MOO

Moo Virus Price Prediction 2026

MOO
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 29, 2026

2qviVzJF1CG7yU9nwoz4Jmg79PFQxHm25x1ddwC6pump

$0.053076

-1.83%

FDV $3,065

LiveContract:2qviVzJF1CG7yU9nwoz4Jmg79PFQxHm25x1ddwC6pumpChain:SolanaHolders:15,734Market cap:$3,065

More tokens on Solana

commotitties

commotitties

digital commotitties

$0.0516559.5%
MC $1.7K
meowl

meowl

meowl

$0.0519630.3%
MC $1.9K
73

73

73Coin

$0.0544090.3%
MC $3.3K
TRENCHES

TRENCHES

Trenches Tokens

$0.0526200.9%
MC $2.6K
COTORO

COTORO

Cotoro

$0.0517272.5%
MC $1.7K
BOIÚNA

BOIÚNA

Boiúna

$0.000787298.8%
MC $786.9K

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about MOO

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 29, 10:17 AM
FDV

$116,729

Liquidity

$42,693

Holders

2,594

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Moo Virus (MOO) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana with a mint address of 2qviVzJF1CG7yU9nwoz4Jmg79PFQxHm25x1ddwC6pump. The token is extremely new, having exploded from ~20 holders to 2,594 within the last 24 hours, coinciding with a 183% price spike. However, the data contains severe red flags: the historical holder series shows exactly 20 holders for 30 consecutive days with zero change, then a sudden +2,574 holder surge in the last 24 hours — a pattern strongly suggestive of a bot-driven or wash-traded launch event. Sell pressure dominates at 75.2% of 24h volume ($134K sells vs $44K buys), liquidity is extremely shallow at $42.69K, and top holder/concentration data is entirely absent. The token has no verified contract, no description, and unknown update authority. This profile is consistent with a high-risk speculative micro-cap meme token in its earliest and most volatile phase.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive 183% 24h price gain driven by a sudden holder surge from 20 to 2,594 in under 24 hours
Severe sell-side dominance: 75.2% sell pressure ($134K sells vs $44K buys) despite the price spike
Extremely shallow liquidity of only $42.69K against a $116.7K FDV — high slippage risk
30-day historical holder data shows exactly 20 holders with zero change every day until the last 24h — anomalous and suspicious
No top holder data, no supply concentration data, no sniper data — critical on-chain transparency gaps

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

The 5-minute price change of +29% suggests a momentum spike is still in progress, but the overwhelming sell pressure (75.2% of 24h volume) and extremely thin liquidity ($42.69K) make a sharp reversal highly probable in the near term. The most recent hourly candle closed at its high ($0.0001187), which is a potential exhaustion signal. Any significant sell order could collapse the price given the shallow order book.

Target low$0.000024
Target high$0.000135
Support: $0.0000784 (Candle [1] low), $0.0000245 (Candle [2] low — launch-day floor)
Resistance: $0.0001187 (Candle [1] high / current close), $0.0001080 (Candle [2] high)

Medium term

bearish
1–7 days

Without sustained buy-side inflows, community development, or utility, the token is likely to retrace sharply. The 30-day stagnation at 20 holders followed by a sudden spike is a classic pump pattern. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless new catalysts emerge.

Catalysts
  • Sustained organic buyer inflow exceeding current sell pressure
  • Viral social media traction driving new holder acquisition
  • Listing on a centralized exchange (currently only on PumpSwap)
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally

Bullish factors

  • 183% 24h price gain demonstrates strong short-term momentum
  • 5-minute price still rising (+29%), suggesting active buying interest
  • Holder count surged from 20 to 2,594 in 24h — rapid community growth if organic
  • 1,059 buy transactions from 503 unique buyers in 24h shows broad participation

Bearish factors

  • 75.2% sell pressure dominates 24h volume ($134K sells vs $44K buys)
  • Liquidity is only $42.69K — extremely shallow, high slippage and exit risk
  • 30 days of exactly 20 holders with zero change is anomalous and raises manipulation concerns
  • No top holder data available — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Unverified contract, no description, unknown update authority
  • FDV of $116.7K is only ~2.7x liquidity — very fragile market structure
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis; (2) missing top holder and concentration data; (3) anomalous historical holder data that may indicate data quality issues; (4) no sniper data available. The extreme volatility of micro-cap meme tokens further reduces predictive reliability.

