layerbrett Price Today & AI Analysis

LBRETTSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 10, 2026

$0.0₅1967

Contract

Live

d2XfydZozkuUGRv9h8cjjvFdnaLcyBWQ7TTfG8ppump

Chain

Solana

Holders

Market cap

$1,966

At a $1M market cap, $LBRETT would be $0.001000 (509x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is LBRETT a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 24

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about LBRETT

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

ANSEMOTHYAnsemothy$0.0₅3393-2.3%MC $3.3K

MarioPixel Mario Coin$0.0₅3134+0.0%MC $3.1K

JesterJester$0.0₅2451+0.0%MC $2.5K

HOODRobinhood$0.0₅2326+0.0%MC $2.3K

DOPEDoge Pepe$0.0₅1919+0.0%MC $1.9K

BIRBMoonbirds$0.0865+4.5%MC $24.66M

layerbrett: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-10 08:17 UTC

Holder addresses

Not available

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$119,845.00

How concentrated is layerbrett ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling layerbrett?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is layerbrett liquidity falling?: As of 2026-09-10 08:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $119,845.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-10 08:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Sep 10, 08:17 AM UTC

FDV

$8,039,915

Liquidity

$119,845.00

Holders

Not available

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

LayerBrett (LBRETT) on Solana (mint d2XfydZozkuUGRv9h8cjjvFdnaLcyBWQ7TTfG8ppump) is a nascent PumpSwap-listed memecoin priced at $0.00804, up a claimed 18,764% in 24h with an FDV of ~$8.04M and just $119.84K total liquidity. The token exhibits classic extreme-early-stage pump-launch behavior: a massive single-hour candle spike (0.0000417 -> 0.00582 -> 0.00776 -> 0.00804), overwhelming buy pressure (95.4% buys vs 4.6% sells), and no holder or sniper data available to verify distribution safety. The description references an unrelated Ethereum L2 project and includes a separate 0x contract address, which is a red flag for either impersonation/branding confusion or a cross-chain wrapped/bridge narrative that could not be verified from the data provided.

Key points

Extremely thin liquidity ($119.84K) relative to $8.04M FDV creates high slippage and manipulation risk
24h price move of ~18,764% suggests this is minutes/hours old on PumpSwap, not an established token
Buy-dominated volume (95.4%/4.6%) with high buyer/seller counts (2,847 buyers vs 2,797 sellers) shows broad retail participation but no way to verify insider/sniper concentration
No holder distribution or sniper data available — a major transparency gap for risk assessment
Description mentions an Ethereum contract address distinct from the Solana mint, raising provenance/branding concerns

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 1-24 hours

neutral

Price has gone parabolic within the last 3 hourly candles (from ~$0.0000417 to ~$0.00804), an increase of roughly 19,000% intra-window. This pattern is typical of a fresh PumpSwap listing catching momentum buying. Given the extremely thin $119.84K liquidity pool, further short-term upside is possible on continued buy pressure, but a sharp reversal/correction is equally or more likely once early buyers or any large holder decides to take profit. 5m change is still positive (+1.05%) and 1h change is strongly positive (+32.5%), indicating momentum has not yet broken down as of the data snapshot.

Target low

$0.0045

Target high

$0.0110

Support: $0.00582 (candle 1 close / candle 2 open), $0.00776 (candle 2 close / candle 3 open)
Resistance: $0.00804 (candle 3 high, current ATH in dataset), $0.00900 (psychological/extension level)

Medium term · 3-14 days

bearish

Newly launched memecoins that spike >10,000% in hours on sub-$150K liquidity pools overwhelmingly mean-revert as early buyers and any concentrated holders realize profits. Without renounced-authority confirmation, holder distribution data, or sniper wallet visibility, the medium-term base case leans bearish/high-volatility rather than sustained uptrend.

Catalysts

Potential liquidity additions or LP burns that could stabilize price
Marketing pushes via listed Twitter/Telegram/website driving continued retail inflow
Broader memecoin market sentiment/rotation on Solana
Risk of large holder or team wallet dumping given no verified tokenomics safeguards

Bullish factors

Strong 24h buy pressure at 95.4% of volume
More unique buyers (2,847) than sellers (2,797) in the last 24h
Consistent higher-high, higher-close pattern across the 3 available candles
Active social presence (Twitter, Telegram, website) suggesting ongoing marketing

Bearish factors

Extremely low liquidity ($119.84K) versus $8.04M FDV creates high volatility and dump risk
No verifiable holder concentration or sniper data to rule out insider control
Price up ~18,764% in 24h is a hallmark of an unsustainable pump that often reverses sharply
Mint/freeze authority status and update authority are all unknown, leaving rug risk unverified
Token description references a mismatched Ethereum contract address, raising provenance/legitimacy questions

Confidence: low. Only 3 hourly candles are available, there is no holder or sniper data, and authority/renouncement status is unknown. The parabolic move and thin liquidity make any forecast highly speculative; confidence is therefore rated low.

