bukangi

부캉이 busan shark Price Today & AI Analysis

bukangiSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 27, 2026

Price

$0.000770

+1122.39% 24h

Contract

Live
3iUTyNYW6xKv5kZUjtbrEDTsuJTrSVwvB3bQtxkLpump

Chain

Holders

1,680

Market cap

$751,414

More tokens on Solana

부캉이 busan shark: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-27 15:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,680

Top 10 supply share

20.68%

Reported liquidity

$46,945.00
How concentrated is 부캉이 busan shark ownership?
As of 2026-09-27 15:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 20.68% of supply. It reports 1,680 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling 부캉이 busan shark?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-27 15:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $642,510.00 in buys and $611,962.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is 부캉이 busan shark liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +1352.46%, from $3,400.16 (2026-09-26 16:00 UTC) to $49,385.95 (2026-09-27 15:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-27 15:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-26 16:00 UTC$3,400.16
2026-09-27 08:00 UTC$4,017.99
2026-09-27 09:00 UTC$3,878.85
2026-09-27 10:00 UTC$3,867.92
2026-09-27 11:00 UTC$4,128.42
2026-09-27 12:00 UTC$4,135.15
2026-09-27 13:00 UTC$19,361.30
2026-09-27 14:00 UTC$46,340.26
2026-09-27 15:00 UTC$49,385.95

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about bukangi

Continue in chat

Report snapshot

as of Sep 27, 03:16 PM UTC

FDV

$751,414

Liquidity

$46,945.00

Holders

1,680

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Neutral

Bukangi ('부캉이 busan shark') is a Solana meme/mascot token trading on PumpSwap that surged approximately +1122% in the past 24 hours, driven by a parabolic blow-off-top candle following an extended dormant, zero-volume period. It currently trades at $0.00077 with a $751.41K fully diluted valuation, backed by only $46.95K in liquidity, and has already shown a ~46% pullback from its intracandle peak in the most recent hourly candle. Key due-diligence data — mint/freeze authority status, sniper wallet activity, and holder history — are all unavailable, leaving significant blind spots.

Key points

  • Extreme, recent (last ~8 hours) parabolic price move from near-flatline to a ~89x intracandle spike, now retracing
  • Very shallow liquidity ($46.95K) relative to trading volume (>$1.25M/24h) and FDV ($751.41K), creating high slippage and manipulation potential
  • Complete absence of sniper wallet data and holder-history data, and unknown mint/freeze authority status, leaving major due-diligence gaps
  • Roughly balanced 24h buy/sell volume (51.2%/48.8%) with a large, active base of unique buyers (3,256) and sellers (2,580)
  • Distinctive real-world viral narrative (a shark that entered Busan port, inspiring tourism mascot plans) differentiating it narratively from generic meme tokens, though this does not offset the on-chain risk factors

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-48 hours

neutral

Given the extreme volatility, blow-off-top pattern, and shallow liquidity, short-term price action is likely to remain highly choppy with a bias toward further downside testing of recent support unless fresh buying momentum returns. The token could retest either the $0.000462 support or attempt a reclaim of the $0.000861 high, but sustained continuation without new catalysts is uncertain.

Target low

$0.00013 (retest of pre-spike breakout origin)

Target high

$0.00086 (retest of intracandle ATH)

Support

$0.000462 (last hourly low), $0.000127-0.000138 (pre-spike breakout zone)

Resistance

$0.000807 (recent secondary high), $0.000861 (intracandle all-time high)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

bearish

Absent a durable catalyst (real tourism/mascot developments, exchange listings, or sustained social virality), meme tokens that spike this violently on thin liquidity typically mean-revert substantially over the following days to weeks as early buyers and any insiders take profit. Medium-term trajectory is more likely to trend down from current elevated levels rather than sustain the parabolic gain.

Catalysts

  • Potential follow-through social virality tied to the 'Busan shark' story or tourism mascot plans
  • Liquidity providers adding depth to the PumpSwap pool, which could reduce volatility either direction
  • Broader Solana meme-coin market sentiment/liquidity conditions

Bullish factors

  • Strong recent volume surge and broad buyer participation (3,256 unique buyers in 24h)
  • Distinctive, memorable viral mascot narrative with potential tourism tie-in
  • Roughly balanced buy/sell volume split (51.2%/48.8%) rather than one-sided selling

Bearish factors

  • Classic blow-off-top candle pattern with ~46% pullback already visible in the most recent hourly candle
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($46.95K) relative to FDV ($751.41K) and volume, making sustained price support unlikely
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority and verification status add unquantified rug/dilution risk
  • No sniper/holder history data to rule out coordinated early-buyer dumping

Confidence: low. Confidence is low because the analysis relies on a single day of OHLC data dominated by an extreme, likely unsustainable parabolic move, with no historical holder trend data, no sniper wallet visibility, and unknown mint/freeze authority status. These missing pieces of on-chain due diligence make it difficult to confidently project price direction beyond generic mean-reversion patterns typical of meme-token spikes.

