580

+17.08%

FDV $25,801

LiveContract:8mTu8AW8co1QzHHRnvVZnknUaRsEmxdhjCTCJFeZpumpChain:SolanaHolders:410Market cap:$25,801

More tokens on Solana

CLICKCLACK

CLICKCLACK

ClickClack

$0.04350221.8%
MC $35.0K
Instagram

Instagram

Instagram Coin

$0.0599604.2%
MC $9.4K
ANT

ANT

ANThropic

$0.05973738.3%
MC $8.0K
crabbox

crabbox

crabbox

$0.05266127.8%
MC $2.3K
TYGR

TYGR

Tygr

$0.0413503.5%
MC $13.5K
XST

XST

XST

$0.057656.5%
MC $57.58M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Zeus

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 28, 03:18 AM
FDV

$140,676

Liquidity

$43,756

Holders

328

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Ansems Dog (Zeus) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana (mint: 8mTu8AW8co1QzHHRnvVZnknUaRsEmxdhjCTCJFeZpump) with a 1 billion token supply and a fully diluted valuation of ~$140.7K. The token launched on PumpSwap and has experienced a dramatic 273.96% 24h price spike, but exhibits severe red flags: overwhelming sell pressure (73.5% sell volume), only 328 holders, zero top-holder concentration data available, and a 30-day history of complete stagnation at 25 holders before an explosive 24h surge. The description claims supply will be sent to a named influencer ('Ansem'), which is a common social-engineering tactic. This is an extremely high-risk, speculative micro-cap meme token.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 273.96% 24h price pump from a very low base (~$0.000037 to ~$0.000141)
Holder count surged from 25 (stagnant for 30 days) to 328 in under 48 hours — entirely event-driven
Severe sell pressure: 73.5% of 24h volume ($133.24K) is sells vs. 26.5% buys ($47.92K)
Liquidity is extremely shallow at only $43.76K total, creating very high slippage risk
No top holder data available, making concentration risk unquantifiable
Token description references sending supply to a named influencer — a common manipulation/hype tactic

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token is showing extreme sell pressure (73.5% sell volume) and a -14.78% drop in the last 5 minutes at time of analysis. The pump appears to be in distribution phase. With only $43.76K liquidity and 703 sellers vs. 366 buyers in 24h, the path of least resistance is downward. A retracement toward the pre-pump range (~$0.000030–$0.000038) is likely.

Target low$0.000025
Target high$0.000180
Support: $0.000030 (recent candle low / open cluster), $0.000025 (candle [6] low)
Resistance: $0.000141 (current price / 24h high zone), $0.000133 (candle [1] high)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Given the token's 30-day stagnation at 25 holders prior to this pump, there is no organic community base. The pump appears entirely speculative and momentum-driven. Without sustained buying interest, new utility, or genuine influencer endorsement, the token is likely to retrace most of its gains. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless a verifiable catalyst emerges.

Catalysts
  • Verified endorsement or acknowledgment from the named influencer ('Ansem')
  • Sustained holder growth beyond the current 328
  • Significant liquidity additions to reduce slippage risk
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally

Bullish factors

  • 273.96% 24h price surge demonstrates strong short-term momentum
  • Holder count grew +303 (+92%) in 24h, showing rapid new interest
  • 1h price change of +17.7% suggests some buying activity persists
  • PumpSwap listing provides accessible on-chain trading

Bearish factors

  • 73.5% of 24h volume is sell pressure ($133.24K sells vs $47.92K buys)
  • 703 unique sellers vs. only 366 unique buyers in 24h
  • Only $43.76K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage
  • 30 days of zero holder growth before this pump — no organic base
  • No verified contract, update authority unknown
  • Token description uses influencer name as social engineering bait
  • -14.78% price drop in the last 5 minutes signals active distribution
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: missing top-holder data (concentration unknown), no sniper data, extremely thin liquidity ($43.76K), and the highly speculative/meme-driven nature of the token. Price action in micro-cap meme tokens is highly unpredictable and can move 10x in either direction on minimal volume.

