META

MetaDAO Price Today & AI Analysis

METASolanaAnalysis as of May 19, 2026

Price

$5.86

-1.96% 24h

Contract

Live
METAwkXcqyXKy1AtsSgJ8JiUHwGCafnZL38n3vYmeta

Chain

Solana

Holders

6,609

Market cap

$132,940,465

Ask Unhosted AI about META

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Solana

PercolatorPercolatorPercolator$0.003608+9.2%MC $3.57MBanBanComedian$0.0660-1.8%MC $63.47MLUCKY99LUCKY99LUCKY99$0.003102-17.8%MC $2.93MCURVECURVECURVE$0.000429-4.7%MC $342.2KTAOTAOBittensor$290.5-4.9%MC $2.99MZECZECZcash$1,383.51-1.6%MC $137.78M

MetaDAO: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-19 22:49 UTC

Holder addresses

4,917

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$493,302.67
How concentrated is MetaDAO ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 4,917 addresses (2026-05-19 22:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling MetaDAO?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is MetaDAO liquidity falling?
As of 2026-05-19 22:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $493,302.67. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-19 22:49 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Report snapshot

as of May 19, 10:49 PM UTC

FDV

$66,675,456

Liquidity

$493,302.67

Holders

4,917

Snipers

Not available

Risk

High
Loading price chart…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bullish

MetaDAO (META) is the futarchy governance token of the MetaDAO protocol on Solana, trading at $2.94 with a fully diluted valuation of ~$66.5M and a circulating supply of ~22.68M tokens. The token is listed on Meteora Dynamic AMM with $493K in liquidity. Over the past 30 days, holder count has declined by ~120 (-2.40%), reflecting a slow but consistent attrition trend. Trading activity is nearly balanced between buyers and sellers (49.6% buy / 50.4% sell), and no snipers were detected at launch — a positive signal for organic distribution. The update authority is not renounced (mutable metadata), which introduces some governance risk.

Key points

  • Futarchy governance mechanism — a novel on-chain decision-making model
  • Zero snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks, indicating organic launch
  • Verified contract with no spam flag
  • Balanced 24h buy/sell pressure (~50/50)
  • Moderate liquidity of $493K relative to ~$66.5M FDV

AI Price Analysis

bullish

Short term · 24–72 hours

bullish

Price has recovered sharply from the ~$2.51 intraday low (candle 7) to the current ~$2.94, posting a +16.99% 6h gain. The most recent candle (candle 1) closed at its high of $2.951, suggesting continued buying momentum. Short-term bias is cautiously bullish, but the move is extended and a pullback toward the $2.63–2.65 support zone is plausible.

Target low

$2.63

Target high

$2.99

Support

$2.63, $2.51

Resistance

$2.95, $2.99

Medium term · 2–4 weeks

neutral

The 30-day holder trend is declining (-120 holders, -2.40%), which is a structural headwind. Without a catalyst to reverse holder attrition and grow the community, price is likely to consolidate or drift lower. A recovery above $3.00 with sustained volume would be needed to confirm a medium-term uptrend.

Catalysts

  • New futarchy governance proposals driving protocol engagement
  • Broader Solana ecosystem rally lifting governance tokens
  • Reversal of the 30-day holder decline trend
  • Increased DEX liquidity depth reducing slippage risk

Bullish factors

  • Strong 6h price recovery of +16.99% from intraday lows
  • Most recent candle closed at its high ($2.951), signaling buying pressure
  • Zero snipers at launch — no early dumpers to suppress price
  • Balanced buy/sell ratio with slightly more unique buyers (213) than sellers (187)
  • Verified contract, legitimate governance use case

Bearish factors

  • 30-day holder count declining by 120 (-2.40%)
  • 7-day holder count also declining by 18 (-0.37%)
  • Metadata is mutable (update authority not renounced)
  • FDV of $66.5M vs $493K liquidity = very thin market relative to valuation
  • Top 10 holders control 40.6% of supply — concentration risk
  • Several candles show near-zero volume (candles 3, 10, 12, 13), indicating illiquid periods

Confidence: low. Only 23 hourly candles are available, limiting technical pattern reliability. The 30-day holder decline is a structural concern, and the FDV/liquidity ratio (~135x) implies thin market depth. The short-term spike is notable but may be noise given low volume on several candles.

