National Trust Fund System Price Today & AI Analysis

NTFSSolanaAnalysis as of Jul 25, 2026

$0.0₄5487

-0.15% 24h

Contract

Live

NTFSzFdqyjt4babasFp6RxsQj8QLs6xYYKcQMnhmBe7

Chain

Solana

Holders

7,607

Market cap

$54,864

At a $1M market cap, $NTFS would be $0.001000 (18.2x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is NTFS a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 21

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

3%6 bundlers, 65 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about NTFS

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

PMXPMX$0.000194+1.9%MC $192.0K

RUBYThe Reddit Dog$0.0₅6032+2.2%MC $4.7K

trollinatrollina$0.0₅5775+0.0%MC $5.6K

FEDLIENSFEDLIENS$0.0₅2247+1.5%MC $2.2K

PHIPHI$0.0₅3313+3.1%MC $3.2K

KimchiAura Final Boss$0.0112-51.7%MC $11.14M

National Trust Fund System: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-25 17:17 UTC

Holder addresses

8,628

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$109,793.77

How concentrated is National Trust Fund System ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 8,628 addresses (2026-07-25 17:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling National Trust Fund System?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is National Trust Fund System liquidity falling?: As of 2026-07-25 17:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $109,793.77. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-25 17:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jul 25, 05:17 PM UTC

FDV

$3,042,287

Liquidity

$109,793.77

Holders

8,628

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

National Trust Fund System (NTFS) is a Solana SPL token (Mint: NTFSzFdqyjt4babasFp6RxsQj8QLs6xYYKcQMnhmBe7) trading at ~$0.00304 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$3.04M. The token has experienced a severe 72.4% price crash in the past 24 hours, dropping from ~$0.0110 to its current level. Despite strong holder growth over 30 days (from ~517 to 8,628, a ~95% increase), the sharp price decline, very thin liquidity ($109.79K), and missing top-holder/whale data raise significant red flags. The token name and description ('Official National Trust Fund System') appear designed to evoke legitimacy — this should be treated as a potential manipulation signal per ground rule 10.

Key points

Extreme 72.4% 24h price crash following a period of stable ~$0.011 trading
Very rapid holder growth: ~95% increase in 30 days (517 → 8,628 holders)
Critically thin liquidity at only $109.79K against a $3.04M FDV
Top holder and whale concentration data entirely unavailable — major transparency gap
No sniper data available; authority not renounced (update authority is an active wallet)
Token name evokes government/institutional legitimacy — a common social engineering tactic

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bearish

The token has crashed 72.4% in 24 hours, closing at ~$0.00304 after trading in a tight $0.0110–$0.0122 band for the prior ~22 hours. The sharp breakdown candle (candle [2]) saw price collapse from $0.01222 high to $0.00195 close, and the most recent candle [1] partially recovered to $0.00304. With sell pressure at 53.5%, thin liquidity, and 140 holders exiting in the last hour, further downside or continued volatility is the most likely near-term outcome. Immediate support is the recent low of ~$0.00191; resistance is the breakdown level of ~$0.01195.

Target low

$0.00150

Target high

$0.00600

Support: $0.00191 (candle [2] low), $0.00150 (psychological)
Resistance: $0.00304 (current close / candle [1] close), $0.01195 (pre-crash consolidation zone), $0.01222 (candle [2] high / recent peak)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

bearish

Without a catalyst to restore confidence and with liquidity at only $109.79K, recovery to pre-crash levels (~$0.011) would require significant new buying pressure. The holder growth trend, while impressive in absolute terms, has been decelerating in recent days (298 net new holders on 7/24 vs. 716 on 7/15), and the 1-hour holder count dropped 140 (-1.6%) coinciding with the crash. Medium-term outlook is bearish unless liquidity is substantially deepened and the cause of the crash is clarified.

Catalysts

Restoration of liquidity depth above $500K
Transparent disclosure of top holder distribution
Renewed community/social media momentum
Mint/freeze authority renouncement to reduce rug risk

Bullish factors

Strong 30-day holder growth (~95%, from 517 to 8,628)
7-day holder growth of +22% (+1,882 holders)
24h buyer count (241) slightly exceeds seller count (216)
Token is verified and not flagged as spam
Partial price recovery in candle [1] from $0.00191 low to $0.00304 close

Bearish factors

Catastrophic 72.4% price drop in 24 hours
1-hour holder count dropped 140 (-1.6%) — panic exits
Sell volume ($366.74K) exceeds buy volume ($318.74K) in 24h
Critically thin liquidity ($109.79K) relative to FDV ($3.04M)
Top holder data entirely unavailable — cannot assess concentration or rug risk
Update authority not renounced (active wallet: 2w59AihWGFQcEpsrxRHz7fjeScUyP5XZHGwYDXYsARht)
Token name mimics government/institutional branding — social engineering red flag

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) missing top-holder and whale data making it impossible to assess concentration risk; (2) no sniper data; (3) the crash occurred within a single candle with no clear on-chain explanation in the provided data; (4) very thin liquidity amplifies price unpredictability.

