KLED

KLEDAI Price Today & AI Analysis

KLEDSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 25, 2026

Price

$0.0165

-0.63% 24h · FDV $16,484,166

Contract

Live
1zJX5gRnjLgmTpq5sVwkq69mNDQkCemqoasyjaPW6jm

Chain

Solana

Holders

13,165

Market cap

$16,484,166

More tokens on Solana

​​Anonymouse$0.000129-33.8%MC $129.1KDBRDBRdeBridge$0.0167+0.9%MC $166.50MPONTESPONTESPontes$0.042930-32.1%MC $29.3KSV151SV151Scarlet & Violet 151$0.3239-3.4%MC $323.7KMOBYMOBYMoby AI$0.001604-11.0%MC $1.60MSTONKSTONKSTONK$0.3161-4.3%MC $260.36M

KLEDAI: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-25 18:17 UTC

Holder addresses

11,397

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$757,024.88
How concentrated is KLEDAI ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 11,397 addresses (2026-06-25 18:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling KLEDAI?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is KLEDAI liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-25 18:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $757,024.88. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-25 18:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about KLED

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Jun 25, 06:17 PM UTC

FDV

$13,231,733

Liquidity

$757,024.88

Holders

11,397

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bullish

KLEDAI (KLED) is a Solana-based token with a total supply of ~999.79M tokens, currently priced at $0.01323 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$13.2M. The token is associated with 'Nitrility Inc.', described as an AI data marketplace. Over the past 24 hours, KLED has surged ~28.5%, driven by a spike in buy volume ($428K vs $335K sell). However, the token exhibits a persistent 30-day holder decline (-648 holders, -5.7%), a mutable contract with non-renounced update authority, and moderate supply concentration. The price pump is notable but occurs against a backdrop of declining holder base, raising questions about sustainability.

Key points

  • Strong 24h price surge of ~28.5% with net buy pressure (56.1% buys)
  • Relatively deep liquidity at $757K for a ~$13M FDV token
  • Persistent 30-day holder decline of -648 (-5.7%) despite price appreciation
  • Mutable token with update authority not renounced — elevated rug risk
  • Top 10 holders control 23.42% of supply; top 100 control 70.05%

AI Price Analysis

bullish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bullish

The token has broken out sharply from a ~$0.0103–$0.0113 base, printing a strong candle at 17:00 UTC on June 25 (H: $0.01450) before pulling back to $0.01323. Short-term momentum favors bulls if the $0.01285 support holds, but the declining holder base and elevated sell count (2,154 sells vs 1,860 buys) suggest distribution pressure. A retest of the $0.01145–$0.01200 zone is plausible.

Target low

$0.01145

Target high

$0.01450

Support

$0.01285 (recent consolidation), $0.01145 (pre-breakout base), $0.01090 (June 25 early morning low)

Resistance

$0.01450 (June 25 intraday high), $0.01480 (psychological), $0.01550 (extension target)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

neutral

Medium-term outlook is neutral-to-bearish given the persistent 30-day holder decline. Unless the project delivers tangible catalysts (product launch, exchange listing, partnership), the token is likely to consolidate or retrace. The mutable contract and non-renounced authority add structural risk.

Catalysts

  • Nitrility Inc. product/platform launch announcement
  • New exchange listing or liquidity injection
  • Reversal of holder decline trend
  • Broader Solana/AI token sector rally

Bullish factors

  • 28.5% 24h price surge with net buy pressure (56.1%)
  • $757K liquidity provides reasonable depth for the FDV
  • AI/data marketplace narrative is currently in favor
  • Buy volume ($428K) exceeds sell volume ($335K) in 24h
  • Price holding above the breakout level after the spike

Bearish factors

  • 30-day holder decline of -648 (-5.7%) — persistent outflow
  • Sell count (2,154) exceeds buy count (1,860) despite higher buy volume — larger average sell size
  • Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority
  • Top 100 holders control 70.05% — high concentration risk
  • No sniper data available, limiting smart money assessment
  • Hourly holder count declining (-5 in 1h, -19 in 24h)

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) no sniper data available to assess early buyer behavior, (2) persistent holder decline contradicting the price pump, (3) mutable contract introducing unpredictable risk, and (4) limited candle history (19 hourly candles) for robust technical analysis.

