Bani

BONK For Bani Price Prediction 2026

Bani
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of May 10, 2026

8M4p2Gzi57X5TGqLv5nuNhBaRcmGKpKRsbkugkWbbonk

$0.052901

-0.24%

FDV $2,895

LiveContract:8M4p2Gzi57X5TGqLv5nuNhBaRcmGKpKRsbkugkWbbonkChain:SolanaHolders:217Market cap:$2,895

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Bani

Report snapshotas of May 10, 04:17 PM
FDV

$38,615

Liquidity

$0

Holders

875

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

BONK For Bani (Bani) is a micro-cap Solana meme token deployed via j7tracker.io with a total supply of ~999.97M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$38,615. The token experienced an explosive single-hour trading event on 2026-05-10 that drove price up ~11x before collapsing ~77% back down, resulting in a net 24h decline of -59.69%. Liquidity is reported at $0.00 on-chain, raising serious concerns about sustainable market depth. The holder base surged from 55 to 875 in a single day — almost entirely within one hour — suggesting a coordinated launch or bot-driven distribution event. The contract is unverified, the update authority is not renounced, and the token was deployed using a third-party launcher tool.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive single-hour price spike (~11x) followed by rapid collapse, indicating a pump-and-dump pattern
Holder count jumped from 55 to 875 (+820, +94%) in a single day — all growth concentrated in one hour
Reported on-chain liquidity of $0.00 despite $1.2M+ in 24h trading volume — extreme slippage risk
Top holder controls 27.20% of supply; top 10 hold 44.79%; top 100 hold 81.02%
Zero snipers detected in first 1,000 blocks — unusual for a launch with this trading activity
Update authority not renounced (WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh), mutable=false

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The token has already collapsed ~77% from its intra-hour high of $0.000340 back to ~$0.0000386. With $0.00 reported liquidity, no sustainable buy support, and a holder base that largely entered during the spike, further downside pressure is highly probable. The 5-minute price change of -9.99% at time of analysis confirms continued selling.

Target low$0.000010
Target high$0.000060
Support: $0.0000294 (candle [2] low), $0.0000348 (candle [1] low)
Resistance: $0.000174 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close area), $0.000340 (candle [2] all-time high)

Medium term

bearish
7–30 days

Without renounced authorities, verified contracts, real liquidity, or a clear use case beyond a launcher-deployed meme token, sustained price recovery is unlikely. The historical holder stagnation at 55 for 30 days prior to launch day suggests minimal organic community. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless a major catalyst (exchange listing, influencer campaign) emerges.

Catalysts
  • Influencer or KOL promotion driving new buyer inflow
  • Raydium liquidity pool deepening via LP additions
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all boats
  • Token burn or supply reduction announcement

Bullish factors

  • Near-balanced buy/sell pressure (50.4% buys vs 49.6% sells) over 24h suggests some genuine two-sided interest
  • High transaction count (11,377 buys + 9,254 sells) shows active trading engagement
  • 3,604 unique buyers in 24h indicates broad retail participation during the spike
  • Zero snipers detected reduces early-holder dump risk from that specific vector

Bearish factors

  • Price collapsed -59.69% in 24h and -9.99% in the last 5 minutes
  • Reported liquidity of $0.00 — any sell order faces extreme slippage
  • Top holder controls 27.20% of supply and could dump at any time
  • Update authority not renounced — token parameters could be changed
  • Deployed via third-party launcher (j7tracker.io), unverified contract
  • Holder base was flat at 55 for 30 days before a single-day spike — no organic growth history
  • FDV of only ~$38,615 leaves minimal room for institutional interest
Confidence: low. Only 2 hourly OHLC candles are available, liquidity is $0.00, and the holder surge is concentrated in a single hour. The data is insufficient for reliable technical modeling. Price behavior is driven by speculative momentum rather than fundamentals.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available. Candle [2] (15:00 UTC): O=$0.0000305, H=$0.000340, L=$0.0000294, C=$0.000169 — a massive bullish spike candle with a long upper wick, indicating a violent pump followed by partial retracement. The body closed well above open but far below the high, forming a shooting-star-like structure on a micro timeframe. Candle [1] (16:00 UTC): O=$0.000173, H=$0.000174, L=$0.0000348, C=$0.0000386 — opened near the prior close, briefly touched a new high, then collapsed to close near the low. This is a strong bearish engulfing / near-full-body red candle, confirming distribution and sell-off. The two-candle sequence is a classic pump-and-dump pattern: spike up, then hard rejection.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
downtrend

