GILL

gill Price Today & AI Analysis

GILLSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 26, 2026

Price

$0.047421

+46.08% 24h

Contract

Live
4RqBcUAWhWNSeRxM5Az8NyvBuakRqZUwe1AVRe7PuVFV

Chain

Solana

Holders

1,015

Market cap

$72,908

More tokens on Solana

parafactualparafactualparafactual$0.000732+706.6%MC $689.7KSHARTCOINSHARTCOINShartcoin$0.000919-69.1%MC $780.7KGOOGLXGOOGLXAlphabet xStock$344+2.0%MC $55.18METCHETCHEtch$0.049137+84.4%MC $86.3KTTPTTPTrendTrader Pro$0.000280+474.8%MC $273.6KRAYRAYRaydium$2.1+5.4%MC $1.16B

gill: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-26 04:17 UTC

Holder addresses

1,015

Top 10 supply share

16.68%

Reported liquidity

$13,418.00
How concentrated is gill ownership?
As of 2026-09-26 04:17 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.68% of supply. It reports 1,015 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling gill?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 04:17 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $651,355.00 in buys and $642,642.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is gill liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -43.77%, from $24,362.60 (2026-09-26 03:00 UTC) to $13,699.76 (2026-09-26 04:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-26 04:17 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-26 03:00 UTC$24,362.60
2026-09-26 04:00 UTC$13,699.76

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about GILL

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 26, 04:19 AM UTC

FDV

$72,908

Liquidity

$13,418.00

Holders

1,015

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

GILL is a micro-cap Solana token (FDV ≈ $72.9K, price ≈ $0.0000742) trading on PumpSwap against extremely thin liquidity (~$13.4K). The last two hourly candles show an extraordinary spike-and-collapse: price ran from ~$0.0000037 to a high of $0.000361 and then crashed back to ~$0.0000748, while shorter-horizon momentum (5m -48.8%, 1h -42.4%) is sharply negative even though the 24h change shows +46.1% (an artifact of the earlier spike). Holder data is limited to a current snapshot only — 1,015 holder addresses with top-10 wallets controlling 16.68% of supply — with no historical trend, wallet classification, or sniper coverage available. Mint/freeze authority status is unknown. This combination of extreme volatility, thin liquidity, and missing authority/holder-history data makes this a very high risk speculative asset.

Key points

  • Extreme single-hour price spike (to $0.000361) followed by an ~80% collapse within the next hour, indicating possible manipulation or a low-liquidity liquidity event rather than organic demand
  • Total liquidity of only ~$13.4K against ~$1.29M in combined 24h buy+sell volume, implying volume is churning through a very shallow pool with high slippage risk
  • No sniper data available, and holder aggregates provide only a current snapshot (1,015 holders, top-10 = 16.68%) with no growth history or wallet classification
  • Mint/freeze authority and contract verification status all reported as unknown, leaving a material rug-risk data gap
  • Fee-sharing description tied to an external handle (@GillVerd via UsePaid) is unverified creator-supplied text and should not be treated as any endorsement of safety

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1-24 hours

bearish

Momentum is sharply negative on the 5m (-48.8%) and 1h (-42.4%) timeframes following a massive hourly spike-and-crash candle. The 24h figure of +46% is misleading since it captures the earlier spike; current price action is a retracement from the $0.000361 high toward the $0.0000373-$0.0000748 range. Absent fresh buy demand, further downside toward the recent low is plausible.

Target low

$0.0000373

Target high

$0.0001200

Support

$0.0000373 (candle 1 open/low), $0.0000641 (candle 2 low)

Resistance

$0.0000748 (candle 2 close, current price), $0.000245 (candle 2 open), $0.000361 (recent spike high)

Medium term · 3-14 days

neutral

With only two hourly candles and a thin, unstable liquidity base (~$13.4K), there is insufficient data to project a reliable medium-term trend. The token's trajectory will likely hinge on whether liquidity is added/retained and whether buy/sell pressure (currently near-balanced at 50.3%/49.7%) tilts decisively in either direction.

