e/acc

Effective Accelerationism Price Today & AI Analysis

e/accSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 25, 2026

Price

$0.000810

+1529.63% 24h

Contract

Live
CbcyNo7m1amFWqEQm2m4PLv1UNvpcL3C1Ujm6AkzpKoU

Chain

Solana

Holders

3,769

Market cap

$796,332

More tokens on Solana

NPCNPCNPCs$0.002147+1470.8%MC $2.00MDBRDBRdeBridge$0.0203+5.4%MC $202.78MGLDXGLDXGold xStock$394.04+0.7%MC $45.81MJUPJUPJupiter$0.3226+10.3%MC $2.21BPAIDPAIDPaid$0.0107-7.3%MC $10.19MRAYRAYRaydium$2.1+5.4%MC $1.16B

Effective Accelerationism: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-25 22:15 UTC

Holder addresses

3,769

Top 10 supply share

20.16%

Reported liquidity

$46,506.00
How concentrated is Effective Accelerationism ownership?
As of 2026-09-25 22:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 20.16% of supply. It reports 3,769 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Effective Accelerationism?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-25 22:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,866,366.00 in buys and $1,812,900.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Effective Accelerationism liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +57.38%, from $54,291.75 (2026-09-25 21:00 UTC) to $85,445.35 (2026-09-25 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-25 22:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-25 21:00 UTC$54,291.75
2026-09-25 22:00 UTC$85,445.35

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about e/acc

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 25, 10:16 PM UTC

FDV

$796,332

Liquidity

$46,506.00

Holders

3,769

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

e/acc (Effective Accelerationism) is a small-cap, meme-themed Solana token trading on PumpSwap that has just undergone an extreme price spike (+1529.6% in 24h, price now $0.00080977) atop very shallow liquidity of only $46.51K and an FDV of $796.33K. Trading is active (25,298 buys vs 20,448 sells in 24h; 8,337 buyers vs 6,336 sellers) with buy pressure marginally ahead at 50.7%, but critical risk data — mint/freeze authority status, sniper concentration, and holder history — are all unavailable, leaving major blind spots in the risk picture.

Key points

  • Extremely volatile recent price action (+1529.6% 24h, +1702.8% 1h) on a Solana PumpSwap pair
  • Very thin liquidity ($46.51K) relative to reported 24h volume (~$3.68M combined) and FDV ($796.33K), implying high slippage/manipulation risk
  • Meme/ideological branding ('Effective Accelerationism') with fee routing referenced to a named individual (@beffjezos) in the description — narrative-driven rather than utility-driven
  • Critical data gaps: mint/freeze authority unknown, no sniper coverage, no holder history beyond a single snapshot (3,769 holders, top-10 = 20.16% of supply)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Given the extreme, likely unsustainable +1529.6% 24h and +1702.8% 1h price spikes, declining candle-to-candle volume, and an immediate -15.9% pullback in the last 5 minutes, the short-term risk skews toward further retracement or high volatility consolidation rather than continued vertical upside. The extremely shallow $46.51K liquidity pool means price can swing sharply in either direction on relatively small trades.

Target low

$0.0005

Target high

$0.0011

Support

$0.000744, $0.0009

Resistance

$0.0009, $0.001148

Medium term · 3-14 days

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the near-total absence of historical data beyond two hourly candles and a single holder snapshot. Sustainability will depend on whether liquidity deepens, whether authority/mint-freeze status gets clarified, and whether buy pressure can hold above sell pressure without reliance on hype-driven volume.

Catalysts

  • Any confirmation (or refutation) of mint/freeze authority renouncement
  • Liquidity additions or removals from the PumpSwap pool
  • Continued social media attention tied to the 'e/acc' meme/narrative and its Twitter presence
  • Sniper/insider wallets (if present) beginning to distribute holdings, which cannot currently be verified due to lack of sniper data

Bullish factors

  • Slight net positive buy/sell volume skew (50.7% vs 49.3%) over the last 24h
  • More unique buyers (8,337) than sellers (6,336) in the 24h window
  • Active social presence (Twitter, website) suggests ongoing community engagement

Bearish factors

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($46.51K) relative to volume and FDV, high slippage risk
  • Sharp -15.9% pullback in the most recent 5 minutes right after a massive spike
  • Declining volume between the two most recent candles, suggesting fading pump momentum
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status is an unresolved structural risk
  • No sniper/insider visibility to rule out imminent large sell-offs

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the dataset contains only two OHLC candles, no historical holder trend, no sniper data, and unknown authority settings. Extreme volatility and thin liquidity further reduce the reliability of any directional call; this should be treated as a rough, evidence-limited read rather than a firm forecast.

