How concentrated is Pokémon ownership?

As of 2026-09-28 00:16 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 14.69% of supply, out of 2,696 holder addresses.

Are large holders selling Pokémon?

In the 24 hours to 2026-09-28 00:16 UTC, DEX buys were $453,542.00 and sells $359,152.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.

Is Pokémon liquidity falling?

Liquidity rose 200.58%, from $33,994.90 (2026-09-27 21:00 UTC) to $102,181.33 (2026-09-28 00:00 UTC).

Pokémon Price Today & AI Analysis

PokémonSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 28, 2026

$0.0₅2801

Contract

Live

nheVhBEu7aQgtZLbtLkzvZEhhQh9fctKXWWFPd8pump

Chain

Solana

Holders

107

Market cap

$2,786

At a $1M market cap, $POKÉMON would be $0.001005 (359x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Pokémon a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 10

Caution

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

The trading looks automated.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about Pokémon

3 free answers a day

Pokémon: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-09-28 00:16 UTC

Holder addresses

2,696

Top 10 supply share

14.69%

Reported liquidity

$102,181.00

How concentrated is Pokémon ownership?: As of 2026-09-28 00:16 UTC, the top 10 addresses held 14.69% of supply, out of 2,696 holder addresses.
Are large holders selling Pokémon?: In the 24 hours to 2026-09-28 00:16 UTC, DEX buys were $453,542.00 and sells $359,152.00; this report doesn't show which wallets sold.
Is Pokémon liquidity falling?: Liquidity rose 200.58%, from $33,994.90 (2026-09-27 21:00 UTC) to $102,181.33 (2026-09-28 00:00 UTC).

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Unhosted token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-28 00:16 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)	Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-27 21:00 UTC	$33,994.90
2026-09-27 22:00 UTC	$50,940.85
2026-09-27 23:00 UTC	$89,785.92
2026-09-28 00:00 UTC	$102,181.33

A liquidity change compares the first and last samples, which may be less than 24 hours apart. USD liquidity also moves with asset prices, not only with deposits and withdrawals.

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

2026-09-28 00:16 UTCBuy · $61.343m98EH8L…4AnuVZWallet Em8J3gBW…sFECPF
2026-09-28 00:16 UTCBuy · $128.863K2SAhBq…VRCDANWallet Dqp1EsPR…vhRqFs
2026-09-28 00:16 UTCBuy · $0.016j38yu4F…7ranLoWallet J4TFUfpB…ZmQ2eQ
2026-09-28 00:16 UTCBuy · $0.025GKgHhQ9…Li7fVwWallet 6xPTkW7q…Yj1h7j
2026-09-28 00:16 UTCBuy · $0.024LuLCgQJ…iYUqXyWallet 7noAo98H…BMs3u1
2026-09-28 00:16 UTCBuy · $0.01PBEdyfYn…84CZ5HWallet ERbHKuEb…mp9AoB
2026-09-28 00:16 UTCBuy · $0.012ALvGYYJ…N3k5GYWallet DYwpdgAK…zYZBU4
2026-09-28 00:16 UTCBuy · $95.56Gc7KLvhD…xioECFWallet XbBFtWSM…qjyAuk
2026-09-28 00:16 UTCSell · $0.024TZYCKsH…gsftrJWallet CY3mYfJw…Yhfzu2
2026-09-28 00:16 UTCBuy · $7.983S8hNQrQ…uuxNgbWallet 3vNR8J8R…JeR5tK

Report snapshot

as of Sep 28, 12:17 AM UTC

FDV

$3,917,116

Liquidity

$102,181.00

Holders

2,696

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Pokémon (nheVhBEu7aQgtZLbtLkzvZEhhQh9fctKXWWFPd8pump) is a PumpSwap-listed Solana token that has spiked violently in the last 24 hours (+6545% per the reported window) on the back of a series of explosive hourly candles. Current price is ~$0.00394 with a $3.92M fully diluted valuation but only ~$102.18K of total liquidity — a large mismatch that makes the current pricing extremely fragile. 2,696 holder addresses are recorded, with the top 10 addresses controlling ~14.69% of supply per the current Codex snapshot; no holder history, wallet classification, or sniper coverage is available, so growth/accumulation claims cannot be made. Authority renouncement status (mint/freeze) is unknown because it was not provided, which is itself a material transparency gap for a token of this profile.

Key points

Extreme, likely unsustainable short-term price move (+6545% 24h, +171% in the last observed hour alone)
Thin liquidity ($102.18K) relative to a $3.92M FDV, implying high slippage and fragility for any meaningful size
No sniper data and no holder history available — concentration and early-buyer behavior cannot be verified over time
Top-10 holders control only ~14.69% of supply per the current snapshot, which is a comparatively low concentration reading, but it's a single point-in-time figure with no trend context
Mint/freeze authority status unknown — cannot confirm rug-pull protections are in place

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

The token just completed a parabolic run from ~$0.0000588 to ~$0.00394 within four hourly candles, each showing higher highs and higher lows with strong bodies (candle 1: O0.0000588→C0.000444; candle 2: O0.000444→C0.000987; candle 3: O0.000987→C0.00305; candle 4: O0.00305→C0.00394). This kind of vertical move on low liquidity ($102.18K) is prone to sharp mean-reversion or a rapid unwind once early buyers and any snipers begin taking profit. Short-term price action could continue upward on momentum/FOMO but is equally likely to see a fast retracement toward the most recent breakout candle's open.

