ZINC

ZINC Price Today & AI Analysis

ZINCSolanaAnalysis as of May 26, 2026

Price

$0.3846

-9.14% 24h · FDV $144,955

Contract

Live
zinc155BS4mSPk8GXQj4R5hkVDQXcW253pTYq5SGyfi

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,935

Market cap

$144,955

More tokens on Solana

ACMACMAladdin’s Castle Meme Coin$0.000177+9.6%MC $177.2KKirkslopKirkslopKirkslop$0.046286-15.4%MC $62.8KCATAICATAIArtificial Cat INU$0.041771-30.9%MC $17.7KFOLDFOLDClarity Protocol$0.043500-28.9%MC $35.0KLuigiLuigiLuigi Mangione$0.000217-1.7%MC $216.8KRAYRAYRaydium$1.99+8.6%MC $1.10B

ZINC: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-26 16:17 UTC

Holder addresses

911

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is ZINC ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 911 addresses (2026-05-26 16:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling ZINC?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is ZINC liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-26 16:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Ask Unhosted AI about ZINC

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of May 26, 04:17 PM UTC

FDV

$0

Liquidity

Not available

Holders

911

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

ZINC is a self-described 'privacy-preserving proof-of-work mining token' on Solana (mint: zinc155BS4mSPk8GXQj4R5hkVDQXcW253pTYq5SGyfi). The token is unverified, mutable, and carries a reported total supply and FDV of zero — indicating either a data indexing gap or a non-standard supply structure. The token has exploded +1,454% in 24 hours from a near-zero base price, now trading at ~$8.00. However, liquidity is reported as $0.00, holder data is largely missing, and the update authority has NOT been renounced. The combination of extreme price action, zero reported liquidity, missing supply data, and a mutable contract creates a very high-risk profile.

Key points

  • Extreme 24h price surge of +1,454% from a sub-$1 base
  • Described as a proof-of-work mining token — unusual concept on Solana
  • Zero reported total supply and FDV — data anomaly or non-standard tokenomics
  • Zero reported liquidity despite ~$1M in 24h combined buy/sell volume
  • Holder base exploded from 22 to 911 in under 24 hours (+98%)
  • No sniper activity detected in first 1,000 blocks — atypical for a pump token

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token has surged +1,454% in 24h and is showing extreme intraday volatility. The most recent candle (16:00 UTC) shows an open of $0.183, a high of $0.747, and a low of $6.42 — suggesting the OHLC data may have inverted L/H fields, but the current price of ~$8.00 is well above recent candle closes near $0.74. With $0 reported liquidity, any meaningful sell pressure could cause catastrophic price collapse. Short-term direction is bearish due to overextension and structural fragility.

Target low

$0.50

Target high

$12.00

Support

$6.42 (recent candle low), $0.75 (prior candle close cluster), $0.18 (candle open baseline)

Resistance

$8.00 (current price / psychological round), $0.754 (candle 3 high)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Without verified liquidity, a renounced authority, confirmed supply data, or established community, the medium-term outlook is bearish. The token spent 30 days with only 22 holders before a sudden viral spike — this pattern is consistent with coordinated pump activity. Sustained price appreciation requires real utility adoption or liquidity provision, neither of which is evidenced in the data.

Catalysts

  • Proof-of-work mining mechanism gaining traction on Solana if real
  • Liquidity provision to the Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool
  • Authority renouncement and contract verification
  • Broader Solana memecoin/narrative cycle continuation

Bullish factors

  • Massive momentum: +1,454% in 24h with 1,110 unique buyers
  • Novel PoW mining narrative on Solana could attract speculative interest
  • No sniper concentration — early buyers not positioned to dump immediately
  • 3,779 buy transactions vs 3,469 sell transactions — slight buy-side dominance by count

Bearish factors

  • $0.00 reported total liquidity — extreme slippage and exit risk
  • Zero reported total supply and FDV — fundamental data missing
  • Contract is mutable with non-renounced update authority (4Ucw8BNkLWBu6gxkQsw3BRG2qRtw5WrG1UxiKpQjScH5)
  • Token was dormant at 22 holders for 30 days before sudden spike — classic pump pattern
  • Sell volume ($541K) slightly exceeds buy volume ($495K) in 24h
  • No social links, no verified contract, no community infrastructure

