I

IonQ - Backpack Securities Price Today & AI Analysis

IONQSolanaAnalysis as of Sep 22, 2026

Price

$45.07

+7.49% 24h · FDV $244,469

Contract

Live
NQ5hSuXQZrbnrwcDVk2qN73njjd3E3v3badYHnj5thF

Chain

Solana

Holders

3,784

Market cap

$244,469

More tokens on Solana

SISISuper Inu$0.001581+3152.9%MC $1.58MUURAGlobal X Uranium ETF - Backpack Securities$43.9-6.3%MC $1.38MCOPCATCOPCATCopper Cat$0.001449+3120.3%MC $1.45MCARDSCARDSCollector Crypt$0.1833-4.8%MC $362.34Msuitsuitsuit$0.000475+822.0%MC $475.0KANTFUNANTFUNAntFun$0.009311-88.3%MC $82.61M

IonQ - Backpack Securities: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-22 23:15 UTC

Holder addresses

3,784

Top 10 supply share

26.74%

Reported liquidity

$198,875.00
How concentrated is IonQ - Backpack Securities ownership?
As of 2026-09-22 23:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 26.74% of supply. It reports 3,784 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling IonQ - Backpack Securities?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 23:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $2,132,357.00 in buys and $2,845,047.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is IonQ - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -87.10%, from $1,212,487.40 (2026-09-22 15:00 UTC) to $156,398.30 (2026-09-22 23:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-22 23:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-22 15:00 UTC$1,212,487.40
2026-09-22 16:00 UTC$979,714.08
2026-09-22 17:00 UTC$773,269.36
2026-09-22 18:00 UTC$468,059.42
2026-09-22 19:00 UTC$341,040.32
2026-09-22 20:00 UTC$123,515.45
2026-09-22 21:00 UTC$158,175.46
2026-09-22 22:00 UTC$154,806.13
2026-09-22 23:00 UTC$156,398.30

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Ask Unhosted AI about IONQ

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Report snapshot

as of Sep 22, 11:16 PM UTC

FDV

$244,469

Liquidity

$198,875.00

Holders

3,784

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Neutral

IONQ ("IonQ - Backpack Securities") is a low-cap Solana token trading on a single Raydium CLMM pool at ~$45.07, up 7.49% in 24h. Total/fully diluted supply is tiny (5,424.2 tokens, $244.47K FDV) and liquidity is shallow at ~$198.88K. Trading activity is heavy relative to liquidity/FDV (24h volume ~$4.98M combined, i.e. ~20x the FDV), with sell volume ($2.85M) outweighing buy volume ($2.13M), producing net negative pressure (57.2% sell vs 42.8% buy) despite the price gain. Holder data is limited to a single current snapshot (3,784 addresses, top-10 holding 26.74% of supply) with no history, no wallet classification, and no sniper data, so accumulation/distribution and whale-behavior claims cannot be substantiated. Mint/freeze authority status is unknown, and no social links or description were provided, further limiting due diligence.

Key points

  • Extremely small circulating/FDV footprint ($244.47K) relative to 24h trading volume (~$4.98M combined), implying very high turnover and potential for sharp, thin-liquidity price swings
  • Sell volume (57.2%) exceeds buy volume (42.8%) in the last 24h even as price rose 7.49%, a divergence worth monitoring
  • No verifiable contract/authority data, no social presence, and no sniper/holder-history coverage, leaving key rug and manipulation risks unresolved
  • Top-10 holders control 26.74% of supply per the latest snapshot — a moderate concentration figure, but with no trend data to know if it's rising or falling

AI Price Analysis

neutral

Short term · 24-72 hours

neutral

Price has rallied from ~$41.9 to ~$45.1 over the last 9 hourly candles, breaking through the ~$42 area that had capped it for several hours. However, this occurred alongside a 24h sell-volume majority (57.2%), suggesting the move may be driven by low-liquidity thin-book dynamics (note the anomalous candle [1] high of $5737, an extreme outlier likely reflecting a liquidity/oracle glitch or a single large trade against thin depth) rather than broad-based demand. Expect continued high volatility with a possible pullback toward the $42-43 support shelf, or continuation toward $45-46 if buy pressure returns.