LBRETT call history

Full track record →

Sep 10neutral@ $0.00804

24h—

7d—

30d-100.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: d2Xfyd...pump
Total Supply: 999,667,191.77 LBRETT

Key Risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($119.84K) relative to FDV ($8.04M), creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Parabolic ~18,764% 24h price gain is a classic pattern preceding sharp reversals in memecoins
No holder distribution, whale, or sniper data available to assess insider concentration or dump risk
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status leaves rug-pull and metadata-tampering risk unverified

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available (2026-09-10 06:00-08:00 UTC). Candle 1 opened at $0.0000417, spiked intra-candle to a high of $0.00582 and closed there — a massive bullish expansion candle likely marking the pool's launch/initial price discovery. Candle 2 opened at $0.00582, pushed to a high of $0.00777 and closed near the high at $0.00777, another strong bullish candle. Candle 3 opened at $0.00777, made a high of $0.00804 and low of $0.00777, closing near the top at $0.00804 — a smaller-bodied bullish candle showing continued but decelerating upward momentum. Volume fell sharply across the three candles (103.5K -> 23.7K -> 3.5K), suggesting the initial buying frenzy is cooling.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

All three available candles show consecutive higher highs, higher lows, and higher closes, confirming a strong short-term uptrend since pool inception. However, sharply declining volume on the most recent candle suggests the trend's momentum is fading and a pullback or consolidation could be imminent.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

95%

Sell

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00777 (candle 3 low / prior candle high)

Major support

$0.00582 (candle 1 high / candle 2 open)

Immediate resistance

$0.00804 (current all-time high in dataset)

Major resistance

$0.0100 (round-number extension, untested)

With only 3 candles of history, support levels are effectively the prior candle's high/open zones ($0.00777 and $0.00582), while resistance is simply the current high ($0.00804) since no prior distribution has occurred above this level. These levels are unproven and could break easily given the thin $119.84K liquidity.

Notable patterns

Three consecutive bullish candles with higher highs and higher closes (short-term uptrend)
Sharp volume decay across candles despite continued price appreciation (bearish divergence risk)
Parabolic single-candle spike from near-zero price on candle 1, characteristic of a fresh liquidity pool launch

Liquidity

$119,845.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $119.84K against an $8.04M FDV represents a very thin market (~1.5% liquidity-to-FDV ratio), meaning even moderate trade sizes can produce significant slippage and price impact. 24h buy volume ($114.13K) dwarfs sell volume ($5.53K), a 95.4%/4.6% split producing a strong net inflow, and buyer count (2,847) slightly exceeds seller count (2,797) — both signs of currently strong net demand. However, shallow liquidity means this buy-side dominance is also what is mechanically driving the extreme price appreciation, and the pool could be destabilized quickly by a moderate-sized sell order or liquidity removal.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,667,191.77 LBRETT

FDV

$8,039,915

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
24h price change of ~18,764% and hourly candles moving from $0.0000417 to $0.00804 (multiple hundred-percent hourly swings) indicate extreme volatility typical of a brand-new pump-launch token.
Liquidityhigh
Only $119.84K total liquidity against an $8.04M FDV means large trades or a liquidity pull could cause severe price impact or make exiting positions difficult.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extremely thin liquidity ($119.84K) relative to FDV ($8.04M), creating high slippage and manipulation potential
Parabolic ~18,764% 24h price gain is a classic pattern preceding sharp reversals in memecoins
No holder distribution, whale, or sniper data available to assess insider concentration or dump risk
Unknown mint/freeze/update authority status leaves rug-pull and metadata-tampering risk unverified
Mismatched branding referencing an Ethereum L2 contract address for a token trading on Solana, raising provenance concerns
Sharply decreasing hourly volume alongside continued price highs suggests weakening momentum and possible imminent pullback

Mitigating factors

Current 24h buy pressure is strongly positive at 95.4% of volume with more unique buyers than sellers
Active social presence (Twitter, Telegram, website) suggests an operating project team rather than a purely anonymous drop
Three consecutive bullish candles show organic-looking price discovery rather than an obvious single wash-trade spike

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand the risks of trading brand-new, thinly-liquid PumpSwap launches and can tolerate the possibility of total capital loss. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to monitor positions actively given the extreme volatility and shallow liquidity.

