Make A Wish Price Today & AI Analysis

WishSolanaAnalysis as of Apr 30, 2026

$0.0₄1747

-0.04% 24h

Contract

Live

2ssMotVbTUfRJev2UnibHzHsoeszPzgwbfsTZPSHpump

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,586

Market cap

$17,470

At a $1M market cap, $WISH would be $0.001000 (57.2x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Wish a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 27

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

1.5%4 snipers, 4 bundlers, 19 insiders still holding

Creator holds

0.0%

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about Wish

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

TRILLIONTrillion$0.0₅2839-0.8%MC $2.8K

HOOKLINEHOOKLINE$0.003670+0.0%MC $3.17M

50$50 and a dream$0.0₅2091+0.0%MC $2.0K

GOPGranny On Plane$0.0₅2793-0.9%MC $2.6K

MILOMilo the Chonk$0.0₅2161+0.0%MC $2.1K

FrongusFrongus$0.000203+391.6%MC $196.0K

Make A Wish: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-04-30 13:49 UTC

Holder addresses

3,652

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$182,118.86

How concentrated is Make A Wish ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 3,652 addresses (2026-04-30 13:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Make A Wish?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Make A Wish liquidity falling?: As of 2026-04-30 13:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $182,118.86. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-04-30 13:49 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Apr 30, 01:49 PM UTC

FDV

$2,017,913

Liquidity

$182,118.86

Holders

3,652

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Make A Wish (Wish) is a PumpFun-launched meme token on Solana with mint address 2ssMotVbTUfRJev2UnibHzHsoeszPzgwbfsTZPSHpump. The token has experienced an extraordinary 2,500%+ 24h price surge, rising from near-zero to ~$0.00202, driven by a viral launch event. However, the token exhibits severe sell-side dominance (80.6% sell pressure), shallow liquidity ($182K), and a holder base that only materialized in the last 24–48 hours after weeks of dormancy. The risk profile is very high.

Key points

Explosive 2,500%+ 24h price appreciation from a near-zero base
Holder count surged +2,553 (70%) in 24h after 29 days of complete stagnation at 1,099 holders
Severe sell pressure: 80.6% of 24h volume is sells ($6.98M sell vs $1.68M buy)
Very shallow liquidity at $182K against a $2.3M FDV — high slippage risk
Top 10 holders control only 15.99% of supply — relatively distributed for a new meme token
20 identified snipers, majority in profit, creating latent sell pressure

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–24 hours

bearish

The token is already down 23% in the last hour and 29.8% over 6 hours from its peak. With 80.6% sell pressure, $6.98M in 24h sell volume vs $1.68M buy volume, and only $182K in liquidity, continued downward pressure is the most likely near-term outcome. The OHLC data shows the price has been oscillating between two fixed levels (~$0.0000274 and ~$0.0000416) in recent candles, which appears to be a data artifact or pre-migration price; the current live price of ~$0.00202 reflects the post-pump level. Short-term support is fragile.

Target low

$0.00080

Target high

$0.00260

Support: $0.00140 (candle [12] low), $0.00113 (candle [13] low), ~$0.00080 (extrapolated from declining lows)
Resistance: $0.00202 (current price / recent high zone), $0.00257 (candle [9] low, former support now resistance), $0.00300 (psychological round number)

Medium term · 3–14 days

bearish

Without a sustained catalyst, new utility, or significant buy-side inflow, the token is likely to retrace substantially from its pump highs. The 29-day dormancy period before the pump, combined with heavy sniper profit-taking and dominant sell pressure, suggests this may be a classic pump-and-dump cycle. A recovery above $0.002 would require fresh narrative momentum and liquidity injection.

Catalysts

Viral social media campaign or influencer endorsement
Listing on a centralized exchange
New utility or partnership announcement
Broader Solana meme coin market rally

Bullish factors

Massive holder growth: +2,553 holders in 24h (70% increase)
Relatively distributed top-10 concentration at 15.99%
High unique wallet activity: 10,422 unique wallets in 24h
Most snipers are in profit but many have already sold, reducing future sniper dump risk
Token is not flagged as spam

Bearish factors

80.6% sell pressure ($6.98M sells vs $1.68M buys in 24h)
Only $182K total liquidity — extremely shallow for a $2.3M FDV token
Price already down 23% in 1h and 29.8% in 6h from peak
29 days of complete holder stagnation before the pump raises questions about organic growth
No verified contract, no description, update authority unknown
Sniper wallets with large realized profits (up to 229%) represent latent sell pressure
Holder count dropped 12 in the last hour, suggesting early exits

