KLED

KLEDAI Price Prediction 2026

KLED
Solana•
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 25, 2026

1zJX5gRnjLgmTpq5sVwkq69mNDQkCemqoasyjaPW6jm

$0.0111

+2.63%

FDV $11,135,645

LiveContract:1zJX5gRnjLgmTpq5sVwkq69mNDQkCemqoasyjaPW6jmChain:SolanaHolders:13,387Market cap:$11,135,645

More tokens on Solana

bop

bop

bop cat

$0.00016513.2%
MC $164.9K
PumpfunLife

PumpfunLife

PumpfunLife

$0.05561638.7%
MC $5.6K
CatchCat

CatchCat

CatchCat

$0.04278433.1%
MC $27.8K
Wish

Wish

Make A Wish

$0.0484129.2%
MC $84.1K
ZINC

ZINC

ZINC

$0.98880.8%
MC $365.9K
arc

arc

AI Rig Complex

$0.060614.9%
MC $60.63M

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about KLED

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshotas of Jun 25, 06:17 PM
FDV

$13,231,733

Liquidity

$757,025

Holders

11,397

Snipers

0

Risk

High

AI Executive Summary

KLEDAI (KLED) is a Solana-based token with a total supply of ~999.79M tokens, currently priced at $0.01323 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$13.2M. The token is associated with 'Nitrility Inc.', described as an AI data marketplace. Over the past 24 hours, KLED has surged ~28.5%, driven by a spike in buy volume ($428K vs $335K sell). However, the token exhibits a persistent 30-day holder decline (-648 holders, -5.7%), a mutable contract with non-renounced update authority, and moderate supply concentration. The price pump is notable but occurs against a backdrop of declining holder base, raising questions about sustainability.

Risk: High
Sentiment: Bullish
Strong 24h price surge of ~28.5% with net buy pressure (56.1% buys)
Relatively deep liquidity at $757K for a ~$13M FDV token
Persistent 30-day holder decline of -648 (-5.7%) despite price appreciation
Mutable token with update authority not renounced — elevated rug risk
Top 10 holders control 23.42% of supply; top 100 control 70.05%

Price Prediction

bullish

Short term

bullish
24–72 hours

The token has broken out sharply from a ~$0.0103–$0.0113 base, printing a strong candle at 17:00 UTC on June 25 (H: $0.01450) before pulling back to $0.01323. Short-term momentum favors bulls if the $0.01285 support holds, but the declining holder base and elevated sell count (2,154 sells vs 1,860 buys) suggest distribution pressure. A retest of the $0.01145–$0.01200 zone is plausible.

Target low$0.01145
Target high$0.01450
Support: $0.01285 (recent consolidation), $0.01145 (pre-breakout base), $0.01090 (June 25 early morning low)
Resistance: $0.01450 (June 25 intraday high), $0.01480 (psychological), $0.01550 (extension target)

Medium term

neutral
1–4 weeks

Medium-term outlook is neutral-to-bearish given the persistent 30-day holder decline. Unless the project delivers tangible catalysts (product launch, exchange listing, partnership), the token is likely to consolidate or retrace. The mutable contract and non-renounced authority add structural risk.

Catalysts
  • Nitrility Inc. product/platform launch announcement
  • New exchange listing or liquidity injection
  • Reversal of holder decline trend
  • Broader Solana/AI token sector rally

Bullish factors

  • 28.5% 24h price surge with net buy pressure (56.1%)
  • $757K liquidity provides reasonable depth for the FDV
  • AI/data marketplace narrative is currently in favor
  • Buy volume ($428K) exceeds sell volume ($335K) in 24h
  • Price holding above the breakout level after the spike

Bearish factors

  • 30-day holder decline of -648 (-5.7%) — persistent outflow
  • Sell count (2,154) exceeds buy count (1,860) despite higher buy volume — larger average sell size
  • Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority
  • Top 100 holders control 70.05% — high concentration risk
  • No sniper data available, limiting smart money assessment
  • Hourly holder count declining (-5 in 1h, -19 in 24h)
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) no sniper data available to assess early buyer behavior, (2) persistent holder decline contradicting the price pump, (3) mutable contract introducing unpredictable risk, and (4) limited candle history (19 hourly candles) for robust technical analysis.