KLED call history

Full track record →

Jun 25bullish
24h+30.2%
7d+23.9%
30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
1zJX5g...W6jm
Total Supply
999,790,419.23 KLED

Key Risks

  • Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority — metadata and potentially token behavior can be changed
  • Persistent 30-day holder decline (-648, -5.7%) despite price appreciation — divergence is bearish
  • Top 100 holders control 70.05% of supply — extreme concentration risk
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and profit-taking risk unquantifiable

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

19 hourly candles analyzed from June 24 20:00 UTC to June 25 18:00 UTC. The token trended upward from a low of $0.01030 (candle 19) to an intraday high of $0.01450 (candle 2, 17:00 UTC), representing a ~40.8% range over the period. The most recent candle (18:00 UTC) shows a bearish close at $0.01323 from an open of $0.01381, suggesting a pullback from the spike high. Candle 2 (17:00 UTC) is a large-bodied bullish candle with a wide range ($0.01255–$0.01450) and very high volume ($287K), indicating a momentum surge. Candle 1 (18:00 UTC) is a bearish candle closing at the low, suggesting the spike may be fading.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Short-term and medium-term trends are both upward over the 19-candle window, with a series of higher lows from $0.01030 to $0.01255. However, the most recent candle shows a bearish reversal signal after the spike high, warranting caution.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

56%

Sell

44%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.01285 (recent consolidation zone, candles 3–4)

Major support

$0.01090 (June 25 early morning lows, candles 15–16)

Immediate resistance

$0.01381 (current candle open / recent high before spike)

Major resistance

$0.01450 (June 25 intraday spike high, candle 2)

The $0.01285–$0.01335 zone is the key battleground. A hold above $0.01285 keeps the short-term uptrend intact. A break below $0.01145 would signal a full retracement of the breakout. The $0.01450 spike high is the key resistance to reclaim for continuation.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off top candle at 17:00 UTC (candle 2): extremely high volume with wide range, followed by bearish pullback
  • Series of higher lows from June 24 20:00 UTC to June 25 17:00 UTC — confirmed uptrend structure
  • Bearish close candle at 18:00 UTC closing at the low of the candle — potential short-term reversal signal
  • Low-volume consolidation in candles 13–17 (June 25 00:00–04:00 UTC) before the breakout — classic accumulation base
  • Candle 4 (15:00 UTC): bullish engulfing-style recovery from $0.01149 low to $0.01313 close on moderate volume

Liquidity

Liquidity

$757,024.88

Depth

Moderate

Slippage risk

Medium

Total liquidity of $757K against a $13.2M FDV gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~5.7%, which is moderate for a small-cap Solana token. The Meteora Dynamic AMM pool (4SBYWY5UuxybWuj8FwHdFXUN6mbtACrqbJwiZ9mXworP) provides the primary trading venue. 24h buy volume ($428K) exceeds sell volume ($335K), indicating net inflow and supporting the price surge. However, the number of unique sellers (358) exceeds unique buyers (285), meaning fewer but larger buy orders are driving the price — a pattern consistent with coordinated buying or a small number of large buyers accumulating. Average buy size per buyer: ~$1,503; average sell size per seller: ~$936. The 56.1% buy pressure is positive but not overwhelming. Slippage risk is medium given the $757K liquidity pool — larger trades (>$10K) could move the price meaningfully.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,790,419.23 KLED

FDV

$13,231,732.54

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    28.5% 24h price surge with a blow-off top candle reaching $0.01450 before pulling back to $0.01323. The token has demonstrated extreme intraday volatility (40%+ range in 19 hours). Low-volume candles surrounding the spike suggest thin order books susceptible to large price swings.

  • Liquiditymedium

    $757K total liquidity against $13.2M FDV provides a 5.7% liquidity ratio. Moderate for a small-cap token, but large trades (>$10K–$20K) risk significant slippage. A coordinated sell-off could rapidly drain the pool.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority — metadata and potentially token behavior can be changed
  • Persistent 30-day holder decline (-648, -5.7%) despite price appreciation — divergence is bearish
  • Top 100 holders control 70.05% of supply — extreme concentration risk
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and profit-taking risk unquantifiable
  • Price spike (+28.5%) on a single high-volume candle may be a coordinated pump
  • Unique sellers (358) exceed unique buyers (285) — distribution pattern despite net buy volume
  • Small-cap token ($13.2M FDV) with limited price discovery history

Mitigating factors

  • $757K liquidity is relatively healthy for the FDV size
  • Token is verified (not marked as spam)
  • Buy volume ($428K) exceeds sell volume ($335K) in 24h — net inflow
  • AI/data marketplace narrative provides a plausible use case
  • Holder distribution includes 193 whales and 520 dolphins — not purely retail
  • 56.1% buy pressure over 24h supports short-term price momentum

Suitable for

Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi/crypto traders who understand the risks of small-cap Solana tokens. Not suitable for conservative investors, those unfamiliar with on-chain risks, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal given the mutable contract, holder decline, and concentration risks.

