EYES

👀 Price Today & AI Analysis

EYESSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 26, 2026

Price

$0.000553

+1304.38% 24h

Contract

Live
ZrueWB1YvjruJpTGiJSYYfyuL71FZeeSUwJY1ZPeyes

Chain

Solana

Holders

296

Market cap

$539,615

More tokens on Solana

OTCOTCOTC$0.006416-32.7%MC $4.43M$PLAY$PLAYDoggies Play Play Play$0.002907+5583.5%MC $2.80Mparafactualparafactualparafactual$0.000732+706.6%MC $689.7KSHARTCOINSHARTCOINShartcoin$0.000919-69.1%MC $780.7KGILLGILLgill$0.047421+46.1%MC $72.9KTRUMPTRUMPOFFICIAL TRUMP$2.15+2.8%MC $2.15B

👀: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-26 20:45 UTC

Holder addresses

296

Top 10 supply share

27.84%

Reported liquidity

$99,067.00
How concentrated is 👀 ownership?
As of 2026-09-26 20:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 27.84% of supply. It reports 296 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling 👀?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 20:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $733,703.00 in buys and $631,003.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is 👀 liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +274.98%, from $33,999.28 (2026-09-25 21:00 UTC) to $127,490.40 (2026-09-26 20:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-26 20:45 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-25 21:00 UTC$33,999.28
2026-09-25 23:00 UTC$38,326.82
2026-09-26 00:00 UTC$38,334.86
2026-09-26 12:00 UTC$148,023.80
2026-09-26 13:00 UTC$136,652.35
2026-09-26 14:00 UTC$153,295.14
2026-09-26 15:00 UTC$153,452.29
2026-09-26 16:00 UTC$113,270.14
2026-09-26 17:00 UTC$107,311.71
2026-09-26 18:00 UTC$104,687.77
2026-09-26 19:00 UTC$114,426.53
2026-09-26 20:00 UTC$127,490.40

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about EYES

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 26, 08:46 PM UTC

FDV

$539,615

Liquidity

$99,067.00

Holders

296

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

EYES (👀) is a micro-cap token trading on Meteora DBC (dynamic bonding curve) with a mint of ZrueWB1YvjruJpTGiJSYYfyuL71FZeeSUwJY1ZPeyes. The token experienced an extreme parabolic move in the last 24h (+1304%), rocketing from ~$0.000039 to a peak near $0.00097 before retracing sharply to $0.000553. Liquidity is very thin ($99.07K) relative to a $539.6K FDV, and the token shows classic hallmarks of a freshly-launched, highly volatile bonding-curve asset with minimal track record (296 holder addresses, no verified authority status, no social links). The description embeds a 'Fomo verification' buy-gating mechanic until $10M FDV and a fee buyback/burn — these are creator-supplied claims that cannot be verified on-chain from the data provided and should be treated with caution.

Key points

  • Extreme 24h price move (+1304%) followed by a ~45% drawdown from intraday highs, indicating a pump-and-partial-dump pattern typical of new bonding-curve launches
  • Very shallow liquidity (~$99K) against a $539.6K FDV, meaning large trades can cause significant slippage
  • Only 296 holder addresses recorded with top-10 wallets controlling 27.84% of supply — no historical trend data available to assess whether this is improving or worsening
  • Mint/freeze authority status and sniper wallet data are entirely unavailable, leaving key rug-risk questions unanswered
  • Token description includes an unverifiable 'Fomo verification' gating mechanism and fee buyback/burn claim that cannot be confirmed on-chain from the data given

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24-48h

bearish

After an explosive +1304% 24h rally that peaked near $0.00097 (candle 18) and has since retraced to $0.000553, the token is showing classic post-pump exhaustion. The last few candles show lower highs and volume decay compared to the parabolic spike candles, suggesting sellers are taking profit. Short-term price action is likely to remain volatile with elevated downside risk unless fresh buy volume re-emerges.

Target low

$0.00035

Target high

$0.00075

Support

$0.000365 (candle 22 low), $0.000385 (pre-pump base from candles 1-15)

Resistance

$0.000805 (candle 19/20 high), $0.00097 (candle 18 high, session peak)

Medium term · 7-14d

neutral

Medium-term direction is highly uncertain given the token is only ~24h old in terms of active trading data. Sustained appreciation would require continued buy-side demand, growth in holder base beyond the current 296 addresses, and liquidity deepening beyond the current ~$99K. Absent that, mean-reversion toward pre-pump levels or further bleed-out is plausible.

Catalysts

  • Potential continuation of fee buyback/burn mechanic if genuine, which could create structural buy pressure
  • Further FOMO-driven retail inflows given social attention on parabolic movers
  • Risk of liquidity withdrawal or abandonment typical of low-liquidity bonding-curve tokens
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open a rug-pull risk that could invalidate any bullish scenario

Confidence: low. Only 24 hourly candles are available, most of the price history is flat/illiquid (candles 2-15 show zero volume), and the entire move happened within a ~9 hour window. There is no multi-day trend, no historical holder growth, no sniper data, and no confirmed authority settings — all of which severely limit forecasting reliability.

