P

Pikachu Price Today & AI Analysis

PIKACHUSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 20, 2026

Price

$0.041262

+89.55% 24h · FDV $1,262,126

Contract

Live
2rcCySNstCrFuSkQu6ueJDgUSTBngfNcBEXTghNHzeVQ

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,474

Market cap

$1,262,126

More tokens on Solana

NVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA$0.042359+275.8%MC $2.36MTBTHE BULLTHE BULL$0.041819+44.7%MC $1.82MSTONKSTONKSTONK$0.2497-5.7%MC $208.61MCATECATECatecoin$0.1102+31.2%MC $106.29MPAIDPAIDPaid$0.0260-8.6%MC $25.08M

Pikachu: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-20 06:16 UTC

Holder addresses

2,474

Top 10 supply share

1.64%

Reported liquidity

$176,028.00
How concentrated is Pikachu ownership?
As of 2026-09-20 06:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 1.64% of supply. It reports 2,474 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Pikachu?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-20 06:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $6,918,451.00 in buys and $6,840,311.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Pikachu liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +17.54%, from $149,764.70 (2026-09-20 04:00 UTC) to $176,026.44 (2026-09-20 06:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-20 06:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-20 04:00 UTC$149,764.70
2026-09-20 05:00 UTC$174,008.46
2026-09-20 06:00 UTC$176,026.44

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Ask Unhosted AI about PIKACHU

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 20, 06:18 AM UTC

FDV

$1,262,126

Liquidity

$176,028.00

Holders

2,474

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Pikachu (PIKACHU) is a Solana meme token trading on PumpSwap with a tiny total liquidity pool (~$176K) against a $1.26M fully diluted valuation. Price has spiked 89.5% in the last 24h, with the most recent hourly candle showing an extreme wick from ~9.6e-12 to 0.000712 before closing near 0.0000104, indicating either a data anomaly or a violent low-liquidity price discovery event. Buy/sell volume is roughly balanced (50.3%/49.7%) on very high notional turnover ($6.9M buy vs $6.84M sell) relative to the token's tiny liquidity pool, a classic signature of a high-velocity, high-volatility meme-coin market. Holder base snapshot shows 2,474 addresses with top-10 wallets holding only 1.64% of supply, but no historical trend, wallet classification, or sniper data is available to confirm organic distribution or detect insider activity.

Key points

  • Extremely thin liquidity (~$176K) relative to $1.26M FDV and ~$6.9M in 24h buy volume, implying large slippage and price impact risk
  • Massive 24h price swing (+89.5%) with an anomalous candle showing a near-total wick range (9.6e-12 to 0.00071), suggesting either a flash crash/pump or unreliable OHLC data at that timestamp
  • Top-10 holder concentration is unusually low (1.64% of supply) per the current snapshot, but this cannot be corroborated with historical trend or wallet labels
  • No sniper data, no authority (mint/freeze) verification, and no holder history available — significant data gaps that prevent full risk clearance

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48h

neutral

Price action over the last 3 hourly candles shows extreme volatility: a huge wick down to near-zero and up to 0.000712 in candle 1, followed by consolidation between ~0.0000103 and 0.0000129 in candles 2-3. Current price ($0.0000126) sits near the upper end of this tight recent range. Given the balanced 24h buy/sell pressure (50.3%/49.7%) and thin liquidity, further sharp moves in either direction are plausible.

Target low

0.0000103

Target high

0.0000129

Support

0.0000103 (candle 2 low), 0.0000124 (candle 3 low)

Resistance

0.0000129 (candle 3 high), 0.0000128 (recent local high)

Medium term · 7-14 days

neutral

With only 3 hourly candles provided and no longer-term OHLC history, a medium-term directional call cannot be made with confidence. The token's fate will likely hinge on whether buy pressure and unique buyer counts (2,516 buyers vs only 91 sellers in 24h) can sustain, or whether the imbalance between buyers/sellers count (despite similar volume) signals a handful of large sellers offloading into many small buyers.

