Credible Finance Price Today & AI Analysis

CREDSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 17, 2026

$0.6526

-7.53% 24h

Contract

Live

CREDBHvVqREBCAxMihzr8D1nepHMr2gmQoZWpmgGmeta

Chain

Solana

Holders

2,060

Market cap

$14,789,739

At a $50M market cap, $CRED would be $2.21 (3.38x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Ask Unhosted AI about CRED

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

POLYMARKETPolymarket PreStocks$140.55+1.0%MC $677.0K

ZAMAZama$0.0743+9.0%MC $1.23M

BOTIFYBotify$0.000194-16.1%MC $194.0K RRACEFerrari - Backpack Securities$390.27+0.2%MC $171.5K

GHOSTCATAave Ghost Cat$0.000315+27.8%MC $315.1K

FTRFlying Tesla Roadster$0.006686+2981.5%MC $6.43M

Credible Finance: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-17 19:17 UTC

Holder addresses

809

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$480,400.37

How concentrated is Credible Finance ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 809 addresses (2026-07-17 19:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Credible Finance?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Credible Finance liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-17 19:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $480,400.37. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-17 19:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 17, 07:17 PM UTC

FDV

$8,883,998

Liquidity

$480,400.37

Holders

809

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

Credible Finance (CRED) is a Solana-based token trading at ~$0.392 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$8.24M–$8.88M and total liquidity of ~$480K on a Meteora DLMM pair. The token has 809 reported holders, a circulating supply of ~22.66M tokens, and shows moderate 24h trading activity (~$358K combined volume). However, the data contains several severe red flags: the contract is unverified, the update authority is NOT renounced (a mutable, non-burn-address authority), top holder data is entirely unavailable (showing 0% concentration for top 10 and top 100, which is anomalous and likely a data gap), historical holder counts show zero for all 30 days prior to a sudden +813 spike, and no social links are present. These anomalies collectively suggest either very recent launch with data indexing lag or deliberate obfuscation, warranting extreme caution.

Key points

Meteora DLMM liquidity pool with ~$480K total liquidity providing moderate depth for the market cap
Sell pressure slightly dominates at 53.8% sell vs 46.2% buy in 24h, but buyer count (174) exceeds seller count (122) suggesting smaller average sell sizes
Token is mutable with a non-renounced update authority (97d3Zq6Ekc1PZdLMD86oCTcKUhBsZfAR5s6fc5z3dKTe), representing a significant rug/upgrade risk
Historical holder data shows zero holders for all 30 tracked days before a sudden +813 jump — strongly indicative of a very recent launch or data indexing failure
No verified contract, no social links, and no top holder data available — transparency is extremely low

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

The single available hourly candle (O: $0.4276, H: $0.4276, L: $0.3971, C: $0.4006) shows a bearish close well below the open, with the current price (~$0.392) having drifted further below that close. Sell pressure at 53.8% and a net 24h price change of approximately -0.73% confirm mild but persistent selling. With no social links, no verified contract, and anomalous holder data, short-term downside pressure is the more likely path.

Target low

$0.340

Target high

$0.430

Support: $0.392 (current price / intraday low zone), $0.371 (approximate -5% from current), $0.340 (approximate -13% from current, psychological round level)
Resistance: $0.401 (hourly candle close), $0.428 (hourly candle open/high), $0.450 (psychological round resistance)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the near-total absence of historical holder data, no social presence, and a mutable token with non-renounced authority. If the project establishes credibility (social links, verified contract, authority renouncement), accumulation could develop. Without those catalysts, gradual sell-off is the base expectation.

Catalysts

Renouncement of mint/freeze/update authority would be a strong positive signal
Listing on a major aggregator or CEX with verified contract status
Launch of social channels and community building driving new holder acquisition
Sustained buy pressure exceeding 55%+ over multiple days

Bullish factors

Buyer count (174) exceeds seller count (122) in 24h, suggesting more participants are buying than selling even if sell volume is slightly higher
$480K liquidity is reasonable relative to the ~$8.24M FDV (~5.8% liquidity ratio)
809 holders reported, indicating some organic distribution has occurred
Price is trading at a meaningful level ($0.392) with active volume (~$358K/24h)

Bearish factors

Sell volume ($192.73K) exceeds buy volume ($165.68K) in 24h — net outflow
Token is mutable with non-renounced update authority — developer can alter token metadata or behavior
No verified contract, no social links — extremely low transparency
Historical holder data shows 0 for all 30 days prior to analysis — anomalous and suspicious
Top holder concentration data unavailable — cannot assess whale/dump risk
Single bearish hourly candle with price closing well below open and continuing to drift lower
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior unknown

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: only one hourly OHLC candle available, historical holder data showing zeros for all 30 prior days (data gap or brand-new launch), no top holder distribution data, no sniper data, and a mutable non-renounced contract. The data set is too sparse and anomalous to support high-confidence directional calls.