Momentum

Status
oversold

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 50%Sell 50%

The two available candles show a clear pump-and-dump structure. The token peaked at $0.000340 in candle [2] and has since declined to ~$0.0000386, a drop of ~88.6% from the high. Both short-term and medium-term trends are firmly bearish based on available data.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000348 (candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000294 (candle [2] low — launch-area low)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000174 (candle [1] open / candle [2] close)
Major$0.000340 (candle [2] all-time high)

The $0.0000294–$0.0000348 zone represents the pre-pump base and is the strongest support. A break below $0.0000294 would signal complete capitulation. Resistance at $0.000174 is the prior candle open; $0.000340 is the all-time high and a very distant resistance.

Notable patterns

  • Shooting star / long upper wick on candle [2] — bearish reversal signal
  • Bearish engulfing on candle [1] — confirms distribution
  • Classic two-candle pump-and-dump sequence
  • Volume climax on spike candle followed by sharp volume decline
  • Price closing near candle [1] low — bearish momentum continuation signal

Total holders875
24h Δ+820
7d Δ+820
30d Δ+820
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

The entire holder growth of +820 (from 55 to 875) occurred within a single 24-hour window, coinciding precisely with the price spike event on 2026-05-10. Prior to this, holders were flat at 55 for the entire 30-day historical period (2026-04-10 to 2026-05-09). This is a near-perfect correlation between the pump event and holder acquisition — suggesting the holder surge was driven by the trading frenzy rather than organic community growth.

The holder history is stark: exactly 55 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero net change, followed by a single-day explosion to 875 holders (+820, +94% of current base). This pattern is highly atypical of organic growth and strongly suggests the token was dormant or in a pre-launch state before a coordinated launch event. Of the 875 holders, 860 acquired via swap and 15 via transfer, confirming nearly all new holders entered through DEX trading during the spike. Growth is not 'accelerating' in a sustainable sense — it was a one-time event. Future holder growth is uncertain and likely to stagnate or decline as underwater holders exit.

Top 10 hold44.79%
Top 100 hold81.02%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

GpMZbSM2GgvTKHJirzeGfMFoaZ8UR2X7F4v8vHTvxFbL

Project treasury or team wallet — holds 27.20% (271.98M tokens), by far the largest single holder. This level of concentration in a single wallet is a major red flag for potential dump risk.

27.20%

9tgfJKupQNoibkMuxQXnfpLJAJhK1e8Jy2yN7w8zcyeL

Individual whale — holds 4.62% (46.18M tokens). Second largest holder with no identifying on-chain markers.

4.62%

BA36AnwpTfKeqNhExVUFFbzUAQTyKYvJrEokKJqVCTPi

Individual whale — holds 2.21% (22.12M tokens).

2.21%

4QgsFkEp6Z4YR7mXYdcou8ZL6Sgz7rFha2iKj9W2PNua

Individual whale — holds 1.87% (18.69M tokens).

1.87%

NNTEF35sVfcud4BWr8dvLxG98HJJBdPMtKw7LrRZ6rb

Individual whale — holds 1.85% (18.51M tokens).

1.85%

Supply concentration is extremely high. The top 10 holders control 44.79% of supply, and the top 100 control 81.02%, leaving only ~19% distributed among the remaining holders. The single largest wallet (GpMZbSM2GgvTKHJirzeGfMFoaZ8UR2X7F4v8vHTvxFbL) holds 27.20% — a dominant position that could single-handedly crash the price if liquidated. Holders 2–20 each hold between 0.77% and 4.62%, suggesting a cluster of medium-sized whales below the top holder. The distribution is classified as 'very concentrated' and represents one of the most significant risks for this token. Sentiment is mixed: the top holder has not yet dumped (price is still above zero), but the incentive to exit is high given the post-pump price decline.

