INSTAGZAM

Instagzam Price Today & AI Analysis

INSTAGZAMSolanaAnalysis as of Aug 13, 2026

Price

$0.053535

Contract

Live
8NLcNjjNVAEtvD8LCB4K99YZCVPtGsUe7NEfRtvkpump

Chain

Holders

196

Market cap

$3,346

More tokens on Solana

Instagzam: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-13 17:17 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$41,876.25
How concentrated is Instagzam ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Instagzam?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Instagzam liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-13 17:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $41,876.25. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-13 17:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about INSTAGZAM

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Aug 13, 05:17 PM UTC

FDV

$108,551

Liquidity

$41,876.25

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Instagzam (INSTAGZAM) is a Solana meme/micro-cap token deployed via https://j7tracker.io on the PumpSwap DEX. The token has experienced an extraordinary 327% price surge in the past 24 hours, rising from ~$0.000027 to ~$0.000115. However, this spike is accompanied by heavily skewed sell pressure (66.3% sell volume vs 33.7% buy volume), very shallow liquidity ($41.88K), and a fully diluted valuation of only $108.55K. The contract is unverified, update authority is unknown, and the token description references a third-party deployment tool. These factors collectively indicate a very high-risk speculative asset.

Key points

  • Extreme 327% 24h price surge on very thin liquidity
  • Heavily sell-dominated volume (66.3% sell vs 33.7% buy pressure)
  • Deployed via third-party tool (j7tracker.io) — unverified contract
  • Ultra-micro-cap: FDV of only $108.55K with $41.88K total liquidity
  • Sellers outnumber buyers nearly 3:1 (1,564 sellers vs 593 buyers)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has already pumped 327% in 24h and is showing strong sell dominance (66.3% sell volume, 5,110 sells vs 2,601 buys, 1,564 sellers vs 593 buyers). The most recent candle (hour 1) shows a significant pullback from the intra-hour high of $0.000159 to close at $0.000115, suggesting distribution is underway. With only $41.88K in liquidity, any sustained selling pressure could rapidly collapse the price.

Target low

$0.000050

Target high

$0.000159

Support

$0.000083 (hour 1 low), $0.000054 (hour 3 close / hour 2 open area), $0.000021 (hour 2 absolute low)

Resistance

$0.000159 (hour 1 high), $0.000173 (hour 2 high — all-time high in data)

Medium term · 1–7 days

bearish

Without a sustained influx of new buyers and given the extremely shallow liquidity, the token is likely to retrace a significant portion of its pump gains. Micro-cap tokens deployed via third-party tools with unverified contracts historically revert sharply after initial pump cycles.

Catalysts

  • New buyer inflow or viral social media momentum could extend the pump
  • Liquidity additions to PumpSwap pair could stabilize price
  • Absence of new catalysts will likely accelerate sell-off
  • Whale or early holder exits could trigger rapid price collapse

Bullish factors

  • Strong 327% 24h price momentum
  • Recent 1h price change of +35%, indicating short-term buying interest
  • 5m price change of +2.4% suggests immediate-term buying
  • Social links (Twitter, website) suggest some community presence

Bearish factors

  • Sell volume dominates at 66.3% of total 24h volume
  • Sellers outnumber buyers nearly 3:1 by wallet count
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($41.88K) amplifies downside risk
  • Unverified contract deployed via third-party tool
  • FDV of only $108.55K — extremely small market cap
  • 6h and 24h price change both show 0% in analytics (data anomaly suggesting possible manipulation or stale feed)
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior unknown

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles of OHLC data are available, no holder data exists, no sniper data is available, and the token is extremely new and illiquid. Price prediction confidence is inherently low for such a micro-cap with limited data history.