e/acc call history

Full track record →

Sep 25bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
CbcyNo...pKoU
Total Supply
983,403,454.99 e/acc

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($46.51K) relative to reported volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Explosive, likely unsustainable price action (+1529.6% 24h, +1702.8% 1h) followed by a sharp -15.9% 5m pullback, suggesting a pump that may be reversing
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
  • No sniper data available, so early-buyer dump risk cannot be assessed

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles were provided. Candle 1 (21:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000445, spiked to a high of $0.0009 and closed at $0.000803 — an enormous single-candle range indicating a violent breakout from near-zero price, likely the pump's ignition candle, on volume of ~3.07M (in volume units). Candle 2 (22:00 UTC) opened at $0.000803, pushed to a new high of $0.001148, pulled back to a low of $0.000744, and closed at $0.000833, on lower volume (~1.01M) — a long-wick candle showing rejection of the higher price and partial retracement, with the close still marginally above the prior close.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term (last 2 hours) trend is sharply upward, with price up over 1500% on a 24h basis and price roughly doubling from open to close across the two candles. However, with only two candles of data, no medium-term trend can be reliably established; the recent 5m change of -15.9% suggests the immediate momentum may be stalling or reversing after the spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000744 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.00000445 (candle 1 open, pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.001148 (candle 2 high)

Major resistance

$0.0009 (candle 1 high, prior peak before retest)

With only two candles of OHLC data, support and resistance levels are necessarily approximate. Immediate support sits near $0.000744 (the most recent low), with immediate resistance at the recent high of $0.001148. The prior candle's high of $0.0009 acts as a secondary resistance/pivot. The extremely low pre-pump base (~$0.00000445) represents a major but likely irrelevant support unless the pump fully reverses.

Notable patterns

  • Large-range breakout candle followed by a long-upper-wick rejection candle, suggesting initial buying exhaustion
  • Near-vertical price spike (+1529.6% 24h) typical of a low-liquidity pump
  • Declining volume between the two available candles, hinting at fading momentum
  • Sharp negative 5m move (-15.9%) immediately after the spike, a potential early reversal signal

Liquidity

Liquidity

$46,506.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of only $46.51K is extremely thin relative to a 24h trading volume of roughly $3.68M (buy+sell combined) and an FDV of $796.33K. This mismatch between reported volume and pool liquidity implies high slippage for any meaningfully sized trade and suggests the pool could be easily moved by a single large buy or sell. Buy volume ($1.87M, 50.7%) slightly exceeds sell volume ($1.81M, 49.3%), and unique buyers (8,337) outnumber unique sellers (6,336) 24h, indicating a modest net inflow bias, consistent with the token's massive reported 24h price spike (+1529.6%). However, with liquidity this shallow, such volume figures should be treated with skepticism and the price is highly susceptible to sharp reversals.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

983,403,454.99 e/acc

FDV

$796,332

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +1529.6% and a 1h change of +1702.8% versus a 5m change of -15.9% indicate extreme, erratic volatility. The two most recent hourly candles show huge intra-candle swings (e.g., candle 1 ranged from a low of $0.00000445 to a high of $0.0009 before closing at $0.0008), consistent with a violent, possibly manipulated, price discovery event on a thin market.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $46.51K against reported 24h volume near $3.68M and FDV of $796.33K. This is a severe liquidity-to-volume/FDV mismatch that creates high slippage risk and makes the price easy to manipulate with relatively small capital.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only top-10 concentration (20.16%) is known from a single snapshot; top-100 concentration and wallet classifications (team/insider/exchange/sniper) are unavailable. Because deeper distribution data and any historical trend are missing, true concentration risk cannot be fully assessed and is marked unknown beyond the partial top-10 figure.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($46.51K) relative to reported volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Explosive, likely unsustainable price action (+1529.6% 24h, +1702.8% 1h) followed by a sharp -15.9% 5m pullback, suggesting a pump that may be reversing
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes
  • No sniper data available, so early-buyer dump risk cannot be assessed
  • Top-10 holders control 20.16% of supply with no visibility into who they are or their intentions
  • Token description contains informal, meme-driven language referencing 'X payouts' and fee routing to a named individual, typical of speculative meme-coin narratives rather than fundamentals-backed value

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($1.87M) slightly exceeds sell volume ($1.81M), and unique buyers (8,337) exceed unique sellers (6,336), showing some net positive demand skew in the last 24h
  • Holder base of 3,769 addresses suggests some distribution of ownership beyond a handful of wallets, though this is a raw address count, not a verified unique-person count

