one life, its worth an attempt Price Today & AI Analysis

worthSolanaAnalysis as of Jun 20, 2026

$0.0₅5721

+0.49% 24h

Contract

Live

8tKWk9c3o8sbvcqTBePv2B99ZTthMdXAhSVRQ1zApump

Chain

Solana

Holders

369

Market cap

$5,719

At a $1M market cap, $WORTH would be $0.001000 (175x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is worth a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 30

Watch insiders

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 11% of the supply.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

Launch wallets hold

11%14 insiders still holding

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about worth

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

MooncoinMooncoin$0.0₅5166-5.2%MC $5.0K

サトシAsh Ketchum$0.0₅1509-15.1%MC $1.4K

ACATAvax Cat$0.0₄1290+11.7%MC $12.9K

DITDead Internet Theory$0.0₅5112-4.6%MC $4.3K

COOKCookie$0.0₄9097+2.5%MC $91.0K

uniuni$0.009020-65.7%MC $9.02M

one life, its worth an attempt: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-20 05:17 UTC

Holder addresses

521

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$48,096.65

How concentrated is one life, its worth an attempt ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 521 addresses (2026-06-20 05:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling one life, its worth an attempt?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is one life, its worth an attempt liquidity falling?: As of 2026-06-20 05:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $48,096.65. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-20 05:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Jun 20, 05:17 AM UTC

FDV

$112,359

Liquidity

$48,096.65

Holders

521

Snipers

Not available

Risk

Very High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very High

Sentiment

Bearish

WORTH ('one life, its worth an attempt') is a Solana meme/community token launched via Discord (discord.gg/uxento) and trading on PumpSwap. The token has experienced an extraordinary 297% price spike in the past 24 hours, driven by a single massive volume candle in the 04:00–05:00 UTC window on June 20, 2026. Despite the price surge, sell pressure dominates heavily (82.4% sell volume vs 17.6% buy volume), total liquidity is shallow at ~$48K, and the top 10 holders control 49.67% of supply. The token carries very high risk characteristics typical of low-cap PumpFun/PumpSwap launches.

Key points

Extreme 297% 24h price spike on very low liquidity (~$48K)
Heavily sell-dominated trading: 82.4% sell pressure vs 17.6% buy pressure
Rapid holder growth of +210 in 24h (40%) coinciding with price pump
Top 10 holders control 49.67% of supply; top 100 control 96.48%
No sniper data available; authority status partially unknown
Token launched via Discord community (discord.gg/uxento)

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term · 1–48 hours

bearish

The 297% pump was driven by a single high-volume candle (candle [2]: ~$103K volume) followed by a sharp pullback candle ([1]: much lower volume). Current price of ~$0.0001124 is ~3–4x the pre-pump baseline of ~$0.0000272–$0.0000289. With 82.4% sell pressure, 576 sellers vs 190 buyers, and shallow liquidity of $48K, a significant mean-reversion toward pre-pump levels is the most probable short-term outcome.

Target low

$0.0000270

Target high

$0.0001400

Support: $0.0000289 (pre-pump consolidation zone, candles 6–17), $0.0000272 (multi-candle low, candles 10–13), $0.0000269 (candle 5 open/close)
Resistance: $0.0001124 (current price / 24h high area), $0.0000369 (candle 2 open/high), $0.0000305 (candle 16 open)

Medium term · 7–30 days

bearish

Historical holder data shows the token was range-bound between 300–341 holders for the 30 days prior to the pump, with no sustained growth trend. The pump appears speculative and unsupported by organic holder accumulation. Unless new catalysts emerge (community growth, listings, utility), price is likely to retrace toward or below pre-pump levels.

Catalysts

Sustained Discord community growth driving new buyers
Broader Solana meme coin market rally lifting all small caps
Whale accumulation at lower prices stabilizing the floor
Any new exchange listing or partnership announcement

Bullish factors

297% price surge demonstrates strong speculative interest and community momentum
Holder count grew +210 (40%) in 24h, indicating new participants entering
Active social presence (Twitter, website, Discord community)
PumpSwap listing provides accessible trading venue
Verified contract with no spam flag

Bearish factors

82.4% sell pressure (576 sellers vs 190 buyers) — sellers dominate overwhelmingly
Shallow liquidity of only ~$48K creates high slippage and manipulation risk
Top 10 holders control 49.67% of supply — extreme concentration risk
Historical holder trend was flat-to-declining for 30 days before the pump
FDV of only ~$112K makes this an ultra-micro-cap with extreme volatility
Update authority status is 'unknown' — cannot confirm renouncement
Price pump appears driven by a single candle event, not sustained buying