Catalysts

  • Sustained buyer count growth vs seller count (2,516 buyers vs 91 sellers in 24h is a notable divergence)
  • Liquidity pool growth or depletion on PumpSwap
  • Any social/community catalyst given the token currently has no social links or description

Bullish factors

  • 24h buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume ($6.92M vs $6.84M)
  • Very high number of unique buyers (2,516) vs sellers (91) in 24h, which could indicate broad retail accumulation
  • Top-10 holder concentration is low (1.64%) per current snapshot, reducing single-wallet dump risk if the snapshot is accurate

Bearish factors

  • Total liquidity is only ~$176K, extremely thin relative to $6.9M+ daily volume — high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Extreme intra-candle volatility (wick to near-zero and 56x spike within one hour) signals a highly unstable/manipulable market
  • No verifiable mint/freeze authority status, no sniper coverage, and no holder history — major transparency gaps
  • 91 sellers moved nearly as much volume as 2,516 buyers, implying average sell size is ~28x average buy size — consistent with large holders distributing into retail demand

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles and a single 24h volume snapshot are available; there is no multi-day price history, no sniper data, and no holder trend data. The anomalous first candle (near-zero low, extreme high) raises questions about data reliability, further reducing confidence.

PIKACHU call history

Full track record →

Sep 20neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
2rcCyS...zeVQ
Total Supply
100,000,000,000 PIKACHU

Key Risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity (~$176K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unverified mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or frozen accounts
  • No sniper or early-buyer data available to assess insider dump risk
  • Highly volatile, low-history price action including an anomalous near-zero-to-spike candle

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 1 (04:00 UTC) opened at 9.57e-12, spiked to a high of 0.000712 (a >74,000x intra-candle range), then closed at 0.0000104 — an extreme anomalous wick that is either a flash liquidity event or a data artifact. Candle 2 (05:00 UTC) opened at the prior close (0.0000104), ranged between 0.0000103 and 0.0000128, and closed higher at 0.0000126, showing bullish continuation. Candle 3 (06:00 UTC) opened at 0.0000126, made a marginally higher high (0.0000129) and higher low (0.0000124), closing at 0.0000126 — a tight-range, near-doji candle suggesting consolidation after the prior rally.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The short-term trend across the last two full candles is upward (higher lows and higher closes from candle 2 to candle 3), but candle 3's tight range and near-flat close vs open suggest the rally is losing momentum and consolidating rather than extending. With only 3 candles, medium-term trend cannot be reliably assessed and is treated as sideways/undetermined.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

0.0000124 (candle 3 low)

Major support

0.0000103 (candle 2 low)

Immediate resistance

0.0000129 (candle 3 high)

Major resistance

0.0000128 (prior local high, now roughly flat with immediate resistance)

With only 3 candles of data, support/resistance levels are provisional and based on a very short lookback. The 0.0000103–0.0000129 range represents the entire observed trading band post-anomaly; a break above 0.0000129 could signal renewed upside, while a break below 0.0000103 would revisit the post-spike low.

Notable patterns

  • Extreme wick/anomaly candle (candle 1) with high 74,000x its low — treat with caution as possible data artifact or extreme illiquidity event
  • Higher low + higher high formation from candle 2 to candle 3 (mild bullish structure)
  • Small-bodied/near-doji candle 3 near session highs, suggesting indecision after the rally
  • Sharply declining volume into candle 3, a potential momentum exhaustion signal

Liquidity

Liquidity

$176,028.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of ~$176K is very shallow relative to a 24h trading volume exceeding $13.7M combined (buy+sell), a turnover ratio of roughly 78x the liquidity pool in a single day. This implies significant price impact and slippage risk for any meaningfully sized trade, and helps explain the extreme candle volatility observed (including the anomalous near-zero-to-spike candle). Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (50.3%/49.7%), producing a 'balanced' net flow classification, but the stark divergence between 2,516 unique buyers and only 91 unique sellers moving comparable dollar volume implies sellers are transacting in much larger average size than buyers — a pattern consistent with early/large holders distributing into a wave of smaller retail buyers.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

100,000,000,000 PIKACHU

FDV

$1.26M (reported as $1,262,126)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +89.5%, a 1h move of +12.6%, and an anomalous hourly candle ranging from near-zero to a 0.000712 high demonstrate extreme short-term volatility. This is amplified by the token's thin liquidity.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only ~$176K against 24h combined trading volume above $13.7M and a $1.26M FDV, implying very high slippage for meaningful trade sizes and elevated vulnerability to liquidity removal or manipulation.

  • Concentrationunknown

    The current snapshot reports top-10 holders at just 1.64% of supply, which appears low, but with no top-100 figure, no historical data, and no wallet classification, it is not possible to confirm this reflects genuine broad distribution versus, for example, undisclosed related wallets or recently rotated holdings. Treating this as confirmed low risk would be premature.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity (~$176K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Unverified mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or frozen accounts
  • No sniper or early-buyer data available to assess insider dump risk
  • Highly volatile, low-history price action including an anomalous near-zero-to-spike candle
  • Stark divergence between 91 sellers and 2,516 buyers moving similar dollar volumes, suggesting large holders may be distributing into retail demand
  • No social links, description, or verification information provided, reducing overall transparency

Mitigating factors

  • Current-snapshot top-10 holder concentration is reported as low (1.64%), though unverified over time
  • 24h buy volume slightly exceeds sell volume, and unique buyer count vastly exceeds seller count
  • Recent candle structure shows higher lows/highs over the last two candles, a mild short-term bullish signal

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can accept the possibility of total capital loss. It is not appropriate for investors seeking capital preservation, given the shallow liquidity, unresolved authority status, absence of sniper/holder-history data, and extreme observed volatility.

