How concentrated is Pokémon Dollar ownership?

As of 2026-09-24 19:16 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 3.74% of supply, out of 65 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling Pokémon Dollar?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-24 19:16 UTC, DEX buys were $244,325.00 and sells $249,752.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is Pokémon Dollar liquidity falling?

Liquidity fell 4.28%, from $2,388.46 (2026-09-23 20:00 UTC) to $2,286.14 (2026-09-24 16:00 UTC).

Pokémon Dollar Price Today & AI Analysis

₽SolanaAnalysis as of Sep 24, 2026

$0.0₅2050

Contract

Live

ttGGMweBRAYecsecJ9RMfCAt7zjDu8KzWTSq6J6pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

Market cap

$1,993

At a $1M market cap, $₽ would be $0.001029 (502x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is ₽ a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 6

Scam

Marked as a scam after a manual review.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about ₽

3 free answers a day

Pokémon Dollar: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-24 19:16 UTC

Holder addresses

Top 10 supply share

3.74%

Reported liquidity

$2,286.00

How concentrated is Pokémon Dollar ownership?: As of 2026-09-24 19:16 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 3.74% of supply, out of 65 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling Pokémon Dollar?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-24 19:16 UTC, DEX buys were $244,325.00 and sells $249,752.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is Pokémon Dollar liquidity falling?: Liquidity fell 4.28%, from $2,388.46 (2026-09-23 20:00 UTC) to $2,286.14 (2026-09-24 16:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-24 19:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-23 20:00 UTC	$2,388.46
2026-09-23 21:00 UTC	$2,181.28
2026-09-24 00:00 UTC	$2,192.36
2026-09-24 01:00 UTC	$2,175.48
2026-09-24 13:00 UTC	$2,235.97
2026-09-24 16:00 UTC	$2,286.14

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-24 16:32 UTCSell · $7.91WkBxJ53G…1SyraYWallet BWy29WoP…fFQxYb
2026-09-24 13:15 UTCBuy · $78.8732T5Q9B6…nisLFtWallet 8goUDVPE…AMTDRU
2026-09-24 13:15 UTCBuy · $4.662o1XdhJQ…tMf3jfWallet 4gwXdP4C…BRTEWR
2026-09-24 01:45 UTCSell · $0.06t8pLpmg4…2pnQKUWallet DEssoX42…EXpgrm
2026-09-24 01:28 UTCSell · $19.62QSjQ1vSx…5zKcyJWallet uzeYCDhL…Vq3vws
2026-09-24 01:24 UTCSell · $0.104kA2CMfv…axxDZwWallet GXbyajES…WMgFwo
2026-09-24 00:13 UTCSell · $1.833tzDKaeb…jpf4oQWallet 3CmvQjp8…iuiDyE
2026-09-24 00:12 UTCBuy · $1.874x7V11U5…dackRBWallet 3CmvQjp8…iuiDyE
2026-09-23 21:59 UTCSell · $7.30EPovfuYZ…fW1124Wallet F24FUtYm…UWTrDM
2026-09-23 21:34 UTCSell · $203.565pzEKobQ…m6L22XWallet AnSfTBjG…zegazW

Report snapshot

as of Sep 24, 07:17 PM UTC

FDV

$2,381

Liquidity

$2,286.00

Holders

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Pokémon Dollar (₽) is a micro-cap PumpSwap-listed pump.fun style token with a total supply of ~972.2M tokens and a fully diluted valuation of only ~$2,381. The token experienced an extreme price collapse of ~94.9% over the last 24 hours, crashing from a spike near $0.003 down to ~$0.0000022-0.0000024, consistent with a classic pump-and-dump pattern typical of newly launched meme tokens. Liquidity is extremely thin at ~$2.29K, and most hourly candles show zero trading volume, indicating a largely inactive/illiquid market punctuated by a few volume spikes. Holder data is limited to a current snapshot: 65 holder addresses with top-10 wallets holding ~3.74% of supply, but there is no historical holder trend, wallet classification, or sniper data available to assess accumulation/distribution behavior.

Key points

Extreme 24h price collapse of ~94.9%, one of the largest single-day drawdowns observable in the candle data
Very low total liquidity (~$2.29K) and FDV (~$2.38K), placing this deep in micro-cap/high-risk territory
Only 65 holder addresses reported with no historical trend data available
No sniper data available for smart money/early buyer analysis
Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown — cannot confirm rug-pull protections

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-72h

bearish

Price has already collapsed ~94.9% in the last 24 hours from a spike high of ~$0.003 to current levels around $0.00000245. The most recent candles (hours 18-24) show a modest recovery bounce from ~$0.00000225 to ~$0.00000245 (~9% up) on very light, sporadic volume, but the overall structure remains a post-pump crash with the vast majority of hourly candles showing zero volume, indicating a largely dead market with occasional small trades moving price mechanically due to thin liquidity.