NTFS call history

Full track record →

Jul 25bearish@ $0.00304

24h-96.1%

7d-95.5%

30d-97.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: NTFSzF...mBe7
Total Supply: 999,999,967.27

Key Risks

Catastrophic 72.4% single-session price crash with no clear on-chain explanation
Critically thin liquidity ($109.79K) creating extreme slippage and crash amplification risk
Complete absence of top-holder and whale data — cannot assess concentration or insider selling
Update authority not renounced — deployer retains control capabilities

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series reveals two distinct phases. Candles [24]–[3] (hours 18:00 7/24 through 15:00 7/25) show extremely tight consolidation in the $0.01095–$0.01222 range with low volatility and modest volume — a classic compression/accumulation or distribution pattern. Candle [2] (16:00 7/25) is a massive bearish engulfing/crash candle: opened at $0.01204, reached a high of $0.01222, then collapsed to a low of $0.00195 and closed at $0.00195 — a ~84% intra-candle drop on elevated volume ($127,926). Candle [1] (17:00 7/25) shows a partial recovery: opened at $0.00197, reached $0.00321 high, and closed at $0.00304 on $91,750 volume. This is a potential dead-cat bounce or early recovery attempt.

Trend

Short-term

Downtrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

The short-term trend is sharply bearish following the crash candle. The medium-term trend is also bearish given the price is now ~72% below where it traded for the prior 22 hours. The prior consolidation zone ($0.0110–$0.0122) now acts as a major resistance ceiling.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Oversold

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

47%

Sell

54%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00191 (candle [2] low)

Major support

$0.00150 (psychological round number below recent low)

Immediate resistance

$0.00304–$0.00321 (candle [1] close/high)

Major resistance

$0.01095–$0.01222 (prior 22-hour consolidation zone)

The $0.00191 level is the most critical near-term support — a break below this would signal continuation of the crash. The prior consolidation zone ($0.01095–$0.01222) represents a massive overhead resistance band that would require extraordinary buying pressure to reclaim. The current price of $0.00304 sits in a vacuum between these two zones.

Notable patterns

Massive bearish engulfing/crash candle at candle [2]: open $0.01204, close $0.00195 (~84% intra-candle collapse)
22-hour tight consolidation band ($0.01095–$0.01222) preceding the crash — possible distribution top
Partial recovery candle [1] with long lower wick from $0.00191 to close $0.00304 — potential dead-cat bounce
Volume climax on crash candle ($127,926) — highest volume in the 24-hour window
Price compression with decreasing volume in candles [3]–[15] before the breakdown

Liquidity

$109,793.77

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Liquidity is critically thin at $109.79K on a single Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 pool (3hk1e2MZotYsU3Uhtt3ueLvRUEZztRWVdVz6xtPTDcDZ). With a FDV of $3.04M, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is approximately 3.6% — extremely low and indicative of high slippage risk for any meaningful trade size. The 24h trading volume ($685.48K combined) is more than 6x the total liquidity, which is unsustainable and suggests the pool is being heavily stressed. Net flow is negative (sell volume $366.74K > buy volume $318.74K). Despite sellers outnumbering buyers in volume, buyer count (241) slightly exceeds seller count (216), suggesting many small buyers against fewer but larger sellers — a pattern consistent with retail accumulation being overwhelmed by whale distribution. The shallow liquidity amplified the 72.4% crash and makes recovery equally volatile.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,999,967.27

FDV

$3,042,287.24

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
72.4% price crash in a single 24-hour period. Prior 22 hours showed tight consolidation followed by a single catastrophic candle dropping ~84% intra-candle. Extreme volatility makes position sizing and stop-loss management nearly impossible.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only $109.79K on a single DEX pool. Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~3.6%. Any trade above a few thousand dollars will incur severe slippage. The pool is on Meteora Dynamic AMM v2 — a single point of liquidity failure.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Catastrophic 72.4% single-session price crash with no clear on-chain explanation
Critically thin liquidity ($109.79K) creating extreme slippage and crash amplification risk
Complete absence of top-holder and whale data — cannot assess concentration or insider selling
Update authority not renounced — deployer retains control capabilities
Token name/description mimics government legitimacy — classic social engineering tactic
Holder growth decelerating and 1-hour holder count dropped 140 during crash
Single liquidity pool on one DEX — no diversified liquidity safety net
No sniper data available — early buyer behavior and profit-taking risk unknown

Mitigating factors

Token is verified and not flagged as spam by the data provider
Strong 30-day holder growth (+95%, 517 → 8,628) suggests genuine community interest
Token marked as 'Mutable: false' limits metadata manipulation
Social links (Twitter, website) exist — some degree of public presence
Buyer count (241) slightly exceeds seller count (216) in 24h — retail demand present
Partial price recovery in the most recent candle (from $0.00191 low to $0.00304 close)

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with high-risk Solana meme/micro-cap tokens. The combination of extreme volatility, thin liquidity, missing transparency data, and social engineering red flags makes this one of the highest-risk profiles possible.