Target low

$40.20

Target high

$46.50

Support

$44.74 (candle 9 low), $42.51-42.76 (candles 7-8 lows), $40.20-40.40 (candles 1-5 lows)

Resistance

$45.37 (candle 8 high), $44.34 (candle 7 high), $42.14 (candle 5 high, prior consolidation ceiling)

Medium term · 1-2 weeks

neutral

With only 9 hourly candles provided, medium-term trend cannot be reliably established. The token's minuscule float ($244.47K FDV) and shallow liquidity ($198.88K) mean price is highly sensitive to individual large trades, making sustained directional forecasts unreliable without more historical data, holder trend data, and clarity on mint/freeze authority status.

Catalysts

  • Any resolution of mint/freeze authority status (renounced vs. active) could materially reduce or increase perceived rug risk
  • Continued high sell-side volume dominance could pressure price lower if not absorbed by new buyers
  • Growth or decline in the 3,784-address holder base (not currently trackable) would be a key signal once historical data becomes available

Confidence: low. Only 9 hourly candles and a single day of trading analytics are available; there is no multi-day price history, no holder trend history, and no sniper data. The extreme outlier high in candle [1] (~$5737 vs O/C near $41-42) raises data-quality concerns. Combined with very thin liquidity ($198.88K) relative to volume, short-term price action is likely to be erratic and hard to forecast with confidence.

IONQ call history

Full track record →

Sep 22neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
NQ5hSu...5thF
Total Supply
5,424.195301 IONQ

Key Risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$198.88K) relative to daily volume (~$4.98M), creating high slippage and susceptibility to large price swings from single trades
  • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezing
  • No holder history, sniper coverage, or wallet classification data, preventing verification of organic growth versus coordinated activity
  • 24h sell volume (57.2%) and seller count (6,427) exceed buy volume (42.8%) and buyer count (5,242), a bearish divergence against the reported price gain

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Across the 9 available hourly candles, price opened near $41.93, dipped to a low of $40.10-40.27 across candles 1-5 (a consolidation/basing phase), then broke out sharply in candles 6-9, closing at $44.02, $42.79 (pullback), $45.12, and $45.07. Candle 1 shows an extreme anomalous high ($5737.34) far detached from its open/close (~$41.9/$41.76), which is very likely a data artifact or a single thin-liquidity wick rather than a genuine sustained price level, and should be treated with caution. Volume was heavily concentrated in candle 1 (~$14.45M) and fell off sharply afterward (down to ~$18K by candle 9), suggesting a burst of activity early in the window followed by cooling.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

The most recent 4 candles show a clear short-term uptrend (higher highs and higher closes from ~$40.40 to ~$45.07), following a sideways consolidation in the first 5 candles between roughly $40.10 and $42.14.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

43%

Sell

57%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$44.74

Major support

$40.20

Immediate resistance

$45.37

Major resistance

$5737.34 (likely data anomaly, not a reliable level)

Immediate support sits at the candle 9 low ($44.74), with a deeper support shelf at $40.20-40.40 formed during the candles 1-5 basing phase. Immediate resistance is the candle 8 high ($45.37); no reliable major resistance level exists above current price in the clean data, since the candle 1 high appears to be an outlier/glitch rather than a tradable ceiling.

Notable patterns

  • Basing/consolidation range in candles 1-5 ($40.10-$42.14) followed by breakout in candles 6-9
  • Higher highs and higher closes in the last 4 candles (bullish short-term structure)
  • Small-bodied/near-doji candle at the most recent hour (9), suggesting a potential pause or indecision after the rally
  • Extreme outlier wick in candle 1 high, inconsistent with surrounding price action — flagged as a possible data quality issue rather than a genuine technical level