Target low

$0.0025 (retest of candle 3 open/close zone)

Target high

$0.0055 (extension of the current parabolic move)

Support: $0.00302 (candle 4 low), $0.000987 (candle 2 close / candle 3 open), $0.000444 (candle 1 close / candle 2 open)
Resistance: $0.00394 (candle 4 high/current price, all-time high in the observed window), Psychological levels above current ATH are untested — no historical resistance data beyond this window

Medium term · 3-14 days

bearish

Tokens that experience this magnitude of vertical price expansion on a thin-liquidity PumpSwap pool historically tend to give back a large portion of gains once initial momentum fades, especially without confirmed liquidity locks, renounced authorities, or verified holder distribution trends. Absent additional catalysts (listings, sustained volume, verified tokenomics), the medium-term bias skews toward mean reversion.

Catalysts

Continued organic volume growth beyond the initial spike
Verification of mint/freeze authority renouncement (would reduce rug risk perception)
Liquidity depth increasing meaningfully beyond $102.18K
Any large holder distribution event (unverifiable currently but a key risk)

Confidence: low. Only 4 hourly candles and a single point-in-time holder/liquidity snapshot are available; there's no multi-day price history, no holder trend data, and no sniper data, making any medium-term directional call highly speculative.

Pokémon call history

Full track record →

Sep 28neutral@ $0.00394

24h—

7d—

30d-99.9%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: nheVhB...pump
Total Supply: 994,767,315.68 tokens (6 decimals)

Key Risks

Extreme, potentially unsustainable price spike (+6545% 24h) on very thin liquidity ($102.18K)
Large FDV-to-liquidity mismatch (~38x) creating high slippage and price-manipulation susceptibility
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or account-freezing risk
No sniper coverage or holder history available, preventing assessment of early-buyer dumping or organic holder growth

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 4 most recent hourly candles, price moved from an open of $0.0000587789 to a close of $0.00393774 — a roughly 67x move in 4 hours. Each candle shows a higher open, higher high, and higher close than the previous one, forming a textbook parabolic/vertical breakout pattern with minimal pullback (wicks to the downside are shallow relative to the candle bodies). Volume was heaviest on candle 1 ($395K) and candle 3 ($240K), while candle 4 (most recent) saw volume drop to $78.5K even as price still pushed to a new high — a potential early warning of waning participation at the top.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both short- and medium-term trend (within the observed 4-hour window) are sharply up, but this is a very short observation period following what looks like a fresh launch or re-pump; there is no multi-day trend data to confirm durability.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

56%

Sell

44%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00302 (candle 4 intraday low)

Major support

$0.000444 (candle 1 close, prior breakout level)

Immediate resistance

$0.00394 (current price / candle 4 high, session ATH)

Major resistance

Untested — no prior price history above current levels exists in the provided data

Because the entire observed price history spans just 4 hours of vertical expansion, all support levels are recent breakout points from the same move rather than tested, multi-touch levels. A break below $0.00302 would likely trigger a retest of $0.000987–$0.000444, unwinding much of the recent gain.

Notable patterns

Three consecutive full-bodied bullish (marubozu-like) candles with higher highs and higher lows — parabolic breakout pattern
Volume/price divergence on the most recent candle (price up, volume down) — possible exhaustion signal
No pullback or consolidation candles present in the sample, indicating an unconfirmed, unseasoned move

Liquidity

$102,181.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $102.18K against a $3.92M fully diluted valuation represents a roughly 38x FDV-to-liquidity ratio, indicating the pool is very thin relative to the token's implied market size. This makes the token highly susceptible to large slippage on even moderate-sized trades and to sharp price swings from relatively small capital flows — consistent with the extreme volatility already observed in the candle data. 24h buy volume ($453.54K) exceeds sell volume ($359.15K), producing a net inflow bias (55.8% buy / 44.2% sell), and unique buyers (2,688) vastly outnumber unique sellers (742), suggesting broad-based new buying interest. However, this imbalance is also typical of the early, hype-driven phase of a pump on a low-liquidity PumpSwap pair and does not guarantee durability.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

994,767,315.68 tokens (6 decimals)