EYES call history

Full track record →

Sep 26bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
ZrueWB...eyes
Total Supply
976,220,688 EYES

Key Risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($99.07K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or wallet-freezing risk
  • Parabolic +1304% 24h move with signs of a blow-off top and ~50% intracandle reversal, indicating high risk of further mean reversion or continued volatility
  • Small holder base (296 addresses) with 27.84% held by top 10, and no historical data to assess whether concentration is worsening

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24h candle series shows a long flat/dead period (candles 1-15) with price pinned near $0.0000386-$0.0000491 and mostly zero volume, followed by a violent breakout candle 16 (12:00 UTC) that surged from $0.0000491 to a high of $0.00126 on volume of 728K — an order-of-magnitude volume spike versus prior candles. This was followed by continued elevated-volume candles (17-19) pushing to a local high of $0.000968 (candle 18) before a sharp reversal candle 20 that wicked down to $0.000394 (a near-50% intracandle drop), followed by consolidation in the $0.00037-$0.00055 range with declining volume, and a final green candle (24) closing at $0.000553.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Zooming out, the medium-term trend (from the flat base to now) is decisively up (+1304%), but the short-term trend over the last ~5 hours shows lower highs and a pullback from the $0.000805-$0.00097 zone, indicating short-term downward/consolidating momentum after the initial pump.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

54%

Sell

46%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000365-$0.000385

Major support

$0.0000386-$0.0000491 (pre-pump base)

Immediate resistance

$0.000805

Major resistance

$0.00097-$0.00126 (session/intracandle high)

The pre-pump flat base around $0.0000386-$0.0000491 represents a major support zone that would only be tested in a full round-trip reversal. Immediate support sits at $0.000365-$0.000385, tested multiple times in candles 21-23. Resistance is layered at $0.000805 (multiple candle highs) and the extreme wick high of $0.00126 in candle 16.

Notable patterns

  • Breakout candle with extreme volume spike (candle 16) after prolonged flat/no-volume base — typical of a bonding-curve token going live/getting discovered
  • Blow-off top / long upper wick reversal around candles 18-20 with a sharp ~50% intracandle drawdown, suggesting profit-taking exhaustion
  • Volume decay pattern (declining volume on subsequent candles) following the initial spike, consistent with fading momentum
  • Recent minor bullish reversal candle (24) with price and volume ticking back up, but on much lower volume than the initial pump

Liquidity

Liquidity

$99,067.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $99.07K is very thin relative to the $539.62K FDV and the enormous 24h trading volume ($733.7K buys + $631.0K sells = ~$1.36M total volume), implying liquidity has turned over roughly 13-14x in a single day. This is a strong signal of high volatility and slippage risk — trades of even modest size relative to the pool can move price significantly, as evidenced by the ~50% intracandle swings seen in the OHLC data. Net flow is modestly positive (53.8% buy vs 46.2% sell volume, 862 buyers vs 658 sellers), suggesting more net demand than supply over the day, but this is consistent with the token being in an active pump/retrace cycle rather than a stable liquidity environment.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

976,220,688 EYES

FDV

$539,615

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +1304% followed by an intracandle drawdown of nearly 50% (candle 20: high $0.000805 to low $0.000394) demonstrates extreme volatility. Momentum indicators show an overbought condition relative to the pre-pump base.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only ~$99.07K against ~$1.36M in 24h volume and a $539.62K FDV, meaning the pool is thin relative to trading activity, creating high slippage risk for any meaningfully-sized trade.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holder addresses control 27.84% of supply across only 296 total holder addresses. No top-100 concentration or historical distribution data is available, so the full concentration picture is incomplete; the risk level reflects the partial data available rather than a comprehensive assessment.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely thin liquidity ($99.07K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or wallet-freezing risk
  • Parabolic +1304% 24h move with signs of a blow-off top and ~50% intracandle reversal, indicating high risk of further mean reversion or continued volatility
  • Small holder base (296 addresses) with 27.84% held by top 10, and no historical data to assess whether concentration is worsening
  • No sniper data available to assess early-buyer dumping risk
  • Unverifiable creator claims in the token description ('Fomo verification' buy gating, fee buyback/burn) that cannot be confirmed on-chain from provided data and could be misleading marketing

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy volume ($733.70K) modestly exceeds sell volume ($631.00K), with more unique buyers (862) than sellers (658), suggesting net demand over the past day
  • Recent price action shows a minor bullish uptick (candle 24) after the sharp pullback, indicating some renewed buying interest
  • Trading activity (2,223 buys vs 1,243 sells) shows broad participation rather than a single dominant wallet driving volume

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand bonding-curve/micro-cap token dynamics and can tolerate total loss of capital. Not suitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking stable, predictable exposure, given the combination of unknown authority settings, shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and lack of verifiable holder history.

