How concentrated is IMU ownership?

As of 2026-09-25 05:15 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 4.00% of supply, out of 402 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling IMU?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-25 05:15 UTC, DEX buys were $833,674.00 and sells $780,345.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is IMU liquidity falling?

Liquidity rose 74.24%, from $29,597.65 (2026-09-25 03:00 UTC) to $51,570.95 (2026-09-25 05:00 UTC).

IMU Price Today & AI Analysis

IMUSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 25, 2026

$0.0₅2853

Contract

Live

33owuxq97P85XaV2oXvBFmMoykb3ZjLH5wdAV4uDpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

Market cap

$2,769

At a $1M market cap, $IMU would be $0.001030 (361x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is IMU a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 7

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about IMU

3 free answers a day

IMU: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-09-25 05:15 UTC

Holder addresses

402

Top 10 supply share

4.00%

Reported liquidity

$51,571.00

How concentrated is IMU ownership?: As of 2026-09-25 05:15 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 4.00% of supply, out of 402 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling IMU?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-25 05:15 UTC, DEX buys were $833,674.00 and sells $780,345.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is IMU liquidity falling?: Liquidity rose 74.24%, from $29,597.65 (2026-09-25 03:00 UTC) to $51,570.95 (2026-09-25 05:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-25 05:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-25 03:00 UTC	$29,597.65
2026-09-25 04:00 UTC	$54,588.80
2026-09-25 05:00 UTC	$51,570.95

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-25 05:15 UTCBuy · $78.83517AmZz1…5yZK8rWallet HVUFpWB7…vMNb7h
2026-09-25 05:15 UTCBuy · $75.674LkCXt2h…X3JNENWallet Hp63DZEj…XYYZoT
2026-09-25 05:15 UTCBuy · $198.705Kh2X3Zz…oK8QiHWallet 6QGwz9cA…XXBSrP
2026-09-25 05:15 UTCSell · $58.803yrQYWqN…vvbK9qWallet 7N7Wn2Ba…hUCdCt
2026-09-25 05:15 UTCSell · $70.405VJhj81N…jusRQbWallet 8vyqKU6u…V7hCUu
2026-09-25 05:15 UTCSell · $63.5335TZpi5S…TUEYo2Wallet FxaLQNKH…Rb1bYD
2026-09-25 05:15 UTCSell · $62.6054Mss7Mu…DHf5qgWallet 4mv5YWJu…r6rdYU
2026-09-25 05:15 UTCSell · $60.665K6vAByM…6EmxdPWallet 7orapUZZ…6druVA
2026-09-25 05:15 UTCSell · $495.99XT42GViM…YdsPLyWallet 9YM7zk67…raVxio
2026-09-25 05:15 UTCSell · $505.97AAPCaSng…JNz44TWallet 2X67uTui…ftsdmr

Report snapshot

as of Sep 25, 05:16 AM UTC

FDV

$1,127,330

Liquidity

$51,571.00

Holders

402

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

IMU is a very new, extremely low-liquidity Solana pump.fun/PumpSwap token (mint 33owuxq97P85XaV2oXvBFmMoykb3ZjLH5wdAV4uDpump) that has posted an eye-catching +2312% 24h price move on only $51.57K total liquidity and a $1.13M FDV. The three available hourly candles show explosive, highly volatile price action from ~$0.0000235 to ~$0.00116, consistent with a freshly launched, thinly-traded micro-cap rather than an established asset. Holder count sits at 402 addresses with top-10 wallets holding just under 4% of supply per the current Codex snapshot, but no historical holder data, wallet classification, sniper data, or mint/freeze authority status is available, which materially limits confidence in this analysis.

Key points

Extreme 24h price move (+2312.6%) on very shallow liquidity ($51.57K)
Only 3 hourly candles of OHLC data available, all within the same trading session, indicating a brand-new/early-stage token
Sniper analysis data is completely unavailable, preventing assessment of bot/early-buyer concentration
Holder aggregate data is a single snapshot (402 holders, top-10 = ~4% of supply) with no history, so growth/accumulation trends cannot be determined
Mint/freeze authority status is unknown, so rug risk from authorities cannot be verified

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Price action over the last 3 hourly candles shows a massive spike from ~$0.0000235 to a high of ~$0.00176 then a pullback to ~$0.00116, indicating a classic early pump.fun-style parabolic move followed by profit-taking. Given the shallow $51.57K liquidity pool, further large swings (in either direction) are likely on relatively small trade sizes.

Target low

$0.00060

Target high

$0.00160

Support: $0.000843 (candle 3 low), $0.000402 (candle 1 close / candle 2 open)
Resistance: $0.00139 (candle 3 high), $0.00176 (candle 2 high, all-time high in dataset)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With only a few hours of trading history visible, medium-term direction cannot be reliably projected. Sustainability will depend on whether liquidity deepens meaningfully beyond $51.57K, whether holder count continues growing, and whether buy pressure (currently 51.7% vs 48.3% sell) persists or flips negative as early buyers/snipers potentially exit.