Zeus call history

Full track record →
Jun 28bearish
24h-10.1%
7d+142.6%
30d-77.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Reviewing the 6 most recent hourly OHLC candles (all times UTC, June 27–28 2026): The price action shows a volatile, choppy structure. Candle [6] (22:00): O=$0.0000302, H=$0.0000496, L=$0.0000258, C=$0.0000379 — a bullish candle with a wide range. Candle [5] (23:00): O=$0.0000379, H=$0.0000379, L=$0.0000339, C=$0.0000302 — bearish close, narrow range. Candle [4] (00:00): O=$0.0000302, H=$0.0000379, L=$0.0000556, C=$0.0000379 — NOTE: the L value ($0.0000556) is HIGHER than H ($0.0000379), which is a data anomaly likely indicating inverted OHLC fields in the feed; treating with caution. Candle [3] (01:00): Similar anomaly with L > H. Candle [2] (02:00): O=$0.0000302, H=$0.0000379, L=$0.0000830, C=$0.0000379 — again L > H anomaly. Candle [1] (03:00): O=$0.0000379, H=$0.0000379, L=$0.0001329, C=$0.0000302 — L > H anomaly persists. The OHLC data appears to have H and L fields swapped in the feed (the 'L' values are consistently higher than 'H'). Reinterpreting: the true highs are the 'L' field values and true lows are the 'H' field values. Under this interpretation, the most recent candle [1] shows a true high of ~$0.0001329 and a true low of ~$0.0000379, with a bearish close at $0.0000302 — a large bearish engulfing/shooting star pattern. The current price of $0.000141 is significantly above all candle values shown, suggesting the major pump occurred after the last recorded candle.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 27%Sell 74%

Short-term trend is technically upward given the 273.96% 24h price surge, but the most recent 5-minute data shows -14.78%, suggesting the peak may be in. Medium-term (30-day) trend is sideways-to-flat, as the token sat dormant at 25 holders for the entire month prior to this 48-hour event.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000038 (recent candle open/close cluster)
Major$0.000025–$0.000030 (candle [6] low zone, pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000141 (current price / recent pump high)
Major$0.000133 (reinterpreted candle [1] true high)

The pre-pump trading range of $0.000025–$0.000050 represents the major support zone. The current price of $0.000141 is well above all recent candle structures, making it a resistance zone. A failure to hold above $0.000083 (candle [2] reinterpreted high) would signal a full retracement toward the $0.000030 base.

Notable patterns

  • Suspected H/L field inversion in OHLC data feed — treat raw candle data with caution
  • Shooting star / bearish engulfing pattern on most recent candle (reinterpreted)
  • Price gap between last candle close (~$0.000038) and current price ($0.000141) — gap-up pump
  • Alternating open/close values between $0.0000302 and $0.0000379 across multiple candles suggests tight pre-pump consolidation
  • Volume spike accompanying the pump is dominated by sell pressure (73.5%)

Total holders328
24h Δ+303
7d Δ+303
30d Δ+303
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is strongly correlated with the price pump: the token sat at exactly 25 holders for the entire 30-day historical period (June 1–26, 2026) with zero net change. On June 27, holders jumped by +176 (+88%) to 201, and within the next 24 hours surged to 328 (+303 total, +92% 24h). This growth is entirely event-driven and coincides with the 273.96% price spike, suggesting FOMO-driven buying rather than organic community building.

The holder history reveals a deeply concerning pattern: 25 wallets held this token for at least 30 days with absolutely zero new holders joining (0% change every day from May 29 to June 26). This strongly suggests the token was pre-mined or held by insiders/bots awaiting a pump event. The explosive growth from 25 to 328 holders (+1,212% in ~48 hours) is entirely driven by the price pump and likely represents retail FOMO buyers entering at or near the top. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to 24h (+303), confirming all growth occurred in the last 48 hours. Growth is accelerating in the very short term but is unsustainable given the sell-dominated volume profile.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

No top holder data available

Data unavailable — top holders endpoint returned no results

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token. The supply concentration fields show top10=0% and top100=0%, which is almost certainly a data gap rather than a genuine even distribution. Given that 25 wallets held the token for 30 days with zero new entrants, it is highly probable that supply is heavily concentrated among a small number of early/insider wallets. The lack of transparency around holder distribution is itself a significant red flag. Without this data, concentration risk cannot be properly quantified, but the circumstantial evidence strongly suggests very high concentration. The 'distributing' sentiment is inferred from the 73.5% sell pressure and 703 unique sellers dominating 24h activity.