Token Info

Chain
Solana
Contract
METAwk...meta
Total Supply
22,684,697.848902

Key Risks

  • 18.63% single-holder concentration — potential treasury/team dump risk
  • Mutable metadata with non-renounced update authority
  • Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~0.74% — extreme slippage risk for large trades
  • 30-day holder decline of 120 (-2.40%) — structural community attrition

Smart money & sniper coverage

Sniper classifications and wallet-level trading histories are not available in this report. Sniper concentration, profit-taking and dump risk have not been assessed.

Deep Analysis

Over the 23 available hourly candles (May 18 23:00 – May 19 22:00 UTC), META opened near $2.93 and initially declined through the early hours of May 19, reaching an intraday low of $2.51 at 16:00 UTC (candle 7). The token then staged a sharp V-shaped recovery, closing the most recent candle (22:00 UTC) at $2.951 — its session high. Several candles in the 08:00–13:00 UTC window show extremely low volume (as low as $1 in candle 13), indicating illiquid periods. The recovery candles (candles 6–2) show progressively higher highs and higher lows, consistent with a short-term uptrend.

Trend

Short-term

Uptrend

Medium-term

Sideways

Short-term trend is bullish following the V-shaped recovery from $2.51 to $2.95. Medium-term trend is sideways-to-bearish given the 30-day holder decline and the price range remaining below the session open near $2.93 for most of the day before recovering.

Momentum & Volume

Momentum

Overbought

Volume trend

Increasing

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$2.83

Major support

$2.51

Immediate resistance

$2.95

Major resistance

$2.99

Immediate support at $2.83 (candle 1 open / candle 2 close). Major support at $2.51 (candle 7 low — session low). Immediate resistance at $2.95 (candle 1 high / current price). Major resistance at $2.99 (candle 22 high from prior session). A break above $2.99 would open the path toward $3.00+ psychological level.

Notable patterns

  • V-shaped recovery from $2.51 session low — bullish reversal signal
  • Candle 1 closed at its high ($2.951) — bullish momentum continuation signal
  • Candle 3 is a doji with identical OHLC ($2.636) on near-zero volume — illiquidity artifact
  • Candles 20–23 show a descending sequence of lower highs and lower lows — prior downtrend before reversal
  • Candle 2 is the highest-volume candle ($216K) and coincides with the sharpest price recovery — volume-confirmed reversal

Liquidity

Liquidity

$493,302.67

Depth

Shallow

Slippage risk

High

Total liquidity of $493K against a $66.5M FDV represents a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 0.74% — extremely thin. This means large trades will face significant slippage, and a coordinated sell from a whale (e.g., the 18.63% holder) could severely impact price. The 24h buy/sell volume is nearly perfectly balanced ($141.8K buys vs $144.1K sells), indicating no strong directional conviction from the market as a whole. There were 1,022 buys vs 880 sells, with 213 unique buyers vs 187 unique sellers — slightly more buyers by count but sellers are larger on average. The single liquidity pool is on Meteora Dynamic AMM (pair EXpXkwcWDhjEYyC5pfNfxsu8fUtK4CDCYTZR4ApQNRzo), concentrating all liquidity risk in one venue.

Supply & authorities

Total supply

22,684,697.848902

FDV

$66,675,456.48

Mint authority

Not available

Freeze authority

Not available

Mint and freeze authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations. Metadata update authority does not establish either permission.

  • Volatilityhigh

    META experienced a ~16% intraday swing (from $2.51 to $2.95) within a single session. Several candles show near-zero volume, indicating illiquid periods where small trades can move price significantly.

  • Liquidityhigh

    Total liquidity of $493K against $66.5M FDV is a ratio of ~0.74%. Slippage risk is high for any trade above a few thousand dollars. All liquidity is concentrated in a single Meteora AMM pool.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Sniper DumpNot assessed

    Sniper classifications and wallet trading histories are unavailable.

  • AuthorityNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

Key risks

  • 18.63% single-holder concentration — potential treasury/team dump risk
  • Mutable metadata with non-renounced update authority
  • Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~0.74% — extreme slippage risk for large trades
  • 30-day holder decline of 120 (-2.40%) — structural community attrition
  • Unknown mint and freeze authority status
  • Single liquidity venue (Meteora AMM) — no redundancy

Mitigating factors

  • Zero snipers at launch — clean organic distribution
  • Verified contract, not flagged as spam
  • Legitimate governance use case (futarchy) with real protocol utility
  • Balanced 24h buy/sell pressure — no obvious coordinated dump in progress
  • Acquisition dominated by swaps (78.4%) — market-driven holder base

Suitable for

Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant investors with deep familiarity with Solana DeFi governance tokens. Not appropriate for risk-averse or capital-preservation-focused investors. Position sizing should account for high slippage risk and concentration risk.