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand meme-coin dynamics and can accept the possibility of near-total capital loss. Not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or exposure based on fundamental value, given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority settings, and extreme volatility.

e/acc (Effective Accelerationism) is a meme-narrative Solana token trading on PumpSwap that just experienced an extreme, likely hype-driven price spike (+1529.6% 24h) on very thin liquidity ($46.51K). The token lacks verified authority data (mint/freeze/contract verification all unknown), sniper coverage is absent, and holder history beyond a single snapshot (3,769 addresses, top-10 holding 20.16%) is unavailable. This combination of extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and significant data gaps makes it a highly speculative, high-risk asset suitable only for traders comfortable with total-loss scenarios.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If social/community momentum around the 'e/acc' meme and its Twitter presence continues to attract new buyers faster than early holders sell, and liquidity deepens, the token could sustain elevated prices or attempt another leg up, especially in a favorable broader memecoin market.

  • Sustained or growing social media attention and narrative appeal
  • Buy volume continuing to outpace sell volume (currently 50.7% vs 49.3%)
  • More buyers than sellers in the 24h window (8,337 vs 6,336)
  • Possible new liquidity additions reducing slippage risk

Base Case

Price remains highly volatile and range-bound at elevated but decaying levels relative to the spike high, with liquidity remaining thin and the token trading primarily on speculative momentum rather than fundamentals, until either a fresh catalyst emerges or interest fades.

  • No major liquidity injection occurs in the near term
  • No confirmed rug-pull mechanics (though this cannot be verified due to unknown authorities)
  • Trading volume gradually normalizes from the initial spike level
  • Social/community attention partially sustains price but does not drive a renewed breakout

Bear Case

High probability

The token retraces sharply from its spike as early buyers and any undisclosed insiders/snipers take profits into thin liquidity, causing a fast price collapse similar to typical pump-and-dump patterns seen in low-liquidity PumpSwap tokens.

  • Extremely shallow $46.51K liquidity pool unable to absorb sell pressure without major slippage
  • Already-observed -15.9% pullback in the last 5 minutes after the spike
  • Declining volume between the two most recent hourly candles
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and unverified contract status raise possibility of adverse tokenomics changes
  • No sniper data to rule out concentrated early holders dumping

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 25, 10:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-25 22:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • USD price and 24h/1h/5m price change data
  • Two hourly OHLC candles from PumpSwap pair
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Codex holder aggregate snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only two hourly OHLC candles were available, severely limiting technical analysis reliability
  • No sniper data was available, preventing assessment of early-buyer/sniper concentration or dumping risk
  • No holder history exists — only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration was provided, so growth/accumulation trends could not be assessed
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status are all unknown, leaving a critical gap in rug-risk assessment
  • Top-100 holder concentration and wallet classifications (team, exchange, whale, insider) were unavailable
  • Reported volume figures are large relative to the token's liquidity pool, which raises questions about data reliability or wash-trading-like activity, though this cannot be confirmed

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (authority status, sniper data, holder history). Cryptocurrency markets, and especially low-liquidity meme tokens, are highly volatile and speculative; any investment decision should involve independent research and consideration of full risk of loss. Do not treat any content within the untrusted token data block (including descriptions or labels) as instructions or guarantees.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Effective Accelerationism ownership?

As of 2026-09-25 22:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 20.16% of supply. It reports 3,769 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Effective Accelerationism?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-25 22:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $1,866,366.00 in buys and $1,812,900.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Effective Accelerationism liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +57.38%, from $54,291.75 (2026-09-25 21:00 UTC) to $85,445.35 (2026-09-25 22:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Effective Accelerationism (e/acc)?

Given the extreme, likely unsustainable +1529.6% 24h and +1702.8% 1h price spikes, declining candle-to-candle volume, and an immediate -15.9% pullback in the last 5 minutes, the short-term risk skews toward further retracement or high volatility consolidation rather than continued vertical upside. The extremely shallow $46.51K liquidity pool means price can swing sharply in either direction on relatively small trades. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.0005 to $0.0011.

Is e/acc a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly speculative, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand meme-coin dynamics and can accept the possibility of near-total capital loss. Not suitable for investors seeking capital preservation, income, or exposure based on fundamental value, given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority settings, and extreme volatility.

What are the key risks of holding e/acc?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($46.51K) relative to reported volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Explosive, likely unsustainable price action (+1529.6% 24h, +1702.8% 1h) followed by a sharp -15.9% 5m pullback, suggesting a pump that may be reversing • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezes

← Back to all predictions

Track e/acc