INSTAGZAM call history

Full track record →

Aug 13bearish
24h-91.1%
7d—
30d-97.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
8NLcNj...pump
Total Supply
946,882,399.14 INSTAGZAM

Key Risks

  • Extreme price volatility — 327% pump in 24h with blow-off top pattern signals imminent reversal risk
  • Severely shallow liquidity ($41.88K) — high slippage and exit risk
  • Heavy sell dominance: 66.3% sell volume, sellers outnumber buyers 2.6:1
  • Unverified contract deployed via third-party tool (j7tracker.io)

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Three hourly candles are available. Candle 3 (15:00 UTC): O=$0.0000295, H=$0.0000563, L=$0.0000167, C=$0.0000550 — a strong bullish candle with a wide range and close near the high, signaling initial breakout. Candle 2 (16:00 UTC): O=$0.0000549, H=$0.0001734, L=$0.0000214, C=$0.0001082 — an extremely wide-range candle (the largest by far) with a high wick and close well below the high, suggesting a blow-off top with significant selling into the spike. Volume was 242,688 — the highest of the three candles. Candle 1 (17:00 UTC): O=$0.0001080, H=$0.0001590, L=$0.0000837, C=$0.0001146 — opened near prior close, made a new high but closed below the open, forming a bearish engulfing-like structure relative to the intra-candle high. Volume dropped sharply to 39,820, indicating fading momentum.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

The medium-term trend (across all 3 candles) is strongly upward from $0.0000295 open to $0.0001146 close. However, the short-term structure is turning bearish: candle 2 printed a massive upper wick (blow-off top pattern), and candle 1 shows declining volume with a close below the intra-hour high, suggesting the pump is losing steam and distribution is occurring.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

34%

Sell

66%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000083 (candle 1 low)

Major support

$0.000021 (candle 2 absolute low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000159 (candle 1 high)

Major resistance

$0.000173 (candle 2 all-time high in dataset)

The $0.000083 level (candle 1 low) is the first line of defense for bulls. A break below this opens a path to the $0.000054 area (candle 3 close). The $0.000021 level represents the extreme downside wick from candle 2 and is the major support. On the upside, $0.000159 and $0.000173 are the key resistance levels from recent highs.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off top wick on candle 2 (16:00 UTC) — upper wick extends from $0.000108 to $0.000173, a 60% wick-to-close ratio
  • Volume exhaustion: 84% volume drop from candle 2 to candle 1 after price spike
  • Bearish engulfing structure on candle 1 relative to intra-candle high
  • Higher highs across all 3 candles (medium-term uptrend) but with deteriorating internals
  • Classic pump-and-distribution pattern: explosive candle 2 followed by declining volume and sell dominance

Liquidity

Liquidity

$41,876.25

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $41.88K against a 24h trading volume of ~$397.3K — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 9.5x, indicating the pool is being heavily traded relative to its depth. This creates severe slippage risk for any meaningful position size. The net flow is clearly outflow: sell volume ($263.23K) nearly doubles buy volume ($134.07K), and sellers (1,564 unique wallets) outnumber buyers (593 unique wallets) by 2.6:1. The FDV of $108.55K with only $41.88K liquidity means the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~38.6%, which is relatively high but still insufficient to absorb large sell orders without significant price impact. The market health is poor — this is a classic post-pump distribution environment.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

946,882,399.14 INSTAGZAM

FDV

$108,550.97

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    The token has surged 327% in 24 hours with extreme intra-candle volatility (candle 2 ranged from $0.0000214 to $0.0001734 — an 8x range within a single hour). This level of volatility is characteristic of highly speculative micro-cap tokens and poses severe risk of rapid capital loss.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $41.88K on PumpSwap. The volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~9.5x means the pool is being drained rapidly. Any moderate sell order will cause significant slippage. Exiting a position of even a few thousand dollars could move the price materially.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extreme price volatility — 327% pump in 24h with blow-off top pattern signals imminent reversal risk
  • Severely shallow liquidity ($41.88K) — high slippage and exit risk
  • Heavy sell dominance: 66.3% sell volume, sellers outnumber buyers 2.6:1
  • Unverified contract deployed via third-party tool (j7tracker.io)
  • Unknown mint and freeze authority status — potential rug or freeze risk
  • No holder distribution data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Ultra-micro-cap FDV of $108.55K — susceptible to manipulation
  • 6h and 24h price change showing 0% in analytics despite obvious price movement — possible data anomaly or feed issue

Mitigating factors

  • Token metadata is immutable (mutable: false) — metadata cannot be changed post-deployment
  • Social links (Twitter, website) suggest some level of community presence
  • Not flagged as possible spam by the data provider
  • Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~38.6% is relatively high for a micro-cap, providing some baseline liquidity

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the risks of ultra-micro-cap, unverified Solana tokens. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose 100% of their investment. Position sizes should be minimal if any exposure is taken. This is NOT a recommendation to buy or hold.