bukangi call history

Full track record →

Sep 27neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
3iUTyN...pump
Total Supply
976,495,104.48

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($46.95K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Parabolic +1122% 24h move with a blow-off-top candle pattern and subsequent ~46% pullback, suggesting the pump may already be reversing
  • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanisms like supply inflation
  • No sniper or holder-history data available, removing visibility into early-buyer behavior and concentration trends

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24h hourly candle set shows an extended flat/dead period (hours 1-16) trading in an extremely tight range around $0.00000448, with zero volume for ~14 consecutive hours — indicative of an illiquid, dormant pair. Starting at hour 17 (08:00 UTC), volume and price began to surge: candle 17 spiked to a high of $0.0000094 on volume of 3,344, then candle 20 spiked to $0.0000158 high on 14,333 volume. The most dramatic move occurs in candles 22-24, where price exploded from an open of $0.00000965 (candle 22) to an intracandle high of $0.000861 (candle 23) on volume of 1.2M — an approximate 89x move within a single hour — before pulling back to close near $0.00077 in the final candle. This is a textbook parabolic pump candle with a long upper wick, followed by a significant retracement (candle 24 low of $0.000462, roughly 46% down from the candle 23 high), indicating aggressive profit-taking after the spike.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Uptrend

Both short-term (last few hours) and medium-term (24h) trends are sharply up given the token went from near-zero price action to a ~1122% 24h gain, but the trend is extremely volatile and punctuated by a violent post-spike pullback in the most recent candle, so 'uptrend' here reflects net direction rather than stability.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000462 (candle 24 intracandle low)

Major support

$0.000127 (candle 23 open/candle low region)

Immediate resistance

$0.000861 (candle 23 high, all-time high in this window)

Major resistance

$0.000807 (candle 24 high, secondary peak just below ATH)

The token spiked to an intracandle ATH of $0.000861 before retracing over 40% within the same look-back window. Immediate support sits at the most recent hourly low of $0.000462; a break below that could see a retest of the $0.000127-0.000138 zone where the parabolic move originated. Immediate resistance is the recent high near $0.000861/$0.000807; a reclaim of that zone would be needed to confirm continuation rather than a blow-off top.

Notable patterns

  • Long dead/flat period with zero volume for ~14 hours followed by a volume explosion (dormancy-to-parabolic transition)
  • Parabolic 'blow-off top' candle (candle 23) with an extremely long upper wick relative to body
  • Sharp reversal/rejection candle after the peak (candle 24 low is ~46% below the candle 23 high) suggesting profit-taking or exhaustion
  • High volume-to-liquidity ratio consistent with a low-float pump.fun-style pump-and-dump pattern

Liquidity

Liquidity

$46,945.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of just $46.95K is extremely shallow relative to the 24h trading volume of over $1.25M combined (buy+sell), implying the pool has likely turned over 25x+ in a day — a classic signature of a low-liquidity PumpSwap pair experiencing a violent pump. Buy volume ($642.51K, 51.2%) slightly exceeds sell volume ($611.96K, 48.8%), producing a marginal net inflow, but the split is close to balanced, suggesting two-sided, high-velocity trading rather than one-directional accumulation. With only ~$47K of liquidity backing a ~$751K FDV, any moderately sized trade (a few thousand dollars) could move price substantially, so slippage risk is high and the price action seen in the candles (huge wicks, multi-hundred-percent hourly moves) is consistent with this shallow depth.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

976,495,104.48

FDV

$751.41K

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +1122% with an intra-day intracandle move of roughly 89x in a single hour, followed by a ~46% retracement from the peak in the very next candle. This is extreme, exchange-defying volatility typical of freshly pumped micro-cap meme tokens.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity is only $46.95K against a 24h combined trading volume of over $1.25M and an FDV of $751.41K. This shallow pool means large trades can cause severe slippage and the price is highly manipulable with modest capital.

  • Concentrationunknown

    Only a top-10 concentration figure (20.68%) from a single snapshot is available; there is no top-100 concentration, no wallet labeling, and no historical holder data, so the true concentration risk (e.g., whether top holders are team/insiders vs. exchanges/LPs) cannot be determined and should not be assumed low.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($46.95K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk
  • Parabolic +1122% 24h move with a blow-off-top candle pattern and subsequent ~46% pullback, suggesting the pump may already be reversing
  • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanisms like supply inflation
  • No sniper or holder-history data available, removing visibility into early-buyer behavior and concentration trends
  • Meme/novelty token (viral shark mascot) with no described utility beyond narrative/tourism appeal, typical of speculative pump.fun-style launches
  • Top-10 holders control 20.68% of supply with no context on wallet identity (team, exchange, LP, or independent whales)

Mitigating factors

  • 24h buy/sell volume is roughly balanced (51.2%/48.8%), indicating broad two-sided participation (3,256 buyers vs 2,580 sellers) rather than a single entity dumping on retail
  • A relatively large, non-trivial holder base of 1,680 addresses at this snapshot, suggesting some distribution beyond a handful of wallets (though composition is unverified)

Suitable for

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand meme-coin/pump.fun-style dynamics and can tolerate total loss of capital. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to actively monitor an extremely volatile, thinly-liquid position. Given unknown mint/freeze authority status and the absence of sniper/holder-history data, standard due diligence checks could not be completed.