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to the extreme volatility of this micro-cap token, shallow liquidity making price easily manipulated, missing sniper/authority data, and the speculative nature of meme token price action. The OHLC data also contains apparent anomalies (candle [1] has L > H which may indicate data quality issues).

worth call history

Full track record →

Jun 20bearish@ $0.000112

24h-21.9%

7d-51.9%

30d-56.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: 8tKWk9...pump
Total Supply: 999,921,716.77 WORTH

Key Risks

Extreme price pump (297%) with 82.4% sell pressure — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Shallow liquidity ($48.1K) makes price highly manipulable and exit difficult
Top 10 holders control 49.67% of supply — whale dump could collapse price
Historical holder base was declining before pump — no organic growth foundation

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 17 available hourly candles reveal two distinct phases. Phase 1 (candles 17–6, June 19 06:00–23:00 UTC): price consolidated tightly in the $0.0000269–$0.0000305 range with very low volume (mostly under $500/candle), indicating near-zero organic trading activity. Phase 2 (candles 2–1, June 20 04:00–05:00 UTC): a massive volume spike occurred — candle [2] recorded ~$103K volume with price moving from $0.0000369 open/high back to $0.0000288 close, and candle [1] shows a further move with ~$10.7K volume. Note: Candle [1] appears to have a data anomaly where L ($0.0000974) > H ($0.0000369), suggesting either a data feed error or extreme intra-candle volatility. The current price of ~$0.0001124 is significantly above all candle closes shown, suggesting the pump continued after the last recorded candle.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is technically uptrend due to the 297% price spike, but this is a pump event rather than organic trend development. Medium-term (30-day) trend was sideways/slightly declining based on historical holder data and the flat price action visible in candles 6–17.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

18%

Sell

82%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0000369 (candle 2 open — first major level below current price)

Major support

$0.0000272–$0.0000289 (30-day consolidation zone from candles 6–17)

Immediate resistance

$0.0001400 (estimated near-term resistance above current price)

Major resistance

$0.0001124 (current price level / recent pump high area)

The key support zone is the pre-pump consolidation range of $0.0000272–$0.0000305, which held for approximately 30+ hours across 12+ candles. A break below $0.0000272 would signal capitulation. The $0.0000369 level (candle 2 open) represents an intermediate support. Resistance above current price is undefined by historical data as the token has not traded at these levels before.

Notable patterns

Single massive volume spike candle (candle [2]) — classic pump event signature
Extended low-volume consolidation (candles 6–17) preceding the pump — accumulation or dormancy phase
Potential data anomaly in candle [1] where Low > High, suggesting extreme volatility or feed error
No higher-high progression — price jumped directly from consolidation to pump without gradual buildup
Post-pump candle ([1]) shows lower volume than pump candle — typical of distribution phase beginning

Liquidity

$48,096.65

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Market health is poor. Total liquidity of ~$48.1K is extremely shallow relative to the 24h sell volume of $94.49K — meaning the total liquidity pool has been turned over nearly twice by sellers alone in 24 hours. The buy/sell ratio is severely imbalanced: 82.4% sell pressure with 576 unique sellers vs only 190 unique buyers. Net flow is strongly negative (outflow). Slippage risk is high — any meaningful sell order against a $48K liquidity pool will cause significant price impact. The FDV of ~$112K vs $48K liquidity gives a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~43%, which is relatively high for a micro-cap but still insufficient to absorb coordinated selling. The trading pair is on PumpSwap (pair: DusBq5QnVjgf2C69WYp3pzgDCdtL9CjpHD8uT9ag6Qv6).

Supply & authorities

Total supply

999,921,716.77 WORTH

FDV

$112,358.65

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
297% price spike in 24h on a micro-cap token with $48K liquidity. Extreme intra-day volatility with potential for equally rapid reversal. Historical 30-day price action was flat before this single pump event.
Liquidityhigh
Total liquidity of only ~$48.1K. Sell volume alone ($94.49K) exceeded total liquidity in 24h. Any significant position exit will cause severe price impact and slippage.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme price pump (297%) with 82.4% sell pressure — classic pump-and-dump pattern
Shallow liquidity ($48.1K) makes price highly manipulable and exit difficult
Top 10 holders control 49.67% of supply — whale dump could collapse price
Historical holder base was declining before pump — no organic growth foundation
Authority status (mint/freeze) unverified — potential rug vector
Ultra-micro-cap FDV (~$112K) with no disclosed utility or roadmap
Community entirely Discord-based with no verifiable team identity

Mitigating factors

Token marked as 'Mutable: false' — metadata cannot be changed
Verified contract with no spam flag from data provider
Active social presence (Twitter, website, Discord)
PumpSwap listing provides some baseline liquidity and trading infrastructure
Holder count grew significantly (+210 in 24h) showing community interest

Suitable for

This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Given the pump-and-dump price pattern, shallow liquidity, and extreme concentration, this token presents characteristics consistent with very high-risk speculative assets.