CRED call history

Full track record →

Jul 17bearish@ $0.392

24h+35.5%

7d+63.5%

30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: CREDBH...meta
Total Supply: 22,663,387 CRED

Key Risks

Mutable token with non-renounced update authority — developer can alter metadata at any time
Unverified contract with no social links — near-zero transparency and accountability
Top holder distribution data unavailable — cannot rule out extreme supply concentration
Historical holder data shows 0 for all 30 prior days — anomalous pattern suggesting very recent launch or data manipulation

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only one hourly OHLC candle is available for analysis (2026-07-17T19:00 UTC): Open $0.4276, High $0.4276, Low $0.3971, Close $0.4006, Volume 2,550 units. This is a strongly bearish candle: the high equals the open (no upside wick, price opened at the top), and the close is near the lower third of the range, producing a large bearish body with a lower wick. The current price (~$0.392) has since fallen below even this candle's close, extending the bearish move. With only one candle, multi-candle pattern analysis (e.g., engulfing, doji series) is not possible.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is bearish based on the single available candle showing a top-to-bottom sell-off and price continuing to drift lower post-close. Medium-term trend cannot be reliably determined with one candle; classified as sideways pending more data.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Stable

Buy

46%

Sell

54%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.392 (current price, intraday low zone)

Major support

$0.371 (approx. -5% from current, pre-candle accumulation zone estimate)

Immediate resistance

$0.401 (hourly candle close level)

Major resistance

$0.428 (hourly candle open/high — the level sellers dominated from)

The hourly candle high of $0.4276 acts as the key near-term resistance; price failed to hold above $0.4006 (candle close) and has since drifted to ~$0.392. The candle low of $0.3971 is the most recent tested support. A break below $0.397 on volume would open a path toward $0.370–$0.350. Recovery above $0.428 would negate the short-term bearish structure.

Notable patterns

Bearish marubozu-like candle: open equals high, close near low — strong single-candle bearish signal
Price continuation below candle close: current price ~$0.392 is below the $0.4006 close, confirming bearish follow-through
High sell-volume-to-transaction ratio: fewer sell transactions but higher sell volume implies larger average sell sizes vs. buys — potential distribution pattern
Insufficient candle history for multi-candle pattern confirmation (only 1 candle available)

Liquidity

$480,400.37

Depth

Moderate

Slippage risk

Medium

Total liquidity of ~$480K on the Meteora DLMM pair (655MucJoLEjZfuSbpmURSHZ4DVNNrvR7YisSLeSkHkdq) represents approximately 5.8% of the ~$8.24M FDV — a moderate liquidity ratio that is neither dangerously thin nor deeply liquid. Slippage risk is medium: trades of a few thousand dollars should execute with manageable slippage, but larger orders ($50K+) could move the price meaningfully. The 24h net flow is negative (outflow): sell volume ($192.73K) exceeds buy volume ($165.68K) by ~$27K, or about 14% more selling than buying by dollar value. Notably, there are more unique buyers (174) than sellers (122), but sellers transact in larger average sizes ($1,580/sell vs. $447/buy), suggesting larger holders are distributing against smaller retail buyers. The 24h price change of -0.73% is relatively contained given this imbalance, which may reflect the DLMM's concentrated liquidity providing price stability. 24h unique wallets total 223, indicating moderate but not exceptional community engagement for a token at this price level.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

22,663,387 CRED

FDV

$8,883,997.68 (metadata) / ~$8.24M (trading analytics)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Only one hourly candle available showing an ~6.4% intraday range (H: $0.4276, L: $0.3971). Price has continued to drift lower post-candle. With a very new token, thin price history, and no established support structure, volatility risk is high.
Liquiditymedium
$480K total liquidity against ~$8.24M FDV gives a ~5.8% liquidity ratio. Moderate for a small-cap token, but large sell orders could cause significant slippage. The DLMM structure may concentrate liquidity in a narrow band.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Mutable token with non-renounced update authority — developer can alter metadata at any time
Unverified contract with no social links — near-zero transparency and accountability
Top holder distribution data unavailable — cannot rule out extreme supply concentration
Historical holder data shows 0 for all 30 prior days — anomalous pattern suggesting very recent launch or data manipulation
625 of 809 holders acquired via transfer (not swap) — possible insider pre-distribution
Net sell pressure in 24h with larger average sell sizes vs. buy sizes — potential distribution by larger holders
No sniper data — early buyer behavior and profit-taking risk are opaque
Mint and freeze authority status unknown — potential for supply inflation or account freezing

Mitigating factors

$480K liquidity provides moderate depth relative to FDV (~5.8% ratio)
Buyer count (174) exceeds seller count (122) in 24h — more participants buying than selling
809 holders reported, suggesting some distribution has occurred
Price decline is modest (-0.73% in 24h) despite net sell pressure, suggesting liquidity is absorbing sells
No spam flag from the data provider
Active trading volume (~$358K/24h) indicates genuine market interest

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the risks of unverified, mutable Solana tokens with opaque ownership structures. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. Due diligence should include: verifying the update authority's identity, confirming mint/freeze authority status on-chain, reviewing top holder distribution via a block explorer, and waiting for social presence and contract verification before committing capital.