Liquidity$0.00 (as reported)
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$604,500
Sell$594,740
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers3,604
Unique sellers3,045

The most alarming data point is the reported total liquidity of $0.00 despite $1,199,240 in combined 24h trading volume. This is a critical red flag — it suggests either the liquidity pool has been fully drained (a rug pull mechanism), the LP tokens were removed after the pump, or there is a data reporting lag. Trading on a pool with near-zero liquidity means any transaction will face catastrophic slippage. The net flow is technically 'inflow' ($604.5K buys vs $594.7K sells), but this is marginal (0.8% net buy pressure) and occurred during the spike event. With 3,604 unique buyers vs 3,045 unique sellers, there are more buyers than sellers, but the price decline of -59.69% suggests sellers are executing larger average trades. The Raydium pair (2GFykP3Xs22DsjS2pC2JVCb1ZiV2EEp9rSrwqW7JhLA6) should be verified directly for current LP depth before any trade is attempted.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,968,553.867085
FDV$38,615.21

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~999.97M with a current FDV of ~$38,615 — an extremely small market cap. The update authority is held by WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh (not a burn address, not renounced), meaning the token metadata can potentially be updated. However, 'mutable: false' is reported, which partially mitigates this concern for metadata changes. Mint authority and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the metadata — classified as 'unknown'. The token was deployed via j7tracker.io, a third-party launcher, and the contract is unverified. The combination of unknown mint/freeze authority, non-renounced update authority, and unverified contract creates a medium authority risk. The FDV of $38,615 is extremely low, meaning even small buy orders could move the price significantly — but also that the token has very limited real-world value backing.

Volatility
high

Price moved from $0.0000294 to $0.000340 and back to $0.0000386 within 2 hours — an intra-session range of ~1,056%. This is extreme volatility even by meme coin standards.

Liquidity
high

Reported liquidity is $0.00 despite $1.2M+ in 24h volume. Any attempt to exit a position of meaningful size will face severe slippage or may be impossible to execute at quoted prices.

Concentration
high

Top holder controls 27.20% of supply. Top 10 hold 44.79%. Top 100 hold 81.02%. A single large holder exiting could collapse the price entirely given the zero liquidity environment.

SniperDump
low

Zero snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks, which reduces the specific risk of early sniper wallets dumping coordinated positions. However, this does not eliminate dump risk from other large holders.

Authority
medium

Update authority is not renounced (WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh). Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. Contract is unverified. Deployed via third-party launcher j7tracker.io. 'Mutable: false' provides partial mitigation.

Key risks

  • $0.00 reported liquidity — potential rug pull or LP removal post-pump
  • Top holder (27.20%) could dump entire position with no warning
  • Unverified contract with unknown mint/freeze authority
  • Token was dormant for 30+ days before a single-day pump event — classic pre-rug setup
  • Price already down -59.69% in 24h with continued selling pressure (-9.99% in 5 min)
  • FDV of $38,615 provides no institutional floor or support
  • Deployed via third-party launcher with no social proof of team identity

Mitigating factors

  • Zero snipers detected reduces one specific category of early dump risk
  • Near-balanced buy/sell ratio (50.4%/49.6%) shows some genuine two-sided market
  • 3,604 unique buyers suggests broad retail distribution rather than single-actor manipulation
  • 'Mutable: false' reduces metadata manipulation risk
  • Token has social links (Twitter, website) suggesting some attempt at community building
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme coin mechanics and rug pull patterns. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket). Do not invest funds you cannot afford to lose entirely.

BONK For Bani (Bani) is a high-risk, speculative micro-cap meme token that experienced a classic pump-and-dump pattern within its first hours of active trading. The token has no verifiable fundamentals, zero reported liquidity, extreme supply concentration, and a dormant 30-day pre-launch history. The investment case is purely speculative momentum-based, with the bear case being the most probable outcome.

Bull case (low)

A sustained influencer or community campaign drives renewed retail interest, liquidity is added to the Raydium pool, and the token rides a broader Solana meme coin market rally back toward its intra-day high.

  • Viral social media campaign on Twitter/X driving new buyer inflow
  • Raydium LP additions restoring tradeable liquidity depth
  • Broader Solana ecosystem meme coin season lifting sentiment
  • Top holder (27.20%) choosing to hold rather than dump, providing price floor

Base case

The token stabilizes at a very low price near its pre-pump base ($0.000029–$0.000039), trading with minimal volume and slowly losing holders as underwater participants exit. The token becomes a low-activity micro-cap with no meaningful price appreciation.

