SIGHT

Clawglasses Price Today & AI Analysis

SIGHT
Solana
AI Analysis
Analysis as of Apr 30, 2026

ByqipPbSHxzLi6ga5LNrnE229vsLuSrCfHMaDbe1TRND

$0.052124

FDV $2,124

LiveContract:ByqipPbSHxzLi6ga5LNrnE229vsLuSrCfHMaDbe1TRNDChain:SolanaHolders:571Market cap:$2,124

More tokens on Solana

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about SIGHT

Report snapshotas of Apr 30, 03:50 PM
FDV

$319,680

Liquidity

$40,418

Holders

1,110

Snipers

0

Risk

Very High

AI Executive Summary

Clawglasses (SIGHT) is a newly launched Solana memecoin/token (mint: ByqipPbSHxzLi6ga5LNrnE229vsLuSrCfHMaDbe1TRND) with a total supply of ~1B tokens and a fully diluted valuation of ~$319K–$329K. The token launched publicly on April 29, 2026, after sitting dormant with only 12 holders for the prior 29+ days. It experienced an explosive 24h price surge of +114.6%, accompanied by a massive holder influx (+577 holders in 24h, +1,098 in 7d). However, the OHLC data reveals extreme price anomalies — candles showing prices as high as $82.97 alongside sub-$0.001 prices — suggesting severe data artifacts, wash trading, or extreme volatility. Liquidity is very shallow at only $40.42K, making this a very high-risk, speculative micro-cap.

Risk: Very High
Sentiment: Bearish
Explosive holder growth from 12 to 1,110 in under 48 hours — entirely concentrated in the last 2 days
Zero snipers in the first 1,000 blocks — unusually clean launch with no bot front-running
Extreme OHLC anomalies with candle highs reaching $82.97 vs current price of ~$0.00032 — possible data artifacts or extreme wash trading
Very shallow liquidity of only $40.42K against $35.89B in 24h combined volume — highly suspicious volume-to-liquidity ratio
Top 10 holders control only 18.83% of supply — relatively healthy distribution for a new micro-cap

AI Price Analysis

bearish

Short term

bearish
1–72 hours

The token is already showing a -23.4% 1h decline and -99.99% 6h change (likely a data artifact from the extreme candle anomalies). The current price of $0.000320 is near the lower bound of recent normal trading. With only $40.42K in liquidity and massive 24h volume, any sustained sell pressure could collapse the price rapidly. Short-term direction is bearish given the post-pump dynamics.

Target low$0.000100
Target high$0.000400
Support: $0.000119 (recent candle low / launch price floor), $0.000157 (candle 13 low)
Resistance: $0.000327 (candle 2 high), $0.000367 (candle 3–11 open/high cluster)

Medium term

neutral
1–4 weeks

Medium-term outlook depends entirely on whether the project develops any utility or community narrative. Given the token sat dormant for 29 days before launch, there is no established track record. If the holder base stabilizes and liquidity deepens, consolidation around $0.000150–$0.000320 is possible. A catalyst such as a CEX listing or viral social moment would be needed for sustained upside.

Catalysts
  • Deepening of liquidity pool beyond $40K threshold
  • Viral social media traction or influencer coverage
  • Verified contract or project transparency improvements
  • Broader Solana memecoin market rally

Bullish factors

  • Zero snipers detected — no early bot accumulation overhang to dump
  • Relatively healthy top-10 concentration at 18.83% of supply
  • Strong buyer dominance: 1,843 buys vs 1,105 sells; 972 buyers vs 531 sellers in 24h
  • 53.1% buy pressure vs 46.9% sell pressure
  • Rapid organic holder growth to 1,110 in under 48 hours

Bearish factors

  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($40.42K) creates severe slippage and exit risk
  • Token was dormant for 29+ days with only 12 holders before sudden launch — raises questions about pre-launch coordination
  • OHLC data shows $82.97 candle highs — extreme anomaly suggesting possible manipulation or data errors
  • Unverified contract with unknown update authority
  • 24h volume of $35.89B against $40.42K liquidity is economically implausible — data integrity concerns
  • -99.99% 6h price change is a red flag regardless of data artifact explanation
  • No description, no verified social presence beyond website/Moralis links
Confidence: low. Confidence is low due to: (1) extreme OHLC anomalies making price history unreliable, (2) only ~48 hours of real trading history, (3) $35.89B in 24h volume against $40.42K liquidity is economically implausible and suggests data quality issues, (4) no sniper data, no verified contract, and unknown update authority all reduce analytical certainty.