CRED presents as a very early-stage, high-risk Solana token with a ~$8.24M FDV and moderate liquidity. The investment case hinges entirely on whether the project behind it establishes credibility through contract verification, authority renouncement, social presence, and demonstrated utility. As of this analysis, the token exhibits multiple severe red flags that make it unsuitable for most investors. The data anomalies (zero historical holders, missing top holder data, mutable authority) mean the risk profile cannot be fully quantified.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The project team renounces update/mint/freeze authorities, verifies the contract, launches social channels, and demonstrates genuine 'Move Money, FASTER' utility (e.g., payment rails, DeFi integration). Holder count grows organically from 809 toward 5,000+, buy pressure flips to sustained 60%+, and the FDV expands toward $25M–$50M as the narrative gains traction.

Authority renouncement and contract verification removing the primary trust barrier
Launch of social media presence and community building driving organic holder growth
Demonstration of actual product utility (payment/DeFi use case)
Broader Solana ecosystem bull market lifting all boats
Whale accumulation at current prices if insiders are confident in the project

Base Case

The token continues trading in a $0.30–$0.45 range with moderate volume. Some social presence is established but authority remains non-renounced. Holder count grows slowly to 1,500–2,500. The project neither rugs nor achieves significant adoption. FDV oscillates between $6M–$10M. Most early holders break even or take small losses/gains.

Team does not rug but also does not deliver significant product milestones
Liquidity remains at current levels (~$480K) without major additions or removals
Holder growth continues at a modest pace driven by organic discovery
No major catalyst (positive or negative) emerges in the near term
Sell pressure remains slightly elevated but does not accelerate into a cascade

Bear Case

High probability

The mutable authority is exploited to alter token metadata or the team executes a rug pull. Alternatively, the project simply fades — no social presence develops, holder growth stalls, and sell pressure gradually drains liquidity. Price declines 70–90% from current levels as early holders exit.

Non-renounced mutable authority enabling metadata manipulation or rug
Failure to establish social presence or verified contract leading to loss of market confidence
Large holders (unknown due to data gap) dumping supply against retail buyers
Broader market downturn reducing risk appetite for unverified micro-cap tokens
Transfer-heavy holder acquisition pattern resolving as insider distribution

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 17, 07:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-17 19:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

Solana on-chain metadata (mint, authority, supply, decimals)
Meteora DLMM pair trading data (pair: 655MucJoLEjZfuSbpmURSHZ4DVNNrvR7YisSLeSkHkdq)
OHLC price feed (1 hourly candle, 2026-07-17T19:00 UTC)
Trading analytics (24h volume, buy/sell breakdown, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and acquisition breakdown
Historical holder series (30-day daily)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 1 hourly OHLC candle available — technical analysis is severely limited and multi-candle patterns cannot be identified
Top holder data entirely unavailable — whale concentration and distribution health cannot be assessed
Historical holder data shows 0 for all 30 prior days — holder trend analysis is not meaningful
Sniper data unavailable — early buyer behavior and smart money signals cannot be quantified
Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — authority risk partially inferred
No social links or external project information available for qualitative assessment
Token is very recently launched (inferred) — all metrics lack historical context
Supply concentration shown as 0% for top 10 and top 100 — almost certainly a data gap, not a real reading

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in unverified micro-cap tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data used is sourced from on-chain feeds and may contain gaps or errors. Always conduct your own due diligence, verify information independently on-chain, and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analyst and platform bear no responsibility for investment outcomes based on this report.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is Credible Finance ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 809 addresses (2026-07-17 19:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Credible Finance?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Credible Finance liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-17 19:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $480,400.37. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for Credible Finance (CRED)?

Is CRED a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.7/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who fully understand the risks of unverified, mutable Solana tokens with opaque ownership structures. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. Due diligence should include: verifying the update authority's identity, confirming mint/freeze authority status on-chain, reviewing top holder distribution via a block explorer, and waiting for social presence and contract verification before committing capital.

What are the key risks of holding CRED?

Mutable token with non-renounced update authority — developer can alter metadata at any time • Unverified contract with no social links — near-zero transparency and accountability • Top holder distribution data unavailable — cannot rule out extreme supply concentration