FDV

$3.92M

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
Price moved roughly 67x within 4 observed hourly candles (+6545% 24h, +171% in the most recent hour), which is extreme volatility by any standard and indicates the token is in an unstable, likely unsustainable price-discovery phase.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity is only $102.18K against a $3.92M FDV, a ~38x gap. This shallow pool means large trades will incur significant slippage and the price can be moved substantially by relatively small buy or sell orders.
Concentrationunknown
Top-10 holders control ~14.69% of supply per a single current snapshot, but top-100 concentration, holder history, and wallet classification are all unavailable. Without trend data or fuller distribution context, true concentration risk cannot be reliably assessed and should not be treated as low simply because the single available figure looks moderate.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme, potentially unsustainable price spike (+6545% 24h) on very thin liquidity ($102.18K)
Large FDV-to-liquidity mismatch (~38x) creating high slippage and price-manipulation susceptibility
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or account-freezing risk
No sniper coverage or holder history available, preventing assessment of early-buyer dumping or organic holder growth
Declining volume on the most recent (highest) candle despite rising price — possible momentum exhaustion/top-forming signal
Token uses a well-known third-party brand name ('Pokémon'), a common pattern in speculative/meme-driven launches with no inherent utility or affiliation confirmed

Mitigating factors

24h buy volume ($453.54K) exceeds sell volume ($359.15K), and unique buyers (2,688) far outnumber unique sellers (742), indicating broad current demand rather than a single-wallet-driven pump
Top-10 concentration of ~14.69% is not, on its face, extreme relative to many newly launched tokens (though this cannot be confirmed as a durable or improving trend)

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand they may lose their entire position; not appropriate for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking capital preservation. Given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, and complete absence of sniper/holder-history data, position sizing should be minimal and treated as high-risk speculation, not investment.

This token presents a classic high-risk, momentum-driven speculative setup: a vertical, low-liquidity pump with strong near-term buyer participation but critical data gaps (authority status, sniper activity, holder history) that prevent confidence in durability. Any position should be treated as a short-term speculative trade rather than a fundamentals-based investment, given the near-total absence of verifiable tokenomics safeguards.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Momentum continues as new buyers pile in (2,688 unique buyers vs 742 sellers in 24h, 55.8% buy pressure), liquidity deepens as the pump attracts more capital, and the token sustains or extends its breakout above $0.00394, potentially retesting higher levels if volume reaccelerates.

Continued strong buyer-to-seller ratio (2,688 vs 742 in 24h)
Positive net volume flow (55.8% buy vs 44.2% sell)
Broader social/speculative attention given the recognizable 'Pokémon' branding drawing retail interest

Base Case

Price experiences elevated volatility with a likely partial retracement from the current all-time-high level as the initial pump cools, followed by a period of consolidation at a lower range while the market re-prices the token based on sustained (or waning) organic interest.

No major new liquidity injection occurs beyond the current $102.18K
No confirmation is obtained on mint/freeze authority status in the near term
Trading activity gradually normalizes from the current hype-driven extremes

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic move exhausts quickly — as hinted by declining volume on the most recent (highest) candle — and price retraces sharply toward earlier breakout levels ($0.000987–$0.000444) as early buyers and any undetected snipers take profit against the thin $102.18K liquidity pool.

Volume declining even as price climbed to new highs (exhaustion signal)
Extremely thin liquidity relative to FDV, magnifying downside moves from even modest selling
Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves rug-pull risk unquantified
No sniper/holder history data to confirm broad-based, durable ownership versus concentrated flippers

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 28, 12:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-28 00:16 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
PumpSwap pair price data
Hourly OHLC candle data (4 most recent candles)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
Unhosted holder aggregate snapshot (holder count, top-10 concentration)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Only 4 hourly candles were available, providing an extremely short price history insufficient for robust technical or trend analysis
No sniper data was available at all, preventing assessment of early-buyer/sniper concentration, PnL, or dumping risk
No holder history or wallet classification data was available, preventing any assessment of holder growth, accumulation, or distribution trends
Mint authority, freeze authority, verified-contract status, mutability, and update authority were all reported as unknown, leaving rug-pull risk unquantified
Top-100 holder concentration was not provided, limiting whale-distribution analysis to a top-10 figure only

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, incomplete on-chain data snapshots and untrusted, potentially adversarial token metadata. Cryptocurrency trading, especially in low-liquidity, high-volatility tokens like this one, carries substantial risk of total loss. Do your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Pokémon a scam?

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own. The trading looks automated. Checked Nov 10, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell Pokémon?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Nov 10, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

What is the short-term price outlook for Pokémon (Pokémon)?

Is Pokémon a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand they may lose their entire position; not appropriate for risk-averse investors or anyone seeking capital preservation. Given the shallow liquidity, unknown authority status, and complete absence of sniper/holder-history data, position sizing should be minimal and treated as high-risk speculation, not investment.

What are the key risks of holding Pokémon?

Extreme, potentially unsustainable price spike (+6545% 24h) on very thin liquidity ($102.18K) • Large FDV-to-liquidity mismatch (~38x) creating high slippage and price-manipulation susceptibility • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or account-freezing risk