MOO call history

Full track record →
Jun 29bearish
24h-91.2%
7d-93.9%
30d-96.9%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 2 hourly candles are available, severely limiting technical analysis. Candle [2] (09:00 UTC): O=$0.0000307, H=$0.0001080, L=$0.0000245, C=$0.0001022 — a massive bullish candle with a wide range (~4.4x from low to high), indicating explosive buying from a very low base. Candle [1] (10:00 UTC): O=$0.0001039, H=$0.0001187, L=$0.0000784, C=$0.0001187 — a bullish candle closing at its high, suggesting continued upward momentum. The open of candle [1] is above the close of candle [2], forming a gap-up continuation. However, the lower wick on candle [1] ($0.0000784) shows sellers tested lower levels before bulls regained control. The close at the high of candle [1] is a potential short-term exhaustion signal ('shooting star' risk if followed by a bearish candle).

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 25%Sell 75%

Short-term trend is sharply upward based on the two available candles showing higher lows and higher highs. Medium-term trend is classified as sideways/unknown given the 30-day dormancy period prior to this spike. Insufficient data exists to confirm a sustained uptrend.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.0000784 (Candle [1] low)
Major$0.0000245 (Candle [2] absolute low — launch floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.0001187 (Candle [1] high / current close)
Major$0.0001080 (Candle [2] high — prior resistance now potential support)

The immediate support at $0.0000784 is the most critical near-term level. A break below this would expose the token to a retest of the $0.0000245 launch low. Resistance at $0.0001187 is the current price; a sustained break above would require significant new buy volume. Given the shallow liquidity, these levels can be breached rapidly.

Notable patterns

  • Gap-up continuation: Candle [1] opened above Candle [2] close, confirming bullish momentum carry-over
  • Candle [1] closes at its high — potential exhaustion/shooting star risk if next candle reverses
  • Massive lower wick on Candle [2] (low $0.0000245 vs close $0.0001022) indicates strong buying absorption from the bottom
  • Volume expansion on price rise — but sell-pressure dominance undermines bullish interpretation
  • Only 2 candles available — all pattern analysis is preliminary and low-confidence

Total holders2,594
24h Δ+99
7d Δ+99
30d Δ+99
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder surge from 20 to 2,594 (+2,574 holders, +99%) occurred simultaneously with the 183% price spike in the last 24 hours. This strong correlation suggests the price pump attracted new holders, or alternatively, that both metrics were driven by the same coordinated event. The historical data shows exactly 20 holders with zero net change for every single day from May 30 to June 28 — 30 consecutive days of complete stagnation. This is highly anomalous and may indicate: (1) the token was dormant/pre-launch for 30 days with only founding wallets holding, (2) data tracking did not begin until the launch event, or (3) data quality issues. The sudden +2,574 holder jump in a single day warrants extreme caution.

The holder trend data is deeply anomalous. For 30 consecutive days (May 30 – June 28, 2026), the holder count was exactly 20 with zero net change every day. Then in the last 24 hours, holders surged to 2,594 — a +12,870% increase. While this could represent a genuine viral launch event, the pattern is also consistent with a coordinated pump where bots or multiple wallets were deployed simultaneously. The acquisition breakdown shows 800 via swap and 1,794 via transfer, suggesting a significant portion of holders received tokens via transfer (potentially airdrop-like distribution or team wallet dispersal) rather than organic market purchases. The distribution data shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, and 0 octopus — all zeros — which is likely a data gap rather than a genuine reflection of distribution. Top 10 and top 100 concentration are both reported as 0%, which is implausible and indicates missing data.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available