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility (2,500%+ 24h move), very short price history, data anomalies in OHLC candles (Open/High values appear inverted relative to Low values suggesting possible data feed issues), and the unpredictable nature of meme token price action. The directional bias is bearish based on sell pressure metrics, but meme tokens can reverse violently.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 2ssMot...pump
Total Supply: 999,989,435.08

Key Risks

Extreme sell pressure: 80.6% of 24h volume is sells — active distribution in progress
Shallow liquidity ($182K) creates high slippage risk for any meaningful position size
29-day dormancy before pump raises questions about organic demand and potential coordinated pump
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — rug pull risk cannot be fully excluded

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 20 hourly OHLC candles reveal a significant data anomaly: Open and High values (~$0.0000274–$0.0000416) are far below the Low values (~$0.00080–$0.00257), which is inverted from normal OHLC convention. This suggests the data feed may have Open/High/Low fields swapped or the token migrated from PumpFun bonding curve to PumpSwap mid-session, causing price discontinuity. Interpreting the 'Low' field as the actual traded price range: the token peaked around $0.00257 (candle [9], 05:00 UTC Apr 30) and has been declining steadily, with lows compressing from $0.00257 → $0.00241 → $0.00233 → $0.00210 → $0.00207 → $0.00216 → $0.00196 in recent candles. Volume peaked massively at candle [13] ($2.82M at 01:00 UTC) and has been declining sharply, suggesting the initial pump momentum is fading. The most recent candle [1] shows a low of $0.00197, near current price of $0.00202.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term and medium-term trends are both bearish. After the explosive pump (candles [13]–[17] showing the initial surge), the price has been making lower highs in the 'Low' field from $0.00257 down to $0.00197 over the last ~8 hours. Volume is declining alongside price, confirming distribution rather than accumulation.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

19%

Sell

81%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00197 (candle [1] low / most recent traded low)

Major support

$0.00113 (candle [13] low — the breakout candle base)

Immediate resistance

$0.00241 (candle [8] low / recent swing high in price)

Major resistance

$0.00257 (candle [9] low — the peak price level)

The token's effective price range over the last 20 hours spans from ~$0.00113 (launch breakout base) to ~$0.00257 (peak). Immediate support sits at ~$0.00197 (current candle low). A break below $0.00140 would signal a deeper retracement toward the $0.00113 breakout level. Resistance at $0.00241 and $0.00257 would need significant buy-side volume to reclaim.

Notable patterns

Declining volume on price decline — classic distribution/dump pattern
Volume exhaustion: peak $2.82M at candle [13] declining to $76K at candle [1]
Lower lows in price over the last 8 consecutive candles — confirmed downtrend
Massive gap between pre-pump price (~$0.0000274) and post-pump price (~$0.00202) — 73x move with no consolidation
High sell transaction count (51,946) vs buy count (13,999) — 3.7:1 sell-to-buy transaction ratio

Liquidity

$182,118.86

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is poor. Total liquidity of $182K against a $2.3M FDV represents a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of only ~7.9%, meaning any significant sell order will cause severe slippage. The 24h trading data reveals extreme sell-side dominance: $6.98M in sell volume vs $1.68M in buy volume (80.6% sell pressure), with 9,778 unique sellers vs 2,647 unique buyers — a 3.7:1 seller-to-buyer ratio. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow). The 24h unique wallet count of 10,422 shows high activity, but the overwhelming majority are sellers. This liquidity and flow profile is consistent with a token in active distribution/dump phase following a pump event. Traders attempting to exit large positions will face significant slippage given the shallow $182K liquidity pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,989,435.08

FDV

$2,017,912.90

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token has moved 2,500%+ in 24 hours from a near-zero base. It is already correcting -23% in 1h and -29.8% in 6h. Extreme volatility is inherent to this asset class and price stage.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $182K against a $2.3M FDV (7.9% ratio). Large sell orders will cause severe slippage. Exiting a position of more than a few thousand dollars will materially move the price.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme sell pressure: 80.6% of 24h volume is sells — active distribution in progress
Shallow liquidity ($182K) creates high slippage risk for any meaningful position size
29-day dormancy before pump raises questions about organic demand and potential coordinated pump
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — rug pull risk cannot be fully excluded
Price already in confirmed downtrend (-23% in 1h, -29.8% in 6h from peak)
No verified contract, no project description, no whitepaper or roadmap
Holder growth entirely pump-driven with no evidence of organic community building
Sniper [5] holds +180% unrealized gain with $0 sold — potential large sell incoming

Mitigating factors

Relatively healthy supply distribution (top 10 = 15.99%, top 100 = 57.9%)
Not flagged as spam by data providers
High unique wallet activity (10,422 in 24h) shows genuine market interest
Most snipers have already sold, reducing future sniper dump pressure
Mutable: false — token metadata cannot be altered
Token is on PumpSwap (graduated from PumpFun bonding curve), indicating it passed the bonding curve threshold

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders with strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline. This token is NOT suitable for long-term investors, beginners, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. Maximum position size should be a small fraction of a speculative portfolio. This is a high-risk meme token in an active distribution phase.