Deep Analysis

The 14 hourly candles (Apr 30, 02:00–15:00 UTC) reveal severe data anomalies. Candles 14 and 13 (02:00–03:00 UTC) show open/high/close values of $82.97 — roughly 259,000x the current price — which are almost certainly data artifacts or extreme outlier trades in a near-zero liquidity pool. Excluding these anomalous candles, the 'normal' price range oscillates between ~$0.000119 (low floor) and ~$0.000367 (upper resistance cluster). Candles 4–11 show a repetitive alternating pattern between O:$0.000119/C:$0.000367 and O:$0.000367/C:$0.000119, suggesting very thin order book with price bouncing between two fixed levels. Candle 2 (14:00 UTC) shows a breakout attempt to $0.000327 with massive volume (334M units). Candle 1 (15:00 UTC, most recent) shows a narrow range between $0.000320–$0.000329 with minimal volume (408 units), indicating activity has sharply cooled.

Trend

Short-term
downtrend
Medium-term
sideways

Momentum

Status
overbought

Volume

Trenddecreasing
Buy 53%Sell 47%

Short-term trend is downward from the anomalous spike highs back toward the $0.000119–$0.000367 normal range. Medium-term is effectively sideways/undefined given the token has only ~48 hours of real trading history. The alternating open/close pattern across multiple candles suggests no clear directional momentum in the normal price band.

Key Price Levels

Support
Immediate$0.000298 (candle 2 low)
Major$0.000119 (recurring candle low / launch price floor)
Resistance
Immediate$0.000327–$0.000329 (candle 1–2 high range)
Major$0.000367 (recurring candle high cluster, candles 3–11)

The $0.000119 level acts as a strong floor — it appears repeatedly as the low across 8+ candles, suggesting it may represent the initial liquidity pool price or a hard support. The $0.000367 level is the recurring ceiling in the normal trading band. A sustained break above $0.000367 would be technically significant but requires substantially more liquidity. The $82.97 anomaly levels are disregarded as non-representative.

Notable patterns

  • Alternating open/close pattern between $0.000119 and $0.000367 across candles 4–11 — suggests thin order book ping-pong
  • Volume collapse in most recent candle (408 units) after multi-billion unit candles — momentum exhaustion signal
  • Anomalous $82.97 spike in candles 13–14 — extreme outlier, likely data artifact or single manipulative trade in zero-liquidity conditions
  • Post-spike price stabilization near $0.000320 — potential base-building or dead-cat bounce zone
  • Higher volume on buy candles (candle 2: 334M, candle 4: 891M) vs sell candles — slight buy-side dominance in volume

Total holders1,110
24h Δ+52
7d Δ+99
30d Δ+99
Accelerating Growth
Yes

Correlation with price

Holder growth is strongly correlated with the price surge. The token had only 12 holders for 29 consecutive days (March 31 – April 28), then exploded to 531 holders on April 29 (+519, +98%) coinciding with the token's public launch and price discovery. The 24h holder growth of +577 (+52%) aligns directly with the +114.6% price pump, suggesting price action is attracting new buyers. However, the 1h holder count declined by 9 (-0.81%), which may signal early profit-taking as the price begins to cool.

Holder growth is entirely a launch phenomenon — the token was effectively pre-launch with 12 holders (likely team/insiders) for the entire month of March and most of April 2026. The explosive growth from 12 to 1,110 holders in under 48 hours is impressive in absolute terms but must be contextualized: (1) growth is accelerating from a near-zero base, making percentage figures misleading; (2) the 7d and 30d growth rates are identical (99%) because all growth occurred in the last 2 days; (3) the -9 holder decline in the last hour may indicate early momentum fading. Distribution shows 339 whales, 125 sharks, 159 dolphins, 399 fish, and 66 octopus — a broad distribution suggesting genuine retail participation alongside larger holders.

