BIO Price Today & AI Analysis

BIOSolanaAnalysis as of Apr 30, 2026

$0.0220

-0.62% 24h

Contract

Live

bioJ9JTqW62MLz7UKHU69gtKhPpGi1BQhccj2kmSvUJ

Chain

Solana

Holders

9,316

Market cap

$4,348,890

At a $10M market cap, $BIO would be $0.0506 (2.30x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is BIO a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 26

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below.

Can you sell?

YesNothing in the token can block or tax a sell

The owner can still mint new supply.
The liquidity could not be measured.

Read from the token’s own on-chain settings, with Unhosted’s automated check: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. The settings say whether the token can block or tax a sell, not whether its pool has the liquidity to sell into.

Ask Unhosted AI about BIO

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on Solana

bukangi부캉이 busan shark$0.0₄2586-23.5%MC $25.2K

LOOKSMAXlooksmax.org$0.000121-4.6%MC $115.4K

PUMPPretty Unreal Massive Pair$0.0₅6522-50.2%MC $6.3K

uncunc$0.000318+13.5%MC $317.5K

TBBThe Bitcoin Bull$0.005900-5.2%MC $5.90M

DUBBLEDubble$0.001277+2674.5%MC $1.26M

BIO: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-04-30 19:49 UTC

Holder addresses

8,874

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$475,515.14

How concentrated is BIO ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 8,874 addresses (2026-04-30 19:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling BIO?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is BIO liquidity falling?: As of 2026-04-30 19:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $475,515.14. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-04-30 19:49 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of Apr 30, 07:49 PM UTC

FDV

$6,554,056

Liquidity

$475,515.14

Holders

8,874

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bullish

BIO is a Decentralized Science (DeSci) curation and liquidity protocol built on Solana, with roots in Molecule (biotech tokenization) and VitaDAO (longevity science DAO). The token trades at $0.0431 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$6.63M and total liquidity of $475.52K on Raydium. The token has experienced a sharp 30.2% 24h price surge, though holder count has been declining steadily over the past 30 days — from ~10,317 to ~8,874 — raising questions about organic demand sustainability. Supply is heavily concentrated, with the top 10 addresses controlling 78.02% of supply.

Key points

Legitimate DeSci narrative backed by Molecule and VitaDAO pedigree
Verified contract with mutable=false and no spam flag
Strong 30.2% 24h price surge on balanced buy/sell pressure (51.2% buys)
No snipers detected in first 1,000 blocks — clean launch
Raydium liquidity pool with $475.52K TVL providing reasonable on-chain depth

AI Price Analysis

bullish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bullish

Price has surged ~30% in 24h, recovering from a low of ~$0.0327 to current $0.0431. The candle structure shows a strong impulse leg from candle [20] ($0.0336) through candle [13] ($0.0462 high), followed by a consolidation/pullback phase. Immediate support sits near $0.0396–$0.0413 (candles [4]–[6] open/close cluster). Resistance is at the recent 24h high of ~$0.0462 (candle [13]). Short-term bias is cautiously bullish but momentum is fading in the most recent candles.

Target low

$0.0390

Target high

$0.0462

Support: $0.0396 (candle [4] low / candle [6] open), $0.0378 (candle [19] high / mid-range), $0.0336 (candle [20] low — 24h base)
Resistance: $0.0462 (candle [13] 24h high), $0.0460 (candle [11] high ~$0.0453), $0.0480–$0.0500 (psychological round number)

Medium term · 1–4 weeks

neutral

The persistent 30-day holder decline (from 10,317 to 8,874, -14% in 7d, -16% in 30d) is a structural headwind. Unless the DeSci narrative attracts new capital and reverses holder attrition, medium-term price action is likely to remain range-bound or drift lower. A sustained break above $0.0462 with volume expansion would be needed to confirm a bullish trend reversal.