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) $0 reported liquidity making price discovery unreliable, (2) zero total supply reported making FDV/market cap calculations impossible, (3) only 3 OHLC candles available with apparent data anomalies (L > H in candle 1), (4) the token is less than 24 hours into its viral phase. Price targets are speculative ranges, not technically derived levels.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
zinc15...Gyfi
Total Supply
0 (as reported — likely a data indexing error; true supply unknown)

Key Risks

  • Zero reported liquidity — catastrophic exit risk for any position size
  • Mutable contract with active, non-renounced update authority
  • Total supply and FDV reported as zero — fundamental data unavailable
  • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic coordinated pump-and-dump signature

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle 3 (14:00 UTC): O=$0.183, H=$0.754, L=$0.183, C=$0.742 — a bullish candle with a long upper wick suggesting early buying pressure. Candle 2 (15:00 UTC): O=$0.747, H=$0.747, L=$0.745, C=$0.183 — a sharp bearish close, nearly a bearish engulfing/shooting star, with price collapsing from $0.747 to $0.183. Candle 1 (16:00 UTC): O=$0.183, H=$0.747, L=$6.42, C=$0.747 — NOTE: The Low ($6.42) exceeds the High ($0.747), which is a data anomaly likely reflecting the price spike to ~$8.00 being captured in the low field erroneously, or the OHLC feed is inverted/malformed. The current price of ~$8.00 is far above all candle closes, suggesting a violent breakout occurred after the 16:00 candle. Volume spiked dramatically in candle 2 ($978K vs $22K in candle 3), indicating the main pump event.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically upward given the +1,454% 24h move and current price of $8.00 vs candle opens near $0.18. However, the medium-term (30-day) trend was completely flat at 22 holders and near-zero activity, making this a sudden vertical spike rather than an organic uptrend. The sustainability of this move is highly questionable.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

48%

Sell

52%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$6.42 (anomalous candle low / potential real price floor during spike)

Major support

$0.75 (pre-spike candle close cluster)

Immediate resistance

$8.00 (current price / psychological level)

Major resistance

$12.00 (no prior price history above $8 to establish resistance)

Key levels are difficult to establish reliably given only 3 candles of history and a data anomaly in candle 1. The $0.75 level represents the pre-spike equilibrium and would be a major support/resistance flip zone. The $6.42 figure from the anomalous candle low may represent a real intraday low during the spike. Above $8.00, there is no historical resistance — price is in price discovery territory.

Notable patterns

  • Parabolic vertical spike — price moved from ~$0.18 to ~$8.00 in under 2 hours
  • Bearish shooting star / engulfing pattern in candle 2 (15:00 UTC) — close at $0.183 after open at $0.747
  • Volume climax in candle 2 followed by volume decline — potential exhaustion signal
  • OHLC data anomaly in candle 1 (Low > High) — data feed reliability concern
  • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden viral activation — classic pump-and-dump pattern signature

Liquidity

Liquidity

Not available

Depth

Not assessed

Slippage risk

Not assessed

Liquidity depth and slippage risk cannot be assessed without a liquidity observation.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

0 (as reported — likely a data indexing error; true supply unknown)

FDV

$0.00 (as reported — unreliable due to supply data gap)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    +1,454% in 24 hours with intraday swings from $0.18 to $8.00+. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and stop-loss management nearly impossible.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Zero reported liquidity — catastrophic exit risk for any position size
  • Mutable contract with active, non-renounced update authority
  • Total supply and FDV reported as zero — fundamental data unavailable
  • 30-day dormancy followed by sudden pump — classic coordinated pump-and-dump signature
  • Original 22 holders sitting on massive unrealized gains with no lock-up
  • No social links, no community, no verified contract — zero accountability infrastructure
  • OHLC data anomalies suggest unreliable price feed
  • Conflicting price change data (0% in 6h/24h fields vs +1,454% headline)

Mitigating factors

  • No sniper concentration detected in first 1,000 blocks
  • Buyer count (1,110) exceeds seller count (863) — some genuine demand
  • Novel PoW mining narrative could attract legitimate interest if mechanism is real
  • Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 is a legitimate DEX infrastructure

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana memecoin/pump dynamics. Any position should be considered a high-risk speculative trade with strict position sizing (no more than 0.5–1% of portfolio) and an immediate exit plan.