Top 10 hold18.83%
Top 100 hold48.76%
Sentiment
Mixed

Notable holders

GpMZbSM2GgvTKHJirzeGfMFoaZ8UR2X7F4v8vHTvxFbL

Individual whale or project treasury — largest single holder at 6.41% (64.06M tokens); non-round balance suggests trading activity rather than a fixed allocation

6.41%

Gf4CZSLf3bk7z8Y21Y6GaSPqgGxuG6dnCRPz5jJ2oybt

Project treasury or team wallet — exactly 40,000,000 token balance (round number) strongly suggests a pre-allocated team or treasury wallet

4.00%

C6B7knNSF8X8YfW54D8jQvM3VUCifsphHEQZSCyAERoE

Individual whale — 14.19M tokens, non-round balance consistent with market purchase

1.42%

6jQk8523YMLCPuWKb31krgEBHGyoaKYwx2N9b3DDBjqb

Individual whale — 12.04M tokens, non-round balance consistent with market purchase

1.20%

A7GKGyBFbcUWtHqNRuaApgvqkVgkzrdi1YjQCHKVsuHT

Individual whale — 11.77M tokens, non-round balance consistent with market purchase

1.18%

The top 10 holders control 18.83% of supply and the top 100 control 48.76% — both figures are relatively healthy for a new micro-cap memecoin, indicating supply is not dangerously concentrated. The #2 holder (Gf4CZSLf3bk7z8Y21Y6GaSPqgGxuG6dnCRPz5jJ2oybt) holds exactly 40,000,000 tokens — a round number strongly suggestive of a team or treasury pre-allocation, which warrants monitoring for potential dumps. The #1 holder at 6.41% is the largest single risk concentration point. Holdings from positions 3–20 range from 0.51% to 1.42%, suggesting a relatively broad distribution among the top tier. Sentiment is mixed: the round-number treasury wallet is a concern, but the absence of any single dominant whale (>10%) is reassuring.

Liquidity$40,420
Depth
Shallow
Slippage risk
high

Volume (24h)

Buy$19.05B
Sell$16.84B
Net flow
inflow

Traders (24h)

Unique buyers972
Unique sellers531

Liquidity is critically shallow at only $40,420 on a single Raydium pool (9ar7ahwTgrkagpsP3szjwwgBRRogcDAGt62h48tDaGtv). This creates extreme slippage risk — even modest sell orders could move the price significantly. The reported 24h buy volume of $19.05B and sell volume of $16.84B (total ~$35.89B) against $40.42K liquidity is economically implausible by a factor of ~887,000x and strongly suggests either severe data quality issues, wash trading, or the $82.97 anomalous candle prices inflating volume calculations. The buyer-to-seller ratio is healthy at 972:531 (1.83:1), and buy transactions outnumber sells 1,843:1,105 (1.67:1), indicating genuine net buying interest. However, the volume figures cannot be trusted at face value. Any position of meaningful size would face catastrophic slippage in this pool.

Supply & Valuation

Total supply999,999,904.40 SIGHT
FDV$319,680 (metadata) / $329,410 (analytics)

Authorities

Mint authority
Active
Freeze authority
Active

Total supply is effectively 1 billion SIGHT tokens (999,999,904.40 formatted). The FDV ranges between $319K–$329K depending on the price source used — a very small market cap typical of early-stage memecoins. The token has 6 decimals, standard for Solana SPL tokens. Critically, the update authority is listed as 'unknown' in the metadata, and mint/freeze authority status cannot be confirmed from the available data. The token is marked as 'mutable: false' which is a positive signal (metadata cannot be changed), but without explicit confirmation that mint and freeze authorities have been renounced, there remains an unquantifiable rug risk from token authorities. The contract is unverified. No description is provided, and social presence is limited to a website and Moralis link. Investors should verify authority status on-chain before committing capital.

Volatility
high

+114.6% in 24h with OHLC anomalies showing $82.97 spikes vs $0.000119 lows — extreme intraday volatility. The -23.4% 1h decline and -99.99% 6h change (likely artifact) underscore the violent price swings possible in this token.

Liquidity
high

Only $40,420 in total liquidity on a single Raydium pool. Any sell order above a few hundred dollars will face severe slippage. Exit risk is very high for any position above ~$500.

Concentration
medium

Top 10 hold 18.83% and top 100 hold 48.76% — relatively healthy distribution. However, the #2 holder's round 40M token balance suggests a team wallet that could dump. The #1 holder at 6.41% is the largest single concentration risk.

SniperDump
low

Zero snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks — no bot accumulation overhang. This is a genuine positive. However, the 12 pre-launch transfer holders represent potential insider supply that could be sold at any time.

Authority
high

Mint and freeze authority status are unknown. Update authority is listed as unknown. The contract is unverified. Without confirmed authority renouncement, there is an unquantifiable risk of token minting, freezing, or metadata manipulation.

