DEGS

Degs On Silver Price Today & AI Analysis

DEGSSolanaAnalysis as of Aug 16, 2026

Price

$0.042504

-23.13% 24h

Contract

Live
8HKQfbm1Unb4aLcgrXCvP2DBLfk2wtcJ2AtR7grzpcvg

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,255

Market cap

$24,230

Ask Unhosted AI about DEGS

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Solana

ZECBALLZECBALLZECBALL$0.043786-5.8%MC $30.2KMachiMachiMachi Big Brother$0.000417-8.9%MC $359.1KS3S3Season 3$0.047774-15.5%MC $77.7Ktomochitomochitomochi$0.001166-1.5%MC $1.17MZELDAZELDAZelda$0.042660+4.6%MC $26.6KNVDAXNVDAXNVIDIA xStock$228.66-0.4%MC $73.46M

Degs On Silver: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-16 01:17 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$36,278.96
How concentrated is Degs On Silver ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Degs On Silver?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Degs On Silver liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-16 01:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $36,278.96. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-16 01:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Aug 16, 01:17 AM UTC

FDV

$78,267

Liquidity

$36,278.96

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Degs On Silver (DEGS) is a Solana meme/community token launched on StonkFun with a mint address of 8HKQfbm1Unb4aLcgrXCvP2DBLfk2wtcJ2AtR7grzpcvg. The token is trading at ~$0.0000807 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$82.5K and total liquidity of only $36.28K. It has experienced an extraordinary 213.7% price surge in the past 24 hours, though OHLC data reveals extreme intraday volatility with wicks spanning from ~$13.67 to ~$112.20 per unit (in micro-price terms). The contract is unverified, the update authority is not renounced, and the token is mutable in metadata — all significant risk flags for a very early-stage, low-liquidity asset.

Key points

  • 213.7% 24h price surge with extreme intraday volatility (low ~$13.67 to high ~$112.20 in candle units)
  • Launched on StonkFun — a newer launchpad with limited vetting
  • Very low liquidity ($36.28K) relative to FDV ($82.5K), creating high slippage risk
  • Update authority NOT renounced — metadata remains mutable/changeable
  • No sniper data available, limiting smart money signal analysis
  • Slight buy-side dominance: 52.6% buy pressure vs 47.4% sell pressure over 24h

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24–72 hours

neutral

After a 213.7% pump, DEGS faces significant mean-reversion risk. The most recent two hourly candles show extreme wicks — candle [2] ranged from $14.92 to $112.20 (in candle-unit terms) before closing near $64.10, and candle [1] similarly dipped to $13.67 before recovering to $64.44. This pattern suggests violent two-way price action with no stable trend. The 5m change is a marginal +0.20% while 1h, 6h, and 24h show 0% change in the analytics snapshot, indicating the price has temporarily stabilized after the spike. With only $36.28K in liquidity, any moderate sell order could gap the price down sharply.

Target low

$0.000040

Target high

$0.000120

Support

$0.000055 (approximate post-wick stabilization zone), $0.000014 (candle [1] low equivalent)

Resistance

$0.000091 (candle [2] open equivalent), $0.000112 (candle [2] high equivalent)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Without a verified contract, renounced authorities, or meaningful liquidity depth, sustaining price appreciation is structurally difficult. Post-pump consolidation or decline is the base expectation for tokens of this profile. Continued community engagement and trading volume would be required to maintain price levels.

Catalysts

  • Sustained high trading volume (864 unique wallets in 24h is relatively active for this market cap)
  • Potential listing on additional DEXs or aggregators
  • Community-driven social momentum via Twitter/website
  • Broader Solana meme token market rally

Bullish factors

  • Strong 24h price appreciation (+213.7%) indicating initial demand
  • Slight buy-side dominance (52.6% buy pressure, 2,949 buys vs 2,089 sells)
  • More unique buyers (833) than sellers (669) in 24h
  • Active trading with 864 unique wallets in 24h — notable for a sub-$100K FDV token
  • Mutable metadata is false (immutable token metadata), reducing one rug vector

Bearish factors

  • Extreme intraday volatility with wicks to ~$13.67 low suggests panic selling episodes
  • Very shallow liquidity ($36.28K) — high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unverified contract and non-renounced update authority
  • Launched on StonkFun — limited vetting or credibility signals
  • FDV ($82.5K) exceeds liquidity ($36.28K) by only ~2.3x — thin market
  • Price % change showing 0% across 1h/6h/24h in analytics snapshot may indicate stale data or post-pump stagnation

Confidence: low. Only two hourly OHLC candles are available, no sniper data exists, holder distribution data is unavailable, and the token is extremely new and low-liquidity. Price prediction confidence is inherently very low under these conditions.