Make A Wish (Wish) is a classic PumpFun meme token that has executed a textbook pump cycle: 29 days of dormancy at 1,099 holders, followed by a viral 2-day surge to 3,652 holders and a 2,500%+ price increase. The token is now in active distribution with 80.6% sell pressure and declining volume. The investment thesis is primarily speculative and momentum-driven, with the bull case requiring a sustained viral narrative and the bear case (most likely) being continued price decline as early buyers exit.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A sustained viral social media campaign, influencer endorsement, or broader Solana meme season drives continued retail FOMO buying. New liquidity inflows overwhelm sell pressure, price stabilizes above $0.002 and potentially retests the $0.00257 peak. The relatively healthy distribution (top 10 = 15.99%) means no single whale can single-handedly crash the price.

Viral Twitter/social media momentum sustaining retail FOMO
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all boats
Influencer or KOL endorsement driving new buyer inflows
Sniper sell pressure already largely exhausted (high sell-through rate)
Healthy supply distribution preventing coordinated whale dumps

Base Case

The token experiences a 50–70% retracement from its peak over the next 3–7 days as early buyers and snipers complete their exits. Price stabilizes in the $0.00060–$0.00100 range with reduced volume. A small core community of 1,500–2,000 holders remains. Without a new catalyst, the token slowly bleeds toward irrelevance, though a secondary pump remains possible if Solana meme season continues.

Sell pressure gradually normalizes as distribution completes
Liquidity remains shallow but stable around $100–200K
No major new catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term
Broader Solana market conditions remain neutral
The token does not get listed on any centralized exchange

Bear Case

High probability

Sell pressure continues to dominate as early buyers, snipers, and pump participants exit. Liquidity ($182K) is insufficient to absorb selling, causing rapid price decline. The token retraces 70–90% from its peak, returning toward the $0.00020–$0.00050 range. The 29-day dormancy period before the pump suggests this was a coordinated pump event with no organic foundation.

80.6% sell pressure with 9,778 unique sellers vs 2,647 buyers
Shallow $182K liquidity unable to absorb distribution
Price already in confirmed downtrend (-23% in 1h, -29.8% in 6h)
No verified contract, description, or utility to sustain demand
29-day holder stagnation before pump — no organic community base
Declining volume confirming momentum exhaustion

Analysis details

Generated

Apr 30, 01:49 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-04-30 13:49 UTC

Model confidence

Medium

Data sources

On-chain Solana token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, mutability)
PumpSwap DEX price and liquidity data
Hourly OHLC candle data (20 candles, USD-denominated)
24h trading analytics (volume, buys/sells, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and distribution data
30-day historical holder series (daily)
Top 20 holder addresses and balances
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks, 20 snipers)
Social link metadata (Twitter, Moralis)

Limitations

OHLC candle data appears to have Open/High/Low fields in non-standard order (O and H values far below L values), suggesting a possible data feed issue or bonding curve migration artifact — technical analysis is based on interpreted 'Low' field as actual price
Sniper 'sniped' amounts and current balances are largely 'unknown', limiting precise sniper concentration calculation
Mint and freeze authority status are unconfirmed (update authority listed as 'unknown')
No historical price data beyond 20 hourly candles limits longer-term technical analysis
The 29-day holder stagnation at exactly 1,099 holders is anomalous and may reflect a data gap rather than true on-chain state
FDV discrepancy: metadata shows $2,017,912.90 while trading analytics shows $2.30M — minor difference likely due to price movement between data pulls
No on-chain program verification data available

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analyst has no position in this token.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Make A Wish (Wish) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Make A Wish (Wish)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 27, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is Make A Wish ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 3,652 addresses (2026-04-30 13:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Make A Wish?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Make A Wish liquidity falling?

As of 2026-04-30 13:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $182,118.86. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Make A Wish (Wish)?

Is Wish a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable only for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders with strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline. This token is NOT suitable for long-term investors, beginners, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. Maximum position size should be a small fraction of a speculative portfolio. This is a high-risk meme token in an active distribution phase.

What are the key risks of holding Wish?

Extreme sell pressure: 80.6% of 24h volume is sells — active distribution in progress • Shallow liquidity ($182K) creates high slippage risk for any meaningful position size • 29-day dormancy before pump raises questions about organic demand and potential coordinated pump