Key risks

  • Critically shallow liquidity ($40.42K) — catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful position
  • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential rug vector
  • Unverified contract with no project description
  • 29-day pre-launch dormancy with 12 insider holders — possible coordinated launch
  • Economically implausible 24h volume ($35.89B vs $40.42K liquidity) — data integrity or wash trading concerns
  • Extreme OHLC anomalies ($82.97 spike) suggest possible price manipulation or data errors
  • Token is only ~48 hours old with no established track record
  • Holder count declining in the last hour (-9) — early momentum fade signal

Mitigating factors

  • Zero snipers in first 1,000 blocks — clean launch without bot front-running
  • Relatively healthy supply distribution (top 10: 18.83%, top 100: 48.76%)
  • Strong buyer-to-seller ratio: 972 buyers vs 531 sellers, 1,843 buys vs 1,105 sells
  • Mutable: false — token metadata cannot be altered
  • Rapid organic holder growth to 1,110 in 48 hours suggests genuine community interest
  • 53.1% buy pressure vs 46.9% sell pressure — net buying dominance
Suitable for: Suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi/memecoin traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Position sizes should be limited to amounts that can be fully lost without financial impact. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, beginners, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. Due diligence on authority status is mandatory before any investment.

SIGHT is an ultra-early-stage Solana memecoin that launched publicly ~48 hours ago after a 29-day dormancy period. It has attracted 1,110 holders and posted a +114.6% 24h gain, but trades against only $40.42K in liquidity with unverified contract authorities and highly anomalous volume data. The risk/reward profile is extremely speculative — this is a lottery ticket, not an investment.

Bull case (low)

Community-driven memecoin rally: SIGHT captures a viral narrative around the 'Clawglasses/SIGHT' brand, liquidity deepens significantly, and the token follows the classic Solana memecoin pump trajectory toward a $1M–$5M FDV.

  • Viral social media moment or influencer endorsement drives holder growth beyond 10,000
  • Liquidity pool deepens to $500K+, reducing slippage and enabling larger position sizes
  • Project team reveals utility or roadmap, converting speculative interest to conviction holders
  • Broader Solana memecoin market enters bull phase
  • Zero sniper overhang means any rally is not immediately sold into by bots

Base case

Consolidation and slow bleed: SIGHT stabilizes in the $0.000100–$0.000200 range as early buyers take profits, holder count plateaus around 1,000–1,500, and the token trades with low volume until a catalyst (positive or negative) breaks the range.

  • Mint/freeze authorities are renounced or benign
  • The 12 pre-launch holders do not aggressively dump
  • Liquidity remains at current levels without significant additions or removals
  • No major social catalyst emerges in the near term
  • Price gravitates toward the $0.000119 support floor before finding equilibrium

Bear case (high)

Rug pull or organic death: Either the team dumps the round-number treasury wallet (40M tokens, 4% of supply), mint authority is used to inflate supply, or the community fails to sustain momentum and the token fades to near-zero as holders exit the illiquid pool.

  • Unknown mint/freeze authority enables supply manipulation
  • Pre-launch insider holders (12 transfer wallets) begin distributing into retail buying
  • Liquidity remains at $40.42K, making any meaningful exit impossible without catastrophic price impact
  • Holder count decline (-9 in last hour) accelerates as pump momentum fades
  • No utility, no description, no verified contract — nothing to sustain long-term interest

GeneratedApr 30, 03:50 PM
Data freshnessPrice and trading data current as of approximately 15:00 UTC on April 30, 2026. Holder data reflects snapshot at time of analysis. OHLC data covers the 14 most recent hourly candles.
Model confidence
low

Data sources

  • On-chain Solana token metadata (mint: ByqipPbSHxzLi6ga5LNrnE229vsLuSrCfHMaDbe1TRND)
  • Raydium DEX pair data (pair: 9ar7ahwTgrkagpsP3szjwwgBRRogcDAGt62h48tDaGtv)
  • Hourly OHLC candle data (14 candles, Apr 30 2026 02:00–15:00 UTC)
  • Trading analytics (24h buy/sell volume, unique wallets, transaction counts)
  • Holder metrics and historical holder series (30-day daily)
  • Top 20 holder wallet data with balances and percentages
  • Sniper analysis (first 1,000 blocks)
  • Moralis and on-chain data aggregation