Instagzam (INSTAGZAM) is a high-risk, ultra-micro-cap Solana token that has experienced a violent 327% pump in 24 hours. The on-chain data paints a clear picture of a post-pump distribution phase: sell volume nearly doubles buy volume, sellers outnumber buyers 2.6:1, volume is collapsing after a blow-off top candle, and liquidity is razor-thin. The token has no verified contract, unknown authority status, and was deployed via a third-party tool. Any investment thesis must be grounded in the reality that this is a highly speculative, potentially ephemeral asset.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued viral momentum drives new buyer inflow, sustaining or extending the pump. Social media traction on Twitter leads to a second wave of buying, pushing price toward or beyond the $0.000173 all-time high in the dataset.

  • Viral social media momentum on Twitter/Telegram
  • New liquidity additions to the PumpSwap pool
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally
  • Influencer promotion or community-driven FOMO

Base Case

The token consolidates in the $0.000050–$0.000115 range for a short period before gradually declining as sell pressure continues to outpace buying interest. Price eventually settles 60–80% below the 24h high as the pump cycle completes.

  • Sell dominance persists but does not immediately accelerate
  • No major new catalysts emerge to drive fresh buying
  • Liquidity remains thin but does not completely disappear
  • Price action follows typical micro-cap pump-and-fade pattern

Bear Case

High probability

Sell pressure continues to dominate, liquidity is drained, and the price collapses back toward pre-pump levels ($0.000020–$0.000030). Early holders and deployer exit, leaving late buyers with near-total losses.

  • Sustained 66.3% sell volume dominance
  • Blow-off top candle pattern with volume exhaustion
  • Unverified contract and unknown authority risk
  • No fundamental value proposition beyond speculative trading
  • Shallow liquidity amplifying downside moves

Analysis details

Generated

Aug 13, 05:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-13 17:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Mint, Supply, Decimals, Update Authority, Mutability)
  • USD price feed and 24h price change data
  • OHLC hourly candle data (3 candles)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, unique wallets)
  • PumpSwap liquidity pool data (pair: 3NwPtvvtK314KUAmaFj5ETcXN1YmYxXSoXyvUA5KB84U)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • No holder data available (endpoint retired) — concentration and distribution analysis impossible
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and smart money signals cannot be assessed
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — rug risk cannot be fully quantified
  • Unverified contract — on-chain code cannot be audited
  • 6h and 24h price change showing 0% in analytics despite clear price movement — possible data feed anomaly
  • FDV and liquidity figures are point-in-time snapshots and may change rapidly given thin liquidity
  • Token is extremely new — limited track record for pattern analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an endorsement of this token. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. The analyst and platform bear no responsibility for any financial losses incurred based on this analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Instagzam ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Instagzam?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Instagzam liquidity falling?

As of 2026-08-13 17:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $41,876.25. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Instagzam (INSTAGZAM)?

The token has already pumped 327% in 24h and is showing strong sell dominance (66.3% sell volume, 5,110 sells vs 2,601 buys, 1,564 sellers vs 593 buyers). The most recent candle (hour 1) shows a significant pullback from the intra-hour high of $0.000159 to close at $0.000115, suggesting distribution is underway. With only $41.88K in liquidity, any sustained selling pressure could rapidly collapse the price. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000050 to $0.000159.

Is INSTAGZAM a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the risks of ultra-micro-cap, unverified Solana tokens. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose 100% of their investment. Position sizes should be minimal if any exposure is taken. This is NOT a recommendation to buy or hold.

What are the key risks of holding INSTAGZAM?

Extreme price volatility — 327% pump in 24h with blow-off top pattern signals imminent reversal risk • Severely shallow liquidity ($41.88K) — high slippage and exit risk • Heavy sell dominance: 66.3% sell volume, sellers outnumber buyers 2.6:1

← Back to all predictions

Track INSTAGZAM