Catalysts

  • Any liquidity additions or removals on the PumpSwap pool
  • Continued high wallet turnover (3,653 buyers vs 3,181 sellers in 24h) sustaining or reversing
  • Resolution of unknown mint/freeze authority status, which could materially re-rate risk if authorities are found unrenounced
  • Broader PumpSwap/meme-token sentiment given the pump-and-dump-like candle shape

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume ($651.36K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($642.64K), a marginal net positive flow
  • 24h unique buyers (3,653) exceed unique sellers (3,181), suggesting more distinct wallets are entering than exiting
  • High volume relative to FDV suggests active speculative interest that could re-attract momentum traders

Bearish factors

  • Massive intra-day price collapse from $0.000361 to $0.0000748 (~79% drawdown from the peak) within a single hour
  • Extremely thin liquidity ($13.4K) relative to volume ($1.29M) creates high slippage and price instability risk
  • Very negative short-term momentum (5m -48.8%, 1h -42.4%) contradicts the headline 24h gain
  • No verifiable authority/rug-risk data, and no historical holder trend to confirm organic growth

Confidence: low. Only two hourly candles are available, liquidity is extremely thin (~$13.4K), and key risk inputs (authorities, sniper data, holder history) are missing entirely, making any directional call highly uncertain.

GILL call history

Full track record →

Sep 26bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
4RqBcU...uVFV
Total Supply
982,401,166.66 GILL

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($13.42K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and price manipulation potential
  • Violent, unexplained intra-day price spike-and-crash pattern (up to 97x then -79% from peak) consistent with pump-and-dump dynamics on a low-cap PumpSwap pair
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer
  • No sniper data and no holder history data mean early-buyer behavior and distribution trends cannot be verified

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only two hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (03:00 UTC) opened at $0.00000373, spiked to a high of $0.000361 (nearly 97x the open) before closing at $0.000246, on volume of ~1.27M. Candle 2 (04:00 UTC) opened at that $0.000246 level, fell to a low of $0.0000641, and closed near $0.0000748, on much lower volume (~81.4K) — an order of magnitude decline in participation alongside an ~70% drop from open to close. This is a classic vertical spike-and-dump pattern typical of illiquid PumpSwap pairs.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term price action is a sharp downtrend/retracement from the spike high. With only two candles, medium-term trend cannot be reliably established and is best characterized as directionless/sideways pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000641 (candle 2 low)

Major support

$0.00000373 (candle 1 open/low)

Immediate resistance

$0.000246 (candle 2 open, prior close of candle 1)

Major resistance

$0.000361 (candle 1 high / spike peak)

Price is currently trading near the bottom of its very short observed range ($0.0000748 close vs. a $0.00000373-$0.000361 range). The $0.000246 level acted as both a close and subsequent open, marking it as a key pivot; reclaiming it would be the first sign of stabilization, while a break below $0.0000641 would revisit levels closer to the pre-spike base.

Notable patterns

  • Vertical spike candle followed by sharp reversal (blow-off top / pump-and-dump shape)
  • Volume climax on candle 1 followed by steep volume decay on candle 2
  • Wide-range candle with close near the low, suggesting seller dominance after the spike

Liquidity

Liquidity

$13,418.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total pool liquidity of only $13.42K is dramatically smaller than the ~$1.29M in combined 24h volume (a ~96x volume-to-liquidity ratio), which strongly indicates high price impact per trade and explains the violent single-hour price swings seen in the candle data (spike to $0.000361, then crash to $0.0000748). Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.3% vs 49.7%), and 24h unique buyers (3,653) modestly exceed unique sellers (3,181), suggesting broad-based two-sided activity rather than one-directional dumping, but the shallow liquidity means even routine trading can move price substantially. Slippage risk is high for any meaningfully sized trade.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

982,401,166.66 GILL

FDV

$72,908

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Observed hourly candles show a spike from $0.00000373 to $0.000361 (nearly 97x) followed by a collapse to $0.0000748, and 1h/5m momentum readings of -42.4%/-48.8% confirm extreme, ongoing volatility.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of just $13.42K against ~$1.29M in 24h volume creates a very high volume-to-liquidity ratio, meaning trades of moderate size can move price dramatically and exiting positions may face significant slippage.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only top-10 concentration (16.68%) is available; top-100 concentration, wallet classification, and any historical accumulation pattern are missing, so overall concentration risk cannot be fully assessed and is marked unknown rather than assumed low.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($13.42K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and price manipulation potential
  • Violent, unexplained intra-day price spike-and-crash pattern (up to 97x then -79% from peak) consistent with pump-and-dump dynamics on a low-cap PumpSwap pair
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer
  • No sniper data and no holder history data mean early-buyer behavior and distribution trends cannot be verified
  • Unverified contract status and unverifiable creator-supplied fee-sharing description

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy/sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.3%/49.7%) and unique buyers (3,653) modestly exceed unique sellers (3,181), indicating two-sided market activity rather than one-way exit pressure
  • Top-10 holder concentration (16.68%) is not extreme in isolation, though this is only a partial picture given missing top-100 and historical data

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total loss. Given the extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (authorities, sniper activity, holder history), this token is not appropriate for risk-averse investors or as anything beyond a small, speculative allocation.