KLED presents a speculative, high-risk opportunity in the AI data marketplace narrative on Solana. The token has shown strong short-term price momentum (+28.5% in 24h) with moderate liquidity, but is undermined by a persistent holder decline, mutable contract with non-renounced authority, and high supply concentration. The investment case hinges entirely on whether Nitrility Inc. can deliver a functional product and attract new holders.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Nitrility Inc. launches its AI data marketplace with real traction, attracting new users and token demand. The 24h price surge marks the beginning of a sustained uptrend as the AI narrative drives broader interest. New exchange listings or partnerships inject fresh liquidity and reverse the holder decline.

  • Successful Nitrility Inc. platform launch with verifiable user adoption
  • Reversal of 30-day holder decline trend
  • Broader AI token sector rally on Solana
  • New CEX or DEX listing increasing accessibility
  • Whale accumulation at current levels

Base Case

KLED consolidates in the $0.011–$0.014 range following the spike, with gradual holder attrition continuing. The token maintains its liquidity pool but fails to attract significant new buyers. Price drifts lower over 4–8 weeks as the pump fades without a fundamental catalyst.

  • No major product announcement from Nitrility Inc. in the near term
  • Holder decline continues at current pace (~-20/day)
  • Liquidity pool remains stable at ~$700K–$800K
  • No authority exploit or rug event
  • Broader market conditions remain neutral

Bear Case

Medium probability

The 28.5% price pump is a coordinated pump-and-dump. Concentrated holders (top 100 = 70.05%) begin distributing into the spike. The mutable contract is exploited to modify token parameters. Holder decline accelerates, liquidity drains, and the token retraces to pre-pump levels (~$0.010) or lower.

  • Coordinated sell-off by top 10–100 holders into the price spike
  • Mutable contract exploited for rug or metadata manipulation
  • Continued holder decline accelerating beyond -5.7%/month
  • No product delivery from Nitrility Inc.
  • Broader Solana market downturn reducing risk appetite

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 25, 06:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-25 18:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • Moralis price and OHLC data (hourly candles)
  • Moralis trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Moralis holder metrics and distribution data
  • Moralis historical holder time series (30-day daily)
  • Moralis top 20 holder snapshot
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No sniper/early buyer data available — smart money signals are severely limited
  • Only 19 hourly candles provided — insufficient for robust multi-timeframe technical analysis
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata — marked as unknown
  • Top holder wallet classifications are inferred from balance patterns, not verified on-chain contract data
  • No order book depth data — slippage estimates are approximations
  • Token description and project claims (Nitrility Inc.) are unverified — treat as marketing material
  • Update authority (52T4zD6pQ9LuMeLgcmzH61RBMTP3ywCCLnq3caKkxyvJ) not cross-referenced against known project wallets
  • 30-day holder history only — longer-term trend unknown

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. All data is sourced from on-chain metrics and third-party APIs. Past price performance does not guarantee future results. Small-cap tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is KLEDAI ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 11,397 addresses (2026-06-25 18:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling KLEDAI?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is KLEDAI liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-25 18:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $757,024.88. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for KLEDAI (KLED)?

The token has broken out sharply from a ~$0.0103–$0.0113 base, printing a strong candle at 17:00 UTC on June 25 (H: $0.01450) before pulling back to $0.01323. Short-term momentum favors bulls if the $0.01285 support holds, but the declining holder base and elevated sell count (2,154 sells vs 1,860 buys) suggest distribution pressure. A retest of the $0.01145–$0.01200 zone is plausible. Short-term outlook is bullish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.01145 to $0.01450.

Is KLED a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 7.2/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi/crypto traders who understand the risks of small-cap Solana tokens. Not suitable for conservative investors, those unfamiliar with on-chain risks, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal given the mutable contract, holder decline, and concentration risks.

What are the key risks of holding KLED?

Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority — metadata and potentially token behavior can be changed • Persistent 30-day holder decline (-648, -5.7%) despite price appreciation — divergence is bearish • Top 100 holders control 70.05% of supply — extreme concentration risk

← Back to all predictions

Track KLED