Liquidity$43,760
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$47,920
Sell$133,240
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers366
Unique sellers703

Liquidity is critically shallow at $43.76K on PumpSwap (pair: HFu4wM862Fyw9AjVa75CRM818zVuXpUmMYmguYfxixx4). The 24h trading volume of ~$181K is over 4x the total liquidity pool, indicating extreme turnover and very high slippage risk for any meaningful position. The net flow is strongly negative: $133.24K in sell volume vs. $47.92K in buy volume represents a net outflow of ~$85.3K. There are nearly twice as many sellers (703) as buyers (366), confirming active distribution. The FDV of $140.68K vs. $43.76K liquidity means the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~31%, which is low but not atypical for micro-cap PumpFun tokens. Any large sell order will cause severe price impact given the shallow pool depth.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 (1 billion)
FDV$140,675.71

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a standard 1 billion supply with 6 decimals, typical of PumpFun launches. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and the contract is unverified. Mutable is set to false, which is a mild positive indicator. However, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The token description states 'supply will be sent to Ansem and fees redirected to him' — this is a social engineering claim that cannot be verified on-chain and should be treated with extreme skepticism. If true, it would represent a massive centralization risk. The FDV of ~$140.7K is micro-cap territory. The .pump suffix in the mint address confirms PumpFun origin. Authority risks remain unknown and unverified.

Volatility
high

273.96% 24h price spike followed by -14.78% in 5 minutes. Extreme volatility typical of micro-cap meme tokens in pump-and-dump cycles.

Liquidity
high

Only $43.76K total liquidity on PumpSwap. 24h volume of ~$181K is 4x the pool size. Any position of meaningful size will face severe slippage and potential inability to exit.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable. 25 wallets held the token for 30 days with zero new entrants — strong circumstantial evidence of heavy insider concentration. Supply concentration fields show 0% for top10/top100, likely a data gap.

SniperDump
medium

No sniper data available. However, the 25 early wallets that held for 30 days are likely sitting on large unrealized gains and represent a significant dump risk. The 73.5% sell pressure and 703 sellers vs. 366 buyers suggests active distribution is already underway.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown', contract is unverified, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The token description makes unverifiable claims about sending supply to a named influencer, which is a common rug/scam vector.

Key risks

  • Extreme sell pressure: 73.5% of 24h volume is sells ($133.24K vs $47.92K buys)
  • 30-day holder stagnation at 25 wallets before pump — strong insider/pre-mine signal
  • No top holder data — concentration risk is unquantifiable but likely very high
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($43.76K) with high slippage risk
  • Unverified contract and unknown authority status
  • Token description uses influencer name ('Ansem') as social engineering — unverifiable claim
  • Pump appears to be in active distribution phase (-14.78% in 5 minutes)
  • PumpFun origin with no verified utility or project fundamentals
  • Only 328 total holders — extremely thin community base

Mitigating factors

  • Mutable flag is set to false, reducing metadata manipulation risk
  • Token is listed on PumpSwap providing some on-chain price discovery
  • FDV is micro-cap ($140.7K), limiting absolute dollar loss for small positions
  • Rapid holder growth (+303 in 24h) shows some market interest, however FOMO-driven
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of rapid execution. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation. This appears to be a classic pump-and-dump pattern.

Ansems Dog (Zeus) is a PumpFun meme token that has experienced a 273.96% pump in 24 hours, driven entirely by speculative momentum and social engineering around a named influencer. The token shows all hallmarks of a pump-and-dump: 30 days of insider-only holding, explosive price action, overwhelming sell pressure (73.5%), shallow liquidity, and no verifiable fundamentals. The risk/reward is extremely unfavorable for new entrants at current prices.

Bull case (low)

If the named influencer ('Ansem') publicly acknowledges or endorses the token, a second wave of FOMO buying could drive further price appreciation. Continued holder growth and a shift in buy/sell ratio toward buying could sustain momentum in the very short term.

  • Verified influencer endorsement or acknowledgment
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Sustained buy pressure overcoming current sell dominance
  • Viral social media attention driving new buyer inflow

Base case

The token experiences a partial retracement of 50–80% from the pump high as sell pressure continues to dominate. A small residual community of ~300–500 holders remains, with the token trading in a new, slightly elevated range above pre-pump levels but well below the pump peak. No sustained price appreciation without a genuine catalyst.

  • Sell pressure remains dominant but gradually normalizes
  • No verified influencer endorsement materializes
  • Liquidity remains shallow, limiting recovery potential
  • Holder count stabilizes around 300–500 without further growth

Bear case (high)

The pump is already in distribution phase. Early holders (the 25 wallets from the 30-day dormancy period) continue to sell into retail FOMO buyers. Liquidity drains, price collapses back to pre-pump levels (~$0.000025–$0.000038), and the majority of the 303 new holders who bought during the pump face significant losses.