PIKACHU is a highly speculative, low-liquidity Solana meme token exhibiting extreme volatility and significant data gaps around authority permissions and sniper/holder history. Its recent 89.5% 24h price surge and high unique-buyer count (2,516) reflect retail enthusiasm, but the paper-thin $176K liquidity pool, an anomalous candle pattern, and a stark seller-count-to-volume imbalance (91 sellers moving comparable volume to 2,516 buyers) warrant significant caution.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued retail-driven demand pushes buyer counts and volume higher, liquidity gets added by the team/community, and price breaks above the recent 0.0000129 resistance to establish a new higher range.

  • Sustained high unique-buyer participation (2,516 in 24h)
  • Low reported top-10 concentration (1.64%) allowing broader organic price discovery
  • Possible social/community momentum building around the Pikachu meme theme

Base Case

Price continues to trade in a wide, volatile range roughly between the observed 0.0000103–0.0000129 band in the near term, with outcomes highly dependent on liquidity conditions and whether large sellers continue to distribute.

  • No material change in the ~$176K liquidity pool size in the short term
  • Buy/sell volume balance (currently ~50/50) persists absent a new catalyst
  • No new authority or sniper information becomes available to materially change the risk picture

Bear Case

Medium probability

Large holders (implied by the 91 sellers moving volume comparable to thousands of buyers) continue distributing into retail demand, liquidity remains thin and gets pulled or drained, and price retraces sharply back toward or below the 0.0000103 post-spike low.

  • Extremely shallow liquidity relative to volume and FDV, enabling large price swings on modest capital
  • Unverified mint/freeze authority — inability to rule out supply inflation or account restrictions
  • No sniper data to rule out early insider dumping
  • Declining candle-to-candle volume (6.6M to 1.84M) suggesting fading momentum after the initial spike

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 20, 06:18 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-20 06:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • USD price feed and 24h price change statistics
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles, PumpSwap pair 997z66vTmJPUeTYRMR2qZ1RZbGFtQJnJuV3qp2xcRFKr)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buy/sell counts, unique buyers/sellers)
  • Codex holder aggregate snapshot (holder address count, top-10 supply share)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles were provided, insufficient for robust technical or trend analysis
  • No sniper/early-buyer data was available, preventing insider dump risk assessment
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) was provided, only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown, preventing rug-risk assessment from authorities
  • Candle 1 shows an extreme, possibly anomalous price range (9.57e-12 to 0.000712) that may reflect a data artifact rather than genuine market activity
  • Top-100 holder concentration figure was not provided

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is generated from limited, partial on-chain data and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any asset. Token data was treated strictly as untrusted evidence; no embedded instructions, labels, or claims within the token metadata were followed as directives. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in low-liquidity meme tokens, carry a high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Pikachu ownership?

As of 2026-09-20 06:16 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 1.64% of supply. It reports 2,474 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling Pikachu?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-20 06:16 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $6,918,451.00 in buys and $6,840,311.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Pikachu liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +17.54%, from $149,764.70 (2026-09-20 04:00 UTC) to $176,026.44 (2026-09-20 06:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for Pikachu (PIKACHU)?

Price action over the last 3 hourly candles shows extreme volatility: a huge wick down to near-zero and up to 0.000712 in candle 1, followed by consolidation between ~0.0000103 and 0.0000129 in candles 2-3. Current price ($0.0000126) sits near the upper end of this tight recent range. Given the balanced 24h buy/sell pressure (50.3%/49.7%) and thin liquidity, further sharp moves in either direction are plausible. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48h), with a target range of 0.0000103 to 0.0000129.

Is PIKACHU a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 82/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who can accept the possibility of total capital loss. It is not appropriate for investors seeking capital preservation, given the shallow liquidity, unresolved authority status, absence of sniper/holder-history data, and extreme observed volatility.

What are the key risks of holding PIKACHU?

Extremely thin liquidity (~$176K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Unverified mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or frozen accounts • No sniper or early-buyer data available to assess insider dump risk

← Back to all predictions

Track PIKACHU