Target low

0.0000018

Target high

0.0000030

Support: 0.00000225 (post-crash floor seen in candles 6-17), 0.00000222 (intraday low of the crash candle)
Resistance: 0.00000245 (current level/recent local high), 0.0000030 (initial spike high before crash)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

bearish

With FDV at only ~$2.38K and liquidity at ~$2.29K, this token has effectively lost nearly all speculative value after the initial pump faded. Without new catalysts, sustained volume, or holder growth, medium-term trajectory for pump.fun-style tokens post-crash is typically continued decay or abandonment, though a small float can also produce sharp, low-liquidity bounces.

Catalysts

Potential renewed retail/meme interest tied to Pokémon-themed branding
Any liquidity additions or CEX/DEX listing attention
Continued extremely low float could allow outsized % moves on small capital inflows (double-edged: pump or further dump)

Bullish factors

Small recovery bounce of ~9% in final candles on light volume
Extremely low FDV (~$2.38K) means small dollar inflows could produce large percentage price moves
Meme/brand theme (Pokémon) could attract speculative retail attention

Bearish factors

94.9% 24h price crash signals a failed pump with likely early buyer exit
Total liquidity of only ~$2.29K is extremely shallow, making the token vulnerable to further sharp drawdowns
Most hourly candles show zero volume, indicating abandonment/lack of sustained interest
Sell volume ($249.75K) modestly exceeds buy volume ($244.32K) in the 24h window despite more buy transactions than sell transactions, suggesting larger average sell sizes

Confidence: low. Only 24 hourly candles are available, many with zero volume, and the token has virtually no liquidity or trading depth. Predictions are inherently unreliable for a micro-cap token this thinly traded and this recently crashed.

₽ call history

Full track record →

Sep 24bearish@ $0.00000245

24h+27.3%

7d-4.6%

30d-16.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: ttGGMw...pump
Total Supply: 972,196,099.09

Key Risks

Extreme 24h price crash (-94.9%) indicative of a pump-and-dump or failed launch
Very shallow liquidity (~$2.29K) creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Extremely low FDV (~$2,381) signals the token has lost nearly all market value/interest
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Candle 1 shows an enormous spike from open $0.00206 to high $0.00300 before collapsing to close $0.00000274 — a massive single-candle blow-off top and crash (~-99.9% intra-candle range), consistent with a pump.fun launch/pump followed by an immediate rug-style dump. Candles 2-17 show price grinding down and flatlining near $0.00000225-0.00000228 with mostly zero volume, indicating an illiquid, dormant market. Candles 18 and 21 show two small upward jumps (to $0.00000240 then $0.00000245) on very light volume (83.5 and 7.9 USD notional respectively), after which price flatlines again through candle 24 at $0.00000245.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Medium-term trend is decisively down given the ~94.9% crash from the initial spike. However, the most recent few hours show a minor short-term uptick (two step-ups in candles 18 and 21) off the post-crash floor, though this is occurring on negligible volume and should not be mistaken for a trend reversal.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

50%

Sell

51%

Key Price Levels

Major support

0.00000222 (candle 1 intraday low)

Immediate resistance

0.00000245

Major resistance

0.00000300 (candle 1 spike high)

The market is trading in a very tight range between roughly $0.00000222 and $0.00000245 after the initial crash from $0.003. The $0.003 level is effectively irrelevant as resistance now given the scale of the collapse; realistic near-term levels are the $0.00000225 floor and $0.00000245 current ceiling.

From the report of Sep 24, 2026. The price has since moved through one of its levels, so it is not shown.

Notable patterns

Blow-off top / crash candle (candle 1): massive wick from $0.003 high to near-total collapse
Extended flat-lining / zero-volume candles indicating illiquid, inactive market
Stair-step micro-recovery in final hours (candles 18 & 21) on minimal volume

Liquidity

$2,286.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $2.29K against a 24h trading volume near $494K (buy+sell combined) implies extremely high turnover relative to pool depth, meaning even modest trade sizes can move price dramatically — consistent with the observed 94.9% crash. Buy and sell volumes are nearly balanced (49.5% vs 50.5%), and buy transaction count (6,246) and buyer count (2,760) both exceed sell transactions (4,763) and sellers (1,271), suggesting many small buyers versus fewer, likely larger, sellers. This dynamic — more buyers but similar aggregate sell volume — is a hallmark of a token where a smaller number of holders are offloading larger positions into a wider base of smaller retail buyers. Slippage risk is high given the shallow $2.29K liquidity pool.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