KLED call history

Full track record →
Jun 25bullish
24h+30.2%
7d+23.9%
30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

19 hourly candles analyzed from June 24 20:00 UTC to June 25 18:00 UTC. The token trended upward from a low of $0.01030 (candle 19) to an intraday high of $0.01450 (candle 2, 17:00 UTC), representing a ~40.8% range over the period. The most recent candle (18:00 UTC) shows a bearish close at $0.01323 from an open of $0.01381, suggesting a pullback from the spike high. Candle 2 (17:00 UTC) is a large-bodied bullish candle with a wide range ($0.01255–$0.01450) and very high volume ($287K), indicating a momentum surge. Candle 1 (18:00 UTC) is a bearish candle closing at the low, suggesting the spike may be fading.

Trend

Short-term
uptrend
Medium-term
uptrend

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trendincreasing
Buy 56%Sell 44%

Short-term and medium-term trends are both upward over the 19-candle window, with a series of higher lows from $0.01030 to $0.01255. However, the most recent candle shows a bearish reversal signal after the spike high, warranting caution.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.01285 (recent consolidation zone, candles 3–4)
Major$0.01090 (June 25 early morning lows, candles 15–16)
Resistance
Immediate$0.01381 (current candle open / recent high before spike)
Major$0.01450 (June 25 intraday spike high, candle 2)

The $0.01285–$0.01335 zone is the key battleground. A hold above $0.01285 keeps the short-term uptrend intact. A break below $0.01145 would signal a full retracement of the breakout. The $0.01450 spike high is the key resistance to reclaim for continuation.

Notable patterns

  • Blow-off top candle at 17:00 UTC (candle 2): extremely high volume with wide range, followed by bearish pullback
  • Series of higher lows from June 24 20:00 UTC to June 25 17:00 UTC — confirmed uptrend structure
  • Bearish close candle at 18:00 UTC closing at the low of the candle — potential short-term reversal signal
  • Low-volume consolidation in candles 13–17 (June 25 00:00–04:00 UTC) before the breakout — classic accumulation base
  • Candle 4 (15:00 UTC): bullish engulfing-style recovery from $0.01149 low to $0.01313 close on moderate volume

Total holders11,397
24h Δ-19
7d Δ-176
30d Δ-648
Accelerating Growth
No

Correlation with price

Negative correlation observed: the 24h price surge of ~28.5% coincides with a net loss of 19 holders in 24h and -176 over 7 days. This divergence — rising price with falling holder count — is a bearish signal suggesting the price pump is not attracting new participants but may be driven by existing holders or external actors. The 30-day decline of -648 (-5.7%) is persistent and predates the current price move.

Holder count has been in a consistent decline for the entire 30-day observation window, falling from ~12,013 on May 26 to 11,397 currently — a net loss of 616 holders over ~30 days. The decline is not accelerating dramatically (daily losses are mostly in the -2 to -103 range) but is persistent with no sustained recovery periods. Notable single-day drops occurred on June 9 (-103), June 11 (-82), and June 22 (-67). The acquisition breakdown (swap=5,705, transfer=5,384, airdrop=308) suggests a mix of organic buyers and airdrop recipients, with airdrop recipients likely contributing to the holder decline as they sell. The holder distribution shows 193 whales, 82 sharks, 520 dolphins, 560 fish, and 563 octopus-tier holders.

Top 10 hold23.42%
Top 100 hold70.05%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

6aYhxiNGmG8AyU25rh2R7iFu4pBrqnQHpNUGhmsEXRcm

Individual whale or project treasury — largest single holder at 6.07% (~60.65M tokens). Round-ish balance and top position suggest possible team/treasury wallet.