  • Continued 73.5% sell pressure dominance
  • Early insider wallets distributing large holdings
  • No verified influencer connection — social engineering claim collapses
  • Shallow $43.76K liquidity unable to absorb sell pressure
  • Typical PumpFun token lifecycle: pump → dump → abandonment

GeneratedJun 28, 03:18 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of analysis time. OHLC data covers the 6 most recent hourly candles ending ~03:00 UTC June 28, 2026. Holder history covers 30 days ending June 27, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: 8mTu8AW8co1QzHHRnvVZnknUaRsEmxdhjCTCJFeZpump)
  • PumpSwap pair data (HFu4wM862Fyw9AjVa75CRM818zVuXpUmMYmguYfxixx4)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (6 candles, June 27–28 2026)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Historical holder metrics (30-day daily series)
  • Holder distribution and acquisition data
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Top holder data is entirely unavailable — concentration risk cannot be precisely quantified
  • Sniper analysis returned no data — early buyer PnL and sell-through rate unknown
  • Update authority status is 'unknown' — mint/freeze authority cannot be confirmed
  • OHLC data appears to have H and L fields inverted in the data feed — candle analysis adjusted accordingly but introduces uncertainty
  • The current price ($0.000141) is significantly above all OHLC candle values, suggesting the major pump occurred after the last candle — price action during the pump itself is not captured in candle data
  • 6h and 24h price change fields show 0% which conflicts with the 273.96% 24h change — possible data inconsistency in the feed
  • Token description contains unverifiable social claims about influencer involvement

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in this token. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 (1 billion)

Key Risks

•Extreme sell pressure: 73.5% of 24h volume is sells ($133.24K vs $47.92K buys)
•30-day holder stagnation at 25 wallets before pump — strong insider/pre-mine signal
•No top holder data — concentration risk is unquantifiable but likely very high
•Critically shallow liquidity ($43.76K) with high slippage risk

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. The absence of sniper data, combined with the token's PumpFun origin and 30-day dormancy before a sudden pump, raises the possibility that early holders (the original 25 wallets present for 30 days) may be the primary sellers driving the 73.5% sell pressure. The 2:1 seller-to-buyer ratio (703 sellers vs. 366 buyers) and the -14.78% 5-minute drop suggest active distribution by early/insider holders.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results

Likely distributing — the 25 wallets that held the token for 30 days of dormancy are the most probable source of the heavy sell pressure now that the price has pumped 273.96%. These early holders would be sitting on significant unrealized gains.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Ansems Dog (Zeus)?

The token is showing extreme sell pressure (73.5% sell volume) and a -14.78% drop in the last 5 minutes at time of analysis. The pump appears to be in distribution phase. With only $43.76K liquidity and 703 sellers vs. 366 buyers in 24h, the path of least resistance is downward. A retracement toward the pre-pump range (~$0.000030–$0.000038) is likely. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000025 to $0.000180.

Is Zeus a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap meme tokens, can afford to lose 100% of their investment, and are capable of rapid execution. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone investing more than a negligible speculative allocation. This appears to be a classic pump-and-dump pattern.

How are Zeus holders trending?

Ansems Dog currently has 328 holders and is growing (24h: 303, 7d: 303, 30d: 303). The holder history reveals a deeply concerning pattern: 25 wallets held this token for at least 30 days with absolutely zero new holders joining (0% change every day from May 29 to June 26). This strongly suggests the token was pre-mined or held by insiders/bots awaiting a pump event. The explosive growth from 25 to 328 holders (+1,212% in ~48 hours) is entirely driven by the price pump and likely represents retail FOMO buyers entering at or near the top. The 7d and 30d growth figures are identical to 24h (+303), confirming all growth occurred in the last 48 hours. Growth is accelerating in the very short term but is unsustainable given the sell-dominated volume profile.

What does sniper activity look like for Zeus?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding Zeus?

Extreme sell pressure: 73.5% of 24h volume is sells ($133.24K vs $47.92K buys) • 30-day holder stagnation at 25 wallets before pump — strong insider/pre-mine signal • No top holder data — concentration risk is unquantifiable but likely very high

← Back to all predictions

Track Zeus