Liquidity

Liquidity

$198,875.00

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of ~$198.88K is very shallow relative to the 24h combined trading volume of ~$4.98M (roughly 25x turnover of liquidity in a single day), meaning large trades can move price significantly and slippage risk is high. Sell volume ($2.85M) exceeds buy volume ($2.13M), and unique sellers (6,427) outnumber unique buyers (5,242), pointing to a net outflow bias in the last 24h even though price rose over the period — a divergence that could reflect a small number of large buy trades pushing price up against broader, more distributed selling.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

5,424.195301 IONQ

FDV

$244,469 (approx. $244.47K)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    24h price change of +7.49% with intra-window swings from ~$40.10 to ~$45.37 (and an unexplained outlier wick to $5737 in candle 1) demonstrate significant volatility, amplified by the token's shallow liquidity.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of only ~$198.88K against 24h combined volume of ~$4.98M implies high turnover relative to depth, meaning moderate-to-large trades can produce substantial slippage and price impact.

  • Concentrationmedium

    Top-10 holders control 26.74% of supply per the current snapshot. This is a moderate concentration level, but with no historical trend, no top-100 figure, and no wallet classification, the true concentration risk (e.g., whether these are exchange wallets, team wallets, or distributed retail) cannot be fully assessed.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • Extremely shallow liquidity (~$198.88K) relative to daily volume (~$4.98M), creating high slippage and susceptibility to large price swings from single trades
  • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezing
  • No holder history, sniper coverage, or wallet classification data, preventing verification of organic growth versus coordinated activity
  • 24h sell volume (57.2%) and seller count (6,427) exceed buy volume (42.8%) and buyer count (5,242), a bearish divergence against the reported price gain
  • No social links, description, or verification status provided, reducing overall transparency and due-diligence confidence
  • Anomalous OHLC data point (candle 1 high of $5737 vs. surrounding ~$40-42 prices) suggests possible data quality or extreme thin-liquidity manipulation risk

Mitigating factors

  • Token has an active, apparently liquid trading pool on Raydium CLMM with tens of thousands of daily trades (22,606 buys, 27,230 sells), indicating real-time market activity rather than a dead/inactive pool
  • Top-10 holder concentration (26.74%) is not extreme in isolation compared to many micro-cap tokens
  • Thousands of distinct holder addresses (3,784) suggest some degree of distribution, though this cannot be confirmed as genuine unique participants

Suitable for

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. The combination of unknown mint/freeze authority status, shallow liquidity, absence of holder history/sniper data, and net sell-side volume dominance despite a rising price makes this unsuitable for conservative or risk-averse investors, and position sizing should reflect very high risk if engaged at all.

IONQ is a micro-cap Solana token ($244.47K FDV) showing a sharp short-term price rally (+7.49% 24h) on the back of high nominal trading volume, but this is set against shallow liquidity ($198.88K), a net sell-volume bias (57.2% sell vs. 42.8% buy), and near-total absence of due-diligence data (unknown mint/freeze authority, no sniper coverage, no holder history). Any thesis here is necessarily speculative and short-horizon given the data gaps.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the recent breakout above the $42 consolidation range holds and buy-side interest returns to dominate volume, price could continue trending toward and beyond the $45.37 resistance, supported by high overall trading engagement (tens of thousands of daily trades) for such a small-cap token.

  • Continuation of the higher-highs/higher-closes pattern seen in the last 4 candles
  • A shift in volume mix back toward buy-side dominance
  • Positive resolution/disclosure of mint and freeze authority status (i.e., confirmed renounced) that would reduce a major overhang of uncertainty
  • Growing genuine holder base beyond the current 3,784-address snapshot (unverifiable with current data)

Base Case

Price likely continues to trade with high volatility within a broad $40-46 range in the near term, oscillating based on individual large trades given the shallow liquidity, without a clear sustained directional trend until more data (multi-day history, authority confirmation, holder trends) becomes available.

  • No major new information (e.g., authority renouncement confirmation, listing, or exploit) emerges in the immediate term
  • Liquidity remains in the ~$150-250K range, keeping volatility elevated
  • Trading volume remains high relative to FDV, continuing the pattern of rapid turnover observed in the 24h data

Bear Case

Medium probability

Given shallow liquidity, sell-volume dominance, and unresolved authority risk, price could reverse sharply back toward the $40.20-40.40 support zone or lower, especially if a large holder (within the 26.74% top-10 concentration) exits or if the market treats the unknown authority status as a red flag.