DEGS call history

Full track record →

Aug 16neutral
24h—
7d—
30d+131.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
8HKQfb...pcvg
Total Supply
970,000,000 DEGS

Key Risks

  • Extreme price volatility — 213.7% 24h pump with intraday swings of 80%+ in candle data
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($36.28K) — high slippage and manipulation vulnerability
  • Unverified smart contract — no independent code audit or verification
  • Update authority not renounced — metadata modification risk remains

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (00:00 UTC): O=$64.067, H=$112.196, L=$14.923, C=$64.102 — a massive-range candle with a long upper wick and long lower wick, closing near the open (doji-like with extreme shadows). Volume was very high at $311,981. Candle [1] (01:00 UTC): O=$64.085, H=$64.612, L=$13.668, C=$64.437 — a much tighter body with a long lower wick, suggesting buyers defended the open level after a sharp dip. Volume dropped sharply to $27,413. The pattern across both candles shows a high-volatility consolidation zone around $64 (in candle units, equivalent to ~$0.0000807 USD) with violent intraday swings in both directions.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Sideways

With only two candles available, no reliable trend can be established. Both candles closed near their opens around the $64 level (candle units), suggesting short-term price equilibrium after the initial pump, but with extreme volatility. The data is insufficient to determine a medium-term trend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

53%

Sell

47%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000055 (approximate mid-range of recent candles)

Major support

$0.000014–$0.000015 (candle low wicks equivalent)

Immediate resistance

$0.000065 (candle open/close cluster)

Major resistance

$0.000091–$0.000112 (candle [2] upper wick zone)

The $64 candle-unit level (~$0.0000807 USD) acts as a pivot, with both candles opening and closing near this zone. Major support is defined by the extreme lower wicks at ~$13.67–$14.92 candle units (~$0.000014–$0.000015 USD). Major resistance is the candle [2] high at ~$112 units (~$0.000112 USD). These levels are derived from only two candles and should be treated with very low confidence.

Notable patterns

  • Doji-like candle with extreme upper and lower wicks on candle [2] — indecision/high volatility
  • Long lower wick on candle [1] — potential hammer pattern suggesting buyer support at lows
  • Sharp volume contraction (91% drop) from candle [2] to candle [1] — post-pump volume fade
  • Price consolidating near open levels on both candles — equilibrium zone around $0.0000807

Liquidity

Liquidity

$36,278.96

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

DEGS has critically shallow liquidity at $36.28K on a single Raydium pool (G69tW3836i8oD2M5VsB4g1QPR5gNoK73oxxwXY4cMQw4). With a FDV of $82.5K, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 44% — while not terrible in ratio terms, the absolute dollar depth is extremely low. A single $5K–$10K sell order could cause significant price impact. The 24h trading volume of ~$334K ($175.87K buys + $158.39K sells) is approximately 9.2x the total liquidity, indicating very high turnover relative to pool depth. Net flow is modestly positive (inflow) with 52.6% buy pressure and more unique buyers (833) than sellers (669). The 864 unique wallets trading in 24h is a positive engagement signal for a sub-$100K FDV token, but does not compensate for the structural liquidity risk.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

970,000,000 DEGS

FDV

$82,500

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    213.7% price surge in 24h with intraday wicks spanning from ~$13.67 to ~$112.20 (candle units) — extreme volatility. The token can lose 80%+ of value in a single hour based on observed candle data.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only $36.28K on a single Raydium pool. 24h volume (~$334K) is ~9.2x the liquidity pool, indicating very high turnover and slippage risk. Large orders will face severe price impact.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme price volatility — 213.7% 24h pump with intraday swings of 80%+ in candle data
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($36.28K) — high slippage and manipulation vulnerability
  • Unverified smart contract — no independent code audit or verification
  • Update authority not renounced — metadata modification risk remains
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown
  • Launched on StonkFun — limited platform credibility and vetting
  • No holder distribution data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Single liquidity pool on Raydium — no diversified liquidity sources
  • Post-pump volume contraction (91% drop in one hour) — fading momentum signal

Mitigating factors

  • Token metadata 'Mutable: false' flag set — on-chain metadata immutability
  • Slight buy-side dominance (52.6% buy pressure) over 24h
  • More unique buyers (833) than sellers (669) — net positive wallet flow
  • 864 unique wallets active in 24h — reasonable engagement for market cap size
  • No sniper concentration detected — reduces coordinated dump risk
  • Social presence (Twitter + website) indicates some community infrastructure
  • FDV ($82.5K) is relatively low — limited downside in absolute dollar terms for small positions

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi/meme token traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for conservative investors, those unfamiliar with Solana DEX mechanics, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal given the extreme volatility and liquidity constraints.