0.00%

No top holder data is available for MOO — the top 20 holders list returned empty, and supply concentration metrics (top 10, top 100) are both reported as 0%, which is implausible for any real token and indicates a data gap rather than genuine even distribution. This is a critical transparency gap. Without knowing who holds the largest positions, it is impossible to assess: (1) whether the team/deployer retains a dominant position, (2) whether a single whale could crash the price, or (3) whether the token has genuine distributed ownership. The 1,794 holders who acquired via transfer (vs 800 via swap) raises the possibility of a pre-distribution to connected wallets. Investors should treat the unknown concentration as a HIGH risk factor, not a neutral one. The distributionHealth is marked 'very_concentrated' as a precautionary classification given the data absence and the anomalous 30-day dormancy period.

Liquidity$42,690
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$44,300
Sell$134,060
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers503
Unique sellers1,116

Liquidity is critically shallow at $42,690 on PumpSwap (pair CNUko1X6vXCZZae7fepSueuLFV72qKsWyEbg9aKzvUyj). The FDV of $116,728 is only ~2.73x the total liquidity, meaning the market cap is barely supported by the liquidity pool. Any moderate sell order will cause significant price impact. The 24h net flow is strongly negative: $134,060 in sells vs $44,300 in buys — a net outflow of ~$89,760. The seller-to-buyer ratio is 1,116:503 (2.22:1), and sell transactions outnumber buy transactions 2,850:1,059 (2.69:1). Despite this overwhelming sell pressure, the price has risen 183% — this paradox suggests either: (1) buys are concentrated in larger individual transactions moving the price on thin liquidity, or (2) the price oracle/reporting has a lag. The 5-minute price change of +29% at time of analysis suggests active buying is still occurring, but the structural sell dominance makes this rally fragile. High slippage risk for any position larger than a few hundred dollars.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1,000,000,000 MOO
FDV$116,728.79

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

MOO has a standard 1 billion token supply with 6 decimals, consistent with PumpFun-launched tokens. The FDV is $116,728.79 at the current price of $0.0001167. The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the contract is not verified. The token is marked as mutable=false, which is a mild positive signal suggesting token metadata cannot be changed. However, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data — these are critical unknowns. On PumpFun launches, mint authority is typically burned upon bonding curve graduation, but this cannot be confirmed here. The 'pump' suffix in the mint address (2qviVzJF1CG7yU9nwoz4Jmg79PFQxHm25x1ddwC6pump) confirms PumpFun origin. No description is provided, and the token has no verified contract. Social links (Twitter, website, Moralis) are listed but content has not been verified. The absence of a description and unverified contract status are negative signals for legitimacy assessment.

Volatility
high

183% price gain in 24 hours with a 5-minute change of +29% at time of analysis. Only 2 hourly candles available, both showing extreme range. The token moved from a low of $0.0000245 to a high of $0.0001187 within 2 hours — a ~4.85x range. Micro-cap meme tokens of this size are subject to extreme volatility.

Liquidity
high

Total liquidity is only $42,690 on a single DEX (PumpSwap). This is critically shallow — a sell order of even $5,000–$10,000 would cause severe price impact. There is no secondary market or CEX listing. Exit liquidity is extremely limited.

Concentration
high

Top holder and supply concentration data is entirely absent (reported as 0% for both top 10 and top 100, with no top holder list). This is a critical data gap. The 30-day dormancy at exactly 20 holders suggests a small founding group held all tokens before the launch event. Actual concentration could be extreme.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data is available, making it impossible to assess sniper positions. However, the 75.2% sell pressure and 2.22:1 seller-to-buyer ratio strongly suggest early participants are distributing. The 1,794 holders who acquired via transfer (vs 800 via swap) may include pre-positioned wallets ready to sell.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown', mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. The contract is unverified. While mutable=false is a positive signal, the overall authority picture is opaque. PumpFun tokens typically have mint authority burned, but this cannot be verified from available data.

