ETHICS

ethics.ltd Price Today & AI Analysis

ETHICSSolanaAnalysis as of Aug 7, 2026

Price

$0.000286

+21.67% 24h · FDV $283,565

Contract

Live
3SXQSMVWTf6rZaJiXn3tHNpNEKLeTK1FShFR3s4fxSUR

Chain

Holders

1,032

Market cap

$283,565

More tokens on Solana

ethics.ltd: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-07 14:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$70,039.22
How concentrated is ethics.ltd ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling ethics.ltd?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is ethics.ltd liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-07 14:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $70,039.22. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-07 14:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about ETHICS

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Aug 7, 02:16 PM UTC

FDV

$137,423

Liquidity

$70,039.22

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

ETHICS (ethics.ltd) is a Solana-based token with mint address 3SXQSMVWTf6rZaJiXn3tHNpNEKLeTK1FShFR3s4fxSUR, trading at approximately $0.0001374 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$137.4K and total liquidity of ~$70K on Raydium. The token is flagged as possible spam by on-chain metadata services, has an unverified contract, and carries a non-renounced update authority. Despite a reported 252% 24h price change in the metadata, the hourly OHLC data shows a very tight, sideways range (~714–726 SOL-denominated units) with no dramatic spike visible in the candle data, suggesting the large percentage change may reflect a prior-period baseline rather than current momentum. Overall risk is very high.

Key points

  • Flagged as possible spam by on-chain metadata services
  • Unverified contract with mutable-false but non-renounced update authority
  • Extremely low liquidity (~$70K) relative to FDV (~$137K), creating high slippage risk
  • Tight sideways price action over 24 hours despite a reported +252% 24h change in metadata
  • No sniper data available, limiting smart-money signal analysis

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1–24 hours

neutral

The hourly OHLC candles show price oscillating in a very narrow band between approximately 711 (candle [8] low) and 726.65 (candle [2] high) in SOL-denominated terms. Buy and sell pressure are nearly balanced (51.2% buy vs 48.8% sell), and volume is extremely low in most hours (many candles under 2,000 units). No clear directional catalyst is evident from the candle data. Short-term price action is likely to remain range-bound with high volatility risk given thin liquidity.

Target low

$0.000120

Target high

$0.000155

Support

$0.000130 (candle [8] low zone), $0.000125 (candle [23] low zone)

Resistance

$0.000145 (candle [2] high zone), $0.000150 (candle [1] and [24] high zone)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Given the spam flag, very low liquidity, unverified contract, and lack of any described utility or community traction, medium-term price outlook is bearish. Thin liquidity means any moderate sell pressure could cause significant price deterioration. Without new catalysts or verified fundamentals, sustained upward price movement is unlikely.

Catalysts

  • Any significant sell-off by early holders could collapse price given $70K liquidity
  • Continued spam classification may deter new buyers
  • No described utility or roadmap to drive organic demand

Bullish factors

  • Buy pressure slightly exceeds sell pressure at 51.2% vs 48.8% over 24h
  • 3,747 buys vs 3,543 sells suggests marginally more buy-side activity
  • 678 unique buyers vs 608 unique sellers — slightly more buyers active
  • Token has social links (Twitter, website) suggesting some community presence

Bearish factors

  • Flagged as possible spam by on-chain metadata services
  • Unverified contract
  • Total liquidity of only ~$70K creates extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Update authority not renounced (held by 2Znq72DbztqtYkM3c6hesYLiZLH2MexZBHXPnSCDMBY5)
  • No token description or stated utility
  • Hourly volume extremely low in most candles (many under 2,000 units), indicating thin real trading activity
  • FDV of ~$137K is barely above liquidity, suggesting minimal market depth

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) the token is flagged as possible spam, (2) no holder distribution data is available, (3) no sniper data is available, (4) the reported 252% 24h change conflicts with the flat hourly OHLC data suggesting data inconsistency, and (5) extremely thin liquidity makes price highly manipulable.