Catalysts

DeSci sector narrative momentum and broader crypto market recovery
New partnership or protocol milestone announcements from BIO/Molecule/VitaDAO
Reversal of holder decline trend — net positive holder growth over 7 consecutive days
Increased Raydium liquidity depth reducing slippage and attracting larger traders

Bullish factors

30.2% 24h price surge with balanced buy/sell pressure (51.2% buys, $640K vs $611K)
No snipers detected — clean launch without early predatory accumulation
Verified contract, mutable=false, legitimate DeSci project with real-world backing
Raydium liquidity of $475.52K provides reasonable depth for micro-cap
Unique buyer/seller counts nearly equal (266 vs 264) suggesting organic two-sided market

Bearish factors

Persistent holder decline: -537 in 24h (-6.1%), -1,237 in 7d (-14%), -1,441 in 30d (-16%)
Top 10 holders control 78.02% of supply — extreme concentration risk
Top 100 holders control 96.43% — virtually no broad distribution
FDV of $6.63M is micro-cap; thin market susceptible to whale-driven volatility
Price spike of 30% in 24h without clear catalyst may be unsustainable
Update authority not renounced (man5NNs4NvVgczbEpxFxjGXCSwCEx8rrN4eRkR26CcJ)

Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) the 30-day holder decline trend contradicts the short-term price spike, suggesting the pump may be event-driven or thin-market; (2) no sniper data limits smart money signal quality; (3) extreme supply concentration (top 10 = 78.02%) means a single large holder exit could overwhelm buy-side; (4) FDV of only $6.63M means the token is micro-cap and highly susceptible to manipulation.

Token Info

Chain: Solana
Contract: bioJ9J...SvUJ
Total Supply: 151,903,902.05 BIO

Key Risks

Extreme supply concentration: top holder alone controls 32.84% (~$2.15M at current price)
Persistent and accelerating holder decline: -1,441 holders (-16%) over 30 days, -537 in last 24h alone
Price pump (+30.2% 24h) coinciding with holder exodus suggests distribution into strength
Non-renounced update authority and unknown mint/freeze authority status

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

The 24-hour OHLC series (hourly) shows a clear V-shaped recovery and impulse rally. Candles [24]–[20] (Apr 29 20:00–Apr 30 00:00) established the base at $0.0327–$0.0344. Candles [19]–[15] show the initial recovery leg, with candle [19] printing a strong bullish candle (O:$0.0339, H:$0.0384, C:$0.0362). Candles [14]–[7] show a consolidation/distribution phase between $0.0394–$0.0461. Candles [12]–[8] show a high-volume sell-off (candle [12] volume: 116,742; candle [11]: 100,702) with wicks indicating selling pressure at the $0.0453–$0.0462 range. Candles [7]–[4] show a secondary dip and recovery, with candle [4] printing a bullish engulfing-style candle (O:$0.0395, H:$0.0420, C:$0.0412). The most recent candles [3]–[1] show a modest recovery to $0.0431, with declining volume — suggesting the impulse is losing steam.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Downtrend

Short-term (24h) trend is clearly bullish — price has risen from $0.0327 to $0.0431 (+30%). However, the medium-term (30-day) trend is bearish as evidenced by the persistent holder decline and the price level itself being well below any prior highs implied by the FDV trajectory. The current rally appears to be a counter-trend bounce within a broader downtrend.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Neutral

Volume trend

Decreasing

Buy

51%

Sell

49%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0413 (candle [4] close / candle [3] open cluster)

Major support

$0.0336 (candle [20] low — 24h absolute low)

Immediate resistance

$0.0440 (candle [2] high / recent consolidation ceiling)

Major resistance

$0.0462 (candle [13] 24h high — key breakout level)

The $0.0396–$0.0413 zone has acted as both support and resistance multiple times across candles [4]–[8], making it the key pivot zone. A sustained hold above $0.0413 is needed for continued bullish momentum. Below $0.0396, the next meaningful support is the $0.0336 base. On the upside, $0.0462 is the critical resistance — a confirmed break above this level with volume would signal a trend continuation.