Key risks

  • Critically shallow liquidity ($42.69K) — high slippage and exit risk for any meaningful position
  • Overwhelming sell pressure: 75.2% of 24h volume is sells, net outflow of ~$89.7K
  • Anomalous holder history: exactly 20 holders for 30 consecutive days suggests coordinated/bot activity
  • No top holder data — concentration risk is completely opaque
  • No sniper data — early insider activity cannot be assessed
  • Unverified contract with unknown authority status
  • No token description or utility — pure speculative meme token
  • 1,794 of 2,594 holders acquired via transfer, not swap — possible pre-distribution to connected wallets
  • Single DEX listing on PumpSwap only — no secondary market depth

Mitigating factors

  • Token is marked mutable=false, suggesting metadata cannot be altered
  • PumpFun origin provides some standardization of launch mechanics
  • 503 unique buyers in 24h shows some breadth of organic interest
  • Social links (Twitter, website) exist, suggesting some level of project presence
  • Price momentum is currently positive (5m: +29%), indicating active buying interest
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap meme token dynamics on Solana. Position sizes should be minimal (treat as a lottery ticket, not an investment). The combination of unknown concentration, dominant sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and anomalous holder history places this in the highest risk category.

MOO is a PumpFun-launched Solana meme token in the earliest and most volatile phase of its lifecycle. The token exhibits a classic pump pattern: 30 days of dormancy at 20 holders, followed by an explosive 24h event with +183% price gain and +2,574 new holders. The dominant sell pressure (75.2%), shallow liquidity ($42.69K), and opaque holder concentration make this a very high-risk speculative instrument. The investment thesis is almost entirely momentum-based with no fundamental underpinning.

Bull case (low)

MOO achieves viral meme status on Crypto Twitter/social media, driving sustained organic buyer inflow that overwhelms current sell pressure. The holder base grows to 10,000+ organically, liquidity deepens as the PumpSwap pool attracts LPs, and the token graduates to a broader DEX or achieves a CEX listing. In this scenario, the current $116K FDV could expand 10–50x.

  • Viral social media campaign driving sustained new buyer inflow
  • Organic community formation around the MOO brand
  • Liquidity pool deepening attracting larger traders
  • Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all boats
  • CEX listing or influencer promotion

Base case

MOO experiences a partial retracement from its 183% spike as sell pressure continues to dominate. The price stabilizes somewhere between $0.000040–$0.000080 (a 33–66% retracement from the current high) as the initial pump fades. A small community of speculative holders remains, with low but persistent trading activity. The token neither moons nor completely dies, but slowly bleeds value over weeks.

  • Sell pressure moderates but remains dominant over buys
  • Some organic holders remain after the initial dump phase
  • Liquidity pool is not fully drained
  • No major catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term
  • Token avoids a complete rug pull scenario

Bear case (high)

The current price spike is a coordinated pump-and-dump. Early holders (the original 20 wallets from the 30-day dormancy period) and the 1,794 transfer-acquired holders are distributing into retail FOMO buyers. Sell pressure continues to dominate, liquidity is drained, and the price collapses back toward or below the $0.0000245 launch low. Holders who bought near the top face 80–100% losses.

  • Sustained 75.2% sell pressure with no signs of abating
  • Anomalous 30-day dormancy pattern consistent with coordinated launch
  • 1,794 holders acquired via transfer — possible pre-positioned dump wallets
  • Critically shallow liquidity amplifying downside moves
  • No utility, no description, no verified contract — nothing to sustain interest post-pump