ETHICS call history

Full track record →

Aug 7neutral
24h
7d
30d+405.6%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
3SXQSM...xSUR
Total Supply
999,930,885.98

Key Risks

  • Token flagged as possible spam by on-chain metadata services
  • Unverified contract — no independent code audit
  • Update authority not renounced — wallet 2Znq72DbztqtYkM3c6hesYLiZLH2MexZBHXPnSCDMBY5 retains control
  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$70K) — high slippage and exit risk

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24 hourly candles (candles [24] through [1], covering ~2026-08-06T15:00Z to 2026-08-07T14:00Z) show price in a very tight range. The session low is candle [8]'s low of 711.17 and the session high is candle [2]'s high of 726.65 (SOL-denominated). Most candles have very small bodies and wicks, indicating indecision and low conviction. Volume is extremely uneven: candle [2] has the highest volume at 244,590 units, candle [1] at 142,159 units, while many other candles have volumes under 2,000 units — suggesting sporadic bursts of activity rather than sustained interest. The most recent candle [1] closed at 719.12, below its open of 720.81, forming a small bearish candle.

Trend

Short-term

Sideways

Medium-term

Sideways

Price has been oscillating in a narrow band of roughly 711–727 SOL-denominated units across the 24-hour window. There is no clear directional trend — neither higher highs nor lower lows are being established in a sustained manner. The overall structure is a tight consolidation range.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

718.00 (multiple candle closes cluster near this level)

Major support

711.17 (candle [8] session low)

Immediate resistance

722.68 (candle [4] high)

Major resistance

726.65 (candle [2] session high)

Immediate support sits around 718 where multiple candles have closed. The session low of 711.17 from candle [8] represents the major support. On the upside, 722–726 has acted as resistance with candles [2] and [3] failing to sustain above 725. A break above 726.65 would be needed to signal any bullish continuation.

Notable patterns

  • Tight consolidation range across all 24 candles — no breakout pattern
  • Volume spike in candles [1] and [2] against otherwise near-zero volume — possible wash trading or single large transaction
  • Candle [8] shows a notable lower wick (low 711.17 vs open 718.88) suggesting a brief dip and recovery — potential liquidity grab
  • Candle [6] has extremely low volume (18.8 units) — near-zero activity hour
  • Most recent candle [1] is a small bearish candle closing below open — minor short-term bearish signal
  • Candle [3] closed at its high (725.74) — bullish close, but followed by lower candles

Liquidity

Liquidity

$70,039.22

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of ~$70K on the Raydium pair (7J3CWXX3Fz4drdykvEeKVHHRNNirePc8EDnYbFQo8VBH) is extremely shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of ~$572K combined. This means the pool is being turned over multiple times per day, which is a red flag for potential wash trading or highly volatile price impact. The FDV of ~$137K is only ~2x the liquidity pool size, indicating minimal market depth. Any moderately sized sell order could cause significant price slippage. Net flow is marginally positive (inflow) with $293K buys vs $279K sells, but the margin is thin. The 761 unique wallets active in 24h shows some breadth of participation, but the shallow liquidity remains the dominant concern.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,930,885.98

FDV

$137,422.97

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    Despite appearing range-bound in the 24h OHLC data, the token has a reported 252% 24h price change in metadata, indicating extreme historical volatility. Thin liquidity amplifies any price swings.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only ~$70K against a 24h trading volume of ~$572K means the pool turns over ~8x per day. Any significant sell pressure will cause severe slippage. Exit risk for larger positions is very high.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Token flagged as possible spam by on-chain metadata services
  • Unverified contract — no independent code audit
  • Update authority not renounced — wallet 2Znq72DbztqtYkM3c6hesYLiZLH2MexZBHXPnSCDMBY5 retains control
  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$70K) — high slippage and exit risk
  • No token description or stated utility — no fundamental value proposition
  • 24h volume (~$572K) vastly exceeds liquidity pool (~$70K) — potential wash trading signal
  • Holder distribution data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Mint and freeze authority status unknown

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked mutable:false, limiting some metadata modification vectors
  • Buy/sell pressure is nearly balanced (51.2%/48.8%), suggesting no immediate coordinated dump
  • 761 unique wallets active in 24h shows some breadth of participation
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist, suggesting some community presence
  • No snipers detected, reducing one category of early-holder dump risk

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap, unverified, spam-flagged tokens on Solana. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