Bukangi is a Korean meme/mascot token (viral 'Busan shark') that experienced an explosive +1122% 24h price move on PumpSwap, driven by a sudden shift from a dormant, zero-volume order book to a parabolic spike followed by partial retracement. The setup carries classic pump.fun-style hallmarks: shallow liquidity ($46.95K) against a $751K FDV, unverifiable mint/freeze authority status, and no sniper or holder-history visibility. Trading remains highly two-sided (51.2%/48.8% buy/sell split), suggesting active retail participation rather than a single orchestrated dump, but the blow-off-top candle and subsequent pullback raise real concerns about sustainability.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued viral/narrative momentum around the 'Busan shark' mascot story (potential tourism angle) draws sustained social attention and new buyers, allowing the token to consolidate gains and attract deeper liquidity providers, stabilizing above prior support levels.

  • Ongoing viral social media attention could keep attracting new buyers (3,256 unique buyers in 24h already)
  • A local tourism/mascot narrative offers a distinct, memorable story vs generic meme tokens, aiding virality
  • Balanced buy/sell flow (51.2% buys) shows the pump wasn't driven by pure one-sided speculation alone

Base Case

High volatility persists in the near term as the token searches for a stable trading range well below the intraday peak; price likely oscillates between the recent support ($0.000462) and resistance ($0.000861) zones as speculative interest cools from its initial frenzy.

  • No major new catalyst emerges beyond the initial viral spike
  • Liquidity remains thin, keeping volatility elevated in both directions
  • Buy/sell flow stays roughly balanced rather than turning decisively one-sided

Bear Case

High probability

The parabolic spike proves to be a classic blow-off top; profit-taking accelerates, liquidity remains too shallow to support the elevated valuation, and price mean-reverts sharply toward pre-spike levels or lower.

  • Candle 24 already shows a ~46% intracandle pullback from the candle 23 peak, a strong exhaustion signal
  • Liquidity of only $46.95K cannot sustainably support a $751K FDV once buying momentum fades
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status leaves open the possibility of adverse tokenomics actions
  • No sniper/holder history data to confirm whether early insiders are exiting into retail demand

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 27, 03:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-27 15:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, decimals, supply, FDV)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (24 most recent hours, USD)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change)
  • Holder aggregates snapshot (Codex) — current holder count and top-10 concentration only
  • Sniper analysis endpoint — returned no data

Limitations

  • No sniper wallet data was available, preventing any assessment of early-buyer/sniper concentration or PnL
  • No historical holder count data (24h/7d/30d) was available, only a single current snapshot, preventing trend analysis
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and spam-flag status were all unknown, preventing rug-risk confirmation
  • Only 24 hourly candles were provided, limiting technical analysis to a very short, highly volatile window dominated by a single parabolic event
  • No wallet labeling/classification data was available, so no notable holder identification or accumulation/distribution narrative could be constructed

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided at a single point in time for a highly volatile, low-liquidity token. Cryptocurrency investments, especially in newly launched meme tokens, carry a very high risk of substantial or total loss. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is 부캉이 busan shark ownership?

As of 2026-09-27 15:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 20.68% of supply. It reports 1,680 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling 부캉이 busan shark?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-27 15:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $642,510.00 in buys and $611,962.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is 부캉이 busan shark liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed +1352.46%, from $3,400.16 (2026-09-26 16:00 UTC) to $49,385.95 (2026-09-27 15:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for 부캉이 busan shark (bukangi)?

Given the extreme volatility, blow-off-top pattern, and shallow liquidity, short-term price action is likely to remain highly choppy with a bias toward further downside testing of recent support unless fresh buying momentum returns. The token could retest either the $0.000462 support or attempt a reclaim of the $0.000861 high, but sustained continuation without new catalysts is uncertain. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-48 hours), with a target range of $0.00013 (retest of pre-spike breakout origin) to $0.00086 (retest of intracandle ATH).

Is bukangi a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 88/100. Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced speculative traders who fully understand meme-coin/pump.fun-style dynamics and can tolerate total loss of capital. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking capital preservation, or anyone unable to actively monitor an extremely volatile, thinly-liquid position. Given unknown mint/freeze authority status and the absence of sniper/holder-history data, standard due diligence checks could not be completed.

What are the key risks of holding bukangi?

Extremely shallow liquidity ($46.95K) relative to volume and FDV, creating high slippage and manipulation risk • Parabolic +1122% 24h move with a blow-off-top candle pattern and subsequent ~46% pullback, suggesting the pump may already be reversing • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown — cannot rule out rug-pull mechanisms like supply inflation

← Back to all predictions

Track bukangi