NTFS presents an extremely high-risk speculative profile. The token has demonstrated strong holder growth over 30 days but suffered a catastrophic 72.4% price crash in a single session. Critical data gaps (no top holders, no sniper data) prevent a full risk assessment. The token's name and description are social engineering red flags. Any investment thesis must be grounded in speculation rather than fundamentals.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Recovery and community-driven re-accumulation: If the crash was caused by a single large seller who has now exited, the remaining 8,628 holders could provide a base for recovery. Continued holder growth, deepening liquidity, and social media momentum could drive a return toward the $0.011 consolidation zone.

Single large seller has fully exited, removing overhead supply pressure
Community rallies and new liquidity is added to the pool
Holder growth resumes at prior pace (400–700 new holders/day)
Broader Solana memecoin market enters a bullish phase
Transparency improvements: top holder data becomes visible, authorities renounced

Base Case

Prolonged low-price consolidation with high volatility: The token stabilizes in the $0.002–$0.005 range with continued thin liquidity and sporadic trading. Holder count grows slowly but the price fails to recover to pre-crash levels without a significant catalyst. The token remains a high-risk speculative asset with no clear utility.

No additional large sells in the near term
Liquidity remains at current ~$110K level
Holder growth continues at a reduced pace (50–150/day)
No fundamental developments (utility, partnerships, authority renouncement) emerge
Broader Solana market remains range-bound

Bear Case

High probability

Continued collapse and project abandonment: The crash represents the beginning of a coordinated exit by insiders or early holders. With thin liquidity and no transparency on whale holdings, further large sells could push the price to near zero. Holder count continues to decline as confidence evaporates.

Additional large holders exit through the thin liquidity pool
Liquidity is removed from the Meteora pool by the deployer
Social engineering nature of the token name is exposed, triggering mass exits
No new catalysts emerge to attract fresh capital
Holder growth deceleration continues and turns negative

Analysis details

Generated

Jul 25, 05:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-25 17:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain metadata (Mint, decimals, supply, authority, mutability)
Price feed (USD spot price, 24h change)
OHLC hourly candles (24 candles, USD)
Trading analytics (volume, buy/sell pressure, unique wallets)
Holder metrics (total, acquisition method, 1h/24h/7d/30d changes)
Historical holder series (30 daily data points)
Top holders endpoint (returned no data)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)
Liquidity pool data (Meteora Dynamic AMM v2)

Limitations

Top 20 holder data is entirely unavailable — whale concentration and insider holdings cannot be assessed
Sniper analysis data is unavailable — early buyer behavior and profit-taking risk cannot be quantified
Supply concentration metrics (top10=0%, top100=0%) appear to be data artifacts, not genuine distribution figures
Mint and freeze authority status cannot be definitively confirmed from provided metadata
The cause of the 72.4% price crash is unknown from the provided data — could be a whale exit, liquidity removal, or coordinated dump
No order book depth data available — slippage estimates are approximations
Token is ~1 month old (earliest holder data from 2026-06-25) — limited historical context

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap Solana tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The analyst has no position in NTFS. All data is sourced from third-party providers and may contain errors or gaps. Past holder growth does not guarantee future price performance. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is National Trust Fund System (NTFS) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. Checked Oct 21, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell National Trust Fund System (NTFS)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 21, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is National Trust Fund System ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 8,628 addresses (2026-07-25 17:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling National Trust Fund System?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is National Trust Fund System liquidity falling?

As of 2026-07-25 17:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $109,793.77. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for National Trust Fund System (NTFS)?

Is NTFS a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 9.1/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant traders who can afford to lose their entire investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with high-risk Solana meme/micro-cap tokens. The combination of extreme volatility, thin liquidity, missing transparency data, and social engineering red flags makes this one of the highest-risk profiles possible.

What are the key risks of holding NTFS?

Catastrophic 72.4% single-session price crash with no clear on-chain explanation • Critically thin liquidity ($109.79K) creating extreme slippage and crash amplification risk • Complete absence of top-holder and whale data — cannot assess concentration or insider selling