Catalysts

Growth (or lack thereof) in liquidity depth beyond the current $51.57K
Continued social momentum via Twitter/website presence
Potential large holder distribution once top wallets decide to exit given no lock-up/authority data confirming safety
Listing on additional DEXs or aggregators increasing depth

Bullish factors

24h buy volume ($833.67K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($780.35K), a 51.7%/48.3% split suggesting slightly net-positive demand
2,725 unique buyers vs 2,538 unique sellers in 24h shows broad-based participation rather than a single whale driving price
Top-10 holder concentration is low at ~4% of supply per the current snapshot, which if sustained would reduce single-wallet dump risk

Bearish factors

Total liquidity is only $51.57K against a $1.13M FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
+2312% 24h gain is a hallmark of a pump-and-dump pattern typical of new pump.fun tokens
No verification of mint/freeze authority renouncement — rug pull risk cannot be ruled out
No sniper data available, so bot-driven early buying/dumping cannot be assessed or ruled out
Extremely short trading history (data limited to ~3 hours of candles) means the current price could easily be a transient spike

Confidence: low. Only three hourly candles and a single holder snapshot are available; there is no sniper data, no authority verification, and no historical holder trend. The token's price history is extremely short and volatility extreme, making any prediction highly speculative.

IMU call history

Full track record →

Sep 25neutral@ $0.00116

24h—

7d—

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 33owux...pump
Total Supply: 970,773,294.589295 IMU

Key Risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($51.57K) relative to FDV ($1.13M) and 24h volume (>$1.6M combined), creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Parabolic +2312% 24h price move is a classic pattern seen in pump-and-dump schemes on new pump.fun-style launches
Complete absence of mint/freeze authority verification means rug-pull risk (unlimited minting or account freezing) cannot be ruled out
No sniper data available, obscuring whether bot wallets accumulated a large early position poised to dump

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly USD candles are available (2026-09-25 03:00-05:00 UTC). Candle 1 opened at $0.0000235, spiked to a high of $0.000412, and closed at $0.000403 on volume of $537.9K — a strong bullish initial move. Candle 2 opened at $0.000403, surged to a high of $0.00176 (the dataset's peak), dipped to a low of $0.000200, and closed at $0.00131 on the largest volume of $895.9K — extreme intracandle volatility suggesting aggressive buying followed by partial profit-taking within the same hour. Candle 3 opened at $0.00131, made a lower high of $0.00140, dropped to a low of $0.000843, and closed at $0.00116 on reduced volume of $190.7K, indicating cooling momentum and a modest pullback from the peak.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Zooming out across the 3 candles, the token is still up massively from its starting point (medium-term uptrend from $0.0000235 to $0.00116), but the most recent candle shows a lower high and a close below the prior candle's close, suggesting short-term momentum is fading after the initial parabolic spike.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

52%

Sell

48%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000843 (candle 3 intracandle low)

Major support

$0.000402 (candle 1 close / candle 2 open)

Immediate resistance

$0.00140 (candle 3 high)

Major resistance

$0.00176 (candle 2 high, dataset peak)

Given the extremely limited 3-candle dataset, these levels should be treated as provisional. The $0.00176 peak represents the strongest resistance seen so far; a break above it would signal renewed bullish momentum, while a fall below the $0.000843 low of the most recent candle would suggest the pullback is deepening toward the $0.000402 zone.

Notable patterns

Parabolic spike across candles 1-2 followed by a lower high in candle 3, a potential early reversal/consolidation signal
Wide-range candles with large high-to-low spreads (e.g., candle 2: $0.000200 to $0.00176) indicating extreme intracandle volatility typical of thinly-liquid new tokens
Declining volume on the most recent candle relative to the prior candle, suggesting waning buyer conviction

Liquidity

$51,571.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $51.57K against a $1.13M FDV and 24h trading volume exceeding $1.6M combined (buy+sell) represents an extremely thin liquidity pool relative to trading activity — a ratio that implies high slippage for any meaningfully sized trade and elevated vulnerability to price manipulation. The 24h buy volume ($833.67K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($780.35K), a 51.7%/48.3% split indicating a slight net inflow, and unique buyers (2,725) slightly outnumber unique sellers (2,538), suggesting broad participation rather than a single actor dominating flow. Nonetheless, the mismatch between tiny liquidity and heavy volume is a red flag for volatility and potential difficulty exiting large positions.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

970,773,294.589295 IMU

FDV

$1,127,330 (reported as $1.13M in trading analytics)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of +2312.6% and 1h change of +310.5%, combined with hourly candles showing intracandle swings from $0.0002 to $0.00176, demonstrate extreme volatility typical of a newly launched, thinly-traded token.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $51.57K versus a $1.13M FDV and over $1.6M in combined 24h trading volume, creating high slippage risk and making it difficult to enter/exit sizable positions without materially moving price.
Concentrationunknown
The available snapshot shows top-10 holders at ~4.0% of supply, which appears low, but top-100 concentration, wallet classification, and any historical distribution data are unavailable. Because a single current-only metric cannot confirm true decentralization (e.g., wallets could be linked or the snapshot could change rapidly), this risk is best classified as unknown rather than confidently low.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely shallow liquidity ($51.57K) relative to FDV ($1.13M) and 24h volume (>$1.6M combined), creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Parabolic +2312% 24h price move is a classic pattern seen in pump-and-dump schemes on new pump.fun-style launches
Complete absence of mint/freeze authority verification means rug-pull risk (unlimited minting or account freezing) cannot be ruled out
No sniper data available, obscuring whether bot wallets accumulated a large early position poised to dump
Only 3 hours of OHLC history and a single holder snapshot exist, providing minimal track record to evaluate sustainability
Declining volume in the most recent candle (down ~79% from the prior hour) suggests the initial buying frenzy may be fading