ETHICS (ethics.ltd) is a micro-cap Solana token with a ~$137K FDV and ~$70K liquidity, flagged as possible spam with an unverified contract and non-renounced update authority. The token shows no stated utility, no description, and no verifiable fundamentals. While short-term trading activity shows marginally more buyers than sellers, the structural risks — thin liquidity, spam flag, unknown authority status, and lack of any fundamental value driver — make this a highly speculative instrument with a strongly negative risk/reward profile for most investors.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Community-driven momentum trade: If the token gains viral attention via its Twitter/website presence and the 252% reported price surge attracts momentum traders, short-term price could spike further. Thin liquidity means even modest buy pressure could push price significantly higher.

  • Viral social media attention driving FOMO buying
  • Thin liquidity amplifying upside price moves on buy pressure
  • Marginally positive net flow (51.2% buy pressure) sustaining short-term momentum
  • 761 unique wallets active suggests some organic interest

Base Case

Gradual fade: The token continues to trade in a tight range with sporadic volume bursts, slowly losing liquidity and active traders as interest wanes. Price drifts lower over weeks as the spam flag limits discovery and no new catalysts emerge.

  • No major new buyers or sellers emerge to break the current range
  • Liquidity remains at ~$70K or slowly decreases
  • No rug pull event, but also no positive catalyst
  • Trading activity gradually declines from current 761 unique wallets/day

Bear Case

High probability

Rug pull or organic collapse: Update authority holder or concentrated early buyers exit, collapsing the $70K liquidity pool. Spam flag deters new buyers, volume dries up, and price falls to near zero. Given the token's characteristics, this is the most likely outcome over any meaningful time horizon.

  • Spam flag classification deterring new organic buyers
  • Non-renounced update authority enabling potential malicious metadata changes
  • Extremely thin liquidity making price collapse easy to trigger
  • No stated utility or fundamental demand driver
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential for supply manipulation

Analysis details

Generated

Aug 7, 02:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-07 14:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, authority, mutability flags)
  • Price feed (USD price, 24h change)
  • Raydium pair data (pair address 7J3CWXX3Fz4drdykvEeKVHHRNNirePc8EDnYbFQo8VBH)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles, SOL-denominated)
  • Trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, unique wallets)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Holder distribution data is entirely unavailable — whale concentration and holder growth cannot be assessed
  • Sniper data is unavailable — early buyer PnL and smart money signals cannot be quantified
  • Mint and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the data
  • The reported 252% 24h price change in metadata conflicts with the flat hourly OHLC data — possible data inconsistency or different price basis
  • OHLC values appear to be SOL-denominated (700+ range) while USD price is $0.000137 — direct USD technical levels require conversion not fully performed here
  • Token is flagged as possible spam, meaning metadata fields (name, symbol, description) may be adversarial or misleading
  • No independent contract audit or verified code review available
  • Social link content (Twitter, website) was not analyzed

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. The token analyzed has been flagged as possible spam by on-chain metadata services. Investing in micro-cap, unverified tokens on Solana carries extreme risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is ethics.ltd ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling ethics.ltd?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is ethics.ltd liquidity falling?

As of 2026-08-07 14:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $70,039.22. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for ethics.ltd (ETHICS)?

The hourly OHLC candles show price oscillating in a very narrow band between approximately 711 (candle [8] low) and 726.65 (candle [2] high) in SOL-denominated terms. Buy and sell pressure are nearly balanced (51.2% buy vs 48.8% sell), and volume is extremely low in most hours (many candles under 2,000 units). No clear directional catalyst is evident from the candle data. Short-term price action is likely to remain range-bound with high volatility risk given thin liquidity. Short-term outlook is neutral (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000120 to $0.000155.

Is ETHICS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.5/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap, unverified, spam-flagged tokens on Solana. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. Position sizing should be minimal if any exposure is taken.

What are the key risks of holding ETHICS?

Token flagged as possible spam by on-chain metadata services • Unverified contract — no independent code audit • Update authority not renounced — wallet 2Znq72DbztqtYkM3c6hesYLiZLH2MexZBHXPnSCDMBY5 retains control

← Back to all predictions

Track ETHICS