MetaDAO (META) is a niche governance token built around the futarchy decision-making model on Solana. It has a clean launch (no snipers), a verified contract, and a real use case. However, it faces structural headwinds: declining holder count over 30 days, very thin liquidity relative to FDV, mutable metadata, and high supply concentration. The token is best suited for believers in the futarchy governance model who can tolerate high volatility and illiquidity.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Futarchy governance gains traction as a novel DAO model, attracting new protocols and users to MetaDAO. Holder count reverses its decline, liquidity deepens, and the FDV of $66.5M is justified by growing protocol revenue and governance activity. Price targets $4–6 over 3–6 months.

  • Broader adoption of futarchy governance model in Solana DeFi
  • New protocol integrations or partnerships announced by MetaDAO
  • Solana ecosystem bull market lifting governance token valuations
  • Reversal of 30-day holder decline with sustained new wallet growth
  • Liquidity deepening through additional AMM pools or incentive programs

Base Case

META consolidates in the $2.50–3.00 range over the next 30 days. Holder count stabilizes with minor fluctuations. Liquidity remains thin but sufficient for small-to-mid-size trades. The token maintains its niche governance utility without major catalysts in either direction.

  • No major selling from the 18.63% top holder
  • Solana ecosystem remains broadly stable
  • MetaDAO continues operating its futarchy governance protocol
  • Liquidity stays above $300K on Meteora AMM
  • 24h volume remains in the $100K–$300K range

Bear Case

Medium probability

Holder attrition continues, the 18.63% treasury/team wallet begins distributing tokens, and thin liquidity amplifies the sell pressure. Price revisits the $2.00–2.20 range or lower as community interest wanes.

  • Continued 30-day holder decline accelerates
  • Large holder (18.63%) begins selling into thin liquidity
  • Mutable metadata exploited or updated in a way that damages trust
  • Broader Solana market downturn reducing risk appetite for governance tokens
  • Futarchy model fails to gain mainstream adoption

Analysis details

Generated

May 19, 10:49 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-19 22:49 UTC

Model confidence

Medium

Data sources

  • Moralis on-chain metadata API
  • Meteora Dynamic AMM price feed (pair EXpXkwcWDhjEYyC5pfNfxsu8fUtK4CDCYTZR4ApQNRzo)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (23 candles, May 18–19 2026)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top 20 holder distribution data
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets)
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)

Limitations

  • Only 23 hourly candles available — insufficient for robust multi-timeframe technical analysis
  • Mint and freeze authority status not explicitly provided in metadata
  • Sniper data covers only first 1,000 blocks; later coordinated buying not captured
  • Holder classifications (whale/shark/dolphin/fish/octopus) use platform-defined thresholds not disclosed
  • Top holder wallet classifications are inferred, not confirmed on-chain
  • No order book data available — slippage estimates are approximations
  • Historical price data beyond 23 hours not provided, limiting medium-term technical analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk of loss. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

How concentrated is MetaDAO ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 4,917 addresses (2026-05-19 22:49 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling MetaDAO?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is MetaDAO liquidity falling?

As of 2026-05-19 22:49 UTC, reported liquidity was $493,302.67. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is the short-term price outlook for MetaDAO (META)?

Price has recovered sharply from the ~$2.51 intraday low (candle 7) to the current ~$2.94, posting a +16.99% 6h gain. The most recent candle (candle 1) closed at its high of $2.951, suggesting continued buying momentum. Short-term bias is cautiously bullish, but the move is extended and a pullback toward the $2.63–2.65 support zone is plausible. Short-term outlook is bullish (24–72 hours), with a target range of $2.63 to $2.99.

Is META a safe investment on Solana?

The AI assessment rates overall risk as high with a risk score of 7.2/100. Suitable only for high-risk-tolerant investors with deep familiarity with Solana DeFi governance tokens. Not appropriate for risk-averse or capital-preservation-focused investors. Position sizing should account for high slippage risk and concentration risk.

What are the key risks of holding META?

18.63% single-holder concentration — potential treasury/team dump risk • Mutable metadata with non-renounced update authority • Liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~0.74% — extreme slippage risk for large trades

← Back to all predictions

Questions about META?