  • 24h sell volume ($2.85M) and seller count (6,427) already exceed buy volume/count, suggesting underlying distribution pressure
  • Extremely thin liquidity ($198.88K) makes the token vulnerable to sharp downside moves from moderate-sized sell orders
  • Complete lack of verifiable contract/authority/social data may deter sustained buyer interest and invite risk-averse capital to exit
  • The anomalous candle 1 price spike may indicate erratic, thin-liquidity-driven price action rather than durable demand

Analysis details

Generated

Sep 22, 11:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-22 23:15 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

  • On-chain token metadata (mint, supply, decimals)
  • Raydium CLMM pair price and OHLC hourly candle data (9 most recent candles)
  • 24h trading analytics (buy/sell volume, buyer/seller counts, price % change)
  • Codex holder aggregates (current snapshot: holder count, top-10 concentration)
  • Sniper analysis endpoint (returned no data for this token)

Limitations

  • Only 9 hourly OHLC candles were provided, insufficient for reliable medium/long-term technical analysis
  • No sniper data was available, preventing assessment of early-buyer concentration, PnL, or dump risk
  • No holder history (24h/7d/30d growth) exists, only a single current snapshot of holder count and top-10 concentration
  • Mint authority, freeze authority, contract verification, and mutability status are all unknown/unverified
  • No top-100 holder concentration figure or wallet classification data was available, limiting whale-map analysis
  • One OHLC candle (candle 1) contains an extreme outlier high ($5737.34) inconsistent with surrounding price action, suggesting possible data quality issues
  • No social links, project description, or verification status were provided, limiting qualitative due diligence

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is based solely on the limited on-chain and market data provided, which contains significant gaps (authority status, sniper coverage, holder history). Cryptocurrency investments, especially in micro-cap and low-liquidity tokens, carry substantial risk including total loss of capital. Conduct your own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is IonQ - Backpack Securities ownership?

As of 2026-09-22 23:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 26.74% of supply. It reports 3,784 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.

Are large holders selling IonQ - Backpack Securities?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 23:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $2,132,357.00 in buys and $2,845,047.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is IonQ - Backpack Securities liquidity falling?

Sampled USD liquidity changed -87.10%, from $1,212,487.40 (2026-09-22 15:00 UTC) to $156,398.30 (2026-09-22 23:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.

What is the short-term price outlook for IonQ - Backpack Securities (IONQ)?

Price has rallied from ~$41.9 to ~$45.1 over the last 9 hourly candles, breaking through the ~$42 area that had capped it for several hours. However, this occurred alongside a 24h sell-volume majority (57.2%), suggesting the move may be driven by low-liquidity thin-book dynamics (note the anomalous candle [1] high of $5737, an extreme outlier likely reflecting a liquidity/oracle glitch or a single large trade against thin depth) rather than broad-based demand. Expect continued high volatility with a possible pullback toward the $42-43 support shelf, or continuation toward $45-46 if buy pressure returns. Short-term outlook is neutral (24-72 hours), with a target range of $40.20 to $46.50.

Is IONQ a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as very high with a risk score of 82/100. This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders who fully understand and accept the possibility of total capital loss. The combination of unknown mint/freeze authority status, shallow liquidity, absence of holder history/sniper data, and net sell-side volume dominance despite a rising price makes this unsuitable for conservative or risk-averse investors, and position sizing should reflect very high risk if engaged at all.

What are the key risks of holding IONQ?

Extremely shallow liquidity (~$198.88K) relative to daily volume (~$4.98M), creating high slippage and susceptibility to large price swings from single trades • Mint/freeze authority status entirely unknown, leaving open the possibility of supply dilution or account freezing • No holder history, sniper coverage, or wallet classification data, preventing verification of organic growth versus coordinated activity

← Back to all predictions

Track IONQ