Notable patterns

V-shaped recovery from $0.0327 base (candles [24]→[13])
High-volume sell wicks at $0.0453–$0.0462 (candles [11]–[12]) indicating distribution at highs
Bullish engulfing-style candle at candle [4] (O:$0.0395, C:$0.0412) after secondary dip
Volume climax at candle [20] (211,087 units) at the session low — potential capitulation candle
Declining volume on recovery (candles [3]–[1]) — bearish divergence signal
Doji-like candle at candle [1] (O:$0.04325, C:$0.04314) suggesting indecision at current levels

Liquidity

$475,515.14

Depth

Moderate

Slippage risk

Medium

Total on-chain liquidity of $475.52K on Raydium is moderate for a micro-cap token with a $6.63M FDV. The liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~7.2% is reasonable but not deep. The 24h trading volume of ~$1.25M ($640K buys + $611K sells) represents a volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~2.6x, indicating active trading relative to pool depth. Slippage risk is medium — large trades (>$10K) would likely move the price meaningfully given the pool size. The net flow is marginally positive (inflow) with $29K more in buys than sells over 24h. Unique buyer and seller counts are nearly identical (266 vs 264), suggesting a balanced, organic two-sided market rather than a coordinated pump. The 4,746 buy transactions vs 5,908 sell transactions indicates sellers are executing in smaller average sizes, while buyers are transacting in larger average sizes — a modestly bullish microstructure signal.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

151,903,902.05 BIO

FDV

$6,554,055.82 (metadata) / $6.63M (trading analytics)

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

Volatilityhigh
30.2% price swing in 24h on a micro-cap ($6.63M FDV) token. The token has demonstrated extreme intraday volatility, with a range from $0.0327 to $0.0462 in a single session. Micro-cap tokens on Solana are inherently high-volatility instruments.
Liquiditymedium
Total liquidity of $475.52K is moderate for the FDV. Trades above ~$10K–$20K will experience meaningful slippage. The Raydium pool (holder #5, 4.99% of supply) provides the primary exit venue. Liquidity could deteriorate rapidly if whale holders withdraw LP positions.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Sniper DumpNot assessed
Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.
AuthorityNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

Extreme supply concentration: top holder alone controls 32.84% (~$2.15M at current price)
Persistent and accelerating holder decline: -1,441 holders (-16%) over 30 days, -537 in last 24h alone
Price pump (+30.2% 24h) coinciding with holder exodus suggests distribution into strength
Non-renounced update authority and unknown mint/freeze authority status
Micro-cap FDV ($6.63M) makes token highly susceptible to whale-driven price manipulation
DeSci sector remains niche with limited mainstream adoption and liquidity

Mitigating factors

Zero snipers in first 1,000 blocks — clean, fair launch
Verified contract, not flagged as spam, mutable=false metadata
Legitimate project with real-world backing: Molecule tokenization platform and VitaDAO
Balanced 24h buy/sell pressure (51.2%/48.8%) and near-equal unique buyers/sellers (266/264)
Raydium liquidity of $475.52K provides reasonable exit depth for small-to-mid positions
Active trading community: 366 unique wallets, 10,654 total transactions in 24h

Suitable for

Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi investors who understand micro-cap Solana token risks. Position sizing should be small relative to portfolio. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those unfamiliar with DeSci narratives, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. Due diligence on authority status and whale wallet monitoring is strongly recommended before entry.

BIO represents a high-risk, speculative bet on the DeSci (Decentralized Science) narrative, backed by credible real-world projects (Molecule, VitaDAO) but hampered by extreme supply concentration, persistent holder attrition, and micro-cap liquidity constraints. The 30.2% 24h price surge is notable but appears to be occurring against a backdrop of holder distribution rather than genuine new demand accumulation. The clean launch (zero snipers) and verified contract are genuine positives, but the structural risks dominate the near-term outlook.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

DeSci narrative gains mainstream crypto attention, driving new capital into BIO. The price breaks above $0.0462 resistance with sustained volume, holder decline reverses, and the protocol announces meaningful milestones (new biotech IP tokenization, VitaDAO integration, exchange listing). Top holders maintain positions, and the Raydium pool deepens.