972,196,099.09

FDV

$2,381

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
The token suffered a ~94.9% price decline in 24 hours, including an initial single-candle spike-and-crash from ~$0.003 to ~$0.0000027, and continues to trade with erratic micro-movements on near-zero volume.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only ~$2.29K against tens of thousands of dollars in daily volume, and most hourly candles show zero trading activity, indicating a shallow, fragile, and largely inactive market prone to high slippage.
Concentrationunknown
Only a current-snapshot top-10 concentration figure (~3.74%) is available with no historical data, no top-100 figure, and no wallet classification (team/LP/bot/insider tagging). With only 65 total holder addresses, true concentration risk cannot be reliably assessed and should be treated as unknown rather than confirmed as low.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme 24h price crash (-94.9%) indicative of a pump-and-dump or failed launch
Very shallow liquidity (~$2.29K) creating high slippage and manipulation risk
Extremely low FDV (~$2,381) signals the token has lost nearly all market value/interest
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account freezing
No sniper or holder-history data available to rule out coordinated early extraction of value
Only 65 total holder addresses — a very thin, easily-influenced holder base

Mitigating factors

Reported top-10 concentration is low (~3.74%) in the current snapshot, though this cannot be corroborated with historical or classified data
Buy transaction count and buyer count exceed sell counts, showing some retail-level distributed buying interest
A slight price recovery in the most recent few hours suggests not all liquidity has been withdrawn

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders explicitly comfortable with total loss of capital. This token exhibits multiple hallmark characteristics of a high-risk, low-liquidity meme/pump.fun token post-crash: negligible FDV, shallow liquidity, an extreme single-day drawdown, and multiple critical unknowns (authority status, sniper activity, holder history). It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors or those seeking any degree of capital preservation.

Pokémon Dollar is a micro-cap, low-liquidity pump.fun-style token that has already experienced a near-total value collapse (~94.9% in 24h) from an initial launch spike. The current setup reflects a token in the aftermath of a pump-and-dump cycle with extremely thin liquidity (~$2.29K) and an FDV of only ~$2,381, alongside multiple unresolved data gaps (mint/freeze authority, sniper activity, holder history) that prevent a full risk clearance. Any thesis here is purely speculative and short-term in nature.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A renewed wave of speculative retail interest (potentially tied to the Pokémon branding) drives fresh buy volume into the shallow liquidity pool, producing an outsized percentage price rebound given the token's tiny float and FDV.

Extremely low FDV means small capital inflows can create large percentage price swings
Recent small stair-step price recoveries (candles 18, 21) show at least some residual buying interest
Buyer count (2,760) currently exceeds seller count (1,271) in the 24h window

Base Case

The token continues to trade in a narrow, illiquid range near current levels ($0.00000225-0.00000245) with sporadic, low-volume activity, neither fully recovering nor collapsing to zero in the immediate term, absent a specific catalyst.

No major liquidity injection or listing catalyst occurs
No resolution of unknown mint/freeze authority status
Holder base remains small (~65 addresses) without significant growth or exit

Bear Case

High probability

The token continues to decay toward zero as liquidity providers and remaining holders exit, following the classic post-pump abandonment pattern seen in the mostly zero-volume candles after the initial crash.

94.9% crash already occurred, suggesting the speculative cycle has largely played out
Liquidity of only $2.29K is insufficient to support meaningful price stability
Sell volume ($249.75K) slightly exceeds buy volume ($244.32K), and unknown authority status leaves rug/mint risk unresolved
Long stretches of zero trading volume indicate fading market interest

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 24, 07:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-24 19:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
Price feed (USD spot price, 24h % change)
Hourly OHLCV candle data (24 most recent hours)
DEX trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, PumpSwap pair)
Unhosted holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

No sniper wallet data available, preventing any smart-money/early-buyer quantitative analysis
No historical holder count data (24h/7d/30d), preventing holder growth or trend analysis
No wallet classification data, preventing identification of whales, team wallets, or bots
Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and spam-flag status all unknown at the source
Only 24 hourly candles available, many with zero volume, limiting technical pattern reliability
Top-100 holder concentration figure not provided (only top-10 available)

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (authority status, sniper data, holder history). Cryptocurrency tokens, especially micro-cap and newly launched tokens on pump.fun-style platforms, carry very high risk including total loss of capital. Do your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Pokémon Dollar (₽) a scam?

Marked as a scam after a manual review. Checked Nov 6, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Pokémon Dollar (₽)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 6, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for Pokémon Dollar (₽)?

Is ₽ a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 92/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders explicitly comfortable with total loss of capital. This token exhibits multiple hallmark characteristics of a high-risk, low-liquidity meme/pump.fun token post-crash: negligible FDV, shallow liquidity, an extreme single-day drawdown, and multiple critical unknowns (authority status, sniper activity, holder history). It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors or those seeking any degree of capital preservation.

What are the key risks of holding ₽?

Extreme 24h price crash (-94.9%) indicative of a pump-and-dump or failed launch • Very shallow liquidity (~$2.29K) creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Extremely low FDV (~$2,381) signals the token has lost nearly all market value/interest