ZINC presents as an extremely high-risk, speculative micro-cap token that has undergone a violent pump event (+1,454% in 24h) from a 30-day dormant base. The token's fundamental data is largely missing or unreliable (zero supply, zero FDV, zero liquidity), the contract is mutable and unverified, and the price action pattern is consistent with a coordinated pump. The only notable positive is the absence of sniper concentration. This is not an investment — it is a speculation on momentum continuation in a token with near-zero structural support.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

ZINC's proof-of-work mining mechanism is genuine and functional, attracting a community of PoW enthusiasts to Solana. Liquidity is added to the Meteora pool, the contract is verified and authorities are renounced, and the token establishes itself as a niche but real project. Price consolidates above $5 and builds toward $15–20 on growing adoption.

  • Real PoW mining mechanism with verifiable on-chain proof
  • Authority renouncement and contract verification
  • Liquidity provision bringing pool depth to $500K+
  • Broader Solana narrative cycle supporting new token launches
  • Organic community formation beyond the initial 22 holders

Base Case

ZINC experiences a typical pump-and-dump cycle: price peaks somewhere between $8–$15, then retraces 70–85% over 48–72 hours as early holders exit. A small residual community of 200–400 holders remains, trading at $1–$3 with minimal volume. The PoW mechanism, if real, may attract a small niche following but fails to generate sustained momentum.

  • Pump cycle follows standard Solana memecoin trajectory (peak → 80% retrace → stabilization)
  • Some genuine interest in PoW narrative sustains a floor above zero
  • Liquidity data anomaly is resolved and real pool depth is modest ($50K–$200K)
  • Original holders distribute 50–70% of their positions over 48–72 hours

Bear Case

High probability

The pump was coordinated by the original 22 holders who accumulated over 30 days and triggered a viral event. They distribute into the buying frenzy, liquidity evaporates, and price collapses 90–99% back toward $0.10–$0.50. The token returns to dormancy or is abandoned.

  • Original 22 holders selling into the pump
  • Zero real liquidity making price collapse instantaneous
  • No utility, no community, no verified contract to sustain interest
  • Mutable metadata allowing project abandonment or rug
  • Broader market fatigue with Solana pump tokens

Analysis details

Generated

May 26, 04:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-26 16:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Solana SPL token registry)
  • Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool data (pair: 8s2ohDW1MQUdqcw4dFJVBfcLbjXD2KNBFe6kGCyfBwAy)
  • Trading analytics feed (24h volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • OHLC price feed (hourly candles, USD)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Top holder distribution data (unavailable)

Limitations

  • Total supply reported as 0 — FDV and market cap cannot be calculated
  • Total liquidity reported as $0.00 — slippage and exit analysis is speculative
  • Top holder data unavailable — whale concentration cannot be quantified
  • Only 3 OHLC candles available — technical analysis is severely limited
  • OHLC candle 1 contains a data anomaly (Low > High) — price feed reliability is uncertain
  • Conflicting price change data (0% in 6h/24h fields vs +1,454% headline figure)
  • Mint and freeze authority status not determinable from provided metadata
  • Sniper data is complete (0 snipers) but early holder wallet analysis is unavailable
  • Token is less than 24 hours into its viral phase — all signals are preliminary

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially newly launched or unverified tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data anomalies identified in this report (zero supply, zero liquidity, conflicting price metrics) mean that conclusions drawn here are highly uncertain. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is ZINC ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 911 addresses (2026-05-26 16:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling ZINC?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is ZINC liquidity falling?

Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for ZINC (ZINC)?

The token has surged +1,454% in 24h and is showing extreme intraday volatility. The most recent candle (16:00 UTC) shows an open of $0.183, a high of $0.747, and a low of $6.42 — suggesting the OHLC data may have inverted L/H fields, but the current price of ~$8.00 is well above recent candle closes near $0.74. With $0 reported liquidity, any meaningful sell pressure could cause catastrophic price collapse. Short-term direction is bearish due to overextension and structural fragility. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.50 to $12.00.

Is ZINC a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.2/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with Solana memecoin/pump dynamics. Any position should be considered a high-risk speculative trade with strict position sizing (no more than 0.5–1% of portfolio) and an immediate exit plan.

What are the key risks of holding ZINC?

Zero reported liquidity — catastrophic exit risk for any position size • Mutable contract with active, non-renounced update authority • Total supply and FDV reported as zero — fundamental data unavailable

← Back to all predictions

Track ZINC