6.07%

3TMmZ5iBmhG5JjXzHjTp2EExpYAmeJwvS33FfAHPjNCF

Individual whale — 2.23% (~22.31M tokens). No clear exchange or contract signals.

2.23%

Dt4ujNwecx5pnQWHHvi8J5xK89U7H97rXxBtByKnTGw4

Individual whale — 2.16% (~21.63M tokens).

2.16%

AstaWuJuQiAS3AfqmM3xZxrJhkkZNXtW4VyaGQfqV6JL

Individual whale — 2.14% (~21.39M tokens).

2.14%

5mx9Y6Mhm1GE5VEAahfnrrWxUAhgsSfXQotzFJ96eCXa

Individual whale — 1.98% (~19.79M tokens).

1.98%

The top 10 holders collectively control 23.42% of supply, and the top 100 control 70.05% — a highly concentrated distribution. The largest holder (6aYhxiNGmG8AyU25rh2R7iFu4pBrqnQHpNUGhmsEXRcm) holds 6.07%, which is significant but not extreme. Holders 2–10 each hold 1.66%–2.23%, suggesting a cluster of similarly-sized whale wallets that could be related (team distribution, OTC buyers, or airdrop recipients). Notable round balances at positions 13 (12,000,001), 19 (10,001,000), and 20 (10,000,010) may indicate structured allocations. The 4SBYWY5UuxybWuj8FwHdFXUN6mbtACrqbJwiZ9mXworP Meteora AMM pool is not visible in the top 20, suggesting liquidity pool holdings are distributed or the LP is not a top-20 holder. Overall whale sentiment is mixed — no clear accumulation or distribution signal from static snapshot alone.

Liquidity$757,020
Depth
Moderate
Slippage risk
medium

Volume (24h)

Buy$428,190
Sell$335,090
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers285
Unique sellers358

Total liquidity of $757K against a $13.2M FDV gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~5.7%, which is moderate for a small-cap Solana token. The Meteora Dynamic AMM pool (4SBYWY5UuxybWuj8FwHdFXUN6mbtACrqbJwiZ9mXworP) provides the primary trading venue. 24h buy volume ($428K) exceeds sell volume ($335K), indicating net inflow and supporting the price surge. However, the number of unique sellers (358) exceeds unique buyers (285), meaning fewer but larger buy orders are driving the price — a pattern consistent with coordinated buying or a small number of large buyers accumulating. Average buy size per buyer: ~$1,503; average sell size per seller: ~$936. The 56.1% buy pressure is positive but not overwhelming. Slippage risk is medium given the $757K liquidity pool — larger trades (>$10K) could move the price meaningfully.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,790,419.23 KLED
FDV$13,231,732.54

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The token has a total supply of ~999.79M KLED (effectively 1 billion). The update authority is 52T4zD6pQ9LuMeLgcmzH61RBMTP3ywCCLnq3caKkxyvJ — this is NOT the burn address (111...1) and is NOT renounced, meaning the token metadata can be modified by this authority. The token is marked as 'Mutable: true', confirming the contract can be updated. Mint and freeze authority status are not explicitly provided in the metadata, so they are marked as unknown. The mutable/non-renounced update authority is a meaningful risk factor — the project team retains the ability to modify token metadata. The FDV of $13.2M at current price implies significant upside potential if the Nitrility Inc. platform gains traction, but also significant downside if the project fails to deliver. The description references an AI data marketplace, which is a credible but unverified use case.

Volatility
high

28.5% 24h price surge with a blow-off top candle reaching $0.01450 before pulling back to $0.01323. The token has demonstrated extreme intraday volatility (40%+ range in 19 hours). Low-volume candles surrounding the spike suggest thin order books susceptible to large price swings.

Liquidity
medium

$757K total liquidity against $13.2M FDV provides a 5.7% liquidity ratio. Moderate for a small-cap token, but large trades (>$10K–$20K) risk significant slippage. A coordinated sell-off could rapidly drain the pool.

