Z

zagentic Price Prediction 2026

Z
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 4, 2026

RRWCLy2ddJzSC7B5wfBEAvEDRtpt8DphkZGYnKJpump

$0.041263

-0.01%

FDV $12,630

LiveContract:RRWCLy2ddJzSC7B5wfBEAvEDRtpt8DphkZGYnKJpumpChain:SolanaHolders:117Market cap:$12,630

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Z

Report snapshotas of Jul 4, 01:17 PM
FDV

$0

Liquidity

$54,022

Holders

442

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

zagentic (Z) is a micro-cap Solana token (mint: RRWCLy2ddJzSC7B5wfBEAvEDRtpt8DphkZGYnKJpump) trading on PumpSwap with a fully diluted valuation of ~$199K and only $54K in liquidity. The token exhibits extreme sell pressure (87.2% sell volume in 24h), a total supply of 1 (likely a fractional/NFT-style token or a display artifact), zero verified contract status, mutable metadata, and unknown update authority — all significant red flags. Holder count surged from 26 to 442 in the last 24 hours, coinciding with a ~95% price spike, but the price is already reversing sharply (-52.8% in the last hour). The data profile is consistent with a pump-and-dump or highly speculative micro-cap launch.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Total supply reported as 1 with 0 decimals — highly unusual tokenomics, possibly a display artifact or fractional NFT-style structure
Holder count exploded from 26 to 442 (+94%) in a single day, suggesting a coordinated pump event
87.2% sell pressure vs 12.8% buy pressure in 24h — overwhelming distribution phase
Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk is elevated
No top holder data available, no sniper data, and supply concentration reported as 0% — data gaps prevent full risk assessment

Price Prediction

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–24 hours

Price is in sharp decline after a ~95% pump. The most recent hourly candle shows a -52.8% drop from open to current levels. With 87.2% sell volume, 4,061 sells vs 708 buys, and 1,368 sellers vs 242 buyers in 24h, the distribution phase is dominant. A continued retracement toward the pre-pump range (~$0.000038–$0.000050) is the most probable short-term outcome.

Target low$0.000038
Target high$0.000132
Support: $0.000087 (candle [2] low), $0.000038 (candle [1] open / candle [3] open and low)
Resistance: $0.000116 (candle [1] high / candle [2] open), $0.000132 (candle [3] high)

Medium term

bearish
1–30 days

The token spent 30 days with only 26 holders and zero price movement before a sudden pump. Without sustained organic demand, new utility, or community growth, the medium-term outlook is bearish. Mutable metadata and unknown authority add structural risk of a rug or abandonment.

Catalysts
  • Any new exchange listing or viral social media attention could temporarily revive price
  • Clarification of tokenomics (supply = 1 anomaly) could either reassure or further alarm the market
  • Sustained holder growth above 500+ with genuine buy pressure would be a prerequisite for recovery

Bullish factors

  • 24h price change of +94.97% demonstrates the token can attract speculative interest rapidly
  • Holder count grew from 26 to 442 (+94%) in 24h, showing some market awareness
  • Trading on PumpSwap with an active pair suggests some infrastructure is in place

Bearish factors

  • 87.2% sell pressure — overwhelming distribution vs accumulation
  • 4,061 sells vs 708 buys in 24h — sellers outnumber buyers ~5.7:1
  • Price already down -52.8% in the last hour from the pump peak
  • Only $54K total liquidity — extremely shallow, high slippage risk
  • 30 days of complete stagnation (26 holders, zero movement) before the pump
  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — rug risk
  • No verified contract, no description, anomalous total supply of 1
  • Top holder data unavailable — concentration risk cannot be assessed
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to missing top holder data, no sniper data, unknown update authority, anomalous total supply of 1, and only 3 hourly OHLC candles available. The token's history is extremely short and data gaps are significant.