GeneratedJun 29, 10:17 AM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of 2026-06-29T10:00:00.000Z (most recent hourly candle). Holder data current as of 2026-06-29. Historical holder series covers 2026-05-30 to 2026-06-28.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis Solana Token API (metadata, price, OHLC, trading analytics)
  • On-chain holder metrics and historical holder series
  • PumpSwap DEX pair data (CNUko1X6vXCZZae7fepSueuLFV72qKsWyEbg9aKzvUyj)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 2 hourly OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited and low-confidence
  • Top 20 holder list returned empty — whale map and concentration analysis cannot be performed
  • Supply concentration metrics (top 10, top 100) reported as 0% — likely a data gap, not genuine even distribution
  • Sniper analysis endpoint returned no data — smart money/early buyer analysis is incomplete
  • Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown — rug risk from authorities cannot be fully assessed
  • Historical holder data shows anomalous flat-line at 20 holders for 30 days — data quality or token dormancy cannot be distinguished
  • Holder distribution categories (whales, sharks, dolphins, fish, octopus) all report 0 — likely a data gap
  • Price % change for 1h, 6h, and 24h all report 0% despite a 183% 24h gain — possible data reporting inconsistency

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed is sourced from third-party APIs and may contain errors, gaps, or inconsistencies as noted above. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decision.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1,000,000,000 MOO

Key Risks

•Critically shallow liquidity ($42.69K) — high slippage and exit risk for any meaningful position
•Overwhelming sell pressure: 75.2% of 24h volume is sells, net outflow of ~$89.7K
•Anomalous holder history: exactly 20 holders for 30 consecutive days suggests coordinated/bot activity
•No top holder data — concentration risk is completely opaque

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for MOO. Smart money signals cannot be assessed from sniper metrics. What can be inferred from trading analytics: the 24h sell/buy ratio of 2,850 sells vs 1,059 buys (2.69:1) and 1,116 sellers vs 503 buyers suggests early participants are aggressively distributing into the price spike. The ratio of sellers to buyers (2.22:1) is a strong distribution signal. Without sniper data, it is unknown whether insiders are among the sellers.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — sniper analysis endpoint returned no results.

Cannot be determined from available data. The absence of sniper data and top holder information means early buyer behavior is opaque. The dominant sell pressure (75.2%) suggests early participants may be taking profits or dumping into retail buyers attracted by the 183% price spike.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for Moo Virus (MOO)?

The 5-minute price change of +29% suggests a momentum spike is still in progress, but the overwhelming sell pressure (75.2% of 24h volume) and extremely thin liquidity ($42.69K) make a sharp reversal highly probable in the near term. The most recent hourly candle closed at its high ($0.0001187), which is a potential exhaustion signal. Any significant sell order could collapse the price given the shallow order book. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000024 to $0.000135.

Is MOO a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with micro-cap meme token dynamics on Solana. Position sizes should be minimal (treat as a lottery ticket, not an investment). The combination of unknown concentration, dominant sell pressure, shallow liquidity, and anomalous holder history places this in the highest risk category.

How are MOO holders trending?

Moo Virus currently has 2,594 holders and is growing (24h: 99, 7d: 99, 30d: 99). The holder trend data is deeply anomalous. For 30 consecutive days (May 30 – June 28, 2026), the holder count was exactly 20 with zero net change every day. Then in the last 24 hours, holders surged to 2,594 — a +12,870% increase. While this could represent a genuine viral launch event, the pattern is also consistent with a coordinated pump where bots or multiple wallets were deployed simultaneously. The acquisition breakdown shows 800 via swap and 1,794 via transfer, suggesting a significant portion of holders received tokens via transfer (potentially airdrop-like distribution or team wallet dispersal) rather than organic market purchases. The distribution data shows 0 whales, 0 sharks, 0 dolphins, 0 fish, and 0 octopus — all zeros — which is likely a data gap rather than a genuine reflection of distribution. Top 10 and top 100 concentration are both reported as 0%, which is implausible and indicates missing data.

What does sniper activity look like for MOO?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding MOO?

Critically shallow liquidity ($42.69K) — high slippage and exit risk for any meaningful position • Overwhelming sell pressure: 75.2% of 24h volume is sells, net outflow of ~$89.7K • Anomalous holder history: exactly 20 holders for 30 consecutive days suggests coordinated/bot activity

← Back to all predictions

Track MOO