WORTH is an ultra-micro-cap Solana meme token that has experienced a speculative pump of 297% in 24 hours. The investment case is almost entirely speculative — there is no disclosed utility, roadmap, or verifiable team. The bull case relies on continued community momentum and meme virality; the bear case (which appears more probable given on-chain data) is a rapid reversion to pre-pump price levels as sellers dominate and liquidity is insufficient to support current valuations.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Community-driven meme momentum sustains buying pressure, new holders continue to accumulate, and the token achieves broader visibility leading to a sustained price discovery above current levels.

Discord community (discord.gg/uxento) drives sustained viral growth and new buyer inflow
Broader Solana meme coin market rally provides tailwind for all small-cap tokens
Whale holders choose to hold rather than distribute, reducing sell pressure
Token achieves listing on aggregators or gains social media traction beyond Discord

Base Case

Price partially retraces from the pump high, settling in a new range between $0.0000369 (candle 2 open) and $0.0000700, as some new holders hold while early buyers take profits. Token continues to trade on PumpSwap with low volume and high volatility.

Some portion of the 210 new 24h holders are genuine community members who hold
Whale concentration does not trigger a coordinated dump
Broader Solana market remains stable
Discord community maintains engagement and prevents complete holder exodus

Bear Case

High probability

The 297% pump reverses rapidly as sellers continue to dominate (82.4% sell pressure), liquidity is exhausted, and price retraces to or below pre-pump consolidation levels of $0.0000272–$0.0000289.

Overwhelming sell pressure (82.4%) continues to dominate trading activity
Whale holders (top 10 control 49.67%) begin distributing into pump-driven liquidity
Shallow liquidity ($48.1K) cannot absorb continued selling without severe price impact
No fundamental catalyst to sustain price at 3–4x pre-pump levels
Historical holder base was declining before pump — no organic demand foundation

Analysis details

Generated

Jun 20, 05:17 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-20 05:17 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Mint: 8tKWk9c3o8sbvcqTBePv2B99ZTthMdXAhSVRQ1zApump)
PumpSwap trading pair data (DusBq5QnVjgf2C69WYp3pzgDCdtL9CjpHD8uT9ag6Qv6)
Hourly OHLC candle data (17 candles, June 19–20 2026)
24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and distribution data (521 total holders)
Top 20 holder addresses and balances
30-day historical holder series (daily)
Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data)

Limitations

Sniper/early buyer data is completely unavailable — cannot assess smart money positioning
Update authority, mint authority, and freeze authority status are unknown or unverified
OHLC candle [1] contains a data anomaly (Low > High) suggesting possible feed error
Only 17 hourly candles available — insufficient for robust technical analysis
Token description and metadata are creator-supplied and unverified (treated as untrusted per ground rules)
No team, roadmap, or utility information available for fundamental analysis
30-day holder history shows only daily granularity — intra-day patterns not visible
FDV and price data may lag real-time due to the extreme volatility of this token

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap meme tokens, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The data analyzed is sourced from on-chain metrics and third-party providers and may contain errors or delays. Always conduct your own research (DYOR) before making any investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is one life, its worth an attempt (worth) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, but wallets from the launch still hold 11% of the supply. Checked Oct 30, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell one life, its worth an attempt (worth)?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 30, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is one life, its worth an attempt ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 521 addresses (2026-06-20 05:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling one life, its worth an attempt?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is one life, its worth an attempt liquidity falling?

As of 2026-06-20 05:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $48,096.65. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for one life, its worth an attempt (worth)?

Is worth a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 8.7/100. This token is suitable ONLY for highly experienced, risk-tolerant speculators who fully understand they may lose 100% of their investment. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose entirely. Given the pump-and-dump price pattern, shallow liquidity, and extreme concentration, this token presents characteristics consistent with very high-risk speculative assets.

What are the key risks of holding worth?

Extreme price pump (297%) with 82.4% sell pressure — classic pump-and-dump pattern • Shallow liquidity ($48.1K) makes price highly manipulable and exit difficult • Top 10 holders control 49.67% of supply — whale dump could collapse price