Z call history

Full track record →
Jul 4bearish
24h-88.2%
7d-92.3%
30d-93.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Deep Analysis

Only 3 hourly candles are available. Candle [3] (11:00 UTC): O=$0.0000385, H=$0.0001317, L=$0.0000385, C=$0.0001023 — a strong bullish candle with a long upper wick, suggesting initial pump with partial rejection. Candle [2] (12:00 UTC): O=$0.0001157, H=$0.0001157, L=$0.0000878, C=$0.0000385 — a strong bearish candle (close well below open), indicating aggressive selling; the high equals the open, suggesting immediate sell pressure from the open. Candle [1] (13:00 UTC): O=$0.0000385, H=$0.0001157, L=$0.0001890, C=$0.0001157 — NOTE: the Low ($0.0001890) is higher than the High ($0.0001157) in the raw data, which is a data anomaly likely indicating a data feed error; this candle should be interpreted with caution. Overall pattern: pump followed by sharp reversal, consistent with a classic pump-and-dump candle structure.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 13%Sell 87%

Short-term trend is clearly bearish following the pump peak. The medium-term (30-day) trend is effectively sideways/flat given 30 days of zero movement prior to the pump event.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000087 (candle [2] low)
Major$0.000038 (candle [3] open/low and candle [1] open — pre-pump base)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000116 (candle [2] open / candle [1] close)
Major$0.000132 (candle [3] high — pump peak)

The pre-pump base around $0.000038 represents the strongest support level, as the token traded near this level before the pump. The pump high of ~$0.000132 is now major resistance. The $0.000087–$0.000116 zone is a key battleground between buyers and sellers.

Notable patterns

  • Pump-and-dump candle structure: strong bullish candle followed immediately by a bearish engulfing/reversal candle
  • Long upper wick on candle [3] indicating rejection at highs (~$0.000132)
  • Candle [2] closes near the open of candle [3], erasing the pump gains rapidly
  • Data anomaly in candle [1]: Low > High, suggesting a possible data feed error for the most recent candle
  • Volume spike on sell candle [2] ($271K) vs low volume on candle [1] ($15.7K) — classic distribution pattern

Total holders442
24h Δ+94
7d Δ+94
30d Δ+94
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

The holder count explosion from 26 to 442 (+416 holders, +94%) occurred simultaneously with the ~95% price pump on 2026-07-04. This strong positive correlation suggests the price pump attracted new buyers, but the overwhelming sell pressure (87.2%) indicates many of these new holders may already be underwater or selling. The 30-day historical data shows zero holder growth from 2026-06-04 to 2026-07-03 (flat at 26 holders), making the sudden 24h surge highly suspicious.

Holder growth is technically 'growing' and 'accelerating' in the 24h window, but this is entirely driven by a single pump event. The 30-day historical series shows the token was completely dormant with exactly 26 holders for the entire period from June 4 to July 3, 2026 — zero net change across 30 consecutive days. The sudden addition of 416 holders in one day is anomalous and consistent with a coordinated pump event rather than organic growth. The -41 holder drop in the last hour (-9.3%) suggests the new holders are already exiting.

Top 10 hold0.00%
Top 100 hold0.00%
Sentiment
Distributing

Notable holders

N/A

No top holder data available — data source returned empty results

0.00%

Top holder data is entirely unavailable for this token. The supply concentration metrics report 0% for both top 10 and top 100, which is almost certainly a data artifact rather than a genuine reflection of distribution — a total supply of 1 with 0 decimals makes standard concentration metrics meaningless. Given the total supply of 1 (indivisible), the token structure is highly unusual. The overwhelming sell pressure (87.2% of 24h volume) and 5.7:1 seller-to-buyer ratio strongly imply that whoever holds the majority of supply (or equivalent value) is distributing. Distribution health is classified as 'very_concentrated' due to the anomalous supply structure and data gaps, not confirmed equal distribution.

Liquidity$54,020
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$42,140
Sell$287,870
Net flow
outflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers242
Unique sellers1,368

Liquidity is extremely shallow at $54K against a $199K FDV — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~27%, which is low for a healthy market. With $287.87K in sell volume against only $42.14K in buy volume, there is a massive net outflow of approximately $245.7K in 24h. The 1,368 unique sellers vs 242 unique buyers (5.7:1 ratio) confirms the market is in a distribution/dump phase. High slippage risk is expected for any trade above a few hundred dollars given the $54K liquidity pool. The pair trades on PumpSwap (pair: 9TkhYbFUqnTFpEwRRDEugWJ7FzS6qfWBLqd1xn4aLvsv), which is a permissionless AMM — no market maker support. The 5m price change of -25.6% and 1h change of -52.8% confirm rapid price deterioration.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply1 (0 decimals — anomalous; likely a display artifact or non-standard token structure)
FDV$199,490