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume ($833.67K) slightly exceeds sell volume ($780.35K), and unique buyers (2,725) slightly exceed unique sellers (2,538), indicating some organic two-sided participation rather than one-sided dumping
Top-10 holder concentration in the current snapshot is relatively low (~4.0% of supply), though this cannot be confirmed as a durable or complete picture given missing historical and top-100 data

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable or predictable returns, or anyone unable to independently verify contract safety (mint/freeze authority) before trading. Given the shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and multiple unknown risk factors, position sizing should be minimal if entered at all.

IMU is a high-risk, high-volatility pump.fun-style micro-cap token that has just experienced an extreme parabolic price surge (+2312% in 24h) on very thin liquidity ($51.57K). While near-term trading data shows modestly positive buy pressure (51.7%/48.3%) and broad participation (2,725 buyers vs 2,538 sellers in 24h), critical due-diligence data — mint/freeze authority status, sniper concentration, and holder history — are all unavailable, making this a speculative, evidence-limited bet rather than a well-underwritten investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If liquidity continues to grow, buy pressure remains net-positive, and the token gains sustained social/community traction (leveraging its Twitter and website presence), price could continue an uptrend beyond the current $0.00176 peak, especially if new capital inflows outpace profit-taking from early buyers.

Sustained net-positive buy/sell volume ratio (currently 51.7%/48.3%)
Growing unique buyer count (2,725 in 24h) outpacing sellers
Potential deepening of liquidity beyond the current $51.57K, reducing slippage and attracting larger participants
Continued social media momentum described in the token's marketing narrative

Base Case

Price likely continues to exhibit high volatility with further sharp swings in both directions as the market digests the initial pump; given shallow liquidity and short track record, a meaningful pullback toward prior support levels (e.g., $0.000843 or lower) is plausible before any stabilization, with outcome highly dependent on whether new liquidity and holders continue to enter.

No major liquidity injection occurs beyond incremental growth
Authorities and contract safety remain unverified, keeping cautious capital on the sidelines
Trading activity gradually normalizes from the initial frenzy, as suggested by the declining volume trend in the latest candle
No new catalysts (listings, partnerships) alter current market dynamics within the observed window

Bear Case

High probability

Given the token's extremely shallow liquidity, unverified authorities, and lack of sniper/holder history, a sharp reversal or rug-pull-style event is plausible; the recent parabolic spike could simply be an early pump.fun mania that reverts sharply once early buyers take profits, especially since the most recent candle already shows a lower high and falling volume.

Unverified mint/freeze authorities create unresolved rug-pull risk
Extremely thin liquidity ($51.57K) makes the price highly susceptible to large sell orders
Declining volume (down ~79%) in the latest candle suggests fading momentum after the initial spike
No sniper data to rule out bot-driven pump-and-dump activity
Classic pattern of exponential 24h gains on new tokens often precedes steep corrections

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 25, 05:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-25 05:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals, FDV)
OHLC hourly candle data (3 most recent candles, PumpSwap pair)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % changes)
Holder aggregate snapshot (Unhosted provider — current holder count and top-10 concentration only)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were available, providing minimal price history for trend/pattern analysis
No sniper data was available at all, preventing assessment of bot concentration, early-buyer PnL, or dump risk
Holder data is a single current snapshot with no 24h/7d/30d history, so growth trends and price correlation could not be assessed
Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status are all unknown, leaving rug-pull risk unverifiable
Top-100 holder concentration was not provided, limiting whale concentration analysis to the top-10 figure only
Token description and social links are creator-supplied and were treated as untrusted marketing content, not verified claims

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partially incomplete on-chain and market data and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, an endorsement, or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any asset. Cryptocurrency tokens, especially newly launched low-liquidity tokens, carry substantial risk of total loss. Conduct independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is IMU a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Nov 7, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell IMU?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 7, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for IMU (IMU)?

Is IMU a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable or predictable returns, or anyone unable to independently verify contract safety (mint/freeze authority) before trading. Given the shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and multiple unknown risk factors, position sizing should be minimal if entered at all.

What are the key risks of holding IMU?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($51.57K) relative to FDV ($1.13M) and 24h volume (>$1.6M combined), creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Parabolic +2312% 24h price move is a classic pattern seen in pump-and-dump schemes on new pump.fun-style launches • Complete absence of mint/freeze authority verification means rug-pull risk (unlimited minting or account freezing) cannot be ruled out