Limitations

  • OHLC data contains extreme anomalies ($82.97 candle highs) that make technical analysis unreliable — these may be data artifacts or single manipulative trades
  • 24h volume figures ($35.89B) are economically implausible against $40.42K liquidity and cannot be trusted at face value
  • Mint and freeze authority status are unknown — a critical gap for rug risk assessment
  • Update authority is listed as 'unknown' — cannot confirm token security posture
  • Token has only ~48 hours of real trading history — insufficient for meaningful trend analysis
  • Sniper data shows zero snipers but methodology (first 1,000 blocks) may not capture all early accumulation
  • No project description, whitepaper, or team information available for fundamental analysis
  • Pre-launch holder wallet classifications (the 12 transfer holders) cannot be confirmed without additional on-chain investigation

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially micro-cap memecoins, carry extreme risk including total loss of capital. The anomalous data points in this dataset (volume, OHLC spikes) significantly reduce analytical confidence. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Past price performance is not indicative of future results.

Token Info

ChainSolana
Contract
Total Supply999,999,904.40 SIGHT

Key Risks

Critically shallow liquidity ($40.42K) — catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful position
Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential rug vector
Unverified contract with no project description
29-day pre-launch dormancy with 12 insider holders — possible coordinated launch

Smart Money & Sniper Analysis

low confidence
High risk

No snipers were detected in the first 1,000 blocks of this token's launch, which is a notable positive signal — it means there is no early bot accumulation overhang that could dump on retail buyers. However, the absence of sniper data also means we cannot assess early smart money positioning or profit-taking risk from that cohort. The token's 29-day dormancy period before launch (only 12 holders from March 31 to April 28) raises questions about whether the 12 pre-launch holders represent coordinated insiders. These early holders acquired tokens via transfer (10 wallets) rather than swap, which warrants scrutiny.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Sniper details

Sniper concentration0.00%
PnL stateUnknown
Sell-through rateUnknown
Profit-taking risk
high

0% — zero snipers detected in the first 1,000 blocks

Unknown — the 12 pre-launch holders acquired tokens via transfer (not swap), suggesting possible team/insider distribution. Their current PnL state cannot be determined from available data, but given the +114.6% 24h price surge, early holders are likely in significant profit.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the short-term price outlook for Clawglasses (SIGHT)?

The token is already showing a -23.4% 1h decline and -99.99% 6h change (likely a data artifact from the extreme candle anomalies). The current price of $0.000320 is near the lower bound of recent normal trading. With only $40.42K in liquidity and massive 24h volume, any sustained sell pressure could collapse the price rapidly. Short-term direction is bearish given the post-pump dynamics. Short-term outlook is bearish (1–72 hours), with a target range of $0.000100 to $0.000400.

Is SIGHT a safe investment on Solana?

Overall risk is rated very_high with a risk score of 9.1/100. Suitable ONLY for highly experienced DeFi/memecoin traders who can afford to lose 100% of their investment. Position sizes should be limited to amounts that can be fully lost without financial impact. Not suitable for risk-averse investors, beginners, or anyone allocating more than a negligible portion of their portfolio. Due diligence on authority status is mandatory before any investment.

How are SIGHT holders trending?

Clawglasses currently has 1,110 holders and is growing (24h: 52, 7d: 99, 30d: 99). Holder growth is entirely a launch phenomenon — the token was effectively pre-launch with 12 holders (likely team/insiders) for the entire month of March and most of April 2026. The explosive growth from 12 to 1,110 holders in under 48 hours is impressive in absolute terms but must be contextualized: (1) growth is accelerating from a near-zero base, making percentage figures misleading; (2) the 7d and 30d growth rates are identical (99%) because all growth occurred in the last 2 days; (3) the -9 holder decline in the last hour may indicate early momentum fading. Distribution shows 339 whales, 125 sharks, 159 dolphins, 399 fish, and 66 octopus — a broad distribution suggesting genuine retail participation alongside larger holders.

What does sniper activity look like for SIGHT?

Snipers hold roughly 0.00% of supply with PnL state "unknown" and sell-through rate "unknown". Profit-taking risk: high.

What are the key risks of holding SIGHT?

Critically shallow liquidity ($40.42K) — catastrophic slippage risk for any meaningful position • Unknown mint/freeze authority status — potential rug vector • Unverified contract with no project description

Track SIGHT