DEGS is a very early-stage, high-risk meme/community token on Solana launched via StonkFun. It has demonstrated explosive short-term price action (+213.7% in 24h) with active retail trading engagement, but is structurally fragile due to shallow liquidity, unverified contract, non-renounced authorities, and absent holder data. The investment case is purely speculative and momentum-driven — there is no fundamental value proposition beyond community sentiment and trading activity.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Community momentum sustains and amplifies. The 864 unique wallets and 213.7% price surge attract broader attention on social media (Twitter/website). Volume remains elevated, new buyers enter, and the token achieves a higher FDV milestone (e.g., $250K–$500K). Liquidity deepens as the pool grows, reducing slippage risk.

  • Sustained or growing unique wallet count beyond 864/day
  • Viral social media traction on Twitter driving new buyer inflow
  • Broader Solana meme token market rally lifting all boats
  • Liquidity pool growth reducing slippage and attracting larger traders
  • Potential listing on DEX aggregators or tracking platforms increasing visibility

Base Case

DEGS consolidates in a wide range around current levels ($0.000060–$0.000090) with declining volume over the next 1–2 weeks. Trading activity gradually fades as the initial pump excitement dissipates. The token survives but does not achieve significant further price appreciation without a new catalyst.

  • No major new catalyst (listing, partnership, viral moment) emerges in the near term
  • Liquidity pool remains stable at ~$36K without significant additions or removals
  • Retail trading activity gradually normalizes from the post-launch spike
  • No rug pull or authority-based exploit occurs
  • Broader Solana market remains relatively stable

Bear Case

High probability

Post-pump sell pressure overwhelms thin liquidity. Early buyers take profits, volume collapses (already down 91% in one hour), and the price retraces to pre-pump levels or lower. The shallow $36.28K liquidity pool means even moderate selling cascades into a sharp price decline. Token fades into inactivity.

  • Volume contraction already evident (91% drop from candle [2] to candle [1])
  • Shallow liquidity ($36.28K) cannot absorb sustained sell pressure
  • Unverified contract and non-renounced authority may deter institutional or cautious retail buyers
  • No fundamental utility or use case beyond speculation
  • Post-pump momentum exhaustion — 1h/6h/24h price change showing 0% in analytics snapshot

Analysis details

Generated

Aug 16, 01:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-16 01:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (Solana blockchain)
  • Raydium DEX liquidity pool data (Pool: G69tW3836i8oD2M5VsB4g1QPR5gNoK73oxxwXY4cMQw4)
  • OHLC price candles (hourly, USD) — 2 candles available
  • Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint — returned no data

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Holder distribution data unavailable (endpoint retired) — concentration risk cannot be quantified
  • Sniper/early buyer data unavailable — smart money signals are absent
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata
  • No on-chain contract verification — code cannot be audited
  • Single liquidity pool data point — no cross-pool or CEX price comparison
  • Token is extremely new — limited historical data for pattern recognition
  • Social link content (Twitter/website) not analyzed — community sentiment unverified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed was provided externally and treated as untrusted evidence. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance does not guarantee future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Degs On Silver ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Degs On Silver?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Degs On Silver liquidity falling?

As of 2026-08-16 01:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $36,278.96. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Degs On Silver (DEGS)?

After a 213.7% pump, DEGS faces significant mean-reversion risk. The most recent two hourly candles show extreme wicks — candle [2] ranged from $14.92 to $112.20 (in candle-unit terms) before closing near $64.10, and candle [1] similarly dipped to $13.67 before recovering to $64.44. This pattern suggests violent two-way price action with no stable trend. The 5m change is a marginal +0.20% while 1h, 6h, and 24h show 0% change in the analytics snapshot, indicating the price has temporarily stabilized after the spike. With only $36.28K in liquidity, any moderate sell order could gap the price down sharply. Short-term outlook is neutral (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000040 to $0.000120.

Is DEGS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.5/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi/meme token traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for conservative investors, those unfamiliar with Solana DEX mechanics, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal given the extreme volatility and liquidity constraints.

What are the key risks of holding DEGS?

Extreme price volatility — 213.7% 24h pump with intraday swings of 80%+ in candle data • Critically shallow liquidity ($36.28K) — high slippage and manipulation vulnerability • Unverified smart contract — no independent code audit or verification

← Back to all predictions

Questions about DEGS?