Broader DeSci sector momentum and media coverage
Protocol milestone: new IP tokenization or DAO partnership announcement
Reversal of holder decline trend with net positive growth over 7+ days
Whale wallets (top 3) demonstrating holding behavior rather than distribution
Broader Solana ecosystem bull market lifting all micro-caps

Base Case

Price consolidates in the $0.038–$0.046 range following the 30.2% pump. Holder decline continues at a moderate pace (-50 to -100/day). Trading volume normalizes to $200K–$400K/day. The token remains a niche DeSci play with limited price appreciation until a concrete protocol catalyst emerges. FDV stays in the $5.5M–$7M range.

No major whale distribution events in the near term
Raydium liquidity remains stable around $400K–$500K
DeSci narrative maintains current level of interest without major new catalysts
Holder decline moderates from the extreme -537/day seen in the last 24h
BIO protocol continues development without adverse events

Bear Case

Medium probability

The 30.2% price pump proves unsustainable. Large holders (particularly the 32.84% top holder) begin distributing into price strength. Holder decline accelerates beyond -537/day. Liquidity thins as LP providers withdraw. Price retraces to the $0.0327 base or lower, potentially testing $0.025–$0.030 levels.

Continued and accelerating holder exodus (already -537 in 24h)
Top holder (32.84%) initiating distribution — would overwhelm $475K liquidity pool
No new protocol catalysts to sustain narrative momentum
Broader crypto market downturn reducing risk appetite for micro-cap DeSci tokens
Unknown mint/freeze authority creating uncertainty that deters institutional interest

Analysis details

Generated

Apr 30, 07:49 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-04-30 19:49 UTC

Model confidence

Low

Data sources

On-chain token metadata (Solana)
Raydium AMM pair data (4LuGwek6Jv4xpGvsQwZXonmLuRhrpHtmKVs95bN9EkTm)
Hourly OHLC candle data (24 candles, Apr 29–30 2026)
Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
Holder metrics and distribution data
Historical holder time series (30 days, daily)
Top 20 holder wallet data
Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)

Limitations

Mint authority and freeze authority status not explicitly provided — classified as unknown
Sniper data is entirely absent (0 snipers, 0 transactions) — smart money signals rely solely on holder/trading data
Top holder wallet classifications are inferred from context (project structure, LP address match) — not verified on-chain
No historical price data beyond 24 hours of hourly candles — medium-term technical analysis is limited
Holder acquisition breakdown (swap/transfer/airdrop) does not specify timing — cannot assess recent acquisition trends
Update authority wallet (man5NNs4NvVgczbEpxFxjGXCSwCEx8rrN4eRkR26CcJ) not cross-referenced against known project multisigs

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, particularly micro-cap tokens on Solana, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. Past price performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analyst has no position in BIO and receives no compensation from the BIO protocol.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is BIO a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, and nothing in the token can block or tax a sell. A few things to know below. The owner can still mint new supply. The liquidity could not be measured. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

Can I sell BIO?

Yes. Nothing in the token’s on-chain settings can block or tax a sell: no freeze authority, no transfer fee and no transfer hook. Checked Oct 26, 2026. This reads the token’s own settings; whether its pool has enough liquidity to sell into is a separate question.

How concentrated is BIO ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 8,874 addresses (2026-04-30 19:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling BIO?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is BIO liquidity falling?

As of 2026-04-30 19:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $475,515.14. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for BIO (BIO)?

Is BIO a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 7.5/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi investors who understand micro-cap Solana token risks. Position sizing should be small relative to portfolio. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, those unfamiliar with DeSci narratives, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment. Due diligence on authority status and whale wallet monitoring is strongly recommended before entry.

What are the key risks of holding BIO?

Extreme supply concentration: top holder alone controls 32.84% (~$2.15M at current price) • Persistent and accelerating holder decline: -1,441 holders (-16%) over 30 days, -537 in last 24h alone • Price pump (+30.2% 24h) coinciding with holder exodus suggests distribution into strength