  • Top holder does not immediately dump entire position
  • Some residual retail interest maintains minimal trading activity
  • Raydium pool retains enough liquidity for small trades
  • No major catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term

Bear case (high)

The top holder (27.20%) or cluster of top-10 holders (44.79% combined) exit their positions into the near-zero liquidity pool, causing a near-total price collapse. The token becomes untradeable and holders are unable to exit.

  • Top holder dumping 271.97M tokens into $0.00 liquidity
  • LP removal confirmed — token becomes effectively untradeable
  • Retail holders panic-selling after continued price decline
  • No new buyer inflow as the pump narrative fades
  • Unverified contract exploited or abandoned by deployer

GeneratedMay 10, 04:17 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-05-10T16:00–17:00 UTC. OHLC data covers only the most recent 2 hourly candles. Historical holder data covers 30 days ending 2026-05-09.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (Mint: 8M4p2Gzi57X5TGqLv5nuNhBaRcmGKpKRsbkugkWbbonk)
  • Raydium DEX pair data (2GFykP3Xs22DsjS2pC2JVCb1ZiV2EEp9rSrwqW7JhLA6)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (2 candles, 2026-05-10 15:00–17:00 UTC)
  • 24h trading analytics (volume, buyer/seller counts, price changes)
  • Holder metrics and distribution data (875 total holders, top 20 balances)
  • Historical holder time series (30 days, 2026-04-10 to 2026-05-09)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Top 20 holder wallet addresses and balances

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Reported liquidity of $0.00 may reflect a data lag rather than actual pool state — verify on-chain directly
  • Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata
  • No sniper data available (0 snipers detected) — smart money signals are limited
  • Holder historical data ends 2026-05-09, missing the launch day detail
  • No order book depth data available
  • Social sentiment data not analyzed (Twitter/website links provided but content not reviewed)
  • FDV from trading analytics shows $0.00 while metadata shows $38,615 — data inconsistency noted

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,968,553.867085

Key Risks

$0.00 reported liquidity — potential rug pull or LP removal post-pump
Top holder (27.20%) could dump entire position with no warning
Unverified contract with unknown mint/freeze authority
Token was dormant for 30+ days before a single-day pump event — classic pre-rug setup

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No snipers were detected in the first 1,000 blocks, which is unusual for a token that generated over $1.2M in 24h trading volume. This could indicate the launch was structured to avoid bot detection, or that the trading activity was driven by retail participants entering after the initial listing. Without sniper data, smart money signals are limited. The near-balanced buy/sell ratio (50.4%/49.6%) and high unique wallet count (3,695) suggest broad retail participation rather than concentrated smart money activity.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

0 snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks — no sniper concentration data available

Unknown — no sniper data available. However, the holder distribution shows 147 'whales' and 80 'sharks' among 875 total holders, suggesting some larger players entered during the spike. Given the -59.69% price decline, most holders who bought during or after the pump are likely underwater.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for BONK For Bani (Bani)?

The token has already collapsed ~77% from its intra-hour high of $0.000340 back to ~$0.0000386. With $0.00 reported liquidity, no sustainable buy support, and a holder base that largely entered during the spike, further downside pressure is highly probable. The 5-minute price change of -9.99% at time of analysis confirms continued selling. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000010 to $0.000060.

Is Bani a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana meme coin mechanics and rug pull patterns. Position sizing should be minimal (treat as lottery ticket). Do not invest funds you cannot afford to lose entirely.

How are Bani holders trending?

BONK For Bani currently has 875 holders and is growing (24h: 820, 7d: 820, 30d: 820). The holder history is stark: exactly 55 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero net change, followed by a single-day explosion to 875 holders (+820, +94% of current base). This pattern is highly atypical of organic growth and strongly suggests the token was dormant or in a pre-launch state before a coordinated launch event. Of the 875 holders, 860 acquired via swap and 15 via transfer, confirming nearly all new holders entered through DEX trading during the spike. Growth is not 'accelerating' in a sustainable sense — it was a one-time event. Future holder growth is uncertain and likely to stagnate or decline as underwater holders exit.

What does sniper activity look like for Bani?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding Bani?

$0.00 reported liquidity — potential rug pull or LP removal post-pump • Top holder (27.20%) could dump entire position with no warning • Unverified contract with unknown mint/freeze authority

Track Bani