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

The tokenomics of zagentic (Z) are deeply anomalous. The total supply is reported as 1 with 0 decimals, which is extremely unusual for a fungible token — this could indicate a data display error, a non-standard token structure, or a deliberate obfuscation. The FDV is reported as $199.49K at the current price of ~$0.000199, which implies the actual circulating supply is much larger than '1' (likely 1,000,000,000 or similar, with the '1' being a formatting artifact). The update authority is listed as 'unknown' and the metadata is mutable — this means the token creator could potentially alter token metadata at any time, representing a significant rug risk. Neither mint authority nor freeze authority status can be confirmed from the available data, so both are marked 'unknown'. The contract is unverified and has no description. The combination of mutable metadata, unknown authority, and unverified contract results in a HIGH rug risk from authorities assessment.

Volatility
high

Price surged ~95% in 24h and has already reversed -52.8% in 1h. Extreme intraday volatility with a 5m drop of -25.6%. The token can lose the majority of its value within hours.

Liquidity
high

Only $54K in total liquidity against $199K FDV. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will cause significant slippage. The liquidity pool on PumpSwap is permissionless and can be removed at any time.

Concentration
high

Top holder data is unavailable. The anomalous total supply of 1 (0 decimals) makes concentration analysis impossible. The 30-day dormant period with only 26 holders suggests extreme early concentration before the pump.

SniperDump
high

No sniper data available, but the trading pattern — 87.2% sell pressure, 4,061 sells vs 708 buys, and a 30-day dormant period followed by a sudden pump — is consistent with early holders using the pump as an exit liquidity event.

Authority
high

Update authority is 'unknown', metadata is mutable, contract is unverified, mint and freeze authority status cannot be confirmed. This combination represents maximum authority risk — the token creator could modify metadata, mint new tokens, or freeze accounts without warning.

Key risks

  • Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation
  • Anomalous total supply of 1 (0 decimals) — possible data obfuscation or non-standard structure
  • 87.2% sell pressure and 5.7:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — active distribution/dump phase
  • Only $54K liquidity — extremely high slippage, exit liquidity risk
  • 30 days of complete dormancy (26 holders) followed by sudden pump — classic pump-and-dump pattern
  • No top holder data — concentration risk cannot be assessed
  • Price already down -52.8% in 1h from pump peak — rapid value destruction
  • Unverified contract, no description, minimal social presence

Mitigating factors

  • Token is listed as 'possible spam: false' by the data provider
  • Active trading pair exists on PumpSwap with real volume ($330K in 24h)
  • Some social links present (Twitter, Moralis) suggesting minimal community presence
  • Holder count grew to 442, indicating some market awareness
Suitable for: This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for total loss. The risk profile is consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme.

zagentic (Z) presents an extremely high-risk speculative profile with multiple red flags consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme. The token spent 30 days completely dormant with 26 holders before a sudden ~95% price pump accompanied by 87.2% sell pressure. The combination of mutable metadata, unknown authority, anomalous tokenomics, shallow liquidity, and overwhelming distribution makes this token unsuitable for investment. Any thesis for participation is purely speculative and carries near-total loss risk.

Bull case (low)

The pump attracts sustained attention, new buyers absorb the sell pressure, and the token finds a higher base. If the project reveals utility or a community forms organically, the token could stabilize and recover.

  • Viral social media attention driving sustained new buyer inflow
  • Revelation of genuine utility or project roadmap
  • Sell pressure exhaustion allowing price stabilization above $0.000087
  • Liquidity deepening through additional LP provision

Base case

Price continues to decline from the pump peak, stabilizing somewhere in the $0.000038–$0.000087 range as sell pressure exhausts. The token remains a low-liquidity micro-cap with minimal trading activity, similar to its pre-pump state.

  • Sell pressure gradually exhausts as early holders finish distributing
  • No rug pull or liquidity removal occurs
  • A small residual community of ~50–100 holders remains
  • Price finds support near the pre-pump base of ~$0.000038
  • No new catalysts emerge to drive sustained demand

Bear case (high)

Early holders continue distributing, price returns to pre-pump levels (~$0.000038) or lower, liquidity is removed, and the token becomes illiquid or abandoned. Mutable metadata could be exploited for a rug pull.