Concentration
high

Top 10 holders control 23.42% of supply; top 100 control 70.05%. The largest single wallet holds 6.07% (~60.65M tokens). A cluster of wallets each holding 1.66%–2.23% (positions 2–10) could represent related parties. If these wallets coordinate selling, price impact would be severe.

SniperDump
low

No sniper data is available for this token. Sniper dump risk cannot be quantified and is conservatively rated low due to absence of data, not confirmed safety. The persistent holder decline (-648 over 30 days) may partially reflect early buyer exits.

Authority
high

The token is mutable (Mutable: true) with a non-renounced update authority (52T4zD6pQ9LuMeLgcmzH61RBMTP3ywCCLnq3caKkxyvJ). This means token metadata can be changed by the authority holder. Mint and freeze authority status are unknown, adding further uncertainty. This is a significant rug/manipulation risk factor.

Key risks

  • Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority — metadata and potentially token behavior can be changed
  • Persistent 30-day holder decline (-648, -5.7%) despite price appreciation — divergence is bearish
  • Top 100 holders control 70.05% of supply — extreme concentration risk
  • No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and profit-taking risk unquantifiable
  • Price spike (+28.5%) on a single high-volume candle may be a coordinated pump
  • Unique sellers (358) exceed unique buyers (285) — distribution pattern despite net buy volume
  • Small-cap token ($13.2M FDV) with limited price discovery history

Mitigating factors

  • $757K liquidity is relatively healthy for the FDV size
  • Token is verified (not marked as spam)
  • Buy volume ($428K) exceeds sell volume ($335K) in 24h — net inflow
  • AI/data marketplace narrative provides a plausible use case
  • Holder distribution includes 193 whales and 520 dolphins — not purely retail
  • 56.1% buy pressure over 24h supports short-term price momentum
Suitable for: Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi/crypto traders who understand the risks of small-cap Solana tokens. Not suitable for conservative investors, those unfamiliar with on-chain risks, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal given the mutable contract, holder decline, and concentration risks.

KLED presents a speculative, high-risk opportunity in the AI data marketplace narrative on Solana. The token has shown strong short-term price momentum (+28.5% in 24h) with moderate liquidity, but is undermined by a persistent holder decline, mutable contract with non-renounced authority, and high supply concentration. The investment case hinges entirely on whether Nitrility Inc. can deliver a functional product and attract new holders.

Bull case (low)

Nitrility Inc. launches its AI data marketplace with real traction, attracting new users and token demand. The 24h price surge marks the beginning of a sustained uptrend as the AI narrative drives broader interest. New exchange listings or partnerships inject fresh liquidity and reverse the holder decline.

  • Successful Nitrility Inc. platform launch with verifiable user adoption
  • Reversal of 30-day holder decline trend
  • Broader AI token sector rally on Solana
  • New CEX or DEX listing increasing accessibility
  • Whale accumulation at current levels

Base case

KLED consolidates in the $0.011–$0.014 range following the spike, with gradual holder attrition continuing. The token maintains its liquidity pool but fails to attract significant new buyers. Price drifts lower over 4–8 weeks as the pump fades without a fundamental catalyst.

  • No major product announcement from Nitrility Inc. in the near term
  • Holder decline continues at current pace (~-20/day)
  • Liquidity pool remains stable at ~$700K–$800K
  • No authority exploit or rug event
  • Broader market conditions remain neutral

Bear case (medium)

The 28.5% price pump is a coordinated pump-and-dump. Concentrated holders (top 100 = 70.05%) begin distributing into the spike. The mutable contract is exploited to modify token parameters. Holder decline accelerates, liquidity drains, and the token retraces to pre-pump levels (~$0.010) or lower.