LBRETT is an extremely early-stage, high-volatility Solana memecoin trading on PumpSwap that has just experienced a massive parabolic price move on thin liquidity. The setup offers high theoretical upside if momentum and marketing continue, but carries very high risk due to missing holder/sniper transparency, unverified authority status, and a suspicious cross-chain branding inconsistency in its description.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued retail buying interest, sustained social media momentum, and potential liquidity growth push LBRETT higher as it gains attention as a fresh PumpSwap memecoin, with buy pressure (currently 95.4% of volume) continuing to outweigh sells.

Sustained buyer dominance (2,847 buyers vs 2,797 sellers in 24h)
Active social channels (Twitter, Telegram, website) enabling community-driven marketing
Possible viral/momentum trading effect common in early PumpSwap launches
Liquidity additions or LP locking that reduce slippage and attract larger buyers

Base Case

LBRETT experiences high volatility with an initial cooling-off period after its parabolic launch spike, trading choppily around the $0.006-$0.009 range as the market digests the initial pump before either finding a sustainable floor with organic volume or fading toward levels closer to its pre-spike pricing.

No major liquidity removal or authority-based rug event occurs in the near term
Buy/sell pressure normalizes closer to balanced as the initial hype cools
Volume continues to decay from its initial spike, consistent with the pattern already observed across the three available candles
Lack of holder/sniper transparency persists, keeping risk assessment conservative

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic 18,764% 24h move mean-reverts sharply as early buyers and any concentrated holders (unknown but plausible) take profits into the shallow $119.84K liquidity pool, causing a rapid price collapse.

Extremely thin liquidity relative to FDV amplifies downside price impact from even moderate sell orders
Rapidly decaying hourly volume (from $103.5K to $3.5K) despite price still rising, a bearish divergence
No visibility into holder concentration or sniper wallets to rule out coordinated dumping
Unknown/unverified mint and freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of supply inflation or account restrictions
Branding inconsistency (Ethereum contract reference for a Solana-listed token) raises legitimacy concerns that could trigger community distrust and selling

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 10, 08:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-10 08:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (mint d2XfydZozkuUGRv9h8cjjvFdnaLcyBWQ7TTfG8ppump)
PumpSwap pair pricing and trading analytics
Hourly OHLC candle data (3 most recent candles)
24h buy/sell volume and unique buyer/seller counts

Limitations

No holder distribution data available (holder endpoints retired/unavailable)
No sniper wallet data available for concentration or PnL analysis
Mint authority, freeze authority, and update authority status all unknown
Only 3 hourly candles provided, severely limiting technical analysis depth and pattern reliability
24h % price change figure (18,764%) implies the token/pool may be only hours old, making historical trend analysis unreliable
Description references a mismatched Ethereum contract address, which could not be verified or reconciled with the Solana mint address provided

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is generated from limited, incomplete on-chain data (no holder or sniper data, unknown authority status) for a token that appears to have launched very recently on PumpSwap. Cryptocurrency markets, and especially newly launched memecoins with shallow liquidity, carry extremely high risk including total loss of capital. All data points, including token descriptions and metadata, are provided by potentially adversarial or unverified sources and should not be treated as fact. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is layerbrett (LBRETT) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell layerbrett (LBRETT)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 24, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is layerbrett ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The holder count is also unavailable. A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling layerbrett?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is layerbrett liquidity falling?

As of 2026-09-10 08:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $119,845.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for layerbrett (LBRETT)?

Is LBRETT a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand the risks of trading brand-new, thinly-liquid PumpSwap launches and can tolerate the possibility of total capital loss. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to monitor positions actively given the extreme volatility and shallow liquidity.

What are the key risks of holding LBRETT?

Extremely thin liquidity ($119.84K) relative to FDV ($8.04M), creating high slippage and manipulation potential • Parabolic ~18,764% 24h price gain is a classic pattern preceding sharp reversals in memecoins • No holder distribution, whale, or sniper data available to assess insider concentration or dump risk