GILL is a sub-$100K FDV Solana meme-style token on PumpSwap that just experienced a dramatic spike-and-crash within its available two-hour candle history, trading against only ~$13.4K of liquidity. The setup is characteristic of a highly speculative, high-risk micro-cap trade rather than a fundamentals-driven investment, compounded by significant data gaps around mint/freeze authorities, sniper wallets, and holder history.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the near-balanced 24h buy/sell flow (50.3%/49.7%) and higher unique buyer count (3,653 vs 3,181 sellers) persist, and if liquidity is added to the pool, renewed speculative interest could push price back toward the recent spike levels, especially if social/twitter momentum around the @GillVerd-linked branding continues to attract new buyers.

  • Sustained or growing unique buyer count relative to sellers
  • Fresh liquidity injections reducing slippage and enabling larger buys to move price up without immediate exhaustion
  • Positive social momentum via the token's twitter/website links attracting speculative inflows
  • Confirmation (if it occurs) that mint/freeze authorities are renounced, reducing a major overhang

Base Case

Price continues to consolidate in a wide, volatile range between roughly $0.0000373 and $0.000246 (the observed candle range) as the pool remains thinly liquid, with volume-driven whipsaws in either direction until either liquidity deepens meaningfully or interest fades.

  • Liquidity remains roughly at current levels (~$13.4K) without a major injection or withdrawal
  • 24h buy/sell volumes remain roughly balanced as observed (50.3%/49.7%)
  • No new information emerges confirming or denying authority renouncement or sniper activity in the near term

Bear Case

High probability

The observed spike-and-crash (peak $0.000361 to $0.0000748, an ~79% drawdown) repeats or extends as the pump exhausts itself, sell pressure overtakes the currently narrow buy/sell balance, and thin liquidity ($13.4K) allows further sharp downside moves on relatively small sell orders.

  • Extremely thin liquidity relative to volume amplifying any sell-side pressure
  • Negative short-term momentum already in effect (5m -48.8%, 1h -42.4%)
  • Unknown authority status raising the possibility of adverse deployer actions
  • Lack of verifiable holder growth or sniper data removing any confirmatory signal of organic, sustainable demand

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 26, 04:19 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-26 04:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, description, social links)
  • Price feed (USD price, 24h/1h/5m % change)
  • OHLC hourly candle data (2 most recent candles)
  • Trading analytics (liquidity, buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Sniper analysis (reported unavailable)
  • Holder aggregates from Codex (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)

Limitations

  • Only two hourly OHLC candles were provided, severely limiting technical trend analysis
  • No sniper wallet data was available at all, preventing any sniper concentration or PnL assessment
  • Holder data lacks any historical time series (24h/7d/30d growth), wallet classification, or notable holder identification — only a current count and top-10 concentration figure exist
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status are all unknown, preventing a definitive rug-risk determination
  • Token description and social links are creator-supplied and unverified, and should not be taken as confirmation of legitimacy

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain data snapshots and carries significant uncertainty. Cryptocurrency tokens, especially low-liquidity micro-cap tokens like GILL, carry a high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is gill ownership?

As of 2026-09-26 04:17 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.68% of supply. It reports 1,015 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling gill?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 04:17 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $651,355.00 in buys and $642,642.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is gill liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -43.77%, from $24,362.60 (2026-09-26 03:00 UTC) to $13,699.76 (2026-09-26 04:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for gill (GILL)?

Momentum is sharply negative on the 5m (-48.8%) and 1h (-42.4%) timeframes following a massive hourly spike-and-crash candle. The 24h figure of +46% is misleading since it captures the earlier spike; current price action is a retracement from the $0.000361 high toward the $0.0000373-$0.0000748 range. Absent fresh buy demand, further downside toward the recent low is plausible. Short-term outlook is bearish (1-24 hours), with a target range of $0.0000373 to $0.0001200.

Is GILL a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total loss. Given the extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and multiple unresolved data gaps (authorities, sniper activity, holder history), this token is not appropriate for risk-averse investors or as anything beyond a small, speculative allocation.

What are the key risks of holding GILL?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($13.42K) relative to trading volume, creating high slippage and price manipulation potential • Violent, unexplained intra-day price spike-and-crash pattern (up to 97x then -79% from peak) consistent with pump-and-dump dynamics on a low-cap PumpSwap pair • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing by the deployer

← Back to all predictions

Track GILL