  • Continued 87%+ sell pressure exhausting buy-side liquidity
  • Liquidity pool removal by the deployer
  • Metadata mutation or authority exploit
  • New holders realizing losses and exiting, accelerating the decline
  • 30-day dormancy pattern suggesting no organic community or utility

GeneratedJul 4, 01:17 PM
Data freshnessData reflects on-chain state as of approximately 2026-07-04T13:00 UTC. Price data may be minutes old. OHLC data covers only the last 3 hours.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain metadata (Solana blockchain via Moralis API)
  • Price feed (PumpSwap pair 9TkhYbFUqnTFpEwRRDEugWJ7FzS6qfWBLqd1xn4aLvsv)
  • OHLC candles (hourly, 3 candles available)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts)
  • Holder metrics (total holders, acquisition method, distribution)
  • Historical holder series (30-day daily snapshots)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

  • Only 3 hourly OHLC candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
  • Top holder data is entirely unavailable — whale concentration cannot be assessed
  • Sniper data is unavailable — smart money signals are inferred from trading analytics only
  • Total supply of 1 (0 decimals) is anomalous and may indicate a data display error — tokenomics analysis is uncertain
  • Update authority is 'unknown' — authority risk cannot be fully characterized
  • Candle [1] contains a data anomaly (Low > High) suggesting a possible data feed error
  • No historical price data beyond 3 hours — medium-term technical analysis relies on holder history only
  • The 6h and 24h price change figures show 0% which conflicts with other data points, suggesting a data reporting artifact

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry extreme risk, including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in this token. Always conduct your own due diligence before making any investment decision. This token exhibits multiple characteristics consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply1 (0 decimals — anomalous; likely a display artifact or non-standard token structure)

Key Risks

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation
Anomalous total supply of 1 (0 decimals) — possible data obfuscation or non-standard structure
87.2% sell pressure and 5.7:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — active distribution/dump phase
Only $54K liquidity — extremely high slippage, exit liquidity risk

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No sniper data is available for this token. Smart money signals cannot be derived from sniper activity. However, the trading analytics paint a clear picture: 4,061 sells vs 708 buys, 1,368 unique sellers vs 242 unique buyers in 24h. This overwhelming sell-side dominance suggests early holders (whoever acquired the token during the 30-day dormant period with only 26 holders) are aggressively distributing into the pump-driven demand.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

No sniper data available — endpoint returned no results. Sniper concentration cannot be assessed.

Early buyers (the 26 holders present during the 30-day dormant period) are likely distributing aggressively given the 87.2% sell pressure and 5.7:1 seller-to-buyer ratio. The pump appears to have been used as an exit liquidity event.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price prediction for zagentic (Z)?

Price is in sharp decline after a ~95% pump. The most recent hourly candle shows a -52.8% drop from open to current levels. With 87.2% sell volume, 4,061 sells vs 708 buys, and 1,368 sellers vs 242 buyers in 24h, the distribution phase is dominant. A continued retracement toward the pre-pump range (~$0.000038–$0.000050) is the most probable short-term outcome. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–24 hours), with a target range of $0.000038 to $0.000132.

Is Z a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone not prepared for total loss. The risk profile is consistent with a pump-and-dump scheme.

How are Z holders trending?

zagentic currently has 442 holders and is growing (24h: 94, 7d: 94, 30d: 94). Holder growth is technically 'growing' and 'accelerating' in the 24h window, but this is entirely driven by a single pump event. The 30-day historical series shows the token was completely dormant with exactly 26 holders for the entire period from June 4 to July 3, 2026 — zero net change across 30 consecutive days. The sudden addition of 416 holders in one day is anomalous and consistent with a coordinated pump event rather than organic growth. The -41 holder drop in the last hour (-9.3%) suggests the new holders are already exiting.

What does sniper activity look like for Z?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding Z?

Mutable metadata with unknown update authority — potential for rug pull or metadata manipulation • Anomalous total supply of 1 (0 decimals) — possible data obfuscation or non-standard structure • 87.2% sell pressure and 5.7:1 seller-to-buyer ratio — active distribution/dump phase

Track Z