  • Coordinated sell-off by top 10–100 holders into the price spike
  • Mutable contract exploited for rug or metadata manipulation
  • Continued holder decline accelerating beyond -5.7%/month
  • No product delivery from Nitrility Inc.
  • Broader Solana market downturn reducing risk appetite

GeneratedJun 25, 06:17 PM
Data freshnessPrice and OHLC data current as of June 25, 2026 18:00 UTC. Holder data reflects June 24–25, 2026. Historical holder series covers May 26 – June 24, 2026.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain token metadata API
  • Moralis price and OHLC data (hourly candles)
  • Moralis trading analytics (24h volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Moralis holder metrics and distribution data
  • Moralis historical holder time series (30-day daily)
  • Moralis top 20 holder snapshot
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • No sniper/early buyer data available — smart money signals are severely limited
  • Only 19 hourly candles provided — insufficient for robust multi-timeframe technical analysis
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata — marked as unknown
  • Top holder wallet classifications are inferred from balance patterns, not verified on-chain contract data
  • No order book depth data — slippage estimates are approximations
  • Token description and project claims (Nitrility Inc.) are unverified — treat as marketing material
  • Update authority (52T4zD6pQ9LuMeLgcmzH61RBMTP3ywCCLnq3caKkxyvJ) not cross-referenced against known project wallets
  • 30-day holder history only — longer-term trend unknown

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. All data is sourced from on-chain metrics and third-party APIs. Past price performance does not guarantee future results. Small-cap tokens carry extreme risk of total loss. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,790,419.23 KLED

Key Risks

•Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority — metadata and potentially token behavior can be changed
•Persistent 30-day holder decline (-648, -5.7%) despite price appreciation — divergence is bearish
•Top 100 holders control 70.05% of supply — extreme concentration risk
•No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and profit-taking risk unquantifiable

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
Low risk

No sniper data is available for KLED. Smart money signals cannot be derived from early buyer behavior. The 24h trading data shows 285 unique buyers vs 358 unique sellers, with average sell size ($155.6) exceeding average buy size ($230.7 per buyer), suggesting larger holders may be distributing into the price spike. Without sniper data, early accumulator behavior and profit-taking risk cannot be quantified.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
low

No sniper data available — the sniper analysis endpoint returned no data for this token.

Unknown — no sniper data available. The persistent 30-day holder decline (-648 holders) suggests that early or mid-term holders have been gradually exiting, which is a cautionary signal even without specific sniper PnL data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for KLEDAI (KLED)?

The token has broken out sharply from a ~$0.0103–$0.0113 base, printing a strong candle at 17:00 UTC on June 25 (H: $0.01450) before pulling back to $0.01323. Short-term momentum favors bulls if the $0.01285 support holds, but the declining holder base and elevated sell count (2,154 sells vs 1,860 buys) suggest distribution pressure. A retest of the $0.01145–$0.01200 zone is plausible. Short-term outlook is bullish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $0.01145 to $0.01450.

Is KLED a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated high with a risk score of 7.2/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi/crypto traders who understand the risks of small-cap Solana tokens. Not suitable for conservative investors, those unfamiliar with on-chain risks, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Position sizing should be minimal given the mutable contract, holder decline, and concentration risks.

How are KLED holders trending?

KLEDAI currently has 11,397 holders and is declining (24h: -19, 7d: -176, 30d: -648). Holder count has been in a consistent decline for the entire 30-day observation window, falling from ~12,013 on May 26 to 11,397 currently — a net loss of 616 holders over ~30 days. The decline is not accelerating dramatically (daily losses are mostly in the -2 to -103 range) but is persistent with no sustained recovery periods. Notable single-day drops occurred on June 9 (-103), June 11 (-82), and June 22 (-67). The acquisition breakdown (swap=5,705, transfer=5,384, airdrop=308) suggests a mix of organic buyers and airdrop recipients, with airdrop recipients likely contributing to the holder decline as they sell. The holder distribution shows 193 whales, 82 sharks, 520 dolphins, 560 fish, and 563 octopus-tier holders.

What does sniper activity look like for KLED?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: low.

What are the key risks of holding KLED?

Mutable contract with non-renounced update authority — metadata and potentially token behavior can be changed • Persistent 30-day holder decline (-648, -5.7%) despite price appreciation — divergence is bearish • Top 100 holders control 70.05% of supply — extreme concentration risk

← Back to all predictions

Track KLED