EYES is a newly-active, extremely volatile micro-cap token on Meteora's dynamic bonding curve that just experienced a violent +1304% 24h pump followed by a sharp partial reversal. The setup is characteristic of a high-risk speculative momentum play rather than a fundamentally-grounded investment: liquidity is shallow, authority/rug-risk data is entirely unverified, and holder history is unavailable. Any thesis here is short-term and speculative in nature.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If genuine organic demand continues (as suggested by 862 unique buyers vs 658 sellers and a slight net-positive volume split of 53.8%/46.2%), and if the claimed fee buyback/burn mechanism is real and structurally reduces float, the token could stabilize at a higher plateau than its pre-pump base and attract further speculative inflows riding the momentum and social attention around the parabolic move.

  • Sustained buy-side volume and growing unique buyer count
  • Verification (if it occurs) that mint/freeze authorities are renounced, reducing rug-pull fear
  • Continued social/FOMO attention on the token given its dramatic 24h move
  • If real, the buyback/burn mechanic reducing sell-side supply over time

Base Case

Price likely continues to consolidate in a wide range between the immediate support (~$0.000365-$0.000385) and resistance (~$0.000805) as the market digests the initial pump, with volatility remaining elevated and volume gradually normalizing lower absent a fresh catalyst.

  • No confirmation of rug/authority risk materializes in the near term
  • Liquidity remains roughly stable near current ~$99K levels
  • No major new holder or volume data emerges to shift the current concentrated/thin profile

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic pump was a classic low-liquidity bonding-curve spike that is already showing exhaustion (volume down ~95% from peak, price down ~40% from the session high). Without confirmed authority renouncement, and with such thin liquidity, the token faces meaningful risk of continued bleed-out, a liquidity pull, or a rug event, especially since none of the standard safety checks (mint/freeze authority, verification) could be confirmed.

  • Sharp volume decay following the initial pump, indicating fading momentum
  • Unconfirmed mint/freeze authority leaves open possibility of supply dilution or freezing
  • Thin liquidity ($99.07K) makes the token vulnerable to further violent drawdowns from moderate sell pressure
  • No historical holder or sniper data to rule out early-buyer dumping
  • Unverifiable marketing claims in the token description (buyback/burn, FOMO-gated buys) raise manipulation concerns

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 26, 08:46 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-26 20:45 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain price/OHLC candle data (Meteora DBC pair BkYnXoVkNXQxSBKF3R7nRADoiTPZaWotUp1NhWRm15j7)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % changes)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Token metadata (supply, FDV, description) — treated as untrusted/unverified creator-supplied data

Limitations

  • No sniper wallet data available — sniper concentration, PnL, and dump risk could not be assessed
  • No historical holder count data (only current snapshot of 296 addresses) — growth trends and correlation with price could not be computed
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, and contract verification status are all unknown — rug risk from authorities could not be assessed
  • No top-100 holder concentration or wallet classification data — whale behavior (accumulation vs distribution) could not be determined
  • Only 24 hourly candles available, with most of the early period showing zero trading volume, limiting the depth of technical trend analysis
  • Token description contains unverifiable claims (buyback/burn mechanism, FOMO-gated buying) that could not be validated against on-chain mechanics

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (authority status, sniper data, holder history). Cryptocurrency investments, especially in low-liquidity micro-cap tokens, carry substantial risk of loss, including total loss of capital. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is 👀 ownership?

As of 2026-09-26 20:45 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 27.84% of supply. It reports 296 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling 👀?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-26 20:45 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $733,703.00 in buys and $631,003.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is 👀 liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +274.98%, from $33,999.28 (2026-09-25 21:00 UTC) to $127,490.40 (2026-09-26 20:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for 👀 (EYES)?

After an explosive +1304% 24h rally that peaked near $0.00097 (candle 18) and has since retraced to $0.000553, the token is showing classic post-pump exhaustion. The last few candles show lower highs and volume decay compared to the parabolic spike candles, suggesting sellers are taking profit. Short-term price action is likely to remain volatile with elevated downside risk unless fresh buy volume re-emerges. Short-term outlook is bearish (24-48h), with a target range of $0.00035 to $0.00075.

Is EYES a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 85/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand bonding-curve/micro-cap token dynamics and can tolerate total loss of capital. Not suitable for risk-averse investors or those seeking stable, predictable exposure, given the combination of unknown authority settings, shallow liquidity, extreme volatility, and lack of verifiable holder history.

What are the key risks of holding EYES?

Extremely thin liquidity ($99.07K) relative to trading volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Unverified/unknown mint and freeze authority status — cannot rule out supply inflation or wallet-freezing risk • Parabolic +1304% 24h move with signs of a blow-off top and ~50% intracandle reversal, indicating high risk of further